(11-14-2021 03:06 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It’s an interesting sociology study. The left wants this kid convicted no matter what happened, no matter the testimony, and no matter the evidence. Kinda scary.

1. white male.
2. Had an assault rifle.
3. not participating in the BLM riot... I mean, ... demonstration.

They would put us ALL in jail if they could get away with it.

(11-14-2021 03:06 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It’s an interesting sociology study. The left wants this kid convicted no matter what happened, no matter the testimony, and no matter the evidence. Kinda scary.

actually, the experiment has = 1 for some time now … aka: “my way or the highway”

(11-14-2021 03:27 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Leftists force people to take sides. Standing up to them is the only thing to do, when your not killed or knocked unconscious first, of course.

This pretty much sums it up, its more accurate than any headline ive read this weekend on the case.

https://babylonbee.com/news/liberals-acc...n-as-trial

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Judge: Is rifle here now? We can measure. If barrel less than 16" or an overall length less than 26" I'll deny motion to dismiss gun charge, otherwise I'll dismiss the gun charge.

State: We are not disputing, it is not a short-barrelled rifle.

Count 6 dismissed.

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/...7099162630

GET OUTTA HERE WITH THAT NONSENSE

BREAKING: Defense team is attacking blurry drone photo. Lunchbox is losing it. Judge seems very uncomfortable with the ‘enhanced’ image

Just said that if the evidence was contaminated everything will fall like a house of cards

Cool that they filed a charge they knew was false.

(11-15-2021 11:01 AM)banker Wrote:  Cool that they filed a charge they knew was false.

Fits with everything else they have done

Total incompetence

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

(11-14-2021 03:19 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

My answer would be, "From what I know about you, yes."

(11-13-2021 10:45 AM)banker Wrote:  I guess I’m just confused. I always that the purpose of the justice system was to make sure the laws of our country were properly enforced by seeking the truth. I believed the role of the prosecutor was to take the evidence and investigative work done by the police, study and interpret that information as it pertains to the law and then determine if, in their opinion, laws were broken, how they were broken, and state which specific laws were broken. If they do determine, in their opinion, laws were broken, they make charges and take the case to trial.

I believed that the underlying key to the whole process was the pursuit of the truth. Defense attorneys have a very different purpose, I thought. I always viewed their role was to seek the truth, if beneficial, and to exploit every loophole if it wasn’t. In this trial the roles seem very much reversed, and that should never be the case. The system can not work if the prosecution values conviction above truth. No citizen is safe if prosecutors do not value truth above all else.

I'm sure there are earlier examples but the first time I became aware of "The Activist DA" was the Duke Lacrosse case.

Weapons charges have been dropped... and the Defense attorney has filed a motion for a mistrial.

(11-15-2021 11:30 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  Weapons charges have been dropped... and the Defense attorney has filed a motion for a mistrial.

Mistrial with prejudice?

(11-15-2021 11:35 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-15-2021 11:30 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  Weapons charges have been dropped... and the Defense attorney has filed a motion for a mistrial.

Mistrial with prejudice?

Yep!

Speaks volumes to as to the mistrust they have in the jury to do the right thing.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

(11-15-2021 11:42 AM)hburg Wrote:  Speaks volumes to as to the mistrust they have in the jury to do the right thing.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

Considering there have been threats against jurors, phones in the courtroom taking photos and videos of the jurors, and threats against the judge along with threats that the city will burn and a prosecutor that didn't know how to prosecute...

Yea I'd have mistrust too.

(11-15-2021 11:44 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(11-15-2021 11:42 AM)hburg Wrote:  Speaks volumes to as to the mistrust they have in the jury to do the right thing.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

Considering there have been threats against jurors, phones in the courtroom taking photos and videos of the jurors, and threats against the judge along with threats that the city will burn and a prosecutor that didn't know how to prosecute...

Yea I'd have mistrust too.

I would love to be a fly on the wall to listen to them deliberate.