RE: Director of National Intelligence Sets Record Straight
(10-19-2020 08:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: Oh...there's a qualified unbiased source.
By default, many on the left side including yourself, consider anybody in the administration, appointed by the administration, or with an "R" next to their name unqualified and biased. Naturally we all have a bias to one extent or another, but the left (and specifically you) seem to imply that the bias is so severe that anybody not "on your side" or anyone that makes a statement that does not conform to your own bias is inherently untrustworthy and unqualified.
Holding such an opinion can only lead to one outcome - civil war.
RE: Director of National Intelligence Sets Record Straight
I’m still waiting for Schiffty to release his 100% ironclad proof that Trump colluded with Russia. I admit that his withholding that info during impeachment was a bold move, so I’m sure he has a good plan to get it out there. No way that he just flat out lied about having it, right Tom?
RE: Director of National Intelligence Sets Record Straight
(10-19-2020 08:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:
(10-19-2020 08:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: Oh...there's a qualified unbiased source.
By default, many on the left side including yourself, consider anybody in the administration, appointed by the administration, or with an "R" next to their name unqualified and biased. Naturally we all have a bias to one extent or another, but the left (and specifically you) seem to imply that the bias is so severe that anybody not "on your side" or anyone that makes a statement that does not conform to your own bias is inherently untrustworthy and unqualified.
Holding such an opinion can only lead to one outcome - civil war.
Well, I don't have 100% trust in Schiff either, but the current DNI is probably the least qualified to hold that position, ever.
RE: Director of National Intelligence Sets Record Straight
(10-19-2020 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:
(10-19-2020 08:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:
(10-19-2020 08:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: Oh...there's a qualified unbiased source.
By default, many on the left side including yourself, consider anybody in the administration, appointed by the administration, or with an "R" next to their name unqualified and biased. Naturally we all have a bias to one extent or another, but the left (and specifically you) seem to imply that the bias is so severe that anybody not "on your side" or anyone that makes a statement that does not conform to your own bias is inherently untrustworthy and unqualified.
Holding such an opinion can only lead to one outcome - civil war.
Well, I don't have 100% trust in Schiff either, but the current DNI is probably the least qualified to hold that position, ever.
Yea, all he's done so far is to declassify documents showing maleficence by the FBI, which brought transparency to the american people. I can see how you hate him.
RE: Director of National Intelligence Sets Record Straight
(10-19-2020 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:
(10-19-2020 08:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:
(10-19-2020 08:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: Oh...there's a qualified unbiased source.
By default, many on the left side including yourself, consider anybody in the administration, appointed by the administration, or with an "R" next to their name unqualified and biased. Naturally we all have a bias to one extent or another, but the left (and specifically you) seem to imply that the bias is so severe that anybody not "on your side" or anyone that makes a statement that does not conform to your own bias is inherently untrustworthy and unqualified.
Holding such an opinion can only lead to one outcome - civil war.
Well, I don't have 100% trust in Schiff either, but the current DNI is probably the least qualified to hold that position, ever.
Based upon what criteria did you come up with that outlandish statement?
Also, it's rich that you don't have "100% trust" in Schiff considering that millions of people don't have any at all.
RE: Director of National Intelligence Sets Record Straight
(10-19-2020 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:
(10-19-2020 08:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:
(10-19-2020 08:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: Oh...there's a qualified unbiased source.
By default, many on the left side including yourself, consider anybody in the administration, appointed by the administration, or with an "R" next to their name unqualified and biased. Naturally we all have a bias to one extent or another, but the left (and specifically you) seem to imply that the bias is so severe that anybody not "on your side" or anyone that makes a statement that does not conform to your own bias is inherently untrustworthy and unqualified.
Holding such an opinion can only lead to one outcome - civil war.
Well, I don't have 100% trust in Schiff either, but the current DNI is probably the least qualified to hold that position, ever.
Does the fact that nobody with the last name "Biden" has not come out and said these are not Hunter Biden's emails tell you anything? If nothing else, a 100% straightforward denial would strengthen their case that this is Russian misinformation.
RE: Director of National Intelligence Sets Record Straight
(10-19-2020 09:38 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:
(10-19-2020 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:
(10-19-2020 08:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:
(10-19-2020 08:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: Oh...there's a qualified unbiased source.
By default, many on the left side including yourself, consider anybody in the administration, appointed by the administration, or with an "R" next to their name unqualified and biased. Naturally we all have a bias to one extent or another, but the left (and specifically you) seem to imply that the bias is so severe that anybody not "on your side" or anyone that makes a statement that does not conform to your own bias is inherently untrustworthy and unqualified.
Holding such an opinion can only lead to one outcome - civil war.
Well, I don't have 100% trust in Schiff either, but the current DNI is probably the least qualified to hold that position, ever.
Does the fact that nobody with the last name "Biden" has not come out and said these are not Hunter Biden's emails tell you anything? If nothing else, a 100% straightforward denial would strengthen their case that this is Russian misinformation.
The best evidence is a “lid” till Thursday. Two weeks before a presidential election. “Vote early!”.....before the chit hits the fan.....