(12-10-2020 03:22 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 07:12 PM)RobUCF Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 07:02 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 06:52 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  Unless i'm mistaken, this case has no dependency on election fraud, vote switching or ballot box stuffing. Its based solely on the US Constitution.

Already posted

Article III (3), Section II (2)
The Constitution of the United States

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;— between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.


Bold by me.

This is real and its happening.

Agree with that as well, it seems to be related to the legality based on the Constitution alone - not related to fraud or even how close the margin is in any of these state. Which is why I brought up the point that this could result in a type of legal civil war between the states since these over-reaches are clearly not isolated to 4 states alone.

It could result in large scale lawsuits between many states. I already brought up North Carolina and Florida, but if the argument is that these States violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause and that these decisions needed to be made by states legislatures (not through the courts or executive actions) - how does the decision of the Governor of Texas, upheld by the Court (not the act of the legislature) to limit ballot drop boxes hold up in this context?

Texas uses Dominion software. Why didn't Biden win there which is the question? Did Trump cheated in Texas and the other Red states with widespread fraud? Maybe the blue states sold file fraud cases to have all the votes be overturned in Texas and the 17 other states as being fraud? This is how stupid Trump and his Minimes taking these things too far.

As has been stated in many articles, Texas rejected Dominion multiple times. Texas doesn’t use it.

#BuckleUp!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

This is an excellent breakdown of the TX lawsuit in layman's terms:

https://thefederalist.com/2020/12/09/6-t...-election/

It is worth a read, whether you are for or againstthe lawsuit, to have a good understanding of the merits.

Indiana signs on to the lawsuit.

https://www.thecentersquare.com/indiana/...84e71.html

(12-09-2020 11:41 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Biden*. How fitting is that asterisk? Never will he be my president. Never.

Got my t-shirt earlier this week. They took the Biden campaign logo and added an * on it. Already had several folks at the bar say they loved it and want one.

(12-09-2020 08:24 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 08:14 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Public opinion polls show that more and more folks are realizing that something smells bad about this election. The % is rising, despite the MSM ridicule and denial and refusal to cover it. Some of the facts are getting out despite the media blackout.

Yeah. Democrats cheated. Lol. They'll probably get away with it because idiots today believe anything else will destroy the country while the exact opposite is true.

Beijing Biden* is the perfect Manchurian candidate. Four years of hell coming for his idiot supporters.

Meanwhile I'll just
.

develop mouth/throat cancer?

I'll go with 9-0 again...

(12-09-2020 01:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:28 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

This is actually false. The attempt is to show 'fraud'... and thus an extra 50,000 votes randomly showing up in a liberal stronghold that skews 90/10 for Biden with no other similar outcomes in the other direction is highly suspicious/statistically improbable.... so while your statement above may not be incorrect, it isn't the entire basis of their position. It is merely the baseline for it.

(12-09-2020 10:53 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  One of the Georgia dismissals lays this out nicely. They go through each claim made by a so called expert and debunk them one by one. All of them show this broad analysis of what may have happened, yet none of them actually show that what happened was in anyway outside the realm of possibility or that it was perpetuated by someone in a fraudulent manner. They also show that many of these experts just don't know what they are talking about...additionally, they also lay out that they haven't performed a complete analysis of the matter either.
You know...they asked them to actually prove it.

And that's problem. After the fact there is no way to prove it. The problem needs to be addressed before the fact, with adequate prevention and detection controls. One party opposes those things.

This. Hence although I care nothing about changing this election, I am not against these suits moving forward in order to make sure that confidence in our process and elections is restored. Democrats had no faith in 2016 and Republicans no faith in 2020. Democrats acting like this is 'unique' are laughable. The specifics may be unique, but the concept that an election did not reflect the will of the people and the options that result is not at all.

So if a few morons claimed the 2016 election was stolen, that makes it okay for millions of morons to claim the 2020 election was stolen?

