(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Wade conveniently forgot whom he met with or why 58 times in his testimony.

Can you remember everyone you met with two to three years ago, the exact date, and the exact contents of those conversations?

If there is any doubt, the answer is 'I dont specifically remember'.

Criminy, I dont remember the actual detailed specifics of tangling with you on this forum, just that you and I have tangled in general. And that is probably no more than 75 days in the past.

Work related... 100% absolutely. I have a record of every meeting with minutes archived for every single one.

You would think an attorney would know that is a general requirement for anything related to your j.o.b.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(10-22-2024 12:12 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(10-21-2024 02:48 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Any attorney given any of his billing records that can't recall what it was about either lied about the billing or is lying about not remembering.

even if he was out chasing ambulances at the time?....oh, heck, Orange Man Bad! That always explains everything!...

lol Yep. That's the left's and Never Trumpers' explanation for everything.

(10-22-2024 12:21 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Wade conveniently forgot whom he met with or why 58 times in his testimony.

Can you remember everyone you met with two to three years ago, the exact date, and the exact contents of those conversations?

If there is any doubt, the answer is 'I dont specifically remember'.

Criminy, I dont remember the actual detailed specifics of tangling with you on this forum, just that you and I have tangled in general. And that is probably no more than 75 days in the past.

Work related... 100% absolutely. I have a record of every meeting with minutes archived for every single one.

You would think an attorney would know that is a general requirement for anything related to your j.o.b.

Records and notes <> billing time entries. Just saying.

(10-22-2024 11:23 AM)TripleA Wrote:  And all this kerfuffle is fogging the real issue...that the special prosecutor in Georgia had several meetings with the WH counsel during the investigation. I'm sure it was only to discuss what type of coffee they liked to drink at breakfast.

pProbably not about the bolded. Aside from that you dont have a clue. It could be he was trying to get records that belong to the office of the Presidency. Could be he was seeking to interview a list of people with the WH, and needed to get the permission and go ahead from the WH counsel to do that.

There are a score of valid items that a person who is prosecuting a former President may wish to obtain.

(10-22-2024 11:00 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Wade conveniently forgot whom he met with or why 58 times in his testimony.

Can you remember everyone you met with two to three years ago, the exact date, and the exact contents of those conversations?

If there is any doubt, the answer is 'I dont specifically remember'.

Criminy, I dont remember the actual detailed specifics of tangling with you on this forum, just that you and I have tangled in general. And that is probably no more than 75 days in the past.

If you're an attorney billing for those hours, you sure as hell should have a record of it. I know you know this.

My actual record is off limits to everyone but the client and the people that work for me in the client's behalf, and share a similar duty of non-disclosure of client information.

I have zero obligation to review that for a deposition. I have zero obligation to disclose information in those records. Up until a judge tells me otherwise. Or my client waives the privilege in an explicit manner.

My comments in a billing sheet are general -- enough to convey information to the client. And general enough where I dont disclose much to outside eyes who might gain access to them.

(10-22-2024 11:50 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 11:23 AM)TripleA Wrote:  And all this kerfuffle is fogging the real issue...that the special prosecutor in Georgia had several meetings with the WH counsel during the investigation.

Tanq is good at deflecting. I give him that.

Simply pointing out baseless rhetoric, oru.

(10-22-2024 12:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 11:50 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 11:23 AM)TripleA Wrote:  And all this kerfuffle is fogging the real issue...that the special prosecutor in Georgia had several meetings with the WH counsel during the investigation.

Tanq is good at deflecting. I give him that.

Simply pointing out baseless rhetoric, oru.

Sometimes, yes.

On this topic, no. Just the facts.

4 in a row
Deep

(10-22-2024 12:51 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 11:23 AM)TripleA Wrote:  And all this kerfuffle is fogging the real issue...that the special prosecutor in Georgia had several meetings with the WH counsel during the investigation. I'm sure it was only to discuss what type of coffee they liked to drink at breakfast.

pProbably not about the bolded. Aside from that you dont have a clue. It could be he was trying to get records that belong to the office of the Presidency. Could be he was seeking to interview a list of people with the WH, and needed to get the permission and go ahead from the WH counsel to do that.

There are a score of valid items that a person who is prosecuting a former President may wish to obtain.

You didn't recognize that line as satire? Figures.

(10-22-2024 12:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 12:21 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Wade conveniently forgot whom he met with or why 58 times in his testimony.

Can you remember everyone you met with two to three years ago, the exact date, and the exact contents of those conversations?

If there is any doubt, the answer is 'I dont specifically remember'.

Criminy, I dont remember the actual detailed specifics of tangling with you on this forum, just that you and I have tangled in general. And that is probably no more than 75 days in the past.

Work related... 100% absolutely. I have a record of every meeting with minutes archived for every single one.

You would think an attorney would know that is a general requirement for anything related to your j.o.b.

Records and notes <> billing time entries. Just saying.

You asked a specific question about remembering who has been met with and what was covered 2-3 years ago.... I answered the question. It's 100%

I can go into Outlook and easily pull up each and every meeting, because it's all nicely organized. So are the records and official minutes for each meeting.

