Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
Author Message
GoodOwl Offline
The 1 Hoo Knocks
*

Posts: 29,300
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 4915
I Root For: New Horizons
Location: Planiverse
Post: #641
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 07:02 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  "1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant....


©Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the prosecution—
(1)of any person for conduct relating to an abortion for which the consent of the pregnant woman, or a person authorized by law to act on her behalf, has been obtained or for which such consent is implied by law;

(2)of any person for any medical treatment of the pregnant woman or her unborn child; or
(3)of any woman with respect to her unborn child.
(d)In this section, the term “unborn child” means a child in utero, and the term “child in utero” or “child, who is in utero” means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.
(Added Pub. L. 108–212, § 3(a), Apr. 1, 2004, 118 Stat. 569; amended Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, § 5401(13)(B), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2939; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, § 1081©(1)(N), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1598.)"


I do think that eventually, these statutes will see their challenge in court also, be revisted and re-written as time goes on, and less and less children will be willfully murderd until one day there are none murdered at all; in the meantime, rejoice that at least some more baies will be saved and get to live a life that so many would selfishly take away from them with no recourse. Life--it sure beats the alternative!
06-26-2022 11:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HCJag Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,679
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 78
I Root For: South Alabama
Location: Mobile, AL
Post: #642
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 10:01 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 09:55 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 06:34 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 06:14 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  I can’t believe some of the things I’ve read in this thread. It’s one thing to debate views of the Left or the Right, the debate in this thread is crazy.

The decision does nothing but send the responsibility of abortion legality back to the states. I can’t tell if the comments about having to leave the country for an abortion are sincere or if it’s just trolling.
If your state has laws making abortion legal, nothing has changed.

In states with trigger laws the decision automatically made abortion illegal in some states and further regulated it in others. If you live in one of those states, you have two choices: travel to a state where the procedure is still legal or work to take control of the state legislature in your state to change abortion laws.

As a Christian living in Kentucky I’m glad it was made illegal. Now if we could just get rid of the death penalty, I would be even happier.

My opinion: you can’t be Pro-Life and Pro-Death Penalty. Differ sides of the same coin.

No it isn't. The unborn are innocent. They will sin, but haven't. Murderers and rapists have judged themselves by action. There are 3 words in Hebrew which mean to kill. One is in defense of family, self, or nation. One is in execution. The third is in murder and manslaughter. The 10 commandments "Thou shalt not kill" only used the third word. Thou shalt not murder, or through willful negligence cause the death of another. Defense and execution were not in the prohibition. Stopping murderers is preserving life. Stopping rapists is preserving the sanctity of life. In order to uphold life we must first be willing to defend it. Capital punishment is not the opposite of sanctity of life, it is the upholding of it!

JR, I agree with Jim about the death penalty. I don’t believe Government should execute it’s citizens. That being said I have no problem with labor camps and prison self sufficiency and if inmates don’t work they don’t eat. I do not like the idea of using tax dollars in effect punishing law abiding citizens to fund inmates. Remember Cain was not executed by ostracized.

Now comparing the number of death penalty executions to the number of abortions annually is ludicrous.

But, if it’s life and death to defend yourself desperate times call for desperate measures and you have every right to defend yourself even if it means having to kill someone. Hopefully no one will ever be put in this situation.

Vengeance is mine says our Father.


I would have to side with JR on this. There are some cases where the death penalty should be avaible, the death penalty was certainly a thing under the OT law.

I don't think we can suggest its ungodly if it was a part of God's law in the OT.

I don't think it should be used very often, but premeditated mass murder? Yeah, it should be at least an option. A rare one to be sure, but at least an option.

The only problem I have with the DP is knowing there have been some innocents that have gone to death row. I'm not sure how I would cope if I had been on those juries. There would have to be zero doubt before I could vote for it.
06-26-2022 11:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mr_XcentricK Offline
World Wanderer
*

Posts: 11,396
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 314
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: NoVA
Post: #643
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 03:12 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 11:04 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 10:46 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 10:38 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  
(06-25-2022 01:08 PM)UofMTigerTim Wrote:  



I guess to you Carol Swain is not qualified.

