(06-17-2023 07:31 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Do some of you just not realize how mentally ill your TDS makes you look?

Damn it man, I was just going to say something about that.

(06-18-2023 04:32 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-17-2023 10:12 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(06-17-2023 08:36 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-17-2023 07:54 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(06-17-2023 07:44 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Well I tried to explain it had nothing to do with him but I guess you missed that part.

They just don't get that. They can't get it apparently. EVERYTHING is about him.

Speaking as another who from time to time has had a few unpleasant things to say about Donald Trump, you have my promise that I will stop doing so the moment he removes his bloated presence from seeking an office for which he is completely unfit to serve.

I’m not fully on board with all of Ee’s list of charges (I thought Bill Barr did a first-rate job as AG, and couldn’t give a rip about Trump’s geography ignorance), but Ee has otherwise offered a pretty thorough listing of why Donald should just do the sensible thing and stand down.

Of course, sensible and Donald are two words that do not belong in the same sentence.

And, because I know that there is a Trumplet out there dying to put words in my mouth, this stated opinion has NOTHING to do with the illegitimate indictment. I hope that Donald fights it to the end, and has the prosecutors disbarred and the Garland/Wray political machine destroyed. It has everything to do with Donald’s hellbent mission to force upon the country his own self-created mess.

The anger is strong in this one. How does it go? Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
Just make sure if you are going to suffer you do it hating the right things.

It’s possible. They say that others know us better than we know ourselves.

In any event, Happy Father’s Day. I’m off to Philadelphia to pay a visit to my 98-year-old dad.

I pray that he is in good shape for his age. You are blessed beyond words to still have your dad with you. Yesterday was tough for me. It seems that with each passing year I miss my old man more and need his guidance and wisdom more, failing of course to acquire my own.

(06-18-2023 08:00 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 07:35 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  There’s no wisdom like road wisdom. (Posted from the Royal Farms in Dagsboro, DE.)

Screw this place, focus on the road and what precious time left you have with your dad.

Stop wasting thought and energy here for a few days. You can pick back up any useless arguments over Donald Trump and politics next week.

Do yourself a solid and do not even click on this site or a single thread until Fathers day is over and you are back home. Don't waste even a seconds thought on anything here until then. What is said here on politics is meaningless in the end, it does no one any good but serving their own ego and pride. Meanwhile the time, love and experiences with your father are priceless.

God Bless

(06-18-2023 01:36 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 01:30 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 12:32 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Exactly. We have no clue who is in control of "The Football", now.

The fact that Biden is terrible is in no way a defense of Trump's shortcomings.

Biden is terrible is independent from Trump being terrible.

I hope neither of them assumes office in 2025.

I second that. If Trump is the nominee, I'm not voting.

Then move your ass on out of here, we don't need you. Go find somewhere they don't mind that ALL you do with each word you write is whine and cry. Booooofuqnhoo. Grow a damn pair.

(06-18-2023 03:42 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 01:36 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 01:30 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 12:32 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Exactly. We have no clue who is in control of "The Football", now.

The fact that Biden is terrible is in no way a defense of Trump's shortcomings.

Biden is terrible is independent from Trump being terrible.

I hope neither of them assumes office in 2025.

I second that. If Trump is the nominee, I'm not voting.

And there you have it. Republican or conservatives take the suicide pill. You think any democrats said if Fedderman or Biden is the nominee I’m not voting? Do not be stupid.

Oops, too late.

(06-18-2023 06:34 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  We're in the primary and all people can discuss is it's Trump or some lefty. Nah republicans have a chance to nominate someone who isn't a habitual liar, someone who hasn't made such terrible pics for positions. Someone who hasn't expanded the debt more than Obama did.

Not to mention none of the Trumpers here ever get their panties in a wad when people say they would only vote for Trump. It's only the other way.

Name one, you can't. But go ahead, name them and watch how fast they're shot down.

Jaysus, you Trump haters have no backbone at all. You would allow the democrats to continue on with another 4 years of their destructive policies just because you bought into the mass hysteria the MSM ginned up over the one man in my lifetime who made ALL of our lives better. Almost every damn metric used to judge the success or failure of a presidential administration was exceeded by Trump yet idiots like you would sit on your hands and watch as the left wins another 4 years just so you can say you didn't vote for a man whose personality made you cry. Weak sauce. Grow a pair.

(06-18-2023 06:59 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 06:41 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 06:34 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  We're in the primary and all people can discuss is it's Trump or some lefty. Nah republicans have a chance to nominate someone who isn't a habitual liar, someone who hasn't made such terrible pics for positions. Someone who hasn't expanded the debt more than Obama did.

