The DA charged these guys to avoid "riots" just like Garchetti moved the OJ trial into the city for the right type of "jury" selection to ensure an acquittal to avoid riots. And he freely admits that.

(05-09-2020 02:51 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 05:50 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(05-08-2020 10:26 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-08-2020 10:05 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(05-08-2020 09:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  There are no facts, and no evidence has been presented, no discovery, no testimony.
Both men were denied bail. Convicted murders, rapists have been released from jail because of CV19. You are confusing media reports as facts and evidence, why?

I went mostly by the police report and the letter from DA #2 which is where the basis for the 2 men not being charged was found.

Of course the two men deserve a trial, but you seem to be forgetting, it took a leaked video to get a trial

Also what is happening to whatever other convicts you are sighting isnt relevant to whether or not these men were performing a lawful citizens arrest. That is an outside voice

That is reasonable doubt. Oh YOU are an outside voice. Time maybe be quiet?

Why? Because you don't like my analysis of what had been presented so far and how it pertains to Georgia law?

Outside voices...your first post in this thread below, which has no relevance to the facts of this case

(05-06-2020 09:08 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  You do realize that a black murdered a white today. Do I have to search for it?

The video was leaked by a lawyer representing the driver and or the other 2 guys to exonerate them. It shows exactly what they described to the police. I guarantphuckingtee you that dude was not out "jogging".

It was the lawyer representing the guy who got the video. He wants to ensure it’s known that his client didn’t do the shooting. He’s not going to represent the other two.

Besides, they didn’t say in the police report that they either saw or knew he was out there committing crimes. They stopped him because they suspected him of it. That’s an unlawful action right there on their part. They had no business stopping him and let’s not forget to mention that they stopped him with vehicles and guns. My question is whether or not that’s a felony itself.

(05-09-2020 02:16 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 01:39 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 12:24 PM)memtigbb Wrote:  

(05-08-2020 07:32 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(05-08-2020 04:44 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  2 white guys profiled a jogging black man as a threatening criminal, and deemed him worthy of stopping at gun point. Race is very at play here. Your head is in the sand or in denial.

How do you know he wasn't the same guy who was in the videos breaking into houses?

Uh, show me these videos because according to the police there, there have been no reports of any break-ins in that area. So that is an entirely false narrative.

The videos haven’t been released and there haven’t been police reports in the free weeks preceding the incident. The guy who owns the house under construction said that he saw him on video stealing $2500 in tackle a bit before, but that wasn’t reported to police either.

Probably because whoever has those videos isn’t a prosecution lawyer without care for due process and how did Obama put it... “rule of law”?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

The person with the videos is someone who’s stolen goods didn’t even exist until MONTHS after they were stolen.

It’s probably going to be an instance where the footage was “deleted”.

(05-09-2020 03:17 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 02:51 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 05:50 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(05-08-2020 10:26 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-08-2020 10:05 PM)solohawks Wrote:  I went mostly by the police report and the letter from DA #2 which is where the basis for the 2 men not being charged was found.

Of course the two men deserve a trial, but you seem to be forgetting, it took a leaked video to get a trial

Also what is happening to whatever other convicts you are sighting isnt relevant to whether or not these men were performing a lawful citizens arrest. That is an outside voice

That is reasonable doubt. Oh YOU are an outside voice. Time maybe be quiet?

Why? Because you don't like my analysis of what had been presented so far and how it pertains to Georgia law?

Outside voices...your first post in this thread below, which has no relevance to the facts of this case

(05-06-2020 09:08 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  You do realize that a black murdered a white today. Do I have to search for it?

The video was leaked by a lawyer representing the driver and or the other 2 guys to exonerate them. It shows exactly what they described to the police. I guarantphuckingtee you that dude was not out "jogging".

It was the lawyer representing the guy who got the video. He wants to ensure it’s known that his client didn’t do the shooting. He’s not going to represent the other two.

Besides, they didn’t say in the police report that they either saw or knew he was out there committing crimes. They stopped him because they suspected him of it. That’s an unlawful action right there on their part. They had no business stopping him and let’s not forget to mention that they stopped him with vehicles and guns. My question is whether or not that’s a felony itself.

And did they charge the guy driving taking the video? Crimes might have been committed by the Father Son duo, but the media narrative in going to start more riots and that is what they want.

