(10-22-2024 03:38 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:19 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 02:59 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 12:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 12:21 PM)maximus Wrote:  Work related... 100% absolutely. I have a record of every meeting with minutes archived for every single one.

You would think an attorney would know that is a general requirement for anything related to your j.o.b.

Records and notes <> billing time entries. Just saying.

You asked a specific question about remembering who has been met with and what was covered 2-3 years ago.... I answered the question. It's 100%

I can go into Outlook and easily pull up each and every meeting, because it's all nicely organized. So are the records and official minutes for each meeting.

If I have a hallway or office drop in I send an email recapping the discussion so there is a follow up and purposeful record of the discussion.

This clown attorney just dudnt know anything he did and why....? Bull spit

I am glad you are so diligent. Most attorneys are as well. And most attorneys dont necessarily review all the background prior to being under oath. For the reasons that if there is any amount of not being absolutely, exactly positive and sure -- one can say exactly what he said.

Again, I dont remember those items off the top of my head. I can review notes and records to bring it back up. If I was to be deposed, or put under oath for questions -- when I dont review them to jigger that back into place, I can see 'I dont specifically recall.'

Glad you equate 'keeping records' with 'actual on the spot instant recollection.' But please, keep complaining and whining.

Ok, so if you can't recall anything but have record of it, we will just subpoena all of your work and personal communications and records.

Knock yourself out defeating privilege there, keemo sabe.

(10-22-2024 03:54 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:23 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:22 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I see oru has a new stick up his ass today. Arent we lucky.

Nah. No stick. Just funny that you tell people to not do the exact thing YOU do.

Self awareness is not his strong suit.

Yeah. Our lefties really struggle with that. Not exactly sure why...?

And our MAGAs are apparently too stupid to understand what and what is not a lefty.

(10-22-2024 03:54 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  Yeah. Our lefties really struggle with that. Not exactly sure why...?

At the risk of repeating myself, they're stupid.

(10-22-2024 10:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:36 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  Which lib here with flip out the most when Trump wins- commie Tommie, Tanq or Kruciff

Lib? Not here My Friend. Lolz.

You might as well be one, your irrational hatred of Trump wont allow you to do the right thing and vote for him, if for no other reason than to keep Obama from his 4th term. Or am I wrong?

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:37 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  You guys seem surprised that lawyers are liars?

They are paid to lie. Never trust one

My lawyer told me the first time I met him to never lie, that was his job.

(10-22-2024 11:00 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Wade conveniently forgot whom he met with or why 58 times in his testimony.

Can you remember everyone you met with two to three years ago, the exact date, and the exact contents of those conversations?

If there is any doubt, the answer is 'I dont specifically remember'.

Criminy, I dont remember the actual detailed specifics of tangling with you on this forum, just that you and I have tangled in general. And that is probably no more than 75 days in the past.

If you're an attorney billing for those hours, you sure as hell should have a record of it. I know you know this.

That's what I said.

Any attorney I know can recall the general details of a billable meeting on the basis of the billing records.

Only exception is if it's a client you have regular contact with over a multitude of transactions or litigation.

Nathan Wade is a liar. He either submitted false billing or he is a perjurer.

(10-22-2024 12:03 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 11:41 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:37 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  You guys seem surprised that lawyers are liars?

They are paid to lie. Never trust one

I'm getting angry I got bent over in a divorce vibes here.

Exactly right. Twice.

I got off easy. With the first one we settled on a monthly amount for child support that I paid for 10 and 13 years respectively for two kids. She never asked for an increase and I knew where the money was going, she was a great mom. Of course I paid for clothes, private school, everything sports related, cheerleading, horseback riding lessons, bedroom furniture, stereo's, tv's, trips overseas to study, health insurance, cars, a hefty down payment on a house rather than a fancy wedding, yada yada yada, I was late on one child support payment one time when I was in between jobs for a month.

She knew if she pressed for more child support I would start making her pay her half of everything.

The second one went away after I gave her 100k cash, a boob job and a brand new car. She was a sweet woman. She let me keep the house and my 401k and pension.

(10-22-2024 12:21 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Wade conveniently forgot whom he met with or why 58 times in his testimony.

Can you remember everyone you met with two to three years ago, the exact date, and the exact contents of those conversations?

If there is any doubt, the answer is 'I dont specifically remember'.

