(12-19-2018 11:54 PM)thespywhozaggedme Wrote: overall better conference than the MWC doesn't reflect in recruiting
https://247sports.com/college/boise-stat...l/Commits/
https://247sports.com/Season/2019-Footba...erence=AAC
I'm not a recruitnik, but the bolded statement is kind of hard to support.
For 2019,247 currently has Boise ahead of any AAC teams (congrats!) but then the #2 mwc team would be #10 in the AAC. In fact, top ten 2019 recruiting classes among all the non-contract-bowl conferences, would be six AAC, two CUSA, one mwc, and one SunBelt. Put another way, those are the only G4 teams that break into the top half of the AAC.
For 2019, Rivals has AAC teams at #1-#3 and #6 before Boise at #7 (again, two CUSA tied #4). The second best mwc team would be #11 in the AAC. Again, top ten non-contract-bowl conferences, six AAC.
I looked at Bill Connelly's 2-year and 5-year recruiting rankings, which factor into his preseason S&P+
https://csnbbs.com/thread-853848.html Five year recruiting rankings, AAC had six of the top ten non-contract bowl conference teams and eight of the top twelve.
In the "P6 off the field - Recruiting" thread I linked back to another thread with a depiction that Mad MacGyver (a Boise State fan) had done for 2014-2017 recruiting comparing AAC and mwc.
https://csnbbs.com/thread-823881-post-14...id14516638 Same thing - AAC, AAC, maybe mwc at the top but AAC overall, AAC.