First off both parties have blood on their hands…

The same Carol Swain who spoke of values in that video but is controversial for being anti gay and Muslim? Let’s see what she might have left out:

Fact: Democrats introduced and led the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Fact: it was the bloc of conservative Southern Democrats in the Senate who filibustered and voted against the act. The same democrats that thought it was okay to beat, sic dogs onto and shoot water hoses at the people protesting/advocating for those same rights

Fact: The act passed with a Democrat majority in both houses.

The South may not be slow, but you sure are. She just laid it out to you as simple as it can get and yet you are so stiffnecked you cannot receive.

Ok Sparky. I disagreed with her and your point and explained why. Care to refute my argurmenrpt or are you only “fast” enough to insult?

Listen Blockhead the ANSWER is simple and straightforward it’s Family Values and all the rights that go along with protecting that. Southerns didn’t leave the Democratic Party it left them by allowing Leftist Regressives to take over the party and lead it in a direction that is perverted and is he’ll bent on destroying the family unit. Carry on clueless.

Wouldn’t want you leading anyone. You can’t see the forest for all those trees getting in the way. That forest is dense.

03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao I was alive for the last “Family Values” GOP platform. All this going to end the same way. Bunch of dudes putting their pole where it did not belong.

Family Values … 03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao

Sparky only you see a forest. I see history repeating itself.
(This post was last modified: 06-26-2022 11:28 PM by Mr_XcentricK.)
06-26-2022 11:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ericsrevenge76 Away
Jesus is coming soon
*

Posts: 24,363
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 5001
I Root For: The Kingdom
Location: The Body of Christ
Post: #644
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 11:11 PM)HCJag Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 10:01 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  I would have to side with JR on this. There are some cases where the death penalty should be avaible, the death penalty was certainly a thing under the OT law.

I don't think we can suggest its ungodly if it was a part of God's law in the OT.

I don't think it should be used very often, but premeditated mass murder? Yeah, it should be at least an option. A rare one to be sure, but at least an option.

The only problem I have with the DP is knowing there have been some innocents that have gone to death row. I'm not sure how I would cope if I had been on those juries. There would have to be zero doubt before I could vote for it.



That's why its got to be rare and used very carefully.

Do you vote for those who support abortion?

One couple possibly kill an innocent person, the other has already killed 60-70 MILLION innocent people.
06-26-2022 11:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mr_XcentricK Offline
World Wanderer
*

Posts: 11,396
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 314
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: NoVA
Post: #645
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 06:41 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 06:34 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 06:14 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  I can’t believe some of the things I’ve read in this thread. It’s one thing to debate views of the Left or the Right, the debate in this thread is crazy.

The decision does nothing but send the responsibility of abortion legality back to the states. I can’t tell if the comments about having to leave the country for an abortion are sincere or if it’s just trolling.
If your state has laws making abortion legal, nothing has changed.

In states with trigger laws the decision automatically made abortion illegal in some states and further regulated it in others. If you live in one of those states, you have two choices: travel to a state where the procedure is still legal or work to take control of the state legislature in your state to change abortion laws.

As a Christian living in Kentucky I’m glad it was made illegal. Now if we could just get rid of the death penalty, I would be even happier.

My opinion: you can’t be Pro-Life and Pro-Death Penalty. Differ sides of the same coin.

No it isn't. The unborn are innocent. They will sin, but haven't. Murderers and rapists have judged themselves by action. There are 3 words in Hebrew which mean to kill. One is in defense of family, self, or nation. One is in execution. The third is in murder and manslaughter. The 10 commandments "Thou shalt not kill" only used the third word. Thou shalt not murder, or through willful negligence cause the death of another. Defense and execution were not in the prohibition. Stopping murderers is preserving life. Stopping rapists is preserving the sanctity of life. In order to uphold life we must first be willing to defend it. Capital punishment is not the opposite of sanctity of life, it is the upholding of it!

Exscellent explanation, JRSEC. There certainly is a difference and in the old days people knew it.

