Aw, how cute. The Drunk Patent Lawyer is defending his fellow leftists.

(11-18-2025 03:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Aw, how cute. The Drunk Patent Lawyer is defending his fellow leftists.

Too fing stupid to note that the statement supported a stay in the decision, I see. Good job, sparkles.

And please do tell where there is any support of any party in what I typed? Are you really *that* stupid? Apparently so....

The gyrations of a nothing but butthurt howler monkey look good on you.... lolz.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(11-20-2025 03:13 PM)maximus Wrote:  

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

The government admitted that they didn't follow procedure, please try to keep up.

Prove it, "Roxie". Put up or shut up.

(11-20-2025 03:18 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Prove it, "Roxie". Put up or shut up.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-bat...osecution/

So somebody in the DOJ is lying. Not surprised.

(11-20-2025 03:13 PM)maximus Wrote:  

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-bat...osecution/
"Instead of presenting a new indictment to the full panel after it rejected one of the counts, interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan gave the grand jury’s foreperson an updated version — not seen by the other grand jurors — to sign."

Basically they are confirming that they screwed up.

Probably a deep state holdover. Not surprised.

(11-20-2025 03:29 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Probably a deep state holdover. Not surprised.

Nah just incompetent like their boss.

(11-20-2025 03:23 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  So somebody in the DOJ is lying. Not surprised.

Somebody in the *Trump administration* is lying.

It’s always the ones you most suspect

(11-20-2025 03:17 PM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:13 PM)maximus Wrote:  

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

The government admitted that they didn't follow procedure, please try to keep up.

I was tickled that Halligan said she never showed the entire grand jury the 2nd, correct bill of indictment.

Last I saw, in order you have to:

Present the bill to the entire gj;
The entire gj votes;
The foreperson signs the bill as proxy for the entire gj.

She presented bill 1, which was voted down.

She skipped step 1 and 2 with the 2nd bill. And the foreperson signed the 2nd bill without any presentment, or vote, by the GJ.

Just the latest of various serious issues. I wonder which of the multitude of fkups will be the first (and final) issue to sink this.

In addition, she lied in an affidavit to the court in SC relating to the issue above to cover another direct question by the judge there, and the above is what she had to teestify to in front of the VA judge yesterday.

(11-20-2025 04:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:17 PM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:13 PM)maximus Wrote:  

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

The government admitted that they didn't follow procedure, please try to keep up.

I was tickled that Halligan said she never showed the entire grand jury the 2nd, correct bill of indictment.

Last I saw, in order you have to:

Present the bill to the entire gj;
The entire gj votes;
The foreperson signs the bill as proxy for the entire gj.

She presented bill 1, which was voted down.

She skipped step 1 and 2 with the 2nd bill. And the foreperson signed the 2nd bill without any presentment, or vote, by the GJ.

Just the latest of various serious issues. I wonder which of the multitude of fkups will be the first (and final) issue to sink this.

In addition, she lied in an affidavit to the court in SC relating to the issue above to cover another direct question by the judge there, and the above is what she had to teestify to in front of the VA judge yesterday.

Arguing procedures instead of countering allegations is one of the surest signs of guilt. Once you get into the weeds on procedures the whole game no longer is about the truth, but about clerical error or incompetence of council and not the matter at hand.

He's guilty. You know it. I know it. The nation knows it. At this point it's no longer about justice, and certainly not about innocence or guilt. It's about finding another crooked dodge for a crooked regime.

(11-20-2025 05:01 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 04:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:17 PM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:13 PM)maximus Wrote:  

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

The government admitted that they didn't follow procedure, please try to keep up.

I was tickled that Halligan said she never showed the entire grand jury the 2nd, correct bill of indictment.

Last I saw, in order you have to:

Present the bill to the entire gj;
The entire gj votes;
The foreperson signs the bill as proxy for the entire gj.

She presented bill 1, which was voted down.

She skipped step 1 and 2 with the 2nd bill. And the foreperson signed the 2nd bill without any presentment, or vote, by the GJ.

Just the latest of various serious issues. I wonder which of the multitude of fkups will be the first (and final) issue to sink this.

In addition, she lied in an affidavit to the court in SC relating to the issue above to cover another direct question by the judge there, and the above is what she had to teestify to in front of the VA judge yesterday.

Arguing procedures instead of countering allegations is one of the surest signs of guilt. Once you get into the weeds on procedures the whole game no longer is about the truth, but about clerical error or incompetence of council and not the matter at hand.