The plot thickens...


https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/gbi-...r80R7CTnL/

How many of my fellow joggers out there take quick detours into houses or houses under construction while “jogging”?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Might as well just execute the two guys on the court house steps. No way they get a fair trial.

(05-09-2020 04:11 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  The plot thickens...


https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/gbi-...r80R7CTnL/

How many of my fellow joggers out there take quick detours into houses or houses under construction while “jogging”?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Rather one sided. Rather typical of AJC which loves to race bait. The Torpy article from the AJC from a couple a days ago was more balanced.

This does have more information about the earlier videos.

(05-09-2020 04:30 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 04:11 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  The plot thickens...


https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/gbi-...r80R7CTnL/

How many of my fellow joggers out there take quick detours into houses or houses under construction while “jogging”?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Rather one sided. Rather typical of AJC which loves to race bait. The Torpy article from the AJC from a couple a days ago was more balanced.

This does have more information about the earlier videos.

Regardless of how one sided you think AJC is... they didn’t make this video. The video links are not biased reporting.

They’re factual, and add context to the entirety of the incident.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Does this video justify detainment by non law enforcement?

The defense is going to need to prove a felony was committed and the 2 men knew it was Arbery that did it

(05-09-2020 04:35 PM)solohawks Wrote:  The defense is going to need to prove a felony was committed...

No. That’s not how that works. That’s not how that works at all.

The DEFENSE doesn’t need to prove anything. That’s the prosecution’s job sweetheart.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

(05-09-2020 04:11 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  The plot thickens...


https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/gbi-...r80R7CTnL/

How many of my fellow joggers out there take quick detours into houses or houses under construction while “jogging”?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Here in NW st John's county? I do it all the time. I like looking at what they are doing. But, I'm white

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

(05-09-2020 04:17 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  

And there it is. Covington 2.0.

How many more times are some of you going to be duped by your bias?

(05-09-2020 04:35 PM)solohawks Wrote:  Does this video justify detainment by non law enforcement?

The defense is going to need to prove a felony was committed and the 2 men knew it was Arbery that did it

The gotta prove they are innocent?

(05-09-2020 04:45 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 04:17 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  

And there it is. Covington 2.0.

How many more times are some of you going to be duped by your bias?

1st page. Wait for the rest of the story.

(05-09-2020 04:37 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 04:11 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  The plot thickens...


https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/gbi-...r80R7CTnL/

How many of my fellow joggers out there take quick detours into houses or houses under construction while “jogging”?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Here in NW st John's county? I do it all the time. I like looking at what they are doing. But, I'm white

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

In cargo pants and boots carrying a hammer? Must be new thing.

(05-09-2020 04:11 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  The plot thickens...


https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/gbi-...r80R7CTnL/

How many of my fellow joggers out there take quick detours into houses or houses under construction while “jogging”?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Honestly, I do it a lot when I go for walks with my dog. I wouldn't say I go IN, but I've definitely poked my head in before to look around. I see others do it a lot too. Depends on the build stage. If this is pre-door installation, it seems innocent enough. If someone is opening doors to go in, it is more questionable.

(05-09-2020 04:51 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 04:37 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 04:11 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  The plot thickens...


https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/gbi-...r80R7CTnL/

How many of my fellow joggers out there take quick detours into houses or houses under construction while “jogging”?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Here in NW st John's county? I do it all the time. I like looking at what they are doing. But, I'm white

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

In cargo pants and boots carrying a hammer? Must be new thing.

Doesn’t everyone jog in/with those?

Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

(05-09-2020 04:54 PM)Niner National Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 04:11 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  The plot thickens...


https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/gbi-...r80R7CTnL/

How many of my fellow joggers out there take quick detours into houses or houses under construction while “jogging”?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Honestly, I do it a lot when I go for walks with my dog. I wouldn't say I go IN, but I've definitely poked my head in before to look around. I see others do it a lot too. Depends on the build stage. If this is pre-door installation, it seems innocent enough. If someone is opening doors to go in, it is more questionable.

I don't trespass on other peoples property because, you know, I dont wanna get shot. But that's me.

(05-09-2020 04:37 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 04:35 PM)solohawks Wrote:  The defense is going to need to prove a felony was committed...

No. That’s not how that works. That’s not how that works at all.

The DEFENSE doesn’t need to prove anything. That’s the prosecution’s job sweetheart.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

The prosecution has video proof of a man being shot to death. Now it is the job of the defense to prove the actions that lead to the situation were justified. Tall order.