Sorry that just comes across as “knowing God’s plan” when it suits you. What is the plan for protecting and preserving life in the classroom?
06-26-2022 11:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mr_XcentricK Offline
World Wanderer
*

Posts: 11,396
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 314
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: NoVA
Post: #646
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 06:42 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 10:57 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 10:50 AM)boss man Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 10:38 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  
(06-25-2022 01:08 PM)UofMTigerTim Wrote:  



I guess to you Carol Swain is not qualified.

First off both parties have blood on their hands…

The same Carol Swain who spoke of values in that video but is controversial for being anti gay and Muslim? Let’s see what she might have left out:

Fact: Democrats introduced and led the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Fact: it was the bloc of conservative Southern Democrats in the Senate who filibustered and voted against the act. The same democrats that thought it was okay to beat, sic dogs onto and shoot water hoses at the people protesting/advocating for those same rights

Fact: The act passed with a Democrat majority in both houses.

One final FACT, reemphasizing one of Swain's final points: the South is now overwhelmingly conservative today.

The last vestiges of pure hard core liberalism is on the Left coast, Hawaii, Illinois (Chicago), Wisconsin, Michigan, New York (NYC; rest of that state is fairly conservative), and the NE USA.

What part of “Conservative Southern Democrat” is so hard to understand? They were trying to conserve their way of life in the south. But keep deluding your self with the idea that only the party name matters.

You cannot be this obtuse.

Your argument is that the beliefs of the Souther conservative Democrats of the 50s and 60 just disappeared instead of being handed down generations. Now I am not saying all the south is this way but it existed and continues to exists. Thankfully the younger generations are finally stepping up rebelling but can remember coming to the south to visit as a kid and hearing things I never heard before. And hearing it a lot. Again not to say these issue don’t exists in other areas. But the south needs to own its history. The D or R really doesn’t matter.
06-26-2022 11:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 44,946
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 13480
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #647
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 11:38 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 11:11 PM)HCJag Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 10:01 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  I would have to side with JR on this. There are some cases where the death penalty should be avaible, the death penalty was certainly a thing under the OT law.

I don't think we can suggest its ungodly if it was a part of God's law in the OT.

I don't think it should be used very often, but premeditated mass murder? Yeah, it should be at least an option. A rare one to be sure, but at least an option.

The only problem I have with the DP is knowing there have been some innocents that have gone to death row. I'm not sure how I would cope if I had been on those juries. There would have to be zero doubt before I could vote for it.



That's why its got to be rare and used very carefully.

Do you vote for those who support abortion?

One couple possibly kill an innocent person, the other has already killed 60-70 MILLION innocent people.

Death penalties once, at least in some states, required 2 separate (unrelated) eyewitnesses before the sentence could be given. Lawyers make money on endless appeals. In my lifetime law has only become more and more complicated because it profits the whole legal system at public and private expense for it to do so. The U.S. has more attorneys per capita than any nation and it's not close. This is why courts are so slow (you pay retainers monthly), many cases are appealed, hired gun lawyers make a ton, and just defending yourself when innocent may still cost you everything you have. You are a piece of meat, and they all want a bite. America is screwed up because it is controlled by lawyers acting in their self-interest and not ours.

Look now at the number of murderers who received life w/o parole who get out early, some under 20 years. Is this just? Is this preserving safety? It profits lawyers, judges, and city governments. Shame!!!

Death Penalties should be uniformed, require unambiguous independent eyewitnesses, and certain physical evidence. But since we stopped them, our murders and violent crime have only spiked. Knowing you will be terminated if caught is a deterrent, just not in the heat of the moment crimes, which are generally specific and not likely to be repeated. Gangs notwithstanding.
06-27-2022 12:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 44,946
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 13480
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #648
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 09:55 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 06:34 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 06:14 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  I can’t believe some of the things I’ve read in this thread. It’s one thing to debate views of the Left or the Right, the debate in this thread is crazy.

The decision does nothing but send the responsibility of abortion legality back to the states. I can’t tell if the comments about having to leave the country for an abortion are sincere or if it’s just trolling.
If your state has laws making abortion legal, nothing has changed.

