(09-10-2025 04:45 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 04:43 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  As far as banning goes----lets not. Charlie Kirk constantly would make the point that we must be allowed to talk to each other---to disagree freely with each other----otherwise---the only outlet remainng for political disagreements becomes violence. I agree with Kirk's view point completely on that issue.

Will the mods let me talk freely to him? I have a lot to say.

They won't. They'll let them get away with saying worse just because there's more conservatives here.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using CSNbbs mobile app

This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

(09-10-2025 05:10 PM)hburg Wrote:  

I don't see how its not a professional hit. And its designed to be a message to everyone.

The original video from far away had lots of people immediately look behind them at the shot. I was guessing a rifle was used.

(09-10-2025 02:28 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Mentally ill, hateful progressives. And the POS politicians that encourage them to act. **** em all.

There's a thread comparing male Trump voters to female Biden voters on what was important to them. #3 on the female Biden voters is mental health.

Total scum

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:10 PM)hburg Wrote:  

I don't see how its not a professional hit. And its designed to be a message to everyone.

It doesn't take a professional assassin to be able to bring a gun onto a campus where lawmakers have decided to allow open carrying of guns.

FBI has confirmed the suspect has been apprehended.

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Rolling Stone magazine is not a legitimate news source.

Utah Governor calling it politically motivated.

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Kirk was saying that there is a social cost to individual liberty. It wasn’t an endorsement of gun violence, but he was stating the obvious.

The left always says we need to “do something” yet never actually provides a legitimate answer outside of complete and total gun confiscation.

What’s yours?

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Are you actually justifying him being killed?

Again, I disagreed with Kirk on most things, but I’m not gonna justify his death. You make change by convincing people why you think they’re wrong, not violence.

(09-10-2025 05:28 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 04:45 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 04:43 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  As far as banning goes----lets not. Charlie Kirk constantly would make the point that we must be allowed to talk to each other---to disagree freely with each other----otherwise---the only outlet remainng for political disagreements becomes violence. I agree with Kirk's view point completely on that issue.

Will the mods let me talk freely to him? I have a lot to say.

They won't. They'll let them get away with saying worse just because there's more conservatives here.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using CSNbbs mobile app

The worm either deleted or altered his post.

(09-10-2025 05:33 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Rolling Stone magazine is not a legitimate news source.

Retarded liberal alert.

(09-10-2025 05:35 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Kirk was saying that there is a social cost to individual liberty. It wasn’t an endorsement of gun violence, but he was stating the obvious.

The left always says we need to “do something” yet never actually provides a legitimate answer outside of complete and total gun confiscation.

What’s yours?

It's clearly to post stuff from Rolling Stone, which once again is not a legitimate political news source.

(09-10-2025 05:33 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Rolling Stone magazine is not a legitimate news source.

You think the video that Kirk posted to his twitter that Rolling Stone linked in their article is illegitimate?

FBI Director Kash Patel just tweeted 11 mins ago...

they have the suspect in custody.

(09-10-2025 02:57 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 02:37 PM)mlb Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 02:34 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Just stop. Nobody has said that. Prog filth actually do it. You are despicable.

Prog filth terrorists. Trying to drag this into some sort of both sides do it is low for even you

The f$ck people haven't said that. Multiple people have. Andy left after being called out for it (and GTS informed him about having been subpoena'd for information before because of posts on this site). Thus far only the leftists have taken it to the level of actually committing the violence. But both sides need to stop calling for it.

With all due respect it's a bit different when a poster on a message board says something over the top versus member of congress, the media and other public figures. You look at the over the top comments from the left calling anyone who disagrees with them fascists, racists, threats to democracy etc... and it doen't take a genius to understand why some feel justified in violence.

Really. And as obnoxious as Trump can be, his worst doesn't hold a candle to what Democrat leaders say. Kamala literally talked about killing him if they ever got in an elevator together.

(09-10-2025 05:36 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:33 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Rolling Stone magazine is not a legitimate news source.

You think the video that Kirk posted to his twitter that Rolling Stone linked in their article is illegitimate?

I think the bullcrap Rolling Stone writes is illegitimate. Besides, if you really believe he was actually calling for violence, you've got a screw loose and need mental help. And if you have a problem with that, I really don't care.

(09-10-2025 05:32 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:10 PM)hburg Wrote:  

I don't see how its not a professional hit. And its designed to be a message to everyone.

It doesn't take a professional assassin to be able to bring a gun onto a campus where lawmakers have decided to allow open carrying of guns.

If it was up to me, every single place in America would be an open carry space.

Open carry laws do not kill people, murderers and assassins do and they by definition do not give a rats ass about laws. Many of the deadliest places in America have the strictest gun laws in the country, yet are filled every week with gun violence.

You have to be a special kind of ignorant not to understand this simple truth.