(11-05-2025 02:17 PM)hburg Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:59 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:58 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:57 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:51 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  1. Dems voted for a candidate, not a sex and not a gender.
2. Dems voted for a candidate, not a sexual persuasion.
3. NAACP endorsed a candidate, and not a race.
4. Obama endorsed a candidate, and not a race, nor a sex.
5. Obama endorsed a candidate, and not a race, nor sex.

I guess you are upset that Dems, NAACP, and Obama operated in a political manner, and not one based on race, sex, or sexual leaning?

I guess how dare that happen, a series of people operated on race neutral manner, operated in a sex neutral manner, and operated in a sexual persuasion neutral manner. The horror. The sheer outrage.

that may be your best interpretation of the medicine man from the 19th century...

yo, trip As, what's the donk count at now ... 5, 6, 7, ...

He just tripped the 5 wire above.

Dem logic says they are racist, homophobic, murderous, misogynistic creeps. They just proved their own identity politics are for opposition and not for them. In other words dems proved themselves to be what they claim others are.

So you are mad that: 1) Dems may not vote for a black female; 2) Dems may not vote for an openly gay man; 3) NAACP may not endorse a black woman and may endorse a white woman; 4) Obama may endorse a white woman; *and* 5) Obama may not endorse a black woman.

Can you point to these 'rules' that the above shouldnt happen. Above and beyond your 'feeling' of what is happening.

The problem seems to be you and your issues. All based on your supposed (and subjective) 'rules' of the road. I am sorry that you are pissed that Reps ran a black female who lost, and who didnt get a Demo endorsement. Nor got an endorsement from the NAACP.

Again, the 'rules of the road' work both ways, if one really holds them as pure truth.

To repeat:

I think only in cartoon world that: 1) Dems must vote for a black female; 2) Dems must vote for an openly gay man; 3) NAACP must endorse a black woman and not endorse a white woman; 4) Obama must not endorse a white woman; *and* 5) Obama must endorse a black woman, as the original post seemingly goes to lengths to complain about.

And I think it only in cartoon world that the mirror image happen of: 1) Reps must not vote for a black female; 2) Reps must not vote for an openly gay man; 3) Turning Point must not endorse a black woman and must endorse a white woman; 4) Trump must endorse a white woman; *and* 5) Trump must not endorse a black woman.

Both sides of it are thin and stupid.

(11-05-2025 02:45 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:57 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:51 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:29 PM)hburg Wrote:  In Virginia, one thing was very clear.

1. Dems did not vote for a black female.
2. Dems did not vote for an openly gay man
3. NAACP refused to endorse a black woman and instead endorsed a white woman.
4. Obama endorsed a white woman and a someone who wants to murder opposition.
5. Obama refused to endorse a black woman.

Am I missing anything?

1. Dems voted for a candidate, not a sex and not a gender.
2. Dems voted for a candidate, not a sexual persuasion.
3. NAACP endorsed a candidate, and not a race.
4. Obama endorsed a candidate, and not a race, nor a sex.
5. Obama endorsed a candidate, and not a race, nor sex.

I guess you are upset that Dems, NAACP, and Obama operated in a political manner, and not one based on race, sex, or sexual leaning?

I guess how dare that happen, a series of people operated on race neutral manner, operated in a sex neutral manner, and operated in a sexual persuasion neutral manner. The horror. The sheer outrage.

that may be your best interpretation of the medicine man from the 19th century...

No better, nor any worse, than the sophomoric comments it was in response to. I guess the former is pure truth for the rabble here, and the latter pure 'medicine man'.

how's that ... he laid it out as it happened ... you of all folk want to argue 'interpreting' facts ... lmmfao...

(11-05-2025 02:59 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:17 PM)hburg Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:59 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:58 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:57 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  that may be your best interpretation of the medicine man from the 19th century...

yo, trip As, what's the donk count at now ... 5, 6, 7, ...

He just tripped the 5 wire above.

Dem logic says they are racist, homophobic, murderous, misogynistic creeps. They just proved their own identity politics are for opposition and not for them. In other words dems proved themselves to be what they claim others are.

So you are mad that: 1) Dems may not vote for a black female; 2) Dems may not vote for an openly gay man; 3) NAACP may not endorse a black woman and may endorse a white woman; 4) Obama may endorse a white woman; *and* 5) Obama may not endorse a black woman.

Can you point to these 'rules' that the above shouldnt happen. Above and beyond your 'feeling' of what is happening.

The problem seems to be you and your issues. All based on your supposed (and subjective) 'rules' of the road. I am sorry that you are pissed that Reps ran a black female who lost, and who didnt get a Demo endorsement. Nor got an endorsement from the NAACP.