In states with trigger laws the decision automatically made abortion illegal in some states and further regulated it in others. If you live in one of those states, you have two choices: travel to a state where the procedure is still legal or work to take control of the state legislature in your state to change abortion laws.

As a Christian living in Kentucky I’m glad it was made illegal. Now if we could just get rid of the death penalty, I would be even happier.

My opinion: you can’t be Pro-Life and Pro-Death Penalty. Differ sides of the same coin.

No it isn't. The unborn are innocent. They will sin, but haven't. Murderers and rapists have judged themselves by action. There are 3 words in Hebrew which mean to kill. One is in defense of family, self, or nation. One is in execution. The third is in murder and manslaughter. The 10 commandments "Thou shalt not kill" only used the third word. Thou shalt not murder, or through willful negligence cause the death of another. Defense and execution were not in the prohibition. Stopping murderers is preserving life. Stopping rapists is preserving the sanctity of life. In order to uphold life we must first be willing to defend it. Capital punishment is not the opposite of sanctity of life, it is the upholding of it!

JR, I agree with Jim about the death penalty. I don’t believe Government should execute it’s citizens. That being said I have no problem with labor camps and prison self sufficiency and if inmates don’t work they don’t eat. I do not like the idea of using tax dollars in effect punishing law abiding citizens to fund inmates. Remember Cain was not executed by ostracized.

Now comparing the number of death penalty executions to the number of abortions annually is ludicrous.

But, if it’s life and death to defend yourself desperate times call for desperate measures and you have every right to defend yourself even if it means having to kill someone. Hopefully no one will ever be put in this situation.

Vengeance is mine says our Father.
All law is of God and beneficial. Why? The purest form of evil in the Old Testament and beyond is Chaos. God is in part order. Chaos is everything which is not God. So, some law, even poorly applied law, bring some order and is therefore somewhat beneficial.

Do you know why Abraham was tested with Isaac? It is the same reason Israelites were commanded to wipe out certain Canaanite tribes and take nothing from them while others were treated as anyone's enemy and given quarter. Abraham was given a sign that the sacrifice of a child was no way to worship God and God would not accept such, in fact God would supply the sacrifice, which of course God did twice. Those tribes they were ordered to wipe out mostly worshipped Molech. That god required child sacrifice in exchange for productive yields. That which destroys children is an abomination to God. We were warned about harming them in both Testaments.

We are to render unto Ceasar that which is Ceasar's and unto God that which is God's. It applies to more than just a coin and tax law. What this means is that adherents of faith in Christ allow secular law for the common good and obey it. Law is for order and safety. Rome had capital punishment (torture on a cross). Jesus was tried by Pilate who permitted the Sanhedrin led crowd to determine which prisoner would receive mercy. Jesus was then rendered unto Ceasar's law and God's law both dying for the first physically and fulfilling Ceasar's law, and then in resurrection defeating the second death and for us fulfilling God's law. The second death is what we call damnation.

We were also told to set ourselves apart (behavior not necessarily isolation) and to tolerate no evil among us. People confuse not enforcing law and punishment with grace. Grace is forgiveness for the sin against God. It is not excusing the consequences of violation of the state's law. Law is for domestic tranquility, protection of people and property, and it is intended to make the guilty prefer not to repeat an offense and good law protects the value of human life which is where the death penalty is the ultimate protection. Executed murderers cannot escape, or be paroled, and kill again. If God forgives them, they have life everlasting. Remember we are all under sentence of death. Those who kill only hasten that sentence. When and how it is used is the state's business, not mine, but I will state that since we have abandoned the death penalty murders have skyrocketed, which leads to citizens feeling the need to arm themselves. Fear is contrary to sanctity of life.

The OT tells us that a man who does not provide for his family's needs (which includes defense) is worse than an infidel. So, we obey God's law and man's law, and find comfort and peace in the first, and hope for justice in the second. We are not only responsible for our family's safety, but as a community everyone's safety. Those who kill and damage our neighbors do so to us. Until we make all of our neighborhoods safe, we have not met our obligation to God, our family, or our neighbors. Here is the great sin of our time. We permit criminals to prey upon the poor. Then we are shocked only when it spills over to more affluent areas.

