(11-05-2025 08:00 PM)TripleA Wrote: (11-05-2025 07:42 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: (11-05-2025 07:33 PM)TripleA Wrote: (11-05-2025 07:08 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: (11-05-2025 07:03 PM)TripleA Wrote: #6.
Condensing a thread is now 'leftist' -- lolz.
You sure as hell have one stupidly odd rationale on what is 'leftist', bro. Double lolz.
I guess the rule is now -- if it gets under the skin of the folks in 3Aville, it *must* be leftist. Cool cool. Still stupider than a truckload of bricks, but still entertaining to watch the dude thrash to try and tag an idea as 'leftist'. triple lolz.
You disagree. What a shocker. Glad to see it bugs the crap out of you.
That little tantrum you went on about "your beloved Triple A" was cute, too. 
Tanq, you could post Marx's economic theory, fully support it, I would add it to your Donk Count, and you would deny it.
Dayum, you are one entertaining dude. 
Actually I would readily admit actual leftist policies if I had them. Hard to disagree with them when they are honestly presented as such.
Your incessant garbage is just stupid as fk. But that is what I expect from you. Not much more than mouth breathing lazy ass ****.
Your fixation on trying to classify anything and everything as leftist by simply slinging items simply points out how stupid you are.
I will tell you, that within the libertarian items, there are some that actually could be denoted as somewhat leftist. Albeit based on the Friedman and Hayeks work.
In terms of economics that define leftism -- not anywhere near that. But your magpie schtick simply denotes what an absolute idiot you are. Nor anywhere in the ideas of central government.
But that eludes you. Instead, you substitute anything that the talking heads tell you is that which you immediately turn around and squawk. Without any bother if it actually leftist or not. Good for you, sparky. I have met a lot of venal stupid people, and you are close to the top, my friend. Cool cool. Arent we all much better for that. Yay.
1. Why do you care so much what anybody else thinks?
Simply pointing out shallow magpie schtick, my friend.
Quote:2. You come down on the side of "not conservative" quite a bit in here. Nobody is arguing any nuanced libertarian stances. It's clear black and white, or left and right, in most debates here.
Im sure it is clear black/ white in here. That much is stunningly obvious from the folks here. The idiocy of simply tossing around 'leftist' or 'prog' in response to anything that might run contrary to the inhabitants of 3Aville as kneejerk left is fairly stupid.
But I will give you credit here for that. Finally. You have actually demonstrated directly above (finally) at least a rudimentary idea of 'that which isnt conservative isnt necessarily left.' As opposed to your previous chant of 'left'. Only took 5 or 6 days for that to sink in. Cool cool.
As for libertarianism, that is why I am a big fan of the BOR. And feel free to discount those in your race to be conservative if you wish.
Quote:And you take the anti-right position quite a bit. The rest of us don't really care. We have others here who take opposing positions.
From your previous continuous attempts to define them simply as 'left', it sure seems that you do care, my friend.
Again, I find it interesting that backing most of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to some here (maybe even you) is seemingly 'anti-right'.
As much as I find any criticism of Trump around here to be 'anti-right'.
That term has changed considerably in the last 6 years it seems.
Quote:But you take opposing opinions and then deny you took them.
Name some.
Quote:Plus, if you have raging TDS, which even you admit, that puts you on the anti-right a lot. Those count, too. And before long, they all tend to blend together.
See the italicized above.
The interesting thing is that there are a lot of goals of this administration that I support. And more than a few policies. The means of achieving some of them I find atrocious. But yet, that engenders the chorus of 'anti-right', or 'anti-conservative', and / or lefty from this rabble.