Side Show Joe
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10,005
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 394
I Root For: North Texas
Location: TEXAS
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-18-2019 08:35 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: This thread is a joke, and the longer it stays active, the more of a circus you guys are running. There were coma rumors, a link to a Ruth Ginsberg death notice, and all sorts of cruel memes about a very sick woman who has given a lifetime of service on the court or in the classroom.
I said almost a month ago in this thread TMZ would break the real story and lo and behold they did. I also predicted she would show up at the Oscars, and I still think that will happen next weekend.
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods. To not do so would be akin in my eyes to anything that some of you like to continually throw in the face of JD Tulane. Hell, one of you has a sig which is a direct and constant slap in his face.
Okay he didn't say he would close this thread. I'm wrong about that. I can't believe he would want to keep it open at this point though. Looking at the video, you will all get your wish soon enough. That should be enough of a victory, and you would think a mod would show some human dignity and close the thread on their own.
The fact that TMZ had to break this story is a disappointing indictment of the main stream media. ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, MSN, CNBC, and OAN should all be ashamed. The traditional media has become a dinosaur, and is now obsolete. Mostly due to self inflected wounds, like this story.
|
|
02-18-2019 09:08 PM |
|
Fort Bend Owl
Legend
Posts: 28,448
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 454
I Root For: An easy win
Location:
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote: [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.
Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.
Post 133 in this thread
|
|
02-18-2019 09:24 PM |
|
Owl 69/70/75
Just an old rugby coach
Posts: 80,833
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3211
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: (02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote: [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.
Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.
Post 133 in this thread
Not in the post 133 that comes up on my computer.
|
|
02-18-2019 09:40 PM |
|
Fort Bend Owl
Legend
Posts: 28,448
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 454
I Root For: An easy win
Location:
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
|
|
02-18-2019 09:50 PM |
|
Side Show Joe
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10,005
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 394
I Root For: North Texas
Location: TEXAS
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: (02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote: [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.
Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.
Post 133 in this thread
He agreed to my suggestion of keeping the count going in the title. I don't see where he said he would remove the thread.
Although, I could see this thread evolving into a discussion of her health and fitness to serve. She did look very bad in the video you posted.
|
|
02-18-2019 09:52 PM |
|
Eagleaidaholic
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10,143
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 784
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Anybody ask her where she was flying in from? Why was she in the airport?
|
|
02-18-2019 09:55 PM |
|
Claw
Hall of Famer
Posts: 24,986
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 1231
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Orangeville HELP!
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-18-2019 09:55 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote: Anybody ask her where she was flying in from? Why was she in the airport?
The bold lie. It isn't her. It's the arrival of the double.
|
|
02-18-2019 10:23 PM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 69,227
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7133
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
supposedly, the 'dixie darling' is 'physically' going to work today....
I'm certain you guys will let me know if 1 or 0....
|
|
02-19-2019 06:26 AM |
|
q5sys
1st String
Posts: 2,135
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 323
I Root For: MIT & USAFA
Location: DC/Baltimore Metro
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: (02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote: [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.
Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.
Post 133 in this thread
Here is what I see him say in post 133:
(02-05-2019 06:28 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: (02-05-2019 06:15 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote: So, RBG went to a theatrical performance about her life, and those in charge didn't stop to recognize or highlight her attendance at the event? That makes absolutely no sense.
A public appearance implies that the public actually get to see the individual in question. Apparently, no one thought to snag a photo or video of her at this event. I find that hard to believe. She could have been there, but this report is far from proof. I say keep the count in the title going.
Till there is visual proof, it will keep going.
|
|
02-19-2019 10:13 AM |
|
CrimsonPhantom
CUSA Curator
Posts: 42,061
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 2401
I Root For: NM State
Location:
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-19-2019 10:13 AM)q5sys Wrote: (02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: (02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote: [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.
Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.
Post 133 in this thread
Here is what I see him say in post 133:
(02-05-2019 06:28 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: (02-05-2019 06:15 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote: So, RBG went to a theatrical performance about her life, and those in charge didn't stop to recognize or highlight her attendance at the event? That makes absolutely no sense.
A public appearance implies that the public actually get to see the individual in question. Apparently, no one thought to snag a photo or video of her at this event. I find that hard to believe. She could have been there, but this report is far from proof. I say keep the count in the title going.
Till there is visual proof, it will keep going.