If I have a hallway or office drop in I send an email recapping the discussion so there is a follow up and purposeful record of the discussion.

This clown attorney just dudnt know anything he did and why....? Bull spit



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(10-22-2024 02:28 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 12:51 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 11:23 AM)TripleA Wrote:  And all this kerfuffle is fogging the real issue...that the special prosecutor in Georgia had several meetings with the WH counsel during the investigation. I'm sure it was only to discuss what type of coffee they liked to drink at breakfast.

pProbably not about the bolded. Aside from that you dont have a clue. It could be he was trying to get records that belong to the office of the Presidency. Could be he was seeking to interview a list of people with the WH, and needed to get the permission and go ahead from the WH counsel to do that.

There are a score of valid items that a person who is prosecuting a former President may wish to obtain.

You didn't recognize that line as satire? Figures.

I recognize it as satire. I actually believe that we both believe that the bolded isnt true. You in a whiny attempt to implicate some sort of malfeasance, and mine for more mundane reasons.

You just wasted a lot of words for nothing.

(10-22-2024 02:59 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 12:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 12:21 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 09:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Wade conveniently forgot whom he met with or why 58 times in his testimony.

Can you remember everyone you met with two to three years ago, the exact date, and the exact contents of those conversations?

If there is any doubt, the answer is 'I dont specifically remember'.

Criminy, I dont remember the actual detailed specifics of tangling with you on this forum, just that you and I have tangled in general. And that is probably no more than 75 days in the past.

Work related... 100% absolutely. I have a record of every meeting with minutes archived for every single one.

You would think an attorney would know that is a general requirement for anything related to your j.o.b.

Records and notes <> billing time entries. Just saying.

You asked a specific question about remembering who has been met with and what was covered 2-3 years ago.... I answered the question. It's 100%

I can go into Outlook and easily pull up each and every meeting, because it's all nicely organized. So are the records and official minutes for each meeting.

If I have a hallway or office drop in I send an email recapping the discussion so there is a follow up and purposeful record of the discussion.

This clown attorney just dudnt know anything he did and why....? Bull spit

I am glad you are so diligent. Most attorneys are as well. And most attorneys dont necessarily review all the background prior to being under oath. For the reasons that if there is any amount of not being absolutely, exactly positive and sure -- one can say exactly what he said.

Again, I dont remember those items off the top of my head. I can review notes and records to bring it back up. If I was to be deposed, or put under oath for questions -- when I dont review them to jigger that back into place, I can see 'I dont specifically recall.'

Glad you equate 'keeping records' with 'actual on the spot instant recollection.' But please, keep complaining and whining.

(10-22-2024 03:16 PM)TripleA Wrote:  You just wasted a lot of words for nothing.

Much like you wasted your whiny empty rhetoric. Cool cool.

Did you really just tell someone to keep complaining and whining?

I see oru has a new stick up his ass today. Arent we lucky.

(10-22-2024 03:22 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I see oru has a new stick up his ass today. Arent we lucky.

Nah. No stick. Just funny that you tell people to not do the exact thing YOU do.

(10-22-2024 03:19 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 02:59 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 12:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 12:21 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 10:44 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Can you remember everyone you met with two to three years ago, the exact date, and the exact contents of those conversations?

If there is any doubt, the answer is 'I dont specifically remember'.

Criminy, I dont remember the actual detailed specifics of tangling with you on this forum, just that you and I have tangled in general. And that is probably no more than 75 days in the past.

Work related... 100% absolutely. I have a record of every meeting with minutes archived for every single one.

You would think an attorney would know that is a general requirement for anything related to your j.o.b.

Records and notes <> billing time entries. Just saying.

You asked a specific question about remembering who has been met with and what was covered 2-3 years ago.... I answered the question. It's 100%

I can go into Outlook and easily pull up each and every meeting, because it's all nicely organized. So are the records and official minutes for each meeting.

If I have a hallway or office drop in I send an email recapping the discussion so there is a follow up and purposeful record of the discussion.

This clown attorney just dudnt know anything he did and why....? Bull spit

I am glad you are so diligent. Most attorneys are as well. And most attorneys dont necessarily review all the background prior to being under oath. For the reasons that if there is any amount of not being absolutely, exactly positive and sure -- one can say exactly what he said.

Again, I dont remember those items off the top of my head. I can review notes and records to bring it back up. If I was to be deposed, or put under oath for questions -- when I dont review them to jigger that back into place, I can see 'I dont specifically recall.'

Glad you equate 'keeping records' with 'actual on the spot instant recollection.' But please, keep complaining and whining.

Ok, so if you can't recall anything but have record of it, we will just subpoena all of your work and personal communications and records.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(10-22-2024 03:23 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:22 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I see oru has a new stick up his ass today. Arent we lucky.

Nah. No stick. Just funny that you tell people to not do the exact thing YOU do.

Self awareness is not his strong suit.

(10-22-2024 03:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:23 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-22-2024 03:22 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I see oru has a new stick up his ass today. Arent we lucky.

Nah. No stick. Just funny that you tell people to not do the exact thing YOU do.

Self awareness is not his strong suit.

Yeah. Our lefties really struggle with that. Not exactly sure why...?