(09-08-2021 08:42 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(09-08-2021 06:25 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-08-2021 06:02 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Went to sleep with a 101 fever last night. Woke up around midnight soaked from the waist up. I downed some water and curled back up in the wet sheets. This morning I feel better than I have in days. No congetting, just a sore butt and lower back and my eyeballs hurt. No fever.

This took the same course as back in march of 2020, and about the same timeline.

Wife is still feeling yucky, but has not had a fever over 101 or any of the horrible aches. Her biggest gripe is the loss of taste and steady headaches.

I certainly don't want to go through this every year, but I'm in good enough physical shape I think I could manage another round or two until the vaccines are studied more or other treatments are approved.



Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

I have still never really had a bad or even moderate case of it, but it has rolled through my family pretty bad in recent weeks.

I have pushed my grandparents (hard to believe I still have them at my age) to start getting the shots and they have. One is 87 the other is 90. My father is 70 and he has had a shot too.

I'm healthier right now than I have been in many years so I will continue to roll with my natural immunity like you are. I'm not getting routine shots for this the rest of my life when I already have a 99.99% survival rate.

The wife just got a call from her doctor an they made her an appointment for the monoclonal antibody infusion on Friday and suggested I contact my doctor for one as well, so I guess I'm about to do that.

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

my niece had one (23 year old type 2) and it worked like a champ…

GL, 200!

(09-08-2021 08:42 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(09-08-2021 06:25 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-08-2021 06:02 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Went to sleep with a 101 fever last night. Woke up around midnight soaked from the waist up. I downed some water and curled back up in the wet sheets. This morning I feel better than I have in days. No congetting, just a sore butt and lower back and my eyeballs hurt. No fever.

This took the same course as back in march of 2020, and about the same timeline.

Wife is still feeling yucky, but has not had a fever over 101 or any of the horrible aches. Her biggest gripe is the loss of taste and steady headaches.

I certainly don't want to go through this every year, but I'm in good enough physical shape I think I could manage another round or two until the vaccines are studied more or other treatments are approved.



Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

I have still never really had a bad or even moderate case of it, but it has rolled through my family pretty bad in recent weeks.

I have pushed my grandparents (hard to believe I still have them at my age) to start getting the shots and they have. One is 87 the other is 90. My father is 70 and he has had a shot too.

I'm healthier right now than I have been in many years so I will continue to roll with my natural immunity like you are. I'm not getting routine shots for this the rest of my life when I already have a 99.99% survival rate.

The wife just got a call from her doctor an they made her an appointment for the monoclonal antibody infusion on Friday and suggested I contact my doctor for one as well, so I guess I'm about to do that.

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

Same thing my mother and sister did.

(09-08-2021 08:27 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(09-07-2021 11:36 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-07-2021 10:39 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  Standard ericsrevenge. Signal to the right with slightly more vague talking points than the even further right uses on this board, then have a nuclear meltdown when he's called out on it.

You're an idiot and a liar.

Is that clear enough for you?

There is nothing remotely vague about my positions on any of this, I have supported the vaccines for the elderly and compromised from the start. I have questions and doubts about it for healthy young people and am totally against forcing it on anyone.

And I refuse to pretend things are going perfectly as planned and with flying colors when the highest vaccinated nations on earth are having peak pandemic hospitalizations and the "fully vaxxed" already need more brand new UN-PLANNED shots just a few months later.

Those clearly stated positions are only "vague" and "right wing signaling" to you because you're an idiot.

There is an entire universe of difference between admitting the vaccines have not lived up to their promise and saying they are totally useless. Somehow or another you are too stupid to make that incredibly basic distinction.

Are you going to tell everyone “F*ck You” again? That was amusing.

Your well aware it was not addressed to "everyone", only those who demand we permanently wear masks, lock down and take forced covid shots in perpetuity for the rest of our lives.

You really should demand rent if I am going to live this deep in your head this long.