The law protects all, or it ultimately protects none of us. Permit law to dodge criminals and law will become criminal. Selectively applied law is by its nature not law. Government and law enforcement agencies owe it to all people to apply law equally, make laws clear to all citizens, and to pursue it equally in all social groups. We are to be law abiding and to hold government and police agencies accountable to equal protection and equal application.
(This post was last modified: 06-27-2022 01:53 AM by JRsec.)
06-27-2022 01:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
appst89 Offline
Herding Cats
*

Posts: 2,783
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 485
I Root For: Appalachian St.
Location:
Post: #649
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 08:23 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 07:14 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  There was a time the kind of threats libtards are making toward the SCOTUS Justices would land them in jail for a long time, now it's like meh. I think states need to put laws on the books than ban protests from residential neighborhoods with 1 year prison term minimum for those who violate.

Who needs the first amendment.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Doesn't apply to assembly on private property.
06-27-2022 05:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 82,008
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3446
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #650
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-27-2022 12:03 AM)JRsec Wrote:  The U.S. has more attorneys per capita than any nation and it's not close. This is why courts are so slow (you pay retainers monthly), many cases are appealed, hired gun lawyers make a ton, and just defending yourself when innocent may still cost you everything you have. You are a piece of meat, and they all want a bite. America is screwed up because it is controlled by lawyers acting in their self-interest and not ours.

A loser pays system would cut out a lot of this. That's what we need, but we will never get it as long as the legal community has such a strong lobbying base.

Another thing that would help is if punitive damages were payable not to the plaintiff (and plaintiffs' attorneys) but to some sort of victim's relief fund to make restitution to crime victims. A lot of cases that probably should settle are kept alive by greedy ambulance chasers trying to get big punitives.
(This post was last modified: 06-27-2022 06:06 AM by Owl 69/70/75.)
06-27-2022 06:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eldonabe Offline
No More Wire Hangars!
*

Posts: 14,911
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 2014
I Root For: All but Uconn
Location: Van by the River
Post: #651
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
Man I really do not want to go down this rabbit hole, but I have to.

Religion needs to be kept out of this discussion. In the catholic belief system Abortion is a sin and this is fine. But the Catholic religion is not the only religion out there and (obviously) not everyone is on board with it.

I am not taking any sides on the abortion issue only on the use of religion as the reason. I cannot remember which thread but I saw a comment along the lines of the red states are not telling the blue states what to do, but the blue states are trying to force their views on the red states .... or something like that. This is basically the same thing. Many are using a religious argument to ban Abortion which is ideological not scientific.

For many people, they are simply not concerned and/or do not believe in judgement day or at least that they will be judged [for an abortion] and therefore no amount of guilt shaming, threats, or "theological" what ifs are going to change their mind.
06-27-2022 07:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eagleaidaholic Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,013
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 1252
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
Post: #652
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
We have about two more weeks of this abortion stuff and something else will have to come up because that's about when we will find out we are in a recession.
06-27-2022 08:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gdunn Offline
Repping E-Gang Colors
*

Posts: 34,755
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 3144
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: In The Moment

Survivor Champion
Post: #653
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-27-2022 08:08 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  We have about two more weeks of this abortion stuff and something else will have to come up because that's about when we will find out we are in a recession.

This will die down shortly.. I mean Biden has to announce any day now how the economy is struggling, gas prices are out of control, but dangit hot dogs are down $.10/wiener.
06-27-2022 08:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
VA49er Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 32,590
Joined: Dec 2004
Reputation: 1417
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
Post: #654
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-27-2022 08:08 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  We have about two more weeks of this abortion stuff and something else will have to come up because that's about when we will find out we are in a recession.

