(01-16-2020 09:15 AM)The Knight Time Wrote: (01-16-2020 09:10 AM)JUSTGOPLAY Wrote: (01-16-2020 08:53 AM)The Knight Time Wrote: And football alone lost $10M.
If UConn were a business, it would have been put out of its' misery long ago.
http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-sp-ucon...story.html
I believe this move out of the AAC is akin to them falling on their sword....When you're broke, you're broke. They've tried to spin it otherwise, but their financials are a disaster.
Unless they really do intend to drop to FCS very quickly, the move out of the AAC was really dumb. This conference was set to pay $7-8M per year in TV revenue alone; now they're supposedly going into the Indy abyss with a terrible schedule and will sell even less tickets.
That said, the AAC will be far better in the long run not having a financial ticking time bomb in the conference.
Looking at the way their administration has handled most things (other than WBB and a few good FB seasons), they have been bungling one thing after another, before and since they joined the AAC:
1) They permitted MBB recruiting violations to go on for two decades, despite repeated warnings and penalties.
2) They mismanaged their FB program so badly that it tanked in only a few seasons.
3) Unlike nearly every other conference school, their athletic programs stagnated or declined after joining the conference.
4) Instead of taking advantage of the $5 million/year increase in the AAC and following a stable guide path back to stability in college athletics, they threw caution to the winds and risked everything on recovering their glory days in the Big East.
5) In doing so, they seem to have committed a major unforced error by overlooking the financial impact of their FB program to their overall athletic budget.
The loss of UConn MBB & WBB, their brand, and their potential viewership definitely hurts the AAC, and I wish they hadn't decided to leave the conference. But, on the other hand, the way their administration has been bungling UConn athletics, perhaps we might end up doing better off without them, in the long haul.