Mrs. 200 is getting her antibody infusion as we speak and she asked me to call our pharmacy to see if her doctor prescribed ivermectin prescription was ready. The pharmacy tech said they could not fill this as the board of pharmacy had suggested they not fill ivermectin for treatment of covid.

Her doctor prescribed it. The board of pharmacy said no.

Let that sink in. Who is really in charge of your healthcare?

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

(09-10-2021 08:24 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Mrs. 200 is getting her antibody infusion as we speak and she asked me to call our pharmacy to see if her doctor prescribed ivermectin prescription was ready. The pharmacy tech said they could not fill this as the board of pharmacy had suggested they not fill ivermectin for treatment of covid.

Her doctor prescribed it. The board of pharmacy said no.

Let that sink in. Who is really in charge of your healthcare?

Bingo.

Exact same thing happened to a few friends of mine. They went to Tractor Supply. Was that smart? Hell I don't know. They're alive and well and covid free though.

I'm on day 4, feel fine other than head congestion and my eyes are sore. Fever right at a hundred. Mrs. 200 isn't fairing as well, not with the covid infection itself, but with being sick. She's on day 8 of body aches, congestion, and fatigue and it's wearing her down. She's also had bad nausea so she hasn't eaten much and lost a good bit of weight.

She just finished her infusion, which they gave to her as 4 injections. Said it hurt like hell.


Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

(09-10-2021 08:26 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 08:24 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Mrs. 200 is getting her antibody infusion as we speak and she asked me to call our pharmacy to see if her doctor prescribed ivermectin prescription was ready. The pharmacy tech said they could not fill this as the board of pharmacy had suggested they not fill ivermectin for treatment of covid.

Her doctor prescribed it. The board of pharmacy said no.

Let that sink in. Who is really in charge of your healthcare?

Bingo.

Exact same thing happened to a few friends of mine. They went to Tractor Supply. Was that smart? Hell I don't know. They're alive and well and covid free though.

No it isn't smart. The formulation isn't the same, but if they can do math it likely won't kill them.

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

(09-10-2021 08:24 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Mrs. 200 is getting her antibody infusion as we speak and she asked me to call our pharmacy to see if her doctor prescribed ivermectin prescription was ready. The pharmacy tech said they could not fill this as the board of pharmacy had suggested they not fill ivermectin for treatment of covid.

Her doctor prescribed it. The board of pharmacy said no.

Let that sink in. Who is really in charge of your healthcare?

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

If I went for a wisdom tooth extraction and my doctor prescribed 30 oxy's, should someone serve as a gatekeeper, or simply allow the doctor to prescribe?

Not saying the doc shouldn't have the authority to prescribe whatever, just whether in any situation a pharmacy should serve as a gatekeeper?

Obviously they do in the event of prescription interactions, and while not the same as simply denying a singular prescription, they have a duty, to an extent, not to just "fill what the doctor tells them to fill."

(09-10-2021 11:07 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 08:24 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Mrs. 200 is getting her antibody infusion as we speak and she asked me to call our pharmacy to see if her doctor prescribed ivermectin prescription was ready. The pharmacy tech said they could not fill this as the board of pharmacy had suggested they not fill ivermectin for treatment of covid.

Her doctor prescribed it. The board of pharmacy said no.

Let that sink in. Who is really in charge of your healthcare?

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

If I went for a wisdom tooth extraction and my doctor prescribed 30 oxy's, should someone serve as a gatekeeper, or simply allow the doctor to prescribe?

Not saying the doc shouldn't have the authority to prescribe whatever, just whether in any situation a pharmacy should serve as a gatekeeper?

Obviously they do in the event of prescription interactions, and while not the same as simply denying a singular prescription, they have a duty, to an extent, not to just "fill what the doctor tells them to fill."

You would get 10. Apples and hand grenades.

