If we are being honest, there’s not real enthusiasm for Kamala. The media, celebs, and Blue checkmarks are getting their orders to fabricate enthusiasm. “Be as loud as you can, so we can go forward with the steal again”

If they can get the margin of error close enough in the polls. Expect a repeat of 2020. They’ll run heavy dem lean polls to make it look like a close race.

(07-27-2024 08:01 PM)UABFAN23 Wrote:  If we are being honest, there’s not real enthusiasm for Kamala.

Disagree, sort of. I’d say there is some real enthusiasm, but it’s from the same people who always vote “Blue No Matter Who.” She does not add anyone to the Dems’ coalition at all, and may actually shrink it by a few points

Quote:“Be as loud as you can, so we can go forward with the steal again”

If they can get the margin of error close enough in the polls. Expect a repeat of 2020.

I’m not naïve about this. But at least for now, I don’t think they’re going to be able to run the same scam as last time. I think the circumstances are just too different.

(07-27-2024 08:09 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(07-27-2024 08:01 PM)UABFAN23 Wrote:  If we are being honest, there’s not real enthusiasm for Kamala.

Disagree, sort of. I’d say there is some real enthusiasm, but it’s from the same people who always vote “Blue No Matter Who.” She does not add anyone to the Dems’ coalition at all, and may actually shrink it by a few points

Quote:“Be as loud as you can, so we can go forward with the steal again”

If they can get the margin of error close enough in the polls. Expect a repeat of 2020.

I’m not naïve about this. But at least for now, I don’t think they’re going to be able to run the same scam as last time. I think the circumstances are just too different.

These folks are lower than scum. Now you’ve got a candidate who most poll workers identify with. They’ll cheat for her. They did it in Fulton County. I’m in a white neighborhood. All of the poll workers at my polling station are black women. From what I’ve seen on X and Tik Tok, these women don’t just want to be heard, they want to be the only voice in the room. There’s nobody more conniving in our country than a liberal woman. White, black, or brown.

(07-27-2024 07:59 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I think it will be Kelly, but who knows? Good thing he's not stuck in a capsule up in space.

Until about 10-12 days ago, I don’t think I had ever heard Mark Kelly’s name mentioned by any of my Prog/Left contacts.

And then suddenly, all of them were suddenly talking about him. So, this chatter online is clearly being coordinated somewhere. I admit he has a vaguely non-political, or at least non-partisan, image. As the husband of a woman who was the victim of an assassination attempt, he would have some moral authority to confront the events at Butler 2 weeks ago. But he has about as much charisma as Liz Cheney or Mitch McConnell.

(07-27-2024 08:21 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(07-27-2024 07:59 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I think it will be Kelly, but who knows? Good thing he's not stuck in a capsule up in space.

Until about 10-12 days ago, I don’t think I had ever heard Mark Kelly’s name mentioned by any of my Prog/Left contacts.

And then suddenly, all of them were suddenly talking about him. So, this chatter online is clearly being coordinated somewhere. I admit he has a vaguely non-political, or at least non-partisan, image. As the husband of a woman who was the victim of an assassination attempt, he would have some moral authority to confront the events at Butler 2 weeks ago. But he has about as much charisma as Liz Cheney or Mitch McConnell.

Right now, Trump is leading in Arizona. Kelly could flip that.

(07-27-2024 08:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Right now, Trump is leading in Arizona. Kelly could flip that.

Maybe, maybe not.

But either way, Arizona is just one of the Dems’ problems.

(07-27-2024 08:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(07-27-2024 08:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Right now, Trump is leading in Arizona. Kelly could flip that.

Maybe, maybe not.

But either way, Arizona is just one of the Dems’ problems.

Sure, I'm just saying why she could pick Kelly.

(07-27-2024 08:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(07-27-2024 08:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(07-27-2024 08:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Right now, Trump is leading in Arizona. Kelly could flip that.

Maybe, maybe not.

But either way, Arizona is just one of the Dems’ problems.

Sure, I'm just saying why she could pick Kelly.

Agreed.

(07-27-2024 08:18 PM)UABFAN23 Wrote:  

(07-27-2024 08:09 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(07-27-2024 08:01 PM)UABFAN23 Wrote:  If we are being honest, there’s not real enthusiasm for Kamala.

Disagree, sort of. I’d say there is some real enthusiasm, but it’s from the same people who always vote “Blue No Matter Who.” She does not add anyone to the Dems’ coalition at all, and may actually shrink it by a few points

Quote:“Be as loud as you can, so we can go forward with the steal again”

If they can get the margin of error close enough in the polls. Expect a repeat of 2020.

I’m not naïve about this. But at least for now, I don’t think they’re going to be able to run the same scam as last time. I think the circumstances are just too different.

