https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/14...9125089283

DEAD & BURIED

Don't worry, this will never make the news. All they will talk about for days is the charges for a couple guys that planned to do something they never did on Jan. 6.

Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

we gonna lost 10% of our healthcare workers with that second part though.

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

And yet hospitals are now letting covid infected people treat patients.

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

They can't mandate them. Lol

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

rwt sighting ...

BITE YOUR TONGUE

(01-13-2022 02:52 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

They can't mandate them. Lol

Actually they can. What they are saying is that OSHA can't fine companies for not having the mandate.

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

Because you are a numbnut, I guess we will have to point out that this is the opposite of judicial activism.

Telling a branch of the government that they do not have the authority to do something because it wasnt granted to them by congress is not judicial activism, no matter how much it chaps your ass.

Now, if you want to post some threads that are useful, how about telling us all how much less money we are making due to the 7%-9% inflation we are seeing. You know, the same posts you were making back when Trump was president and inflation was 1.5%.

(01-13-2022 02:54 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:52 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

They can't mandate them. Lol

Actually they can. What they are saying is that OSHA can't fine companies for not having the mandate.

That’s not what the majority said

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

It’s not judicial activism to proclaim that a regulatory body does NOT have more power than they actually think they have. OSHA is for asbestos and chemicals exposure

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

Upholding the law of the land is their purpose.

They did that here.

Now you want to talk about Kagan and Sotomayer(sp?) Blatantly lying as supreme court justices in the hearing last week? L.Y.I.N.G



Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Libs are stupid

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

1973 ...
roe v. wade ...
constitutional right to an abortion ...

CREATED OUT OF WHOLE CLOTH

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

So you want OSHAA to determine what treatments and vaccines you take.

(01-13-2022 03:03 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:54 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:52 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

They can't mandate them. Lol

Actually they can. What they are saying is that OSHA can't fine companies for not having the mandate.

That’s not what the majority said

I probably didn't write that well. I meant that individual companies can still mandate vaccines if they want. It's just blocking the White House from mandating that companies mandate vaccines.

(01-13-2022 03:22 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 03:03 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:54 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:52 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

They can't mandate them. Lol

Actually they can. What they are saying is that OSHA can't fine companies for not having the mandate.

That’s not what the majority said

I probably didn't write that well. I meant that individual companies can still mandate vaccines if they want. It's just blocking the White House from mandating that companies mandate vaccines.

How are they going to do that without access to vax status?

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

“Companies that actually care for their employees are mandating common sense anyways”

More like unions and some public companies for obvious reasons

I work for a company that leans left due to industry and they never even thought about mandating. Just said work from home or get a test if I have to or want to go in office. Same COVID policy as day 1 although they implemented remote work feasible for anyone during this time as well permanently. 500+ employees world wide granted I only looked at policy for U.S. I would have left if mandated but they respected me enough to make my own personal health decision and I guess they just don’t care about common sense

(01-13-2022 03:24 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 03:22 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 03:03 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:54 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:52 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  They can't mandate them. Lol

Actually they can. What they are saying is that OSHA can't fine companies for not having the mandate.

That’s not what the majority said

I probably didn't write that well. I meant that individual companies can still mandate vaccines if they want. It's just blocking the White House from mandating that companies mandate vaccines.

How are they going to do that without access to vax status?

I'm guessing if one won't disclose, they could infer that as a "no". That would probably have to also be litigated.

(01-13-2022 02:55 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Remember when you guys hated judicial activism?

Doesn't really matter that much. Companies who actually care about their employees are mandating common sense regardless.

Let the rest die...**** em!

Because you are a numbnut, I guess we will have to point out that this is the opposite of judicial activism.

Telling a branch of the government that they do not have the authority to do something because it wasnt granted to them by congress is not judicial activism, no matter how much it chaps your ass.

Now, if you want to post some threads that are useful, how about telling us all how much less money we are making due to the 7%-9% inflation we are seeing. You know, the same posts you were making back when Trump was president and inflation was 1.5%.

Since somebody quoted rwt...

Quote:Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy holding that the courts can and should go beyond the applicable law to consider broader societal implications of its decisions.

It's the "living document" side of the coin.

AKA legislating from the bench.