(09-10-2021 11:10 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:07 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 08:24 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Mrs. 200 is getting her antibody infusion as we speak and she asked me to call our pharmacy to see if her doctor prescribed ivermectin prescription was ready. The pharmacy tech said they could not fill this as the board of pharmacy had suggested they not fill ivermectin for treatment of covid.

Her doctor prescribed it. The board of pharmacy said no.

Let that sink in. Who is really in charge of your healthcare?

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

If I went for a wisdom tooth extraction and my doctor prescribed 30 oxy's, should someone serve as a gatekeeper, or simply allow the doctor to prescribe?

Not saying the doc shouldn't have the authority to prescribe whatever, just whether in any situation a pharmacy should serve as a gatekeeper?

Obviously they do in the event of prescription interactions, and while not the same as simply denying a singular prescription, they have a duty, to an extent, not to just "fill what the doctor tells them to fill."

You would get 10. Apples and hand grenades.

10 is an insane amount.

But...again, the question posed was what if he prescribed 30. That's the point--what if a doctor was prescribing something that goes beyond medical standards.

And lets be clear...as of now, Ivermectin is not an approved remedy for Covid. Literally, there are zero studies (with control groups, etc) that validate it as a treatment.

Again, I'm not even taking the opinion that it might not be a treatment, but as of now, no legitimate studies have taken place to say that. o any doctor prescribing it is doing so outside of its intended use.

(09-08-2021 09:01 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-08-2021 08:42 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(09-08-2021 06:25 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-08-2021 06:02 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Went to sleep with a 101 fever last night. Woke up around midnight soaked from the waist up. I downed some water and curled back up in the wet sheets. This morning I feel better than I have in days. No congetting, just a sore butt and lower back and my eyeballs hurt. No fever.

This took the same course as back in march of 2020, and about the same timeline.

Wife is still feeling yucky, but has not had a fever over 101 or any of the horrible aches. Her biggest gripe is the loss of taste and steady headaches.

I certainly don't want to go through this every year, but I'm in good enough physical shape I think I could manage another round or two until the vaccines are studied more or other treatments are approved.



Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

I have still never really had a bad or even moderate case of it, but it has rolled through my family pretty bad in recent weeks.

I have pushed my grandparents (hard to believe I still have them at my age) to start getting the shots and they have. One is 87 the other is 90. My father is 70 and he has had a shot too.

I'm healthier right now than I have been in many years so I will continue to roll with my natural immunity like you are. I'm not getting routine shots for this the rest of my life when I already have a 99.99% survival rate.

The wife just got a call from her doctor an they made her an appointment for the monoclonal antibody infusion on Friday and suggested I contact my doctor for one as well, so I guess I'm about to do that.

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

my niece had one (23 year old type 2) and it worked like a champ…

GL, 200!

It seems the monoclonal antibody treatment is breakthrough for many folks. I have a friend that bounced back in a couple of days of having it and she was vaxxed. I must however point out a contradiction that Im seeing. Some of the very folks that are opposed to taking the vaccines because they are "unapproved or experimental" have no problem with the monoclonal treatment that is has exactly the same status.

(09-10-2021 11:18 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:10 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:07 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 08:24 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Mrs. 200 is getting her antibody infusion as we speak and she asked me to call our pharmacy to see if her doctor prescribed ivermectin prescription was ready. The pharmacy tech said they could not fill this as the board of pharmacy had suggested they not fill ivermectin for treatment of covid.

Her doctor prescribed it. The board of pharmacy said no.

Let that sink in. Who is really in charge of your healthcare?

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

If I went for a wisdom tooth extraction and my doctor prescribed 30 oxy's, should someone serve as a gatekeeper, or simply allow the doctor to prescribe?

Not saying the doc shouldn't have the authority to prescribe whatever, just whether in any situation a pharmacy should serve as a gatekeeper?

Obviously they do in the event of prescription interactions, and while not the same as simply denying a singular prescription, they have a duty, to an extent, not to just "fill what the doctor tells them to fill."