Criminy, I dont remember the actual detailed specifics of tangling with you on this forum, just that you and I have tangled in general. And that is probably no more than 75 days in the past.

Work related... 100% absolutely. I have a record of every meeting with minutes archived for every single one.

You would think an attorney would know that is a general requirement for anything related to your j.o.b.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I haven't deleted a business email in 20 years. I got transcripts of minutes for every meeting I was ever in as a manager at AT&T. It's a pretty common practice.

(10-22-2024 06:29 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:54 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:23 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:22 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I see oru has a new stick up his ass today. Arent we lucky.

Nah. No stick. Just funny that you tell people to not do the exact thing YOU do.

Self awareness is not his strong suit.

Yeah. Our lefties really struggle with that. Not exactly sure why...?

And our MAGAs are apparently too stupid to understand what and what is not a lefty.

I'll give you this much, you seem to have collected your wits and aren't baying at the moon too much these days. I have no doubt that you're a fine lawyer but ALL you ever comment on is legal stuff, especially of it involves Trump. I can understand that to a degree but there has to be more to you than lawyering. Otherwise, you come off as a one trick pony.

However, I don't have the same dislike of lawyers that many do. One of my dearest friends practiced for 54 years, he just retired two years ago, he's 84. Three other good friends are lawyers and I am acquainted with several others. They are all decent men and none of them are democrats.

(10-22-2024 06:49 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:36 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  Which lib here with flip out the most when Trump wins- commie Tommie, Tanq or Kruciff

Lib? Not here My Friend. Lolz.

You might as well be one, your irrational hatred of Trump wont allow you to do the right thing and vote for him, if for no other reason than to keep Obama from his 4th term. Or am I wrong?

Glad to know kissing Trumps ass and voting for him is the sin qua non of not being a lefty these days. Lolz.

(10-22-2024 07:16 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 06:29 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:54 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:23 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  Nah. No stick. Just funny that you tell people to not do the exact thing YOU do.

Self awareness is not his strong suit.

Yeah. Our lefties really struggle with that. Not exactly sure why...?

And our MAGAs are apparently too stupid to understand what and what is not a lefty.

I'll give you this much, you seem to have collected your wits and aren't baying at the moon too much these days. I have no doubt that you're a fine lawyer but ALL you ever comment on is legal stuff, especially of it involves Trump. I can understand that to a degree but there has to be more to you than lawyering. Otherwise, you come off as a one trick pony.

However, I don't have the same dislike of lawyers that many do. One of my dearest friends practiced for 54 years, he just retired two years ago, he's 84. Three other good friends are lawyers and I am acquainted with several others. They are all decent men and none of them are democrats.

My issue with many of the threads on this forum is that they are an endless circle jerk of 'nothing but Trump God'. Ill let the circle jerkers do that. No need for me to comment on those.

Yep, I comment on the legal issues. Its rather astounding to see the caterwaul rise when actual issues are presented that dont run in agreement with "ConservativeTreehouseQuaffTheKoolAid.com".

(10-22-2024 06:59 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Any attorney I know can recall the general details of a billable meeting on the basis of the billing records.

Only exception is if it's a client you have regular contact with over a multitude of transactions or litigation.

Nathan Wade is a liar. He either submitted false billing or he is a perjurer.

General details <> specific recollection.

If I am under oath, and I cant remember exact specifics -- Im answering 'I dont specifically recall", or something like that.

Finally, the committee shouldnt ask him specifics of conversations he has. You know, the 'privilege thingy'.

He's a liar.

(10-22-2024 07:04 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 12:21 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Wade conveniently forgot whom he met with or why 58 times in his testimony.

Can you remember everyone you met with two to three years ago, the exact date, and the exact contents of those conversations?

If there is any doubt, the answer is 'I dont specifically remember'.

Criminy, I dont remember the actual detailed specifics of tangling with you on this forum, just that you and I have tangled in general. And that is probably no more than 75 days in the past.

Work related... 100% absolutely. I have a record of every meeting with minutes archived for every single one.

You would think an attorney would know that is a general requirement for anything related to your j.o.b.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I haven't deleted a business email in 20 years. I got transcripts of minutes for every meeting I was ever in as a manager at AT&T. It's a pretty common practice.

So I’m guessing L3 is defending a known lying lawyer conspirator of not knowing the answers to any questions. Even though he knew in advance he would be asked these questions.
L3 is a defender of liars. Imagine that.