Again, the 'rules of the road' work both ways, if one really holds them as pure truth.

To repeat:

I think only in cartoon world that: 1) Dems must vote for a black female; 2) Dems must vote for an openly gay man; 3) NAACP must endorse a black woman and not endorse a white woman; 4) Obama must not endorse a white woman; *and* 5) Obama must endorse a black woman, as the original post seemingly goes to lengths to complain about.

And I think it only in cartoon world that the mirror image happen of: 1) Reps must not vote for a black female; 2) Reps must not vote for an openly gay man; 3) Turning Point must not endorse a black woman and must endorse a white woman; 4) Trump must endorse a white woman; *and* 5) Trump must not endorse a black woman.

Both sides of it are thin and stupid.

Day drinking again?

(11-05-2025 02:57 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:33 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  So we had elections as scheduled?

I was promised by so many over the past year that we’d never have them again.

Yeah, no you weren't.

There are plenty of people who actually believed that.probably doesn’t help the stupid, ignorant, people of the word when people like Gavin Newsome feed into the nonsensical hysteria about never having elections again.

Now anyone with a half functioning brain knew the hysteria was nonsense. Unfortunately there are a good amount of people that don’t even have that.

Quote: "in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote."

that's a direct quote from Dear Leader. What does he mean by you won't have to vote again? You can understand people being worried about it when the authoritarian wannabe dictator says to his followers: if you elect me this time, you won't have to worry about elections going forward.

(11-04-2025 08:09 PM)450bench Wrote:  Trump is the President of the United States

The senate is red.

The house is red.

Liberals are still nuts.

And allow me to add, for our short bus friends-

Your President, Donald J. Trump wasn’t on any of these ballots.

But sure, continue with the waves of illegals fleeing Marxism only to bring that to our shores.

I’ll never understand 2 things that confound me.

A. Why do people continue to vote against their own self interests
2. Why is basic economics or even history never allowed to be taught in our government schools any longer?

Hunh. One simple answer escapes The Crazy.

(11-05-2025 03:03 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:57 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:33 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  So we had elections as scheduled?

I was promised by so many over the past year that we’d never have them again.

Yeah, no you weren't.

There are plenty of people who actually believed that.probably doesn’t help the stupid, ignorant, people of the word when people like Gavin Newsome feed into the nonsensical hysteria about never having elections again.

Now anyone with a half functioning brain knew the hysteria was nonsense. Unfortunately there are a good amount of people that don’t even have that.

Quote: "in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote."

that's a direct quote from Dear Leader. What does he mean by you won't have to vote again? You can understand people being worried about it when the authoritarian wannabe dictator says to his followers: if you elect me this time, you won't have to worry about elections going forward.

He was right.

Im not worried about it

I dont live in a shitehole full of filth

(11-05-2025 03:00 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:45 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:57 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:51 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:29 PM)hburg Wrote:  In Virginia, one thing was very clear.

1. Dems did not vote for a black female.
2. Dems did not vote for an openly gay man
3. NAACP refused to endorse a black woman and instead endorsed a white woman.
4. Obama endorsed a white woman and a someone who wants to murder opposition.
5. Obama refused to endorse a black woman.

Am I missing anything?

1. Dems voted for a candidate, not a sex and not a gender.
2. Dems voted for a candidate, not a sexual persuasion.
3. NAACP endorsed a candidate, and not a race.
4. Obama endorsed a candidate, and not a race, nor a sex.
5. Obama endorsed a candidate, and not a race, nor sex.

I guess you are upset that Dems, NAACP, and Obama operated in a political manner, and not one based on race, sex, or sexual leaning?

I guess how dare that happen, a series of people operated on race neutral manner, operated in a sex neutral manner, and operated in a sexual persuasion neutral manner. The horror. The sheer outrage.

that may be your best interpretation of the medicine man from the 19th century...

No better, nor any worse, than the sophomoric comments it was in response to. I guess the former is pure truth for the rabble here, and the latter pure 'medicine man'.

how's that ... he laid it out as it happened ... you of all folk want to argue facts ... lmmfao...

And I laid it out as it happened is well. Imagine that. Without the vast permutations of identity politics, and reverses of identity politics that seem to gnaw at the insides of and required to sustain the OP.

If you want to *believe* in the set of issues that back that OP, you are as free to be as big a victim as you wish. Free country and all that jazz.

I think it rank stupid. Dems and Reps are political animals. Dems and Reps are free to vote for, and to endorse, whomever their little heart desires. Most of the time (the vast majority) those are dictated by *party* choices.