You would get 10. Apples and hand grenades.

10 is an insane amount.

But...again, the question posed was what if he prescribed 30. That's the point--what if a doctor was prescribing something that goes beyond medical standards.

And lets be clear...as of now, Ivermectin is not an approved remedy for Covid. Literally, there are zero studies (with control groups, etc) that validate it as a treatment.

Again, I'm not even taking the opinion that it might not be a treatment, but as of now, no legitimate studies have taken place to say that. o any doctor prescribing it is doing so outside of its intended use.

You finally figured it out. There aren't any studies for HCQ either. Matter of fact there aren't any studies for anything to TREAT Covid. NIH should have run studies on HCQ back in March of last year to test the efficacy of it as a treatment. They should have run studies on Ivermectin as a treatment also. But no, they haven't tested anything currently on the market for treatment. Does that not startle you. Doctors have found cheap drugs with wide availability and the NIH has done nothing other than say, "you can't use it". Really? First time in the history of American Medicine the government is telling doctors and pharmacists to NOT prescribe a med that is readily available and safe to treat something, but yet at the same time literally thousands of people have died from the "Vaccine" for it and now those same people are mandating for people to take that. For normal people, that is some scary pshit.

(09-10-2021 11:34 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:18 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:10 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:07 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 08:24 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Mrs. 200 is getting her antibody infusion as we speak and she asked me to call our pharmacy to see if her doctor prescribed ivermectin prescription was ready. The pharmacy tech said they could not fill this as the board of pharmacy had suggested they not fill ivermectin for treatment of covid.

Her doctor prescribed it. The board of pharmacy said no.

Let that sink in. Who is really in charge of your healthcare?

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

If I went for a wisdom tooth extraction and my doctor prescribed 30 oxy's, should someone serve as a gatekeeper, or simply allow the doctor to prescribe?

Not saying the doc shouldn't have the authority to prescribe whatever, just whether in any situation a pharmacy should serve as a gatekeeper?

Obviously they do in the event of prescription interactions, and while not the same as simply denying a singular prescription, they have a duty, to an extent, not to just "fill what the doctor tells them to fill."

You would get 10. Apples and hand grenades.

10 is an insane amount.

But...again, the question posed was what if he prescribed 30. That's the point--what if a doctor was prescribing something that goes beyond medical standards.

And lets be clear...as of now, Ivermectin is not an approved remedy for Covid. Literally, there are zero studies (with control groups, etc) that validate it as a treatment.

Again, I'm not even taking the opinion that it might not be a treatment, but as of now, no legitimate studies have taken place to say that. o any doctor prescribing it is doing so outside of its intended use.

You finally figured it out. There aren't any studies for HCQ either. Matter of fact there aren't any studies for anything to TREAT Covid. NIH should have run studies on HCQ back in March of last year to test the efficacy of it as a treatment. They should have run studies on Ivermectin as a treatment also. But no, they haven't tested anything currently on the market for treatment. Does that not startle you. Doctors have found cheap drugs with wide availability and the NIH has done nothing other than say, "you can't use it". Really? First time in the history of American Medicine the government is telling doctors and pharmacists to NOT prescribe a med that is readily available and safe to treat something, but yet at the same time literally thousands of people have died from the "Vaccine" for it and now those same people are mandating for people to take that. For normal people, that is some scary pshit.

My doc won't prescribe me birth control pills if I'm having raging hardons, but that might make sense to some people.

HCQ was studied and it showed to be a fly by night idea. https://www.drugs.com/medical-answers/hy...9-3536024/


This, again, falls into the "taking more time to avoid a task than just doing it."

People are trying to wipe their ass with their elbows by wanting to take Ivermectin or HCQ AFTER they get Covid so they won't get as sick as they would if they just took some day-quil.

When the whole time the easiest way not to get sick from Covid and need to take a malaria drug or human de-wormer is getting a damn shot that is proving to be effective in keeping people from getting sick or dying.