For Gods sake man, Hillary conceded in no time and that election was much much much closer. There is NO comparison to what trump and his minions are doing here to 2016. And throw in that he's likely only doing this to raise money, makes it even worse.

75,000,000 people voted for Trump. The majority of them believe there was fraudulent activity based on events seen on election night via broadcast and web media. Those events were followed up with eye-witness legally sworn testimony of fraudulent activities as well as statistical analysis.

There's a meme that's been floating around recently that states:

Quote:One anonymous whistle-blower was OK to impeach the President but 1000s of sworn affidavits on fraud not worth investigating?

For 75 MILLION people, the idea that ONE person can accuse Trump of wrong-doing results in both Democrats and the media going full-throttle on delegitimizing his presidency seemed like a witch hunt. Watching those same politicians and media outlets not only disregard the overwhelming evidence of election fraud but actively censuring it only reinforces the belief of election fraud for those 75,000,000 people.


You don't have to agree that fraud occurred, but to discount very serious and firmly grounded concerns places you in the complicit category.

(12-10-2020 10:16 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:28 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

This is actually false. The attempt is to show 'fraud'... and thus an extra 50,000 votes randomly showing up in a liberal stronghold that skews 90/10 for Biden with no other similar outcomes in the other direction is highly suspicious/statistically improbable.... so while your statement above may not be incorrect, it isn't the entire basis of their position. It is merely the baseline for it.

(12-09-2020 10:53 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  One of the Georgia dismissals lays this out nicely. They go through each claim made by a so called expert and debunk them one by one. All of them show this broad analysis of what may have happened, yet none of them actually show that what happened was in anyway outside the realm of possibility or that it was perpetuated by someone in a fraudulent manner. They also show that many of these experts just don't know what they are talking about...additionally, they also lay out that they haven't performed a complete analysis of the matter either.
You know...they asked them to actually prove it.

And that's problem. After the fact there is no way to prove it. The problem needs to be addressed before the fact, with adequate prevention and detection controls. One party opposes those things.

This. Hence although I care nothing about changing this election, I am not against these suits moving forward in order to make sure that confidence in our process and elections is restored. Democrats had no faith in 2016 and Republicans no faith in 2020. Democrats acting like this is 'unique' are laughable. The specifics may be unique, but the concept that an election did not reflect the will of the people and the options that result is not at all.

So if a few morons claimed the 2016 election was stolen, that makes it okay for millions of morons to claim the 2020 election was stolen?

For Gods sake man, Hillary conceded in no time and that election was much much much closer. There is NO comparison to what trump and his minions are doing here to 2016. And throw in that he's likely only doing this to raise money, makes it even worse.

75,000,000 people voted for Trump. The majority of them believe there was fraudulent activity based on events seen on election night via broadcast and web media. Those events were followed up with eye-witness legally sworn testimony of fraudulent activities as well as statistical analysis.

There's a meme that's been floating around recently that states:

Quote:One anonymous whistle-blower was OK to impeach the President but 1000s of sworn affidavits on fraud not worth investigating?

For 75 MILLION people, the idea that ONE person can accuse Trump of wrong-doing results in both Democrats and the media going full-throttle on delegitimizing his presidency seemed like a witch hunt. Watching those same politicians and media outlets not only disregard the overwhelming evidence of election fraud but actively censuring it only reinforces the belief of election fraud for those 75,000,000 people.


You don't have to agree that fraud occurred, but to discount very serious and firmly grounded concerns places you in the complicit category.

They. Aren't. That's why the courts are ALL rejecting them! Wake up my good man. You're missing life.

(12-10-2020 10:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 10:16 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:28 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

This is actually false. The attempt is to show 'fraud'... and thus an extra 50,000 votes randomly showing up in a liberal stronghold that skews 90/10 for Biden with no other similar outcomes in the other direction is highly suspicious/statistically improbable.... so while your statement above may not be incorrect, it isn't the entire basis of their position. It is merely the baseline for it.