Not to mention none of the Trumpers here ever get their panties in a wad when people say they would only vote for Trump. It's only the other way.

Reeeeeeee

Here come the ronbots with the concern posts.

FFS just dont vote for prog filth. You have two choices.

The primary will take care of itself. You arent gonna sway anyone here

That post applies directly to you. As much as much as you will say it only comes to two choices I never see you post a comment when someone says they will never vote for anyone, but Trump. None of the Trumpers did. It's only people you even think might be anyone, but Trump.

Here it is again. Here is yet another fool who bought into the mass hypnosis spread by the MSM. I have yet to see a person here claim they would never vote for anyone but Trump. Most here dislike his personality but, and this applies to musicians more than Trump, I have tried over the years as my musical favorites have descended into the madness that is liberalism to separate the art from the artist. I am able to separate his personality from his performance.

Show me a better candidate and I would gladly vote for them but so far none has announced their presence.

(06-18-2023 07:25 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 03:44 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 04:28 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-17-2023 08:55 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  So you'd rather have a pos Democrat as President AM?

No. But I prefer to have a non-p.o.s. Democrat, if we are put to that choice.

Edit (from the Royal Farms rest stop in Ardmore, VA):

I answered your question poorly, Bartlett. My own preferences are meaningless. What matters is who can beat the pos Democrat in 2024. It’s not Donald Trump. He will find some way to lose disgracefully.

So the question goes back to you, since you are white-knighting for Trump on at least this particular thread: would you rather have a pos Democrat as president? If not, you may want to think about being a bit more vocal on your concerns (which I know you have) about Donald’s many serious shortcomings.

A better question is: which demon currently in the news that may run is a better fit than any of the ones that are currently in power or want that power? Can you name one who has common sense and looks out for the country instead of him/herself and/or party?

Honestly, the only one, so far, is RFK and he ain't getting no presidency. The media and the Demoncraptic Party are seeing to that. I still wouldn't vote for him myself as I haven't actually seen anything that he has done in his life to warrant the WH, except being a descendant of past Demoncrap office holders.

Tulsi Gabbard, Joe Manchin, John Delaney, Harold Ford, Sherrod Brown, Andrew Yang and of course RFK, Jr. I don’t think that ANY of them have a chance of being the 2024 Democrat nominee. That party is way too far around the insanity bend. But I would be open to voting for any of them over Donald Trump.

And now, ollie, why is your question better than mine? Is defending the precious honor of Donald Trump more important to you than keeping a pos Democrat out of the White House in this upcoming election? That’s the question that was posed and that’s very much what’s at stake.

I answered your silly question. You got an answer to mine, or is this yet another one-way Trumplet conversation?

One name that stands out because of his connections to Memphis political power is Harold Ford, JR. You must not be aware of his family history or his own checkered past. The one thing he has that his father and uncle lacked is eloquence and an ability to thoughtfully articulate himself. Don't be fooled by pretty sounds.

(06-18-2023 07:31 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 06:34 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  We're in the primary and all people can discuss is it's Trump or some lefty. Nah republicans have a chance to nominate someone who isn't a habitual liar, someone who hasn't made such terrible pics for positions. Someone who hasn't expanded the debt more than Obama did.

Not to mention none of the Trumpers here ever get their panties in a wad when people say they would only vote for Trump. It's only the other way.

I have not heard a single person say they would only vote for Trump. You heard what you wanted to hear like a lot of never Trumpers.

Same here.

(06-18-2023 10:02 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 09:40 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 08:50 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 07:31 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 06:34 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  We're in the primary and all people can discuss is it's Trump or some lefty. Nah republicans have a chance to nominate someone who isn't a habitual liar, someone who hasn't made such terrible pics for positions. Someone who hasn't expanded the debt more than Obama did.

Not to mention none of the Trumpers here ever get their panties in a wad when people say they would only vote for Trump. It's only the other way.

I have not heard a single person say they would only vote for Trump. You heard what you wanted to hear like a lot of never Trumpers.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-969123-page-1.html There's several in this thread. One who called DeSantis the enemy. One who said they couldn't see themselves voting for Desantis if he got the nod. They are both firm Trump supporters. It should be pretty familiar since you had several posts in that thread.

There was no posts talking about how it's either vote for the Republican nominee or it's a vote for the leftists from those who make such a big deal about on posts criticizing Trump.

In other threads where Trump supporters criticize Desantis. I don't see people saying that means they pretty much support a Biden win. It's only when you criticize Trump that people assume you will never vote for him. Because any tough criticisms of Trump somehow equates to a vote for Biden for some people.