It's like fuggin' "They Live" where Roddy Piper and dude have a 10 minute brawl because dude won't try some damn glasses on.

(09-10-2021 11:38 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:34 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:18 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:10 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:07 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  If I went for a wisdom tooth extraction and my doctor prescribed 30 oxy's, should someone serve as a gatekeeper, or simply allow the doctor to prescribe?

Not saying the doc shouldn't have the authority to prescribe whatever, just whether in any situation a pharmacy should serve as a gatekeeper?

Obviously they do in the event of prescription interactions, and while not the same as simply denying a singular prescription, they have a duty, to an extent, not to just "fill what the doctor tells them to fill."

You would get 10. Apples and hand grenades.

10 is an insane amount.

But...again, the question posed was what if he prescribed 30. That's the point--what if a doctor was prescribing something that goes beyond medical standards.

And lets be clear...as of now, Ivermectin is not an approved remedy for Covid. Literally, there are zero studies (with control groups, etc) that validate it as a treatment.

Again, I'm not even taking the opinion that it might not be a treatment, but as of now, no legitimate studies have taken place to say that. o any doctor prescribing it is doing so outside of its intended use.

You finally figured it out. There aren't any studies for HCQ either. Matter of fact there aren't any studies for anything to TREAT Covid. NIH should have run studies on HCQ back in March of last year to test the efficacy of it as a treatment. They should have run studies on Ivermectin as a treatment also. But no, they haven't tested anything currently on the market for treatment. Does that not startle you. Doctors have found cheap drugs with wide availability and the NIH has done nothing other than say, "you can't use it". Really? First time in the history of American Medicine the government is telling doctors and pharmacists to NOT prescribe a med that is readily available and safe to treat something, but yet at the same time literally thousands of people have died from the "Vaccine" for it and now those same people are mandating for people to take that. For normal people, that is some scary pshit.

My doc won't prescribe me birth control pills if I'm having raging hardons, but that might make sense to some people.

HCQ was studied and it showed to be a fly by night idea. https://www.drugs.com/medical-answers/hy...9-3536024/

I will raise you one. We can do this all day. From October of last year.
From the NIH

Quote: HCQ was found to be consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting. It was also found to be overall effective in inpatient studies. No unbiased study found worse outcomes with HCQ use. No mortality or serious safety adverse events were found. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting, it is overall effective against COVID-19, it has not produced worsening of disease and it is safe.

(09-10-2021 11:38 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:34 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:18 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:10 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:07 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  If I went for a wisdom tooth extraction and my doctor prescribed 30 oxy's, should someone serve as a gatekeeper, or simply allow the doctor to prescribe?

Not saying the doc shouldn't have the authority to prescribe whatever, just whether in any situation a pharmacy should serve as a gatekeeper?

Obviously they do in the event of prescription interactions, and while not the same as simply denying a singular prescription, they have a duty, to an extent, not to just "fill what the doctor tells them to fill."

You would get 10. Apples and hand grenades.

10 is an insane amount.

But...again, the question posed was what if he prescribed 30. That's the point--what if a doctor was prescribing something that goes beyond medical standards.

And lets be clear...as of now, Ivermectin is not an approved remedy for Covid. Literally, there are zero studies (with control groups, etc) that validate it as a treatment.

Again, I'm not even taking the opinion that it might not be a treatment, but as of now, no legitimate studies have taken place to say that. o any doctor prescribing it is doing so outside of its intended use.

You finally figured it out. There aren't any studies for HCQ either. Matter of fact there aren't any studies for anything to TREAT Covid. NIH should have run studies on HCQ back in March of last year to test the efficacy of it as a treatment. They should have run studies on Ivermectin as a treatment also. But no, they haven't tested anything currently on the market for treatment. Does that not startle you. Doctors have found cheap drugs with wide availability and the NIH has done nothing other than say, "you can't use it". Really? First time in the history of American Medicine the government is telling doctors and pharmacists to NOT prescribe a med that is readily available and safe to treat something, but yet at the same time literally thousands of people have died from the "Vaccine" for it and now those same people are mandating for people to take that. For normal people, that is some scary pshit.