IMO, it'll stay around until mid terms. The D's are going to ride this as far as they can since they have nothing else.
06-27-2022 08:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gdunn Offline
Repping E-Gang Colors
*

Posts: 34,755
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 3144
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: In The Moment

Survivor Champion
Post: #655
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
I didn't hear of "peaceful protests" that resulted in billions of dollars of damage, which to me didn't do what the left wanted it to do.
06-27-2022 08:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Freaking Lunatic
*

Posts: 60,888
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 1547
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #656
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-24-2022 02:59 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  
(06-24-2022 02:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(06-24-2022 02:24 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  
(06-24-2022 02:21 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(06-24-2022 02:18 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  When do they have brains, and their hearts start beating? When do they feel pain?

When do they live on their own without breathing?

When they are born. Doesn't make them any less HUMAN that they must spend time growing inside their mothers. Only a sick or evil piece of **** can't acknowledge the humanity of another person based on needs.

I completely get it. That's why my position is that after a certain number of weeks when the baby can be born and breath on its own, no abortions unless the pregnancy was from rape/incest or if the life of the mother/baby is at stake under consultation from medical personnel.

And further, if it were me, being a guy who can't have one of course, I would never counsel anyone to have one outside of those qualifiers I mentioned above. But in the end, it's not up to me.

Are you putting this word salad together poorly or do you literally support infanticide? That reads as you believe in abortion all the way up to the baby can breath on it's own and even after that for your qualifiers.

Yes, I CLEARLY support babies being able to be killed by their mother after they are born. 01-wingedeagle

The notion that you even entertain this complete and utter 04-bs talking point about infanticide is pathetic. You're better than this.

You know what I meant. I want a time frame in law that denotes an agreed upon number of weeks after conception that a fetus can be aborted in utero to be established, and it should be inline with when a fetus can be removed from the womb and usually breath on its own. My personal preference is 20 weeks. So no abortions after 20 weeks unless the pregnancy was the result of a rape or incest, or if the life and health of the mother and/or baby is an issue after consultation with the medical professionals caring for the mother.
06-27-2022 08:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
b2b Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,092
Joined: May 2021
Reputation: 1422
I Root For: Fam+ECU/CSU/App
Location: Land of Confusion
Post: #657
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 06:14 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  I can’t believe some of the things I’ve read in this thread. It’s one thing to debate views of the Left or the Right, the debate in this thread is crazy.

The decision does nothing but send the responsibility of abortion legality back to the states. I can’t tell if the comments about having to leave the country for an abortion are sincere or if it’s just trolling.
If your state has laws making abortion legal, nothing has changed.

In states with trigger laws the decision automatically made abortion illegal in some states and further regulated it in others. If you live in one of those states, you have two choices: travel to a state where the procedure is still legal or work to take control of the state legislature in your state to change abortion laws.

As a Christian living in Kentucky I’m glad it was made illegal. Now if we could just get rid of the death penalty, I would be even happier.

My opinion: you can’t be Pro-Life and Pro-Death Penalty. Differ sides of the same coin.

I respectfully disagree. The context of the 10 commandments "thou shalt not kill". Kill in that sense was literally translated from the Hebrew word for murder. There's a big difference between murder and just killing such as that in war or punishment for grave sins. Maybe it sounds harsh but your opinion doesn't really matter. It doesn't align with what the Bible teaches on killing. As an aside the Jews were commanded by God to kill literally every single Amalekites and Caananite. These were an extremely evil group of people. There's probably some other "ites" that I'm forgetting. Point being there's a huge difference in just killing and killing for convenience sake in worship of the self.
06-27-2022 08:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
b2b Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,092
Joined: May 2021
Reputation: 1422
I Root For: Fam+ECU/CSU/App
Location: Land of Confusion
Post: #658
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-27-2022 08:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(06-24-2022 02:59 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  
(06-24-2022 02:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(06-24-2022 02:24 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  
(06-24-2022 02:21 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  When do they live on their own without breathing?

When they are born. Doesn't make them any less HUMAN that they must spend time growing inside their mothers. Only a sick or evil piece of **** can't acknowledge the humanity of another person based on needs.

I completely get it. That's why my position is that after a certain number of weeks when the baby can be born and breath on its own, no abortions unless the pregnancy was from rape/incest or if the life of the mother/baby is at stake under consultation from medical personnel.

