Quote:A liberal congressman on Wednesday said the quiet part out loud regarding what a future Democrat President would do to MAGA voters if they had their way.

Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT) appeared on MSNBC to discuss Senator Lindsey Graham’s (RINO-SC) comments regarding the strikes on Venezuelan drug boats in the Caribbean. Graham has defended the commonsense actions and said he would welcome a debate because he knows most Americans will agree with President Trump.

Himes predictably ripped Graham’s comments and accused the White House of hiding a memo from Congress supposedly arguing for the legal basis for these strikes.

Himes then shockingly stated that if the Trump Administration gets away with these strikes, a Democrat president like AOC would have no guardrails against taking out her enemies.

Translation: Back off these strikes, Trump, or one of our own may decide to take out your supporters in the future.

How insane and dangerous.

WATCH:

HIMES: There is no legal authorization for these strikes. There is a purported memo inside the White House articulating the legal basis for these strikes which has not been shared with the Congress.

I bet if it exists, it is nonsense. And if Lindsey Graham and Republicans want to go the route and say it’s okay to kill people illegally just so long as the American public supports it…The American public really needs to think that through.

There will be a Democratic President someday, and all my MAGA friends who are cheering on these illegal killings need to imagine who gets killed when President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says it doesn’t matter what the law says.

She’s going to do what she’s going to do.

One should believe exactly what Himes just said. The left has already taken out Charlie Kirk, the most promising young star in the conservative movement, and came within a centimeter of ending Trump’s life.

We also know the last Democrat regime threw innocent Americans in prison on bogus charges just for speaking up against election fraud, protesting abortion, woke school activities, and much more.

The regime also tried to lock up Trump for life right after he announced his third run for the Presidency.

The real question is, does a President AOC really need an excuse to either secretly take out a political opponent or have someone do the dirty work for her?

Link

Saw that on Breitbart yesterday. God help us all if she becomes President, which is certainly possible.

Come and kill me.

Aside from the implied threat of an American president ordering the Armed Forces to kill political dissidents, what’s really key in that interview is that when Congressman Himes envisions the next Democrat to occupy the Oval Office, the first name that he spoke was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That’s a very sobering message about how he sees the future of his party.

(10-30-2025 03:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Aside from the implied threat of an American president ordering the Armed Forces to kill political dissidents, what’s really key in that interview is that when Congressman Himes envisions the next Democrat to occupy the Oval Office, the first name that he spoke was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That’s a very sobering message about how he sees the future of his party.

I mean, NYC is about to elect a socialist Muslim as it's mayor. Does it really surprise you?

Obama is bad, but Bernie Sanders is way worse. Sanders has ensured his legacy will be carried on by the squad.

(10-30-2025 03:50 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 03:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Aside from the implied threat of an American president ordering the Armed Forces to kill political dissidents, what’s really key in that interview is that when Congressman Himes envisions the next Democrat to occupy the Oval Office, the first name that he spoke was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That’s a very sobering message about how he sees the future of his party.

I mean, NYC is about to elect a socialist Muslim as its mayor. Does it really surprise you?

Not really. Maybe a little surprised that Himes would say that out loud.

By the way, the last two people from New York City to be on the national ticket were Alfred Smith (Lower East Side) in 1928 and Geraldine Ferraro (Astoria) in 1984. Neither election turned out well for the Democrats.

(10-30-2025 06:15 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 03:50 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 03:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Aside from the implied threat of an American president ordering the Armed Forces to kill political dissidents, what’s really key in that interview is that when Congressman Himes envisions the next Democrat to occupy the Oval Office, the first name that he spoke was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That’s a very sobering message about how he sees the future of his party.

I mean, NYC is about to elect a socialist Muslim as its mayor. Does it really surprise you?

Not really. Maybe a little surprised that Himes would say that out loud.

By the way, the last two people from New York City to be on the national ticket were Alfred Smith (Lower East Side) in 1928 and Geraldine Ferraro (Astoria) in 1984. Neither election turned out well for the Democrats.

neither would AOC's...

(10-30-2025 06:16 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 06:15 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 03:50 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 03:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Aside from the implied threat of an American president ordering the Armed Forces to kill political dissidents, what’s really key in that interview is that when Congressman Himes envisions the next Democrat to occupy the Oval Office, the first name that he spoke was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That’s a very sobering message about how he sees the future of his party.

I mean, NYC is about to elect a socialist Muslim as its mayor. Does it really surprise you?

Not really. Maybe a little surprised that Himes would say that out loud.

By the way, the last two people from New York City to be on the national ticket were Alfred Smith (Lower East Side) in 1928 and Geraldine Ferraro (Astoria) in 1984. Neither election turned out well for the Democrats.

neither would AOC's...

My generation will vote for her though. Then again, my generation isn't very smart to begin with.

Don’t know anything about Himes, but I’d be interested in what District or city he may represent.