My doc won't prescribe me birth control pills

Birth control pills wont help your sand in the vag condition.

Quote:People are trying to wipe their ass with their elbows by wanting to take Ivermectin or HCQ AFTER they get Covid so they won't get as sick as they would if they just took some day-quil.

Who wants to tell captain numbuts that the vax doesnt prevent you from getting covid, which is why Pfizer is coming up with a "pill" to take when you get covid after getting the vax.

I mean, thats like wiping your ass with a horse dil-do. (Which may explain why some of you seem so into the vax.)

(09-07-2021 11:36 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-07-2021 10:39 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  Standard ericsrevenge. Signal to the right with slightly more vague talking points than the even further right uses on this board, then have a nuclear meltdown when he's called out on it.

You're an idiot and a liar.

Is that clear enough for you?

There is nothing remotely vague about my positions on any of this, I have supported the vaccines for the elderly and compromised from the start. I have questions and doubts about it for healthy young people and am totally against forcing it on anyone.

And I refuse to pretend things are going perfectly as planned and with flying colors when the highest vaccinated nations on earth are having peak pandemic hospitalizations and the "fully vaxxed" already need more brand new UN-PLANNED shots just a few months later.

Those clearly stated positions are only "vague" and "right wing signaling" to you because you're an idiot.

There is an entire universe of difference between admitting the vaccines have not lived up to their promise and saying they are totally useless. Somehow or another you are too stupid to make that incredibly basic distinction.

You can't argue with people who clearly read and hear what they wish to. There are a couple here who I have been entirely wrong about in assessing them as rational people.

I've just started putting them on ignore rather than even bother trying to reason with them.

Let them have it, I don't want it anymore. In fact if I could I'd move to Russia. Who would have ever thought that freedom and independence would be far greater there than here?

It all went to hell so quickly.

(09-10-2021 11:46 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:38 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:34 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:18 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 11:10 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  You would get 10. Apples and hand grenades.

10 is an insane amount.

But...again, the question posed was what if he prescribed 30. That's the point--what if a doctor was prescribing something that goes beyond medical standards.

And lets be clear...as of now, Ivermectin is not an approved remedy for Covid. Literally, there are zero studies (with control groups, etc) that validate it as a treatment.

Again, I'm not even taking the opinion that it might not be a treatment, but as of now, no legitimate studies have taken place to say that. o any doctor prescribing it is doing so outside of its intended use.

You finally figured it out. There aren't any studies for HCQ either. Matter of fact there aren't any studies for anything to TREAT Covid. NIH should have run studies on HCQ back in March of last year to test the efficacy of it as a treatment. They should have run studies on Ivermectin as a treatment also. But no, they haven't tested anything currently on the market for treatment. Does that not startle you. Doctors have found cheap drugs with wide availability and the NIH has done nothing other than say, "you can't use it". Really? First time in the history of American Medicine the government is telling doctors and pharmacists to NOT prescribe a med that is readily available and safe to treat something, but yet at the same time literally thousands of people have died from the "Vaccine" for it and now those same people are mandating for people to take that. For normal people, that is some scary pshit.

My doc won't prescribe me birth control pills if I'm having raging hardons, but that might make sense to some people.

HCQ was studied and it showed to be a fly by night idea. https://www.drugs.com/medical-answers/hy...9-3536024/

I will raise you one. We can do this all day. From October of last year.
From the NIH

Quote: HCQ was found to be consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting. It was also found to be overall effective in inpatient studies. No unbiased study found worse outcomes with HCQ use. No mortality or serious safety adverse events were found. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting, it is overall effective against COVID-19, it has not produced worsening of disease and it is safe.