Im unsurprised that: 1) Dems didnt vote for a black female, when the black female is R; 2) Dems didnt vote for an openly gay man, when the gay man is R; 3) NAACP didnt endorse a black woman and endorsed a white woman, when the black woman expressly decided to be honest about her opposition to issues that the NAACP holds; 4) Obama endorsed a white woman, when the white woman is D; *and* 5) Obama did not endorse a black woman, when the black woman is R.

Imagine that --- Ds support and endorse Ds. Rs support and endorse Rs. Quite mind blowing.

The only telling difference for any of the actors in 1-5 is which party they support. End of story. Notwithstanding all the rigamarole and faux victimhood you, Hburg, and 3A try to roll into it.

(11-04-2025 09:53 PM)memtigbb Wrote:  Optics.. those who would have voted Republican are looking at their SNAP not funded, their insurance premiums rising and hearing democrats blaming Republicans. Outside of this echo chamber, the talk is very anti republican and most of the blame is falling on them. Get mad if you want, but if they dont change the narrative fast, mid-terms will be a blue wave.

National polling suggests it is you that lives in an echo chamber.

(11-05-2025 03:10 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:09 PM)450bench Wrote:  Trump is the President of the United States

The senate is red.

The house is red.

Liberals are still nuts.

And allow me to add, for our short bus friends-

Your President, Donald J. Trump wasn’t on any of these ballots.

But sure, continue with the waves of illegals fleeing Marxism only to bring that to our shores.

I’ll never understand 2 things that confound me.

A. Why do people continue to vote against their own self interests
2. Why is basic economics or even history never allowed to be taught in our government schools any longer?

Hunh. One simple answer escapes The Crazy.

I'm thrilled to discuss economics, one of my favorite subjects that I only didn't major in because you can't actually do sh*t with it. So please, explain the basic economics of how people are voting against their own self interests. Can't wait!!!

(11-05-2025 01:16 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:36 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 11:44 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 10:30 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 10:27 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I wish they would fix the system. Somehow the repubs are unable to even put together a plan to replace the current one.

b/c there isn't one w/o taking monies away from some 'groups'...

it's puttin' back the genie in the bottle scenario...

in politics, that's a death wish...

"It's the Republicans' fault Medical Insurance is bad because they haven't come up with something to replace Obamacare!!!" You can't make this up. I know, how bout you have to get a job to get Medical Insurance if you aren't 100% disabled or 65 or older? Sounds pretty simple to me. Obamacare did what it was supposed to do. Destroy the private medical insurance business so the Feds were in control of your health. What could go wrong? Hey Stink, I see Johnny Dupree is back in business up around your way. People are so stupid.

Your take makes sense. However, if you had control of both chambers and ultimately failed to find a better replacement to Obamacare…then what good are you as a party? That’s also a reasonable take.

To which party are you referring? The Dems broke it and didn't fix it knowing what they did was expiring.

Talking about the GOP. You're right, the Dems messed it up. However, the GOP never took the opportunity to fix it. They campaiged to fix it but didn't.

(11-05-2025 03:46 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:16 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:36 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 11:44 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 10:30 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  b/c there isn't one w/o taking monies away from some 'groups'...

it's puttin' back the genie in the bottle scenario...

in politics, that's a death wish...

"It's the Republicans' fault Medical Insurance is bad because they haven't come up with something to replace Obamacare!!!" You can't make this up. I know, how bout you have to get a job to get Medical Insurance if you aren't 100% disabled or 65 or older? Sounds pretty simple to me. Obamacare did what it was supposed to do. Destroy the private medical insurance business so the Feds were in control of your health. What could go wrong? Hey Stink, I see Johnny Dupree is back in business up around your way. People are so stupid.

Your take makes sense. However, if you had control of both chambers and ultimately failed to find a better replacement to Obamacare…then what good are you as a party? That’s also a reasonable take.

To which party are you referring? The Dems broke it and didn't fix it knowing what they did was expiring.

Talking about the GOP. You're right, the Dems messed it up. However, the GOP never took the opportunity to fix it. They campaiged to fix it but didn't.

Because the GOP gets paid the exact same amount as Dems get paid to keep filling up Big Pharma and Big Insurance bank accounts.

(11-05-2025 03:46 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:16 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:36 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 11:44 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 10:30 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  b/c there isn't one w/o taking monies away from some 'groups'...

it's puttin' back the genie in the bottle scenario...

in politics, that's a death wish...

"It's the Republicans' fault Medical Insurance is bad because they haven't come up with something to replace Obamacare!!!" You can't make this up. I know, how bout you have to get a job to get Medical Insurance if you aren't 100% disabled or 65 or older? Sounds pretty simple to me. Obamacare did what it was supposed to do. Destroy the private medical insurance business so the Feds were in control of your health. What could go wrong? Hey Stink, I see Johnny Dupree is back in business up around your way. People are so stupid.