I could find plenty of more posts if I spent hours crawling through threads. Because I have definitely seen plenty. That's certainly longer than I want to spend on this though. I just remember these specifically because I made that thread.

I have said and will repeat here that I will (if all remains the same) vote for Trump in the primary. He has been there. Knows the bad actors. Is the most hated republican candidate by the corrupt left. Has a base of new blood to put in positions where things can begin to be cleaned up. We have a solid bench of young republicans to appoint as a running mate if Trump wins the nomination. If he doesn’t I’ll vote for whoever the republican nominee is. I’ll hold my nose and vomit in my mouth if I have to vote for Christi or Hutchinson though. I’m pretty sure that has no chance of happening though.

Hate Trump all y’all want. Call those who will vote for him what you want. Lie that he got nothing done. Lie that he put no one good in positions in his administration. Lie he is a grifter all you want. Complain loudly that he never did the right things. But in the end you are helping the enemy. The side that never complains about their brain dead nominee. The side that will vote for anyone with the D by their names regardless of competence or moral integrity. Only republicans are willing to gladly lose because our nominee isn’t perfect. Only republicans argue that they will not vote for a republican nominee because it’s not their choice.

With this thinking we will get exactly what we deserve. Defeat.

He did a really bad job of identifying the bad actors the first time.

He appointed a lot of bad people. Sessions was a disaster. Tillerson was awful. He couldn't work with Trump as he had every bit as big an ego. Perry was an idiot. DeVos was an idiot. Christopher Wray was a big mistake, especially considering Trump already had experience with Comey.

Good Lord, he was a novice. He did what any good businessman does, he relies on those who are supposed to know. That he made some bad choices shouldn't be an indictment against his whole term.

All of us here, probably to a person, has no clue what it's like to newly occupy such a position or how we would handle such adversity ourselves. I daresay the average person would just pack it in and go home after a month or two of brown poo hitting you in the face 24/7.

(06-19-2023 06:17 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 04:32 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-17-2023 10:12 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(06-17-2023 08:36 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-17-2023 07:54 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  They just don't get that. They can't get it apparently. EVERYTHING is about him.

Speaking as another who from time to time has had a few unpleasant things to say about Donald Trump, you have my promise that I will stop doing so the moment he removes his bloated presence from seeking an office for which he is completely unfit to serve.

I’m not fully on board with all of Ee’s list of charges (I thought Bill Barr did a first-rate job as AG, and couldn’t give a rip about Trump’s geography ignorance), but Ee has otherwise offered a pretty thorough listing of why Donald should just do the sensible thing and stand down.

Of course, sensible and Donald are two words that do not belong in the same sentence.

And, because I know that there is a Trumplet out there dying to put words in my mouth, this stated opinion has NOTHING to do with the illegitimate indictment. I hope that Donald fights it to the end, and has the prosecutors disbarred and the Garland/Wray political machine destroyed. It has everything to do with Donald’s hellbent mission to force upon the country his own self-created mess.

The anger is strong in this one. How does it go? Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
Just make sure if you are going to suffer you do it hating the right things.

It’s possible. They say that others know us better than we know ourselves.

In any event, Happy Father’s Day. I’m off to Philadelphia to pay a visit to my 98-year-old dad.

I pray that he is in good shape for his age. You are blessed beyond words to still have your dad with you. Yesterday was tough for me. It seems that with each passing year I miss my old man more and need his guidance and wisdom more, failing of course to acquire my own.

Thanks to you, eric and others for your thoughtful comments. Dad is doing well for his age - - and very content with where he is in life.

The lump in my throat when I see him failing is tempered by the knowledge that he is a most ordinary man who was given an extraordinary life thanks to the greatness of this nation.

A son of immigrants who escaped the genocidal Turks, my dad grew up dirt poor in a tenement in the Washington Heights neighborhood of Manhattan. He would have been condemned to remain in that status in pretty much any other country. But not in America, which enabled him to attend college and graduate school on the GI Bill, and thereafter to make a very good life for himself and his family.

God Bless America.

(06-19-2023 06:29 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 06:34 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  We're in the primary and all people can discuss is it's Trump or some lefty. Nah republicans have a chance to nominate someone who isn't a habitual liar, someone who hasn't made such terrible pics for positions. Someone who hasn't expanded the debt more than Obama did.

Not to mention none of the Trumpers here ever get their panties in a wad when people say they would only vote for Trump. It's only the other way.

Name one, you can't. But go ahead, name them and watch how fast they're shot down.