And further, if it were me, being a guy who can't have one of course, I would never counsel anyone to have one outside of those qualifiers I mentioned above. But in the end, it's not up to me.

Are you putting this word salad together poorly or do you literally support infanticide? That reads as you believe in abortion all the way up to the baby can breath on it's own and even after that for your qualifiers.

Yes, I CLEARLY support babies being able to be killed by their mother after they are born. 01-wingedeagle

The notion that you even entertain this complete and utter 04-bs talking point about infanticide is pathetic. You're better than this.

You know what I meant. I want a time frame in law that denotes an agreed upon number of weeks after conception that a fetus can be aborted in utero to be established, and it should be inline with when a fetus can be removed from the womb and usually breath on its own. My personal preference is 20 weeks. So no abortions after 20 weeks unless the pregnancy was the result of a rape or incest, or if the life and health of the mother and/or baby is an issue after consultation with the medical professionals caring for the mother.

Dress it up however you want but at the end of the day you're OK with killing the peak of God's creation which was created in His image.
06-27-2022 08:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
b2b Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,092
Joined: May 2021
Reputation: 1422
I Root For: Fam+ECU/CSU/App
Location: Land of Confusion
Post: #659
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-27-2022 07:31 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Man I really do not want to go down this rabbit hole, but I have to.

Religion needs to be kept out of this discussion. In the catholic belief system Abortion is a sin and this is fine. But the Catholic religion is not the only religion out there and (obviously) not everyone is on board with it.

I am not taking any sides on the abortion issue only on the use of religion as the reason. I cannot remember which thread but I saw a comment along the lines of the red states are not telling the blue states what to do, but the blue states are trying to force their views on the red states .... or something like that. This is basically the same thing. Many are using a religious argument to ban Abortion which is ideological not scientific.

For many people, they are simply not concerned and/or do not believe in judgement day or at least that they will be judged [for an abortion] and therefore no amount of guilt shaming, threats, or "theological" what ifs are going to change their mind.

Lies. The red states (and SC) are literally letting the blue states do whatever they want with this issue.
06-27-2022 08:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
maximus Offline
Banned

Posts: 28,795
Joined: Nov 2008
I Root For: MEMPHIS
Location:
Post: #660
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls
(06-26-2022 11:45 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 06:41 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 06:34 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(06-26-2022 06:14 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  I can’t believe some of the things I’ve read in this thread. It’s one thing to debate views of the Left or the Right, the debate in this thread is crazy.

The decision does nothing but send the responsibility of abortion legality back to the states. I can’t tell if the comments about having to leave the country for an abortion are sincere or if it’s just trolling.
If your state has laws making abortion legal, nothing has changed.

In states with trigger laws the decision automatically made abortion illegal in some states and further regulated it in others. If you live in one of those states, you have two choices: travel to a state where the procedure is still legal or work to take control of the state legislature in your state to change abortion laws.

As a Christian living in Kentucky I’m glad it was made illegal. Now if we could just get rid of the death penalty, I would be even happier.

My opinion: you can’t be Pro-Life and Pro-Death Penalty. Differ sides of the same coin.

No it isn't. The unborn are innocent. They will sin, but haven't. Murderers and rapists have judged themselves by action. There are 3 words in Hebrew which mean to kill. One is in defense of family, self, or nation. One is in execution. The third is in murder and manslaughter. The 10 commandments "Thou shalt not kill" only used the third word. Thou shalt not murder, or through willful negligence cause the death of another. Defense and execution were not in the prohibition. Stopping murderers is preserving life. Stopping rapists is preserving the sanctity of life. In order to uphold life we must first be willing to defend it. Capital punishment is not the opposite of sanctity of life, it is the upholding of it!

Exscellent explanation, JRSEC. There certainly is a difference and in the old days people knew it.

Sorry that just comes across as “knowing God’s plan” when it suits you. What is the plan for protecting and preserving life in the classroom?
The root cause for the overwhelming majority of abortions and the overwhelming majority of these school shootings is.....?????

See if you can finish the sentence. Ive put it up on the tee, go ahead it should not be hard to finish.

....and go.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
06-27-2022 08:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.