Your take makes sense. However, if you had control of both chambers and ultimately failed to find a better replacement to Obamacare…then what good are you as a party? That’s also a reasonable take.

To which party are you referring? The Dems broke it and didn't fix it knowing what they did was expiring.

Talking about the GOP. You're right, the Dems messed it up. However, the GOP never took the opportunity to fix it. They campaiged to fix it but didn't.

You will have to dig up John McCain for that one. Mr. Thumbs down himself. Trump took the GOP in Congress at their word. They lied. Trump did fix the problem in the BBB, that is why the Dems have a gun to the people of America's heads. Remove people from the dole that are claiming benefits in up to 6 different states and those that are on Medicaid AND getting Obamacare subsidies. Work requirement etc. The Dems DON'T want "The Problem" fixed. THAT is what this is all about.

(11-05-2025 03:40 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 03:10 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:09 PM)450bench Wrote:  Trump is the President of the United States

The senate is red.

The house is red.

Liberals are still nuts.

And allow me to add, for our short bus friends-

Your President, Donald J. Trump wasn’t on any of these ballots.

But sure, continue with the waves of illegals fleeing Marxism only to bring that to our shores.

I’ll never understand 2 things that confound me.

A. Why do people continue to vote against their own self interests
2. Why is basic economics or even history never allowed to be taught in our government schools any longer?

Hunh. One simple answer escapes The Crazy.

I'm thrilled to discuss economics, one of my favorite subjects that I only didn't major in because you can't actually do sh*t with it. So please, explain the basic economics of how people are voting against their own self interests. Can't wait!!!

You obviously didn't take a legitimate economics course.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

1. Muslims consider women as property.
2. Democrat politicians are all for women athletes competing against men. Clay Travis said the other day he was gonna buy a professional women's soccer team, move it to Nashville and fill the team with nothing but men wearing pony-tails and never lose a game and see what happens. He has the $$$ to do it.

(11-05-2025 05:16 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  1. Muslims consider women as property.
2. Democrat politicians are all for women athletes competing against men. Clay Travis said the other day he was gonna buy a professional women's soccer team, move it to Nashville and fill the team with nothing but men wearing pony-tails and never lose a game and see what happens. He has the $$$ to do it.

... JC at his 'finest' ...

to wit, talk about elections having consequences ... run, Travis, run!!!

(11-05-2025 02:43 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  #5.

Good boy!

You think that's a put down? I think it's funny. I may use it.

(11-05-2025 05:05 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 03:40 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 03:10 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:09 PM)450bench Wrote:  Trump is the President of the United States

The senate is red.

The house is red.

Liberals are still nuts.

And allow me to add, for our short bus friends-

Your President, Donald J. Trump wasn’t on any of these ballots.

But sure, continue with the waves of illegals fleeing Marxism only to bring that to our shores.

I’ll never understand 2 things that confound me.

A. Why do people continue to vote against their own self interests
2. Why is basic economics or even history never allowed to be taught in our government schools any longer?

Hunh. One simple answer escapes The Crazy.

I'm thrilled to discuss economics, one of my favorite subjects that I only didn't major in because you can't actually do sh*t with it. So please, explain the basic economics of how people are voting against their own self interests. Can't wait!!!

You obviously didn't take a legitimate economics course.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Took plenty little fella. Feel free to explain the elasticity of demand to me. Economics is not just simply taxes bad government bad, that's retard economics.

(11-05-2025 06:06 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 05:05 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 03:40 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 03:10 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:09 PM)450bench Wrote:  Trump is the President of the United States

The senate is red.

The house is red.

Liberals are still nuts.

And allow me to add, for our short bus friends-

Your President, Donald J. Trump wasn’t on any of these ballots.

But sure, continue with the waves of illegals fleeing Marxism only to bring that to our shores.

I’ll never understand 2 things that confound me.

A. Why do people continue to vote against their own self interests
2. Why is basic economics or even history never allowed to be taught in our government schools any longer?

Hunh. One simple answer escapes The Crazy.

I'm thrilled to discuss economics, one of my favorite subjects that I only didn't major in because you can't actually do sh*t with it. So please, explain the basic economics of how people are voting against their own self interests. Can't wait!!!

You obviously didn't take a legitimate economics course.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Took plenty little fella. Feel free to explain the elasticity of demand to me. Economics is not just simply taxes bad government bad, that's retard economics.

Id suggest reading Friedman, Hayek, or Sowell... start there if youd like to educate yourself. Again, mommy and daddy overpaid for your ****** economics course(s).





Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk