(11-01-2025 12:41 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(10-31-2025 10:58 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-31-2025 10:47 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Don’t know anything about Himes, but I’d be interested in what District or city he may represent.

Another slam dunk beautiful State turned into a prog schithole.

Sad.

For Connecticut, a crucial turning point was 1991, when they started a personal income tax. Flat rate of 4.5% at the time, although of course that has been increased since then.

As I recall that was supposed to be a temporary situation for 3 or 4 years.

in gubber'mints' speak, temporary always = permanent (soon to increase) ...

Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

My gosh you're a brainwashed fool.

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Obama actually killed Americans in counterterrorism strikes, and y'all were silent.

(11-01-2025 02:22 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Obama actually killed Americans in counterterrorism strikes, and y'all were silent.

To the left, Obama can do no wrong. He's the Black Messiah after all.

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Okay, I'm curious. Link?

(11-01-2025 04:02 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Okay, I'm curious. Link?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/provocat...=109581560

(11-01-2025 04:02 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Okay, I'm curious. Link?

The precedent was already set when the Obama administration killed Americans in counterterrorism strikes.

(11-01-2025 04:49 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 04:02 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Okay, I'm curious. Link?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/provocat...=109581560

Ok, thanks, I read it. That's just an argument by a lawyer in court, not actual law, and not something Trump can carry out unimpeded.

Nobody believes for a second that a president could actually get away with that, and if you think Trump would order an assassination of a political rival, then I can't help you with your TDS.

The lawyer was just trying to win a case argument, not actually advocating for Trump to order an assassination.

(11-01-2025 05:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 04:49 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 04:02 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Okay, I'm curious. Link?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/provocat...=109581560

Ok, thanks, I read it. That's just an argument by a lawyer in court, not actual law, and not something Trump can carry out unimpeded.

Nobody believes for a second that a president could actually get away with that, and if you think Trump would order an assassination of a political rival, then I can't help you with your TDS.

The lawyer was just trying to win a case argument, not actually advocating for Trump to order an assassination.

https://www.readingrainbow.org/

(11-01-2025 05:55 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 05:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 04:49 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 04:02 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Okay, I'm curious. Link?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/provocat...=109581560

Ok, thanks, I read it. That's just an argument by a lawyer in court, not actual law, and not something Trump can carry out unimpeded.

Nobody believes for a second that a president could actually get away with that, and if you think Trump would order an assassination of a political rival, then I can't help you with your TDS.

The lawyer was just trying to win a case argument, not actually advocating for Trump to order an assassination.

https://www.readingrainbow.org/

That might be the dumbest retort you ever posted. You must really be low on ammo.

See, Elvis proves once again what a low IQ idiot he is.

(11-01-2025 06:13 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  See, Elvis proves once again what a low IQ idiot he is.

He's just another pathetic prog filth leftist troll anyway.

(11-01-2025 06:13 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  See, Elvis proves once again what a low IQ idiot he is.

Yeah, reading and understanding the post really showed my low IQ.

Leaded gas really did a number on you guys.

(11-01-2025 02:22 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Obama actually killed Americans in counterterrorism strikes, and y'all were silent.

Obama operated citing the congressional authorization for use of military force (AUMF).

I guess you forgot that.

And yes, Trumps lawyers in the immunity case actually answered the direct question set to them in the manner that Elvis recited above.

But great rhetoric in the reply. Too bad it is nonsensical as a reply for the issue.

(11-01-2025 04:59 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 04:02 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Okay, I'm curious. Link?

The precedent was already set when the Obama administration killed Americans in counterterrorism strikes.

Precedent for ordering seal team 6 to kill US political rivals? Lolz.

You are doing a really crappy job of mixing and matching phrases. Worse than your usual…..

(11-01-2025 05:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 04:49 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 04:02 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2025 01:26 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trumps lawyers argued in court that he could send seal team six to kill political rivals and has immunity for that act…

Okay, I'm curious. Link?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/provocat...=109581560

Ok, thanks, I read it. That's just an argument by a lawyer in court, not actual law, and not something Trump can carry out unimpeded.

Nobody believes for a second that a president could actually get away with that, and if you think Trump would order an assassination of a political rival, then I can't help you with your TDS.

The lawyer was just trying to win a case argument, not actually advocating for Trump to order an assassination.

He is advocating for that broad of a power, hoss. And claims it is under the power. And I doubt claiming that extent is trying to win a case. He answered a loaded question honesty of what his version included.

And no one here has said advocated for any assassination. Try reading. He advocated that the president is alllowed to do so. Again reading comprehension is your friend.

Getting a personality would be your friend.

And what exactly do you think the implication is when somebody mentions that Trump's lawyer argued he would be immune from an ordered kill. They don't have to SAY it. Do you understand the English word "imply?"

Arguing for immunity in court is a long way from any obvious implication that Trump thinks he could order an assassination and get away with it. That's some far left nutjob thinking, right there.

Btw, I feel bad that you tricked our late great friend Owl #s into thinking you are a libertarian with conservative leanings. You're so far gone left, you probably don't have any right side pants pockets.

(11-01-2025 08:12 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Getting a personality would be your friend.

And what exactly do you think the implication is when somebody mentions that Trump's lawyer argued he would be immune from an ordered kill. They don't have to SAY it. Do you understand the English word "imply?"

Arguing for immunity in court is a long way from any obvious implication that Trump thinks he could order an assassination and get away with it. That's some far left nutjob thinking, right there.

Btw, I feel bad that you tricked our late great friend Owl #s into thinking you are a libertarian with conservative leanings. You're so far gone left, you probably don't have any right side pants pockets.

Heck, he's probably so far left he tricked himself when he came back around the planet. He's not a serious person either.

(11-01-2025 08:12 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Getting a personality would be your friend.

And what exactly do you think the implication is when somebody mentions that Trump's lawyer argued he would be immune from an ordered kill. They don't have to SAY it. Do you understand the English word "imply?"

Arguing for immunity in court is a long way from any obvious implication that Trump thinks he could order an assassination and get away with it. That's some far left nutjob thinking, right there.

In the first paragraph above you say that merely mentioning that Trump's attorneys argued that he would be immune from an ordered kill IMPLIES a wish to do that.

In the second, you say exactly the opposite.

Kind of funny.

The *only* thing the Elvis said, and the *only* thing that I have said is -- Trumps lawyers argued that he would be immune for an ordered assassination.

Notwithstanding your addled jabberwocky **** above.

Quote:Btw, I feel bad that you tricked our late great friend Owl #s into thinking you are a libertarian with conservative leanings. You're so far gone left, you probably don't have any right side pants pockets.

Its now "left" to mention that Trumps attorneys argued that Trump has the power to order an assassination and that Trump would be immune? Cool cool.

Lolz. What type of **** have you been consuming with your Geritol there, dude?