(09-27-2018 01:35 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:31 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:27 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:11 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:08 AM)shere khan Wrote:  appeal to tradition,faulty induction, guilt by association.

He was a prep school boy and a member of a fraternity so he MUST have done it.

Again, I’m not saying he’s guilty; but that doesn’t mean the accusers are lying, either.

His buddy who he clearly hung out with has admitted to bad behavior and blackout drunken nights when he didn’t know what he did or didn’t do. Both share little quotes alluding to bad behavior in the yearbook.

Meanwhile, he paints a picture of doing nothing but service projects while all this goes on