She’s back?

Based on her latest public statements, it’s clear that Mrs. Clinton not only recognizes her position as a potential front-runner but also is setting up a process to help her decide whether or not to run for president again. She recently warned of the electoral consequences in the 2022 midterms if the Democratic Party continues to align itself with its progressive wing and urged Democrats to reject far-left positions that isolate key segments of the electorate.

There's only one reason she would run again after everything that has happened in her troubled career...narcissist.

(01-12-2022 11:11 AM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  There's only one reason she would run again after everything that has happened in her troubled career...narcissist.

She is delusional. She would be 77 by the time the next election roles around. She also has more baggage than baggage claim at JFK International.

Round 2? Bring it on!

I don't understand how Americans rejected her so soundly, plus demand a change from Obama, in 2016, then vote for Joe in record numbers.

No idea how 2016 happened, she could win in 2024 easy unfortunately.

(01-12-2022 12:17 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  I don't understand how Americans rejected her so soundly, plus demand a change from Obama, in 2016, then vote for Joe in record numbers.

No idea how 2016 happened, she could win in 2024 easy unfortunately.

You think so? I don’t see it myself.

(01-12-2022 12:44 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 12:17 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  I don't understand how Americans rejected her so soundly, plus demand a change from Obama, in 2016, then vote for Joe in record numbers.

No idea how 2016 happened, she could win in 2024 easy unfortunately.

You think so? I don’t see it myself.

Did you see how the last election turned out?

If she was campaigning like a mean, unlikeable old weeble-wobble with a piss bag in 2016, it’s not going to age well 8 years later.

Well the Dems say you can't investigate a presidential candidate unless they're Republican or Donald Trump.. She'll run so they'll quit investigating the last election stunt she pulled with the fake dossier.

(01-12-2022 12:52 PM)Hernando Hills Tiger Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 12:44 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 12:17 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  I don't understand how Americans rejected her so soundly, plus demand a change from Obama, in 2016, then vote for Joe in record numbers.

No idea how 2016 happened, she could win in 2024 easy unfortunately.

You think so? I don’t see it myself.

Did you see how the last election turned out?

The 2020 election was stolen. You think they will steal it again or is pant suit going to win a fair election?

(01-12-2022 01:10 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If she was campaigning like a mean, unlikeable old weeble-wobble with a piss bag in 2016, it’s not going to age well 8 years later.

She looks ready.

She’s a political opportunist with no platform and will say or do whatever she can for power.

I could see her running to the middle in order to appeal to suburban women. If Trump runs again as well she would have a legit chance.

She's Biden 2.0 with the added bonus of corruption. Why would the current DEMS and the leftist power donors want to get behind that campaign? It takes war chest money to win. Not happening with Diane Rodham.

(01-12-2022 01:54 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  She's Biden 2.0 with the added bonus of corruption. Why would the current DEMS and the leftist power donors want to get behind that campaign? It takes war chest money to win. Not happening with Diane Rodham.

My first inclination is to agree, but then I think of the pool of possible Democratic candidates…….and they are all about as unlikeable and incompetent as pissbag Killary..

(01-12-2022 01:29 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 01:10 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If she was campaigning like a mean, unlikeable old weeble-wobble with a piss bag in 2016, it’s not going to age well 8 years later.

She looks ready.

the hobo sporting the colostomy bag look, coming to you Spring '22.

(01-12-2022 01:29 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(01-12-2022 01:10 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If she was campaigning like a mean, unlikeable old weeble-wobble with a piss bag in 2016, it’s not going to age well 8 years later.

She looks ready.

Is she finally fat enough for Bill to be attracted to her?

There are so many better candidates than her.. So many that are more likeable than her.

Say what you will about Tulsi, I feel like they attacked her for the wrong reasons and she could've been a true contender.. Fresh face.. Fresh ideas.. Just not an establishment person or puppet..

(01-12-2022 02:27 PM)gdunn Wrote:  There are so many better candidates than her.. So many that are more likeable than her.

Say what you will about Tulsi, I feel like they attacked her for the wrong reasons and she could've been a true contender.. Fresh face.. Fresh ideas.. Just not an establishment person or puppet..

IMO, she was the only Dem primary candidate that was even remotely sane, but she never had a chance because of the bolded above.

A moderate Democrat doesn't push the leftist agenda enough to satisfy their base.

A moderate Republican doesn't do enough to stop the leftward drift for their base.

Lots claim to want "moderate" candidates, but at the end of the day "moderates" are weak-willed pushovers no one respects or wants leading them.

"Neither hot nor cold, neither fish nor fowl."

(01-12-2022 01:54 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  She's Biden 2.0 with the added bonus of corruption. Why would the current DEMS and the leftist power donors want to get behind that campaign? It takes war chest money to win. Not happening with Diane Rodham.

A Biden 2.0 has to do nothing but stay in the basement like Biden 1.0 and wait until 2am massive spikes in the count to get her over the hump several days later