Great listen:

(06-22-2025 09:54 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:51 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:47 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:44 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:42 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  They should send the queers for Palestine group over first.

Some people have to learn the hard way.

I volunteer to send Jasmine Crockett and AOC over to them, too. lol

I was thinking more locally. Like send a few peeps on this board.

lol

I was thinking after the post maybe I should retract it.

I honestly don't wish bad things for Elvis.

I don't either. Heck, I don't wish bad things on anybody. I do wish that they would wake up and see the writing on the wall. (They probably won't though.)

I don't, either. I was just joking. I wouldn't wish that on anybody. Not even Elvis. Or Tom. And especially not on Tanq. He is just too damn entertaining.

(06-22-2025 09:26 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:22 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:10 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 08:57 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 08:53 AM)TripleA Wrote:  What are you talking about? The Los Angeles riots before this? An appeals court has already ruled in his favor.

The attack last night? You think we shouldn't take out Iran's nuclear capability, when we are the only ones who can do it?

But beyond that, would you like a list of presidents who have taken military action without congressional approval? It is similar to the list of presidents who have served in office.

Can you not read?

I said that generally other presidents have engaged in limited military action for up to 90 days without congressional approval. Trumps actions are in line with what other presidents have done without congressional approvals.

Who is talking about LA? This thread is about Iran.

Read your sentence again. Since we are talking about Trump, you said "THE president, NOT OTHER presidents or ALL presidents, so I took that to mean Trump.

And you did NOT add the clarifying sentence then that you did this time, about being in line with other presidential actions.

Can you not construct sentences that make your point clear?

I made my point quite clear, you are just so ate up with MAGA syndrome you argued with me when I agreed with you.

No, it wasn't clear, and you even added a second clarifying sentence the second time, which proves my point.

And so far, for some reason, you are ignoring my other post in reference to your comment about the cost effectiveness of certain bombing alternatives, where you said one of the dumbest things I've ever seen on a message board.

I added a clarification statement because you started arguing with me after I agreed with you. The fact that I had to clarify the statement to get you to understand doesn’t mean it wasn’t clear to the average person.

"Average person"


LOL!!

And Elvis continues to grasp at those straws. If it wasn't so sad, I'd laugh my head off.

Oh, who am I kidding? I'm laughing anyway.

A leftist judge will be along shortly to order President Trump restore Iran’s nuclear facilities, asserting that the bombing infringes on due process.

(06-21-2025 08:43 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-21-2025 08:41 PM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  Alright men. Headed in to the office. Y’all hold down the fort here. Cheers!

Late night for work, huh? Later...

https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/...lletin.pdf

(06-22-2025 10:13 AM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  A leftist judge will be along shortly to order President Trump restore Iran’s nuclear facilities, asserting that the bombing infringes on due process.

tanq would have already said that if he was here.

(06-22-2025 10:13 AM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  A leftist judge will be along shortly to order President Trump restore Iran’s nuclear facilities, asserting that the bombing infringes on due process.

I know you're joking. Still, I can't help but think that's somehow in the realm of possibility. lol

(06-22-2025 10:13 AM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  A leftist judge will be along shortly to order President Trump restore Iran’s nuclear facilities, asserting that the bombing infringes on due process.

LOL It literally would not surprise any of us now.

(06-22-2025 09:58 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:50 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:46 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Muslim philosophy doesn't apply to Leftist Gays, right?

They probably see them as "people who are also oppressed by Biblical values" or some crap. They can say what they will about our Judeo-Christian-based culture. We don't want to kill them. (Not at our core, anyway. I know there are wackos of any religion and ideology out there. Those are the exception to the rule.)

They hate our guts more than anyone in the world, yet we believe they have a right to be the biggest freak shows in the world as long as they keep it away from children.

Islamists would cut their heads off before they could ever paint a single eyelash or put in a single piercing.

But Conservatives and Christians are who they hate the most, not the people actually beheading gays in Muslim nations across the globe.

The world hating Christians is expected

(06-22-2025 10:13 AM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  A leftist judge will be along shortly to order President Trump restore Iran’s nuclear facilities, asserting that the bombing infringes on due process.

Of course he will.

(06-22-2025 10:26 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  The world hating Christians is expected

18 “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19 If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. 20 Remember what I told you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. 21 They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the one who sent me.


Its only going to get worse in the years ahead. And its not just the LGBTQers and Muslims, the globalists see fundamentalist Christians as their biggest roadblock and enemy for ushering in their new world order.

We are problem #1 for that ideology and they know it. We know what globalism means and where it ends. No matter how well they package and sell it, we know better and we will never buy into it.

And they know that as well as we do.

They know we're holding them back. We are the problem.

(06-22-2025 10:14 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(06-21-2025 08:43 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-21-2025 08:41 PM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  Alright men. Headed in to the office. Y’all hold down the fort here. Cheers!

Late night for work, huh? Later...

https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/...lletin.pdf

Good info. Thanks.

(06-22-2025 10:08 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:26 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:22 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 09:10 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-22-2025 08:57 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Can you not read?

I said that generally other presidents have engaged in limited military action for up to 90 days without congressional approval. Trumps actions are in line with what other presidents have done without congressional approvals.

Who is talking about LA? This thread is about Iran.

Read your sentence again. Since we are talking about Trump, you said "THE president, NOT OTHER presidents or ALL presidents, so I took that to mean Trump.

And you did NOT add the clarifying sentence then that you did this time, about being in line with other presidential actions.

Can you not construct sentences that make your point clear?

I made my point quite clear, you are just so ate up with MAGA syndrome you argued with me when I agreed with you.

No, it wasn't clear, and you even added a second clarifying sentence the second time, which proves my point.

And so far, for some reason, you are ignoring my other post in reference to your comment about the cost effectiveness of certain bombing alternatives, where you said one of the dumbest things I've ever seen on a message board.

I added a clarification statement because you started arguing with me after I agreed with you. The fact that I had to clarify the statement to get you to understand doesn’t mean it wasn’t clear to the average person.

Then obviously, I'm not an average person. I think that's a good thing.

Btw, Elvis, you still are ignoring the comments about your statement that we should have used JDAMs instead of Tomahawks.

Are you sure you don't want to explain why we're wrong to think that was an incredibly stupid statement?

Or maybe average people saw it, and I missed it.

Elvis calls this a "war". If you come to my house and kick my a$$, and I let you, that's not a "war", that's just an a$$kicking.

Forget about Iran for a moment. Putin can not be happy that the air defense systems he sold to Iran (some of their most sophisticated) did not detect the B2 bombers or their escorts. They basically flew into the heart of Iran and destroyed multiple sites and Iran was none the wiser.

(06-22-2025 10:44 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Elvis calls this a "war". If you come to my house and kick my a$$, and I let you, that's not a "war", that's just an a$$kicking.

Where did I say that?

Crap, for some reason I thought this was your thread, apologies.