(10-22-2024 09:10 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 07:04 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 12:21 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Wade conveniently forgot whom he met with or why 58 times in his testimony.

Can you remember everyone you met with two to three years ago, the exact date, and the exact contents of those conversations?

If there is any doubt, the answer is 'I dont specifically remember'.

Criminy, I dont remember the actual detailed specifics of tangling with you on this forum, just that you and I have tangled in general. And that is probably no more than 75 days in the past.

Work related... 100% absolutely. I have a record of every meeting with minutes archived for every single one.

You would think an attorney would know that is a general requirement for anything related to your j.o.b.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I haven't deleted a business email in 20 years. I got transcripts of minutes for every meeting I was ever in as a manager at AT&T. It's a pretty common practice.

So I’m guessing L3 is defending a known lying lawyer conspirator of not knowing the answers to any questions. Even though he knew in advance he would be asked these questions.
L3 is a defender of liars. Imagine that.

Im always impressed when a dude that has me on ignore cant stop talking about me. Lolz.

(10-22-2024 07:49 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 07:16 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 06:29 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:54 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Self awareness is not his strong suit.

Yeah. Our lefties really struggle with that. Not exactly sure why...?

And our MAGAs are apparently too stupid to understand what and what is not a lefty.

I'll give you this much, you seem to have collected your wits and aren't baying at the moon too much these days. I have no doubt that you're a fine lawyer but ALL you ever comment on is legal stuff, especially of it involves Trump. I can understand that to a degree but there has to be more to you than lawyering. Otherwise, you come off as a one trick pony.

However, I don't have the same dislike of lawyers that many do. One of my dearest friends practiced for 54 years, he just retired two years ago, he's 84. Three other good friends are lawyers and I am acquainted with several others. They are all decent men and none of them are democrats.

My issue with many of the threads on this forum is that they are an endless circle jerk of 'nothing but Trump God'. Ill let the circle jerkers do that. No need for me to comment on those.

Yep, I comment on the legal issues. Its rather astounding to see the caterwaul rise when actual issues are presented that dont run in agreement with "ConservativeTreehouseQuaffTheKoolAid.com".

You comment on the threads that involve the possibility of getting Trump. You post and post and post in those, with long-winded word salads, while screeching "rule of law" and "truth".

If the thread is damning toward a Dem, you don't have much to say unless we call you out and even then it's "let the legal process play out" and "innocent until proven guilty".

You are a complete phony with a terminal case of TDS. But hey, you do you.

(10-22-2024 06:59 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Any attorney I know can recall the general details of a billable meeting on the basis of the billing records.

Only exception is if it's a client you have regular contact with over a multitude of transactions or litigation.

Nathan Wade is a liar. He either submitted false billing or he is a perjurer.

Probably both.

Who did Wade work for?

(10-23-2024 10:00 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 07:49 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 07:16 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 06:29 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:54 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  Yeah. Our lefties really struggle with that. Not exactly sure why...?

And our MAGAs are apparently too stupid to understand what and what is not a lefty.

I'll give you this much, you seem to have collected your wits and aren't baying at the moon too much these days. I have no doubt that you're a fine lawyer but ALL you ever comment on is legal stuff, especially of it involves Trump. I can understand that to a degree but there has to be more to you than lawyering. Otherwise, you come off as a one trick pony.

However, I don't have the same dislike of lawyers that many do. One of my dearest friends practiced for 54 years, he just retired two years ago, he's 84. Three other good friends are lawyers and I am acquainted with several others. They are all decent men and none of them are democrats.

My issue with many of the threads on this forum is that they are an endless circle jerk of 'nothing but Trump God'. Ill let the circle jerkers do that. No need for me to comment on those.

Yep, I comment on the legal issues. Its rather astounding to see the caterwaul rise when actual issues are presented that dont run in agreement with "ConservativeTreehouseQuaffTheKoolAid.com".

You comment on the threads that involve the possibility of getting Trump. You post and post and post in those, with long-winded word salads, while screeching "rule of law" and "truth".

If the thread is damning toward a Dem, you don't have much to say unless we call you out and even then it's "let the legal process play out" and "innocent until proven guilty".

You are a complete phony with a terminal case of TDS. But hey, you do you.

^^^^ Talking about screeching. Lolz.