(12-09-2020 10:53 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  And that's problem. After the fact there is no way to prove it. The problem needs to be addressed before the fact, with adequate prevention and detection controls. One party opposes those things.

This. Hence although I care nothing about changing this election, I am not against these suits moving forward in order to make sure that confidence in our process and elections is restored. Democrats had no faith in 2016 and Republicans no faith in 2020. Democrats acting like this is 'unique' are laughable. The specifics may be unique, but the concept that an election did not reflect the will of the people and the options that result is not at all.

So if a few morons claimed the 2016 election was stolen, that makes it okay for millions of morons to claim the 2020 election was stolen?

For Gods sake man, Hillary conceded in no time and that election was much much much closer. There is NO comparison to what trump and his minions are doing here to 2016. And throw in that he's likely only doing this to raise money, makes it even worse.

75,000,000 people voted for Trump. The majority of them believe there was fraudulent activity based on events seen on election night via broadcast and web media. Those events were followed up with eye-witness legally sworn testimony of fraudulent activities as well as statistical analysis.

There's a meme that's been floating around recently that states:

Quote:One anonymous whistle-blower was OK to impeach the President but 1000s of sworn affidavits on fraud not worth investigating?

For 75 MILLION people, the idea that ONE person can accuse Trump of wrong-doing results in both Democrats and the media going full-throttle on delegitimizing his presidency seemed like a witch hunt. Watching those same politicians and media outlets not only disregard the overwhelming evidence of election fraud but actively censuring it only reinforces the belief of election fraud for those 75,000,000 people.


You don't have to agree that fraud occurred, but to discount very serious and firmly grounded concerns places you in the complicit category.

They. Aren't. That's why the courts are ALL rejecting them! Wake up my good man. You're missing life.

napes, ewe are...

his posit is valid for those that still have one...

(12-10-2020 10:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 10:16 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:28 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

This is actually false. The attempt is to show 'fraud'... and thus an extra 50,000 votes randomly showing up in a liberal stronghold that skews 90/10 for Biden with no other similar outcomes in the other direction is highly suspicious/statistically improbable.... so while your statement above may not be incorrect, it isn't the entire basis of their position. It is merely the baseline for it.

(12-09-2020 10:53 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  And that's problem. After the fact there is no way to prove it. The problem needs to be addressed before the fact, with adequate prevention and detection controls. One party opposes those things.

This. Hence although I care nothing about changing this election, I am not against these suits moving forward in order to make sure that confidence in our process and elections is restored. Democrats had no faith in 2016 and Republicans no faith in 2020. Democrats acting like this is 'unique' are laughable. The specifics may be unique, but the concept that an election did not reflect the will of the people and the options that result is not at all.

So if a few morons claimed the 2016 election was stolen, that makes it okay for millions of morons to claim the 2020 election was stolen?

For Gods sake man, Hillary conceded in no time and that election was much much much closer. There is NO comparison to what trump and his minions are doing here to 2016. And throw in that he's likely only doing this to raise money, makes it even worse.

75,000,000 people voted for Trump. The majority of them believe there was fraudulent activity based on events seen on election night via broadcast and web media. Those events were followed up with eye-witness legally sworn testimony of fraudulent activities as well as statistical analysis.

There's a meme that's been floating around recently that states:

Quote:One anonymous whistle-blower was OK to impeach the President but 1000s of sworn affidavits on fraud not worth investigating?

For 75 MILLION people, the idea that ONE person can accuse Trump of wrong-doing results in both Democrats and the media going full-throttle on delegitimizing his presidency seemed like a witch hunt. Watching those same politicians and media outlets not only disregard the overwhelming evidence of election fraud but actively censuring it only reinforces the belief of election fraud for those 75,000,000 people.


You don't have to agree that fraud occurred, but to discount very serious and firmly grounded concerns places you in the complicit category.

