Bondi takes a sledgehammer to rogue NJ liberal judges
NJ judges colluded to prevent Alina Habba from being extended another 120 days as US Attorney while she awaits her senate confirmation hearing. They wanted her out, and wanted the "first assistant" to be put in her place.
Last I saw US Attorneys needed Senate confirmation, and any interim (by law) is limited to 120 days.
Quite the 'rogue judges' to literally follow the law as written. Double lolz.
semantics are meaningless...
within as writ, it's now our turn, bruv ... and we're changing that writ on the fly as well ... can't wait for the mids and voter roll bs that will most coitenly want their coitus w/o lending a 'hand'...
(This post was last modified: 07-22-2025 05:34 PM by stinkfist.)
Last I saw US Attorneys needed Senate confirmation, and any interim (by law) is limited to 120 days.
Quite the 'rogue judges' to literally follow the law as written. Double lolz.
semantics are meaningless...
within as writ, it's now our turn, bruv ... and we're changing that writ on the fly as well ... can't wait for the mids and voter roll bs that will most coitenly want their coitus w/o lending a 'hand'...
The funny thing is that the right used to be the political side that hated 'law by pulling it out of your ass.'
Apparently not so much anymore. Bizarro world (as Ive said before).
Bondi takes a sledgehammer to rogue NJ liberal judges
Sooo, would these same judges have voted the same way had Sloe* or the Ho appointed the U.S. Attorney for Joisey?
If so, great.
If not, then yes. Rogue. They aren’t the friggin Chief Exec officer that makes these appointments. The POTUS is, no matter who that may be.
Should the senate get off their assses and confirm her? Yes. But in the meantime the POTUS should have his appointment in the interim.
This ain’t hard. Less you’re pulling for the other “team”. Rogue is a pretty good term for this kinda partisan crap.
RE: Bondi takes a sledgehammer to rogue NJ liberal judges
(07-22-2025 06:09 PM)JMUDunk Wrote: Sooo, would these same judges have voted the same way had Sloe* or the Ho appointed the U.S. Attorney for Joisey?
If so, great.
Doesnt matter.
Quote:If not, then yes. Rogue. They aren’t the friggin Chief Exec officer that makes these appointments. The POTUS is, no matter who that may be.
And the judges are simply following the law of interim appointments. Notwithstanding your comments above.
Quote:Should the senate get off their assses and confirm her? Yes. But in the meantime the POTUS should have his appointment in the interim.
There is a reason why interim appointments are, well...... interim.
Quote:This ain’t hard. Less you’re pulling for the other “team”. Rogue is a pretty good term for this kinda partisan crap.
'partisan crap'. I would suggest that Habba's experience doesnt put her anywhere near the experience necessary for the position.
Her 120 days is up, the judges think she is incompetent, and they voted not to extend her. All the while Trump sat on his ass in getting the full appointment through.
And -- in that case, the law is the law. 120 days and you are out, and if not extended, the judges vote in the interim. Until Trump does his thing.
Easy peasy.
Been that way for 70 years. Now its 'rogue judges'. Lolz.
RE: Bondi takes a sledgehammer to rogue NJ liberal judges
(07-22-2025 06:55 PM)450bench Wrote: Go sue her then, tanq…go do it
Dont have standing in the first place.
In the second place, dont have the time.
In the third place, its fairly fun to watch everyone 'chicken little' over <scary music> "ROGUE JUDGES" <end scary music> when the process has been in place for a pretty long time.
Its simply amazing how many simply quaff down anything they read on a tweet.
But an 'A' for effort in trying make shade. At least you didnt run down the 'it said "rogue judges" in the tweet so I am simply going to regurgitate". But you *did* race the churlish ******* defensive comment of above.
RE: Bondi takes a sledgehammer to rogue NJ liberal judges
(07-22-2025 06:32 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote: tanq acts like the vast majority of lawyers aren't complete scum.
Judges are lawyers.
Apologies to rath.
Inside baseball. Most attorneys are dooshbags.
Only did law because I needed a job and admittedly I wasn't sharp enough in certain areas to go to a great MBA program. I'm good at thinking around corners to find solutions. That and recurve bow hunting are my only superpowers.
Last I saw US Attorneys needed Senate confirmation, and any interim (by law) is limited to 120 days.