Jaysus, you Trump haters have no backbone at all. You would allow the democrats to continue on with another 4 years of their destructive policies just because you bought into the mass hysteria the MSM ginned up over the one man in my lifetime who made ALL of our lives better. Almost every damn metric used to judge the success or failure of a presidential administration was exceeded by Trump yet idiots like you would sit on your hands and watch as the left wins another 4 years just so you can say you didn't vote for a man whose personality made you cry. Weak sauce. Grow a pair.

Close thread well said.

Orange man bad. I wont vote for him even if it kills me.

Reeeeeeeeeee

(06-19-2023 06:37 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 07:25 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 03:44 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 04:28 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-17-2023 08:55 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  So you'd rather have a pos Democrat as President AM?

No. But I prefer to have a non-p.o.s. Democrat, if we are put to that choice.

Edit (from the Royal Farms rest stop in Ardmore, VA):

I answered your question poorly, Bartlett. My own preferences are meaningless. What matters is who can beat the pos Democrat in 2024. It’s not Donald Trump. He will find some way to lose disgracefully.

So the question goes back to you, since you are white-knighting for Trump on at least this particular thread: would you rather have a pos Democrat as president? If not, you may want to think about being a bit more vocal on your concerns (which I know you have) about Donald’s many serious shortcomings.

A better question is: which demon currently in the news that may run is a better fit than any of the ones that are currently in power or want that power? Can you name one who has common sense and looks out for the country instead of him/herself and/or party?

Honestly, the only one, so far, is RFK and he ain't getting no presidency. The media and the Demoncraptic Party are seeing to that. I still wouldn't vote for him myself as I haven't actually seen anything that he has done in his life to warrant the WH, except being a descendant of past Demoncrap office holders.

Tulsi Gabbard, Joe Manchin, John Delaney, Harold Ford, Sherrod Brown, Andrew Yang and of course RFK, Jr. I don’t think that ANY of them have a chance of being the 2024 Democrat nominee. That party is way too far around the insanity bend. But I would be open to voting for any of them over Donald Trump.

And now, ollie, why is your question better than mine? Is defending the precious honor of Donald Trump more important to you than keeping a pos Democrat out of the White House in this upcoming election? That’s the question that was posed and that’s very much what’s at stake.

I answered your silly question. You got an answer to mine, or is this yet another one-way Trumplet conversation?

One name that stands out because of his connections to Memphis political power is Harold Ford, JR. You must not be aware of his family history or his own checkered past. The one thing he has that his father and uncle lacked is eloquence and an ability to thoughtfully articulate himself. Don't be fooled by pretty sounds.

Pure filth. Generational filth. One of those tards nearly killed me on the interstate years ago going about 100 miles an hour. Entitled low iq memphis tard royalty.

(06-18-2023 04:28 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  No. But I prefer to have a non-p.o.s. Democrat, if we are put to that choice.

There is no democrat that I would prefer to Donald Trump. Mainly because I don't believe there is any such thing as a non-p.o.s. democrat.

My problem with Trump is very simple. As long as he remains a viable candidate, I don't think republicans can win with him, and I don't think republicans can win without him. And I think 4 more years of Biden or any other democrat will be disastrous.

The best outcomes that I can see are either:
1) Democrats succeed in martyring Trump prior to 2024. I don's see that happening.
2) The economy goes so far in the tank before November 2024 that no democrat is electable.

I don't want 2), but at this point it may be the only way to save our democratic republic.

(06-18-2023 11:05 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 10:06 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 09:49 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 09:29 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 08:50 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  Because any tough criticisms of Trump somehow equates to a vote for Biden for some people.

Any tough criticisms spark the equivalent of a maddened African killer bee swarm. Lol.

Except the African Killer Bees dont scream 'whadabout' nearly as loud.

You just don’t get it. Never will.

Criticize him all you want. AM does it constantly. But at least he gets it. You on the other hand buy into the corrupt DOJFBI cabal. That’s a totally different argument. Beat Trump in the primary or the general. Not with the club of the mighty DOJFBI by a corrupt president who is highly compromised and his highly partisan SCOTUS jilted AG.

Buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz.... I still want to know how anyone can consider a Top Secret document concerning US nuclear stances as "my document". You know, that question you so astutely avoid answering.

The interesting thing is the filter going on over there -- anything positive of Trump is 'gung ho head to the hills'. Anything negative is 'lies'.

You astutely avoid facts in that manner.

All you can say about anything factual in the MAL matter is 'you dont read that chit.'

So please stop with the holier than thou 'mighty DOJFBI' crap. I would prefer you deal with factual issues as opposed to veneer thin rhetorical garbage.

Oh, and I would prefer you maybe once or twice simply decide to converse by something more than butthurt name calling.