They. Aren't. That's why the courts are ALL rejecting them! Wake up my good man. You're missing life.

Can I ask a question and expect an honest answer?

Is a decision by a court always correct simply because the court ruled the way it did?

(12-10-2020 10:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 10:16 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:28 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

This is actually false. The attempt is to show 'fraud'... and thus an extra 50,000 votes randomly showing up in a liberal stronghold that skews 90/10 for Biden with no other similar outcomes in the other direction is highly suspicious/statistically improbable.... so while your statement above may not be incorrect, it isn't the entire basis of their position. It is merely the baseline for it.

(12-09-2020 10:53 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  And that's problem. After the fact there is no way to prove it. The problem needs to be addressed before the fact, with adequate prevention and detection controls. One party opposes those things.

This. Hence although I care nothing about changing this election, I am not against these suits moving forward in order to make sure that confidence in our process and elections is restored. Democrats had no faith in 2016 and Republicans no faith in 2020. Democrats acting like this is 'unique' are laughable. The specifics may be unique, but the concept that an election did not reflect the will of the people and the options that result is not at all.

So if a few morons claimed the 2016 election was stolen, that makes it okay for millions of morons to claim the 2020 election was stolen?

For Gods sake man, Hillary conceded in no time and that election was much much much closer. There is NO comparison to what trump and his minions are doing here to 2016. And throw in that he's likely only doing this to raise money, makes it even worse.

75,000,000 people voted for Trump. The majority of them believe there was fraudulent activity based on events seen on election night via broadcast and web media. Those events were followed up with eye-witness legally sworn testimony of fraudulent activities as well as statistical analysis.

There's a meme that's been floating around recently that states:

Quote:One anonymous whistle-blower was OK to impeach the President but 1000s of sworn affidavits on fraud not worth investigating?

For 75 MILLION people, the idea that ONE person can accuse Trump of wrong-doing results in both Democrats and the media going full-throttle on delegitimizing his presidency seemed like a witch hunt. Watching those same politicians and media outlets not only disregard the overwhelming evidence of election fraud but actively censuring it only reinforces the belief of election fraud for those 75,000,000 people.


You don't have to agree that fraud occurred, but to discount very serious and firmly grounded concerns places you in the complicit category.

They. Aren't. That's why the courts are ALL rejecting them! Wake up my good man. You're missing life.

Every court case so far has been dismissed due to the evidence. Not because of a lack of evidence. To the contrary, Obama judges are dismissing like mad because they dont want to hold a hearing where the evidence is presented.

If you knew how to read decisions, you would know this.

Also, what these judges, that are dismissing on the merit, are saying is that of the evidence of fraud is TRUE. Because thats what they have to admit to if they dismiss on the merit.

NY Sun even comes out for the Texas suit to be heard. https://www.nysun.com/editorials/texas-e...ard/91363/

"...Meantime, the Washington Post is out with an editorial warning about violence. We share the concern. The Post suggests it’s being stoked by President Trump. What makes it so explosive, in our view, is all the efforts to ridicule and block efforts to get a review — somewhere — of the questions Texas has laid before the Supreme Court. We fail to see a reason why the justices shouldn’t adjudicate the case in a constitutional way."

Editorial also notes that December 8th and 14th are legislative, not constitutional rules.

(12-10-2020 11:43 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 10:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 10:16 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:28 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  This is actually false. The attempt is to show 'fraud'... and thus an extra 50,000 votes randomly showing up in a liberal stronghold that skews 90/10 for Biden with no other similar outcomes in the other direction is highly suspicious/statistically improbable.... so while your statement above may not be incorrect, it isn't the entire basis of their position. It is merely the baseline for it.


This. Hence although I care nothing about changing this election, I am not against these suits moving forward in order to make sure that confidence in our process and elections is restored. Democrats had no faith in 2016 and Republicans no faith in 2020. Democrats acting like this is 'unique' are laughable. The specifics may be unique, but the concept that an election did not reflect the will of the people and the options that result is not at all.