Quite the 'rogue judges' to literally follow the law as written. Double lolz.
How'd it work out for them? Did they get their person in??
womp womp
They acted like douchenozzles. Habba was doing a fine job in her position, had the backing of law enforcement agencies, and these jackholes decided to get political and go around her.
Last I saw US Attorneys needed Senate confirmation, and any interim (by law) is limited to 120 days.
Quite the 'rogue judges' to literally follow the law as written. Double lolz.
How'd it work out for them? Did they get their person in??
womp womp
They acted like douchenozzles. Habba was doing a fine job in her position, had the backing of law enforcement agencies, and these jackholes decided to get political and go around her.
And Bondi just neutered them.
" these jackholes decided to get political and go around her"
RE: Bondi takes a sledgehammer to rogue NJ liberal judges
(07-22-2025 06:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:
(07-22-2025 06:09 PM)JMUDunk Wrote: Sooo, would these same judges have voted the same way had Sloe* or the Ho appointed the U.S. Attorney for Joisey?
If so, great.
Doesnt matter.
Quote:If not, then yes. Rogue. They aren’t the friggin Chief Exec officer that makes these appointments. The POTUS is, no matter who that may be.
And the judges are simply following the law of interim appointments. Notwithstanding your comments above.
Quote:Should the senate get off their assses and confirm her? Yes. But in the meantime the POTUS should have his appointment in the interim.
There is a reason why interim appointments are, well...... interim.
Quote:This ain’t hard. Less you’re pulling for the other “team”. Rogue is a pretty good term for this kinda partisan crap.
'partisan crap'. I would suggest that Habba's experience doesnt put her anywhere near the experience necessary for the position.
Her 120 days is up, the judges think she is incompetent, and they voted not to extend her. All the while Trump sat on his ass in getting the full appointment through.
And -- in that case, the law is the law. 120 days and you are out, and if not extended, the judges vote in the interim. Until Trump does his thing.
Easy peasy.
Been that way for 70 years. Now its 'rogue judges'. Lolz.
LOL! And Kumswallow was highly qualified. You’re a gift to all us howling monkeys.
Last I saw US Attorneys needed Senate confirmation, and any interim (by law) is limited to 120 days.
Quite the 'rogue judges' to literally follow the law as written. Double lolz.
How'd it work out for them? Did they get their person in??
womp womp
They acted like douchenozzles. Habba was doing a fine job in her position, had the backing of law enforcement agencies, and these jackholes decided to get political and go around her.
And Bondi just neutered them.
How’d it work out for them? They voted under the law not to extend her. And she wasn’t extended.
And honestly, the only people that have any insight into her ability would seemingly be ——. The people who saw her actions literally on a day to day basis. And that point seems to have been noted.
I hope the next interim can get confirmed. Then the ‘political doucenozzles’ you seem to be absurdly butthurt over don’t have to do that action under the law again.
You seem to have some inside line into the voting process above. Or, you are simply pulling garbage out of your ass to make up for that perpetual victimhood that seemingly drives the above ‘analysis’. That and the perpetual stupid ass war cry of ‘rogue judges’ that seems to be your new parrot myna bird comment. Cool cool.
(This post was last modified: 07-23-2025 03:40 AM by tanqtonic.)
RE: Bondi takes a sledgehammer to rogue NJ liberal judges
(07-23-2025 01:53 AM)TripleA Wrote:
(07-23-2025 12:40 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:
(07-22-2025 06:43 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:
(07-22-2025 06:32 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote: tanq acts like the vast majority of lawyers aren't complete scum.
Judges are lawyers.
Apologies to rath.
Most people dont have the chronic, mortal, and quite honestly ignorantly generalilzed chip on the shoulder you seemingly have, my friend. Just saying.
How do you know? Because you know everything.
Yep, and about 20 of us are obviously retarded, per Tanq.
That generalization seems pretty spot on for the very consistent acitivity of whiny bitching at just about every opportunity exhibited by a special few.
RE: Bondi takes a sledgehammer to rogue NJ liberal judges
Both Senate seats are held by Democrats, and they opposed her. These are not rogue judges. Judges do that all the time in each state even Republican judges who did the same thing as the NJ judges.
/
[NEWS] Bondi takes a sledgehammer to rogue NJ liberal judges
