(10-19-2020 09:38 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 08:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 08:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Oh...there's a qualified unbiased source.

By default, many on the left side including yourself, consider anybody in the administration, appointed by the administration, or with an "R" next to their name unqualified and biased. Naturally we all have a bias to one extent or another, but the left (and specifically you) seem to imply that the bias is so severe that anybody not "on your side" or anyone that makes a statement that does not conform to your own bias is inherently untrustworthy and unqualified.

Holding such an opinion can only lead to one outcome - civil war.

Well, I don't have 100% trust in Schiff either, but the current DNI is probably the least qualified to hold that position, ever.

Does the fact that nobody with the last name "Biden" has not come out and said these are not Hunter Biden's emails tell you anything? If nothing else, a 100% straightforward denial would strengthen their case that this is Russian misinformation.

Other than a dunce hack like schiff, who else in any “position” has made the claim that this is the ROOOSKIES!!! again?

Does anyone, ANYONE, believe this garbage yet again?

What’s that old saying? Fool me once...


Dumbazzes

(10-19-2020 09:57 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 09:38 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 08:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 08:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Oh...there's a qualified unbiased source.

By default, many on the left side including yourself, consider anybody in the administration, appointed by the administration, or with an "R" next to their name unqualified and biased. Naturally we all have a bias to one extent or another, but the left (and specifically you) seem to imply that the bias is so severe that anybody not "on your side" or anyone that makes a statement that does not conform to your own bias is inherently untrustworthy and unqualified.

Holding such an opinion can only lead to one outcome - civil war.

Well, I don't have 100% trust in Schiff either, but the current DNI is probably the least qualified to hold that position, ever.

Does the fact that nobody with the last name "Biden" has not come out and said these are not Hunter Biden's emails tell you anything? If nothing else, a 100% straightforward denial would strengthen their case that this is Russian misinformation.

Other than a dunce hack like schiff, who else in any “position” has made the claim that this is the ROOOSKIES!!! again?

Does anyone, ANYONE, believe this garbage yet again?

What’s that old saying? Fool me once...


Dumbazzes

As I was drinking my morning coffee I perused the MSM channels. More than one was plugging the "alleged" emails "could be part of the "Russian misinformation".campaign. ANYTHING to divert attention it seems. MSM doesn't need it to be truthful, just needs to make the statement. They know their followers will believe everything they say. I could only laugh and chalk it up to standard operating procedure.

(10-19-2020 10:20 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 09:57 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 09:38 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 08:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  By default, many on the left side including yourself, consider anybody in the administration, appointed by the administration, or with an "R" next to their name unqualified and biased. Naturally we all have a bias to one extent or another, but the left (and specifically you) seem to imply that the bias is so severe that anybody not "on your side" or anyone that makes a statement that does not conform to your own bias is inherently untrustworthy and unqualified.

Holding such an opinion can only lead to one outcome - civil war.

Well, I don't have 100% trust in Schiff either, but the current DNI is probably the least qualified to hold that position, ever.

Does the fact that nobody with the last name "Biden" has not come out and said these are not Hunter Biden's emails tell you anything? If nothing else, a 100% straightforward denial would strengthen their case that this is Russian misinformation.

Other than a dunce hack like schiff, who else in any “position” has made the claim that this is the ROOOSKIES!!! again?

Does anyone, ANYONE, believe this garbage yet again?

What’s that old saying? Fool me once...


Dumbazzes

As I was drinking my morning coffee I perused the MSM channels. More than one was plugging the "alleged" emails "could be part of the "Russian misinformation".campaign. ANYTHING to divert attention it seems. MSM doesn't need it to be truthful, just needs to make the statement. They know their followers will believe everything they say. I could only laugh and chalk it up to standard operating procedure.

Trump needs to pick a segment in the upcoming debate, something like the climate change section that has absolutely zero bearing in this election, and spend is entire time focusing on the Biden emails. He would have to do it calmly, and would have to give Biden enough speaking time to hang himself. That's a tall order and Trump would have to show more restraint than he typically has.

Russia Russia Russia LOL.