No you can't.

You don't even take the time to read the ****.

All that was was a survey of studies that were done.

An the first line of it was this:

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some but not all studies.

And what studies were they, you might ask?

"We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Google Scholar and Google for all reports on HCQ as a treatment for COVID-19 patients. This included preprints and preliminary reports on larger COVID-19 studies. "

So they "searched the web" and found some unfinished studies. "Some" of which (again preliminarily) found HCQ "may" have some efficacy in treating Covid.


Or, you can look at the post above which conducted randomized, clinical studies.

But, nah it doesn't say what you need it to say.

(09-10-2021 11:07 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2021 08:24 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Mrs. 200 is getting her antibody infusion as we speak and she asked me to call our pharmacy to see if her doctor prescribed ivermectin prescription was ready. The pharmacy tech said they could not fill this as the board of pharmacy had suggested they not fill ivermectin for treatment of covid.

Her doctor prescribed it. The board of pharmacy said no.

Let that sink in. Who is really in charge of your healthcare?

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

If I went for a wisdom tooth extraction and my doctor prescribed 30 oxy's, should someone serve as a gatekeeper, or simply allow the doctor to prescribe?

Not saying the doc shouldn't have the authority to prescribe whatever, just whether in any situation a pharmacy should serve as a gatekeeper?

Obviously they do in the event of prescription interactions, and while not the same as simply denying a singular prescription, they have a duty, to an extent, not to just "fill what the doctor tells them to fill."

Many people, particularly the elderly, have multiple doctors so pharmacies keeping and eye out for drug interactions is entirely a separate issue. I would argue that pharmacies have no business questioning a doctors order in any one particular instance. As far as I am aware, my pharmacist does not have the right to override my doctor's treatment orders.

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

(09-08-2021 06:02 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Went to sleep with a 101 fever last night. Woke up around midnight soaked from the waist up. I downed some water and curled back up in the wet sheets. This morning I feel better than I have in days. No congetting, just a sore butt and lower back and my eyeballs hurt. No fever.

This took the same course as back in march of 2020, and about the same timeline.

Wife is still feeling yucky, but has not had a fever over 101 or any of the horrible aches. Her biggest gripe is the loss of taste and steady headaches.

I certainly don't want to go through this every year, but I'm in good enough physical shape I think I could manage another round or two until the vaccines are studied more or other treatments are approved.



Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk

You just described the first three days after being diagnosed with it. ALL I had was a fever. I felt fine otherwise. The fever finally went away about 5 days ago but I can't stay out of bed for more than an hour or two before I start feeling like total crap again. This morning I woke up and thought, damn, I actually feel human again. That lasted about two hours and I had to crawl back in bed. I just got back up about an hour ago and I'm ready to go back to bed.

This is exactly how I felt for almost three months beginning Dec 26, 2019. It took me almost the whole of 2020 to get my energy levels back up. You can't convince me I didn't have this crap early on. Here it is almost two years later and I'm back to feeling the same way. I feel like I've aged 10 years in the last two. I have always been a high energy person. I've rarely ever needed more than 4-5 hours of sleep a night, I could work my ass off all day, come home and stay up until 1 or 2 in the morning, go to bed and get back up at 5 or 6 and go do it again. After the first bout if I don't get 8 hours I am washed out all day.

This crap is for real.

(09-10-2021 11:54 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  I've just started putting them on ignore rather than even bother trying to reason with them.

Let them have it, I don't want it anymore. In fact if I could I'd move to Russia. Who would have ever thought that freedom and independence would be far greater there than here?

It all went to hell so quickly.

Yep, I removed a bunch from ignore after Biden*'s Afghanistan fiasco just to see what they could possibly have to say. All it did was get me in trouble. Obviously trolling is acceptable. I put them all back on ignore and will not respond to any of them again. I have better things to do than argue with idiots.