So if a few morons claimed the 2016 election was stolen, that makes it okay for millions of morons to claim the 2020 election was stolen?

For Gods sake man, Hillary conceded in no time and that election was much much much closer. There is NO comparison to what trump and his minions are doing here to 2016. And throw in that he's likely only doing this to raise money, makes it even worse.

75,000,000 people voted for Trump. The majority of them believe there was fraudulent activity based on events seen on election night via broadcast and web media. Those events were followed up with eye-witness legally sworn testimony of fraudulent activities as well as statistical analysis.

There's a meme that's been floating around recently that states:

Quote:One anonymous whistle-blower was OK to impeach the President but 1000s of sworn affidavits on fraud not worth investigating?

For 75 MILLION people, the idea that ONE person can accuse Trump of wrong-doing results in both Democrats and the media going full-throttle on delegitimizing his presidency seemed like a witch hunt. Watching those same politicians and media outlets not only disregard the overwhelming evidence of election fraud but actively censuring it only reinforces the belief of election fraud for those 75,000,000 people.


You don't have to agree that fraud occurred, but to discount very serious and firmly grounded concerns places you in the complicit category.

They. Aren't. That's why the courts are ALL rejecting them! Wake up my good man. You're missing life.

Can I ask a question and expect an honest answer?

Is a decision by a court always correct simply because the court ruled the way it did?

Of course not, but we're a nation of laws...and we rely on courts heavily.

But you have to look at the bigger picture. The election related lawsuits aren't narrowly being defeated by the courts at a rate of like 30-26, they're losing them like 55-1.

There is no there there. Courts have to rely on proof and facts. These suits lack them both, and the shellacking bears that out.

EDIT: And no, not all of them were dismissed by Obama judges. That's an ignorant belief by even the dumbest of fools.

(12-10-2020 12:15 PM)bullet Wrote:  NY Sun even comes out for the Texas suit to be heard. https://www.nysun.com/editorials/texas-e...ard/91363/

"...Meantime, the Washington Post is out with an editorial warning about violence. We share the concern. The Post suggests it’s being stoked by President Trump. What makes it so explosive, in our view, is all the efforts to ridicule and block efforts to get a review — somewhere — of the questions Texas has laid before the Supreme Court. We fail to see a reason why the justices shouldn’t adjudicate the case in a constitutional way."

Editorial also notes that December 8th and 14th are legislative, not constitutional rules.

WTF is the NY Sun? I don't think I've ever heard of it.

(12-10-2020 12:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 11:43 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 10:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 10:16 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 01:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So if a few morons claimed the 2016 election was stolen, that makes it okay for millions of morons to claim the 2020 election was stolen?

For Gods sake man, Hillary conceded in no time and that election was much much much closer. There is NO comparison to what trump and his minions are doing here to 2016. And throw in that he's likely only doing this to raise money, makes it even worse.

75,000,000 people voted for Trump. The majority of them believe there was fraudulent activity based on events seen on election night via broadcast and web media. Those events were followed up with eye-witness legally sworn testimony of fraudulent activities as well as statistical analysis.

There's a meme that's been floating around recently that states:

Quote:One anonymous whistle-blower was OK to impeach the President but 1000s of sworn affidavits on fraud not worth investigating?

For 75 MILLION people, the idea that ONE person can accuse Trump of wrong-doing results in both Democrats and the media going full-throttle on delegitimizing his presidency seemed like a witch hunt. Watching those same politicians and media outlets not only disregard the overwhelming evidence of election fraud but actively censuring it only reinforces the belief of election fraud for those 75,000,000 people.


You don't have to agree that fraud occurred, but to discount very serious and firmly grounded concerns places you in the complicit category.

They. Aren't. That's why the courts are ALL rejecting them! Wake up my good man. You're missing life.