The blow market for the Wall Street traders and New Haven, Bridgeport junkies is astonishing.

Always gotta look into who’s getting a cut.
Another slam dunk beautiful State turned into a prog schithole.

Sad.

(10-31-2025 10:47 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Don’t know anything about Himes, but I’d be interested in what District or city he may represent.

Another slam dunk beautiful State turned into a prog schithole.

Sad.

For Connecticut, a crucial turning point was 1991, when they started a personal income tax. Flat rate of 4.5% at the time, although of course that has been increased since then.

(10-30-2025 06:19 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 06:16 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 06:15 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 03:50 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 03:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Aside from the implied threat of an American president ordering the Armed Forces to kill political dissidents, what’s really key in that interview is that when Congressman Himes envisions the next Democrat to occupy the Oval Office, the first name that he spoke was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That’s a very sobering message about how he sees the future of his party.

I mean, NYC is about to elect a socialist Muslim as its mayor. Does it really surprise you?

Not really. Maybe a little surprised that Himes would say that out loud.

By the way, the last two people from New York City to be on the national ticket were Alfred Smith (Lower East Side) in 1928 and Geraldine Ferraro (Astoria) in 1984. Neither election turned out well for the Democrats.

neither would AOC's...

My generation will vote for her though. Then again, my generation isn't very smart to begin with.

you're either on the tail end of millennial or early gen Z ... you're close enough to either that is figglin' it out sooner than later ... no doubt there's plenty of male beta cucks ... by the time she gets her shot, she'll never have a chance...

discount the msm and all the attached baggage ... they no longer apply to value in the equation that matters...

once the hippie boomers are gonski, the donks are in big fk'n troub troubs ... that party in 'evolution' has become unsustainable...

now that tech allows better scrutiny of voter rolls and the coming-of-age court battle with mail-it-inns, I wouldn't sweat it at this point ... if hill-lair-liar had won in '16, this feedback would easily fall into the line of your fears...

she has zero shot on the nat'l stage ... that one you can book, Danno ...

(10-30-2025 06:19 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 06:16 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 06:15 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 03:50 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 03:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Aside from the implied threat of an American president ordering the Armed Forces to kill political dissidents, what’s really key in that interview is that when Congressman Himes envisions the next Democrat to occupy the Oval Office, the first name that he spoke was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That’s a very sobering message about how he sees the future of his party.

I mean, NYC is about to elect a socialist Muslim as its mayor. Does it really surprise you?

Not really. Maybe a little surprised that Himes would say that out loud.

By the way, the last two people from New York City to be on the national ticket were Alfred Smith (Lower East Side) in 1928 and Geraldine Ferraro (Astoria) in 1984. Neither election turned out well for the Democrats.

neither would AOC's...

My generation will vote for her though. Then again, my generation isn't very smart to begin with.

Her own constituents voted for Trump.

(10-31-2025 12:35 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 06:19 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 06:16 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 06:15 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-30-2025 03:50 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  I mean, NYC is about to elect a socialist Muslim as its mayor. Does it really surprise you?

Not really. Maybe a little surprised that Himes would say that out loud.

By the way, the last two people from New York City to be on the national ticket were Alfred Smith (Lower East Side) in 1928 and Geraldine Ferraro (Astoria) in 1984. Neither election turned out well for the Democrats.

neither would AOC's...

My generation will vote for her though. Then again, my generation isn't very smart to begin with.

Her own constituents voted for Trump.

irony at its finest, that is....

Lest we forget, AOC was first elected to Congress by 15% of her voting constituency.

(10-31-2025 02:14 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Lest we forget, AOC was first elected to Congress by 15% of her voting constituency.

In the primary that year (2018), she got less than 17,000 votes. But less than 30,000 people voted in that primary so she won. This in a district of more than 700,000 people.

(10-31-2025 03:11 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-31-2025 02:14 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Lest we forget, AOC was first elected to Congress by 15% of her voting constituency.

In the primary that year (2018), she got less than 17,000 votes. But less than 30,000 people voted in that primary so she won. This in a district of more than 700,000 people.

But the 700K is population, not voters, right? I know I read somewhere it was less than 15% of the registered voters, but not 2%.

The Dem's in power do not bother going through the motions anymore about condemning political violence. They favor it. They want it. And over half the country is their target.

(11-01-2025 06:48 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  The Dem's in power do not bother going through the motions anymore about condemning political violence. They favor it. They want it. And over half the country is their target.

All part of Obama's fundamental transformation.

(10-31-2025 10:58 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-31-2025 10:47 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Don’t know anything about Himes, but I’d be interested in what District or city he may represent.

Another slam dunk beautiful State turned into a prog schithole.

Sad.

For Connecticut, a crucial turning point was 1991, when they started a personal income tax. Flat rate of 4.5% at the time, although of course that has been increased since then.

As I recall that was supposed to be a temporary situation for 3 or 4 years.