My position is simple as well. There are really no Dems I will vote for. I will vote for just about any Repub. Excepting Trump.

Just taking MAL for an example --

a) the first option is that the stated facts, or some good proportion in the indictment are true. In that case Trump is just exposing his common crook streak. And I will not vote for that.

b) given that Trump actively hid the documents, and lied to the investigators about the documents -- assume that wasnt ill intent. If not ill intent, it is the mark of a really stupid as fk person. In that case, instead of the off ramp of turning the docs over and letting the issue go its own way -- Trump handed the DOJ / FBI exactly the tool they needed to throw the book at him. Someone that irresponsible shouldnt be elected dog catcher, let alone re-elected President.

Thats just MAL. Wash rinse and repeat for 4 or 5 somewhat major issues that are ongoing, and may very well germinate soon.

At best, a walking incompetent train wreck, who blunders into vanity driven fk up to vanity driven fk up. At worst, a conniving dishonest huckster.

Not a great choice in my book.

Maybe reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Not a flame but just an observation.

Now to answer your probing question for the last time.

——-YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE DOCUMENT IS OR EVEN IF THERE IS ACTUALLY A DOCUMENT AT ALL——-

I will assume that the statement made under penalty of perjury in the charging document is not a lie.

Quote:That’s as clear as I can make it.

The standard is now "I may only make a statement if I have seen the base material with my own eyes"? Seriously? This is going to be fun....


But you can’t. The “facts” you have are lines in a government indictment made by a demonstrably corrupt agency against the leading candidate of the opposing party.

The same cabal who lied on multiple FISA warrants to spy on this same person.

The same guy who just happens to know where a lot of bodies are buried and has promised to not miss the target this time.

Yet you blindly follow because you are so angered and hateful you see no wrong doing in getting rid of Trump anyway possible.
[/quote]

Funny the bolded are your own 'leaping without knowing the base facts for sure'. You know, the same stuff you *just* went whiny on me.

I guess it is perfectly okay for you to make up complete unsupported comments out of thin air, and interestingly feel the need to unceasingly dodge a question because 'I havent (or you havent) seen it;', even though it is made under oath.

Wow, what an utterly amazing exhibition of complete hypocrisy -- and embodied in one post.

Well, dude, since I 'see no wrong in getting rid of Trump anyway possible', I guess you are either clueless that I: a) supported Trump during Russiagate, mainly because a lack of tangible facts; b) supported Trump during the Ukraine impeachment, since there really didnt seem to be a 'high crime or midemeanor; and c) have come out that the Bragg indictment is a stretch I cant support.

But, doesnt keep you from mouthing your gibberish above.

Amazing that.

Please keep avoiding the question posed. Yo are a seemingly fing pro at that based on that constant avoidance. Lolz.

Go back to the spigot to slurp up more of your made up crap, and whines. It is so becoming.

(06-19-2023 06:22 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 01:36 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 01:30 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 12:32 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Exactly. We have no clue who is in control of "The Football", now.

The fact that Biden is terrible is in no way a defense of Trump's shortcomings.

Biden is terrible is independent from Trump being terrible.

I hope neither of them assumes office in 2025.

I second that. If Trump is the nominee, I'm not voting.

Then move your ass on out of here, we don't need you. Go find somewhere they don't mind that ALL you do with each word you write is whine and cry. Booooofuqnhoo. Grow a damn pair.

The typical response when the demigod is attacked. Brilliant. Lolz.

The froth and spittle is pretty cool......

Keep barking like a dog and you might tree a coon.

(06-19-2023 08:53 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(06-18-2023 04:28 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  No. But I prefer to have a non-p.o.s. Democrat, if we are put to that choice.

There is no democrat that I would prefer to Donald Trump. Mainly because I don't believe there is any such thing as a non-p.o.s. democrat.

My problem with Trump is very simple. As long as he remains a viable candidate, I don't think republicans can win with him, and I don't think republicans can win without him. And I think 4 more years of Biden or any other democrat will be disastrous.

The best outcomes that I can see are either:
1) Democrats succeed in martyring Trump prior to 2024. I don's see that happening.
2) The economy goes so far in the tank before November 2024 that no democrat is electable.

I don't want 2), but at this point it may be the only way to save our democratic republic.

IMO, it’s tough to argue against the latter at this point in the ‘ginned rummy’ game … again, I hope I’m wrong…

(06-19-2023 10:02 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Keep barking like a dog and you might tree a coon.

Apropos comment coming from the guy running from answering a single question like a vampire seeing a cross. Lolz.

*Opens thread, reads a few comments.. SOSDD, steps away*