Can I ask a question and expect an honest answer?

Is a decision by a court always correct simply because the court ruled the way it did?

Of course not, but we're a nation of laws...and we rely on courts heavily.

But you have to look at the bigger picture. The election related lawsuits aren't narrowly being defeated by the courts at a rate of like 30-26, they're losing them like 55-1.

There is no there there. Courts have to rely on proof and facts. These suits lack them both, and the shellacking bears that out.

EDIT: And no, not all of them were dismissed by Obama judges. That's an ignorant belief by even the dumbest of fools.

Why do you bother posting here Tom? Seriously. It is a bunch of Trump Robots as far as you are concerned. Is someone paying you to fight with everyone here?

(12-10-2020 12:17 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 12:15 PM)bullet Wrote:  NY Sun even comes out for the Texas suit to be heard. https://www.nysun.com/editorials/texas-e...ard/91363/

"...Meantime, the Washington Post is out with an editorial warning about violence. We share the concern. The Post suggests it’s being stoked by President Trump. What makes it so explosive, in our view, is all the efforts to ridicule and block efforts to get a review — somewhere — of the questions Texas has laid before the Supreme Court. We fail to see a reason why the justices shouldn’t adjudicate the case in a constitutional way."

Editorial also notes that December 8th and 14th are legislative, not constitutional rules.

WTF is the NY Sun?

Apparently, something that chaps your ass.

Eldo, he's paid to post here. Have you not figured that out yet?

He admitted it once and if that isn't enough to convince you, he's on literally like clockwork 7a-4p M-F, he simply responds now to those who are unaware of his circular arguments, whataboutism, deflection & massive doses of pettifogging with no end to keep the posts coming.

Its why most of us have him on IGNORE

(12-10-2020 12:31 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 12:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 11:43 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 10:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-10-2020 10:16 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  75,000,000 people voted for Trump. The majority of them believe there was fraudulent activity based on events seen on election night via broadcast and web media. Those events were followed up with eye-witness legally sworn testimony of fraudulent activities as well as statistical analysis.

There's a meme that's been floating around recently that states:



For 75 MILLION people, the idea that ONE person can accuse Trump of wrong-doing results in both Democrats and the media going full-throttle on delegitimizing his presidency seemed like a witch hunt. Watching those same politicians and media outlets not only disregard the overwhelming evidence of election fraud but actively censuring it only reinforces the belief of election fraud for those 75,000,000 people.


You don't have to agree that fraud occurred, but to discount very serious and firmly grounded concerns places you in the complicit category.

They. Aren't. That's why the courts are ALL rejecting them! Wake up my good man. You're missing life.

Can I ask a question and expect an honest answer?

Is a decision by a court always correct simply because the court ruled the way it did?

Of course not, but we're a nation of laws...and we rely on courts heavily.

But you have to look at the bigger picture. The election related lawsuits aren't narrowly being defeated by the courts at a rate of like 30-26, they're losing them like 55-1.

There is no there there. Courts have to rely on proof and facts. These suits lack them both, and the shellacking bears that out.

EDIT: And no, not all of them were dismissed by Obama judges. That's an ignorant belief by even the dumbest of fools.

Why do you bother posting here Tom? Seriously. It is a bunch of Trump Robots as far as you are concerned. Is someone paying you to fight with everyone here?

Not really much of a fight.

(12-10-2020 12:15 PM)bullet Wrote:  "...Meantime, the Washington Post is out with an editorial warning about violence. We share the concern. The Post suggests it’s being stoked by President Trump. What makes it so explosive, in our view, is all the efforts to ridicule and block efforts to get a review — somewhere — of the questions Texas has laid before the Supreme Court. We fail to see a reason why the justices shouldn’t adjudicate the case in a constitutional way."

Editorial also notes that December 8th and 14th are legislative, not constitutional rules.

Tell them to bring their violence. I assure you that Trump supporters aint scared