These folks are lower than scum. Now you’ve got a candidate who most poll workers identify with. They’ll cheat for her. They did it in Fulton County. I’m in a white neighborhood. All of the poll workers at my polling station are black women. From what I’ve seen on X and Tik Tok, these women don’t just want to be heard, they want to be the only voice in the room. There’s nobody more conniving in our country than a liberal woman. White, black, or brown.

Our dear friend shere _khan, or SK for short, has a term for those sort of people: prog filth.

She hasn’t answered a question yet. The word salad is coming and they won’t be able to hide it. She’s not an ideologue either. She’s not socialist or communist. I’m sure she could not explain what either was. She’s just stupid like millions of Americans who believe they can get something for nothing.
I have faith this will blow up in the democrats face.

(07-27-2024 08:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(07-27-2024 08:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(07-27-2024 08:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Right now, Trump is leading in Arizona. Kelly could flip that.

Maybe, maybe not.

But either way, Arizona is just one of the Dems’ problems.

Sure, I'm just saying why she could pick Kelly.

Kelly is the smart pick but that doesn't always happen.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

People are thinking too strategically. I wouldn't be surprised if they picked someone from IL or NY. This is the Democrats we're talking about. They probably think they're ahead in the swing states by 15.

I hope she picks Newscum. Frees California and kills two careers in one election.

(07-28-2024 12:04 AM)Bronco14 Wrote:  People are thinking too strategically. I wouldn't be surprised if they picked someone from IL or NY. This is the Democrats we're talking about. They probably think they're ahead in the swing states by 15.

If Harris were making the decision alone, yes.

But since she’s not…

Not sure exactly who it will be, but I do expect it to be one of the 3 or 4 names that’s been mentioned over and over. I don’t think this will be a surprise.

Quote:(Reuters) -Vice President Kamala Harris cast herself as an "underdog" in the presidential race against Donald Trump on Saturday, despite polls showing the rivals in a virtual tie ...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...ngNewsSerp

she's in a heap of trouble ...
staring at an oncoming freight train ...
loath to give advice ...
shake it up ...

YOU MIGHT WANNA

(07-28-2024 05:56 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(07-28-2024 12:04 AM)Bronco14 Wrote:  People are thinking too strategically. I wouldn't be surprised if they picked someone from IL or NY. This is the Democrats we're talking about. They probably think they're ahead in the swing states by 15.

If Harris were making the decision alone, yes.

But since she’s not…

Not sure exactly who it will be, but I do expect it to be one of the 3 or 4 names that’s been mentioned over and over. I don’t think this will be a surprise.

Fox reported yesterday they were down to 3: Kelly, Shapiro or Walz.

(07-28-2024 07:49 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(07-28-2024 05:56 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Not sure exactly who it will be, but I do expect it to be one of the 3 or 4 names that’s been mentioned over and over. I don’t think this will be a surprise.

Fox reported yesterday they were down to 3: Kelly, Shapiro or Walz.

I think that’s about right. I would add Roy Cooper to that list, and say that Shapiro is by far the least likely of the 4.

(07-28-2024 09:03 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(07-28-2024 07:49 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(07-28-2024 05:56 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Not sure exactly who it will be, but I do expect it to be one of the 3 or 4 names that’s been mentioned over and over. I don’t think this will be a surprise.

Fox reported yesterday they were down to 3: Kelly, Shapiro or Walz.

I think that’s about right. I would add Roy Cooper to that list, and say that Shapiro is by far the least likely of the 4.

FWIW, Fox is saying Cooper is out.

(07-28-2024 09:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(07-28-2024 09:03 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(07-28-2024 07:49 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(07-28-2024 05:56 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Not sure exactly who it will be, but I do expect it to be one of the 3 or 4 names that’s been mentioned over and over. I don’t think this will be a surprise.

Fox reported yesterday they were down to 3: Kelly, Shapiro or Walz.

I think that’s about right. I would add Roy Cooper to that list, and say that Shapiro is by far the least likely of the 4.

FWIW, Fox is saying Cooper is out.

I think he’s still being considered. But I think it will honestly boil down to Kelly or Walz. Those 2, I believe, each has about a 40-50% chance. Everyone else combined has a 10% chance.

(07-27-2024 08:09 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(07-27-2024 08:01 PM)UABFAN23 Wrote:  If we are being honest, there’s not real enthusiasm for Kamala.

Disagree, sort of. I’d say there is some real enthusiasm, but it’s from the same people who always vote “Blue No Matter Who.” She does not add anyone to the Dems’ coalition at all, and may actually shrink it by a few points

Quote:“Be as loud as you can, so we can go forward with the steal again”

If they can get the margin of error close enough in the polls. Expect a repeat of 2020.

I’m not naïve about this. But at least for now, I don’t think they’re going to be able to run the same scam as last time. I think the circumstances are just too different.

Georgia isn't going to allow it. The Republicans will have a bunch of poll watches in Phoenix, Las Vegas, Wisconsin, Detroit and Philadelphia. In any event, NC, GA, AZ and NV look like they will be to big a Trump margin for shenanigans.