Since there is video of her from yesterday landing at the airport ( where is she coming from? is that here double and that's why she's been kept out of the public? needed time to prep her?) The count in the thread title will remain where it is, to represent how long she was absent.
|
|
02-19-2019 01:48 PM |
|
SoMs Eagle
Heisman
Posts: 8,998
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 683
I Root For: Mighty Mustard
Location:
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
She must like that coat....
|
|
02-19-2019 01:56 PM |
|
UofMstateU
Legend
Posts: 39,270
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 3586
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(This post was last modified: 02-19-2019 02:13 PM by UofMstateU.)
|
|
02-19-2019 02:12 PM |
|
CrimsonPhantom
CUSA Curator
Posts: 42,061
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 2401
I Root For: NM State
Location:
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-19-2019 02:12 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:
|
|
02-19-2019 03:10 PM |
|
Claw
Hall of Famer
Posts: 24,986
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 1231
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Orangeville HELP!
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
The shoes are the giveaway.
|
|
02-19-2019 03:12 PM |
|
Side Show Joe
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10,005
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 394
I Root For: North Texas
Location: TEXAS
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-19-2019 01:48 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: (02-19-2019 10:13 AM)q5sys Wrote: (02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: (02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote: [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.
Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.
Post 133 in this thread
Here is what I see him say in post 133:
(02-05-2019 06:28 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: (02-05-2019 06:15 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote: So, RBG went to a theatrical performance about her life, and those in charge didn't stop to recognize or highlight her attendance at the event? That makes absolutely no sense.
A public appearance implies that the public actually get to see the individual in question. Apparently, no one thought to snag a photo or video of her at this event. I find that hard to believe. She could have been there, but this report is far from proof. I say keep the count in the title going.
Till there is visual proof, it will keep going.
Since there is video of her from yesterday landing at the airport (where is she coming from? is that here double and that's why she's been kept out of the public? needed time to prep her?) The count in the thread title will remain where it is, to represent how long she was absent.
Maybe now we can keep a count of how many times she falls asleep during arguments?
The really sad thing is that although the two Justices also pictured in the drawing look concerned about her apparent narcolepsy, they are obviously not concerned enough to make an issue of it.
(This post was last modified: 02-19-2019 09:04 PM by Side Show Joe.)
|
|
02-19-2019 08:52 PM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 69,227
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7133
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-19-2019 08:52 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote: (02-19-2019 01:48 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: (02-19-2019 10:13 AM)q5sys Wrote: (02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: (02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote: [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.
Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.
Post 133 in this thread
Here is what I see him say in post 133:
(02-05-2019 06:28 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: (02-05-2019 06:15 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote: So, RBG went to a theatrical performance about her life, and those in charge didn't stop to recognize or highlight her attendance at the event? That makes absolutely no sense.
A public appearance implies that the public actually get to see the individual in question. Apparently, no one thought to snag a photo or video of her at this event. I find that hard to believe. She could have been there, but this report is far from proof. I say keep the count in the title going.
Till there is visual proof, it will keep going.
Since there is video of her from yesterday landing at the airport (where is she coming from? is that here double and that's why she's been kept out of the public? needed time to prep her?) The count in the thread title will remain where it is, to represent how long she was absent.
Maybe now we can keep a count of how many times she falls asleep during arguments?
The really sad thing is that although the two Justices also pictured in the drawing look concerned about her apparent narcolepsy, they apparently are not concerned enough to make an issue of it.
that's just flat out freddie joe patek(ic)....
it's disturbing this hasn't gained more 'traction'....
she's turned her duty into a fk'n joke...
|
|
02-19-2019 09:00 PM |
|
q5sys
1st String
Posts: 2,135
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 323
I Root For: MIT & USAFA
Location: DC/Baltimore Metro
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-19-2019 02:12 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:
I'm a little interested in how she magically was cured of her kyphosis in the last two months. That usually takes years and/or intensive spinal surgery.
|
|
02-19-2019 09:03 PM |
|
Eagleaidaholic
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10,143
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 784
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-19-2019 09:03 PM)q5sys Wrote: (02-19-2019 02:12 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:
I'm a little interested in how she magically was cured of her kyphosis in the last two months. That usually takes years and/or intensive spinal surgery.
Same shoes and pants even. What is the deal with the blue arrow?
|
|
02-19-2019 09:18 PM |
|
Claw
Hall of Famer
Posts: 24,986
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 1231
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Orangeville HELP!
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Any pictures from today?
|
|
02-19-2019 09:42 PM |
|
Eagleaidaholic
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10,143
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 784
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
|
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-19-2019 09:03 PM)q5sys Wrote: (02-19-2019 02:12 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:
I'm a little interested in how she magically was cured of her kyphosis in the last two months. That usually takes years and/or intensive spinal surgery.
Actually her head being upright is miraculous. Especially for someone who has supposedly been in bed for two months.
|
|
02-19-2019 09:54 PM |
|