He's guilty. You know it. I know it. The nation knows it. At this point it's no longer about justice, and certainly not about innocence or guilt. It's about finding another crooked dodge for a crooked regime.

Until its proven in court you don't know **** sir.

(11-20-2025 05:01 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 04:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:17 PM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:13 PM)maximus Wrote:  

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

The government admitted that they didn't follow procedure, please try to keep up.

I was tickled that Halligan said she never showed the entire grand jury the 2nd, correct bill of indictment.

Last I saw, in order you have to:

Present the bill to the entire gj;
The entire gj votes;
The foreperson signs the bill as proxy for the entire gj.

She presented bill 1, which was voted down.

She skipped step 1 and 2 with the 2nd bill. And the foreperson signed the 2nd bill without any presentment, or vote, by the GJ.

Just the latest of various serious issues. I wonder which of the multitude of fkups will be the first (and final) issue to sink this.

In addition, she lied in an affidavit to the court in SC relating to the issue above to cover another direct question by the judge there, and the above is what she had to teestify to in front of the VA judge yesterday.

Arguing procedures instead of countering allegations is one of the surest signs of guilt. Once you get into the weeds on procedures the whole game no longer is about the truth, but about clerical error or incompetence of council and not the matter at hand.

He's guilty. You know it. I know it. The nation knows it. At this point it's no longer about justice, and certainly not about innocence or guilt. It's about finding another crooked dodge for a crooked regime.

The procedure in this case simply point to a vindictive prosecution. A rush to charge at all costs, regardless of the underlying facts and law. Regardless that the career prosecutors memorialized the decision to decline to charge in a a memo, and subsequently the DOJ ordered the new front line prosecutors to hide that fact from the defense *and* a Federal judge. Notwithstanding there is both a statutory and a Constitutional obligation to turn those items over to the defense.

Yet you choose to preach on the evils of a crooked regime. Absolutely rich. Stupendously rich.

And one more example where Tanq's argument falls on the left. Shocker.

If you have the facts; pound the facts. If you don't have the facts; pound the table.

(11-20-2025 05:01 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 04:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:17 PM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:13 PM)maximus Wrote:  

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

The government admitted that they didn't follow procedure, please try to keep up.

I was tickled that Halligan said she never showed the entire grand jury the 2nd, correct bill of indictment.

Last I saw, in order you have to:

Present the bill to the entire gj;
The entire gj votes;
The foreperson signs the bill as proxy for the entire gj.

She presented bill 1, which was voted down.

She skipped step 1 and 2 with the 2nd bill. And the foreperson signed the 2nd bill without any presentment, or vote, by the GJ.

Just the latest of various serious issues. I wonder which of the multitude of fkups will be the first (and final) issue to sink this.

In addition, she lied in an affidavit to the court in SC relating to the issue above to cover another direct question by the judge there, and the above is what she had to teestify to in front of the VA judge yesterday.

He's guilty. You know it. I know it. The nation knows it.

The drunk patent attorney doesn't care about that, silly man.

(11-20-2025 05:05 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 05:01 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 04:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:17 PM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 03:13 PM)maximus Wrote:  

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

The government admitted that they didn't follow procedure, please try to keep up.

I was tickled that Halligan said she never showed the entire grand jury the 2nd, correct bill of indictment.

Last I saw, in order you have to:

Present the bill to the entire gj;
The entire gj votes;
The foreperson signs the bill as proxy for the entire gj.

She presented bill 1, which was voted down.

She skipped step 1 and 2 with the 2nd bill. And the foreperson signed the 2nd bill without any presentment, or vote, by the GJ.

Just the latest of various serious issues. I wonder which of the multitude of fkups will be the first (and final) issue to sink this.

In addition, she lied in an affidavit to the court in SC relating to the issue above to cover another direct question by the judge there, and the above is what she had to teestify to in front of the VA judge yesterday.

Arguing procedures instead of countering allegations is one of the surest signs of guilt. Once you get into the weeds on procedures the whole game no longer is about the truth, but about clerical error or incompetence of council and not the matter at hand.

He's guilty. You know it. I know it. The nation knows it. At this point it's no longer about justice, and certainly not about innocence or guilt. It's about finding another crooked dodge for a crooked regime.

The procedure in this case simply point to a vindictive prosecution.

You're bothered about "vindictive prosectution", NOW?

Absolutely rich. Stupendously rich.

(10-09-2025 04:10 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I dunno if someone already posted this, but Letitia James has been indicted.

The chickens are coming home to roost...