(01-12-2022 01:29 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 01:10 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If she was campaigning like a mean, unlikeable old weeble-wobble with a piss bag in 2016, it’s not going to age well 8 years later.

She looks ready.

Stacy Abrams might run and she's fatter than Killery. I don't think she'll run and if she does it's just her ego talking.

(01-12-2022 03:26 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 01:29 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 01:10 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If she was campaigning like a mean, unlikeable old weeble-wobble with a piss bag in 2016, it’s not going to age well 8 years later.

She looks ready.

Stacy Abrams might run and she's fatter than Killery. I don't think she'll run and if she does it's just her ego talking.

Stacy Abrams don't run you silly goose.. Oh wait.

Only chance they have is Michelle Obama.

(01-12-2022 05:15 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Only chance they have is Michelle Obama.

he is wholly unqualified, hates america and is a racist.

sound like a democrat dream

honestly, does it really matter who they run at this point...

their only agenda is to merge the middle/lower $$$ class into a singularity which --->>> enhances their voting bloc moving forward...

what's ironic, is it takes the middle's tax $$$ to accomplish such (since the po' don't pay outside of inflated/subsidized purchased goods)


y'all figglin' this shite out yet?!







suckers

(01-12-2022 12:44 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 12:17 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  I don't understand how Americans rejected her so soundly, plus demand a change from Obama, in 2016, then vote for Joe in record numbers.

No idea how 2016 happened, she could win in 2024 easy unfortunately.

You think so? I don’t see it myself.

I see it, most dems with an ounce of sense now understand just how bad Biden is and would probably welcome her with open arms.

(01-12-2022 01:54 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  She's Biden 2.0 with the added bonus of corruption. Why would the current DEMS and the leftist power donors want to get behind that campaign? It takes war chest money to win. Not happening with Diane Rodham.

She will pivot to the center and run as a moderate if she runs. Bill has some experience with that.

(01-12-2022 02:36 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  A moderate Democrat doesn't push the leftist agenda enough to satisfy their base.

A moderate Republican doesn't do enough to stop the leftward drift for their base.

Lots claim to want "moderate" candidates, but at the end of the day "moderates" are weak-willed pushovers no one respects or wants leading them.

"Neither hot nor cold, neither fish nor fowl."

I don't know, that strategy put Bill back in office for a second term.

(01-13-2022 08:02 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 05:15 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Only chance they have is Michelle Obama.

he is wholly unqualified, hates america and is a racist.

sound like a democrat dream

That would destroy their chance to be the first to elect a black "woman".

(01-13-2022 08:13 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  honestly, does it really matter who they run at this point...

their only agenda is to merge the middle/lower $$$ class into a singularity which --->>> enhances their voting bloc moving forward...

what's ironic, is it takes the middle's tax $$$ to accomplish such (since the po' don't pay outside of inflated/subsidized purchased goods)


y'all figglin' this shite out yet?!






suckers

Revolutions almost always start with the middle class.

(01-13-2022 08:22 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(01-13-2022 08:13 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  honestly, does it really matter who they run at this point...

their only agenda is to merge the middle/lower $$$ class into a singularity which --->>> enhances their voting bloc moving forward...

what's ironic, is it takes the middle's tax $$$ to accomplish such (since the po' don't pay outside of inflated/subsidized purchased goods)


y'all figglin' this shite out yet?!






suckers

Revolutions almost always start with the middle class.

yessir .... hill and bill understand that concept all too well... #henceDJT

There is probably no other living person who can energize *all* the elements of the Democrats’ coalition better than Michelle Obama. I know that a lot of Democrats are quietly hoping that she is their nominee in ’24. And I believe a lot of Republicans are quietly dreading that possibility, because they know that would be the toughest campaign the Democrats could put forward.

With that said, I’m about 90% sure it won’t happen. I don’t think Michelle Obama really enjoys politics and I think, in the end, she will simply refuse. She has a lifestyle that most people can only dream of and it will never be taken from her as long as she lives. A presidential campaign — even one with the MSM slobbering over her as the savior of the earth — is just not something she needs.

(01-12-2022 03:26 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 01:29 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 01:10 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If she was campaigning like a mean, unlikeable old weeble-wobble with a piss bag in 2016, it’s not going to age well 8 years later.

She looks ready.

Stacy Abrams might run and she's fatter than Killery. I don't think she'll run and if she does it's just her ego talking.

They are going to have to make that debate stage out of 12" thick concrete and reinforce it with steel girders.

The oped linked in the OP is written by someone who used to work for the Clintons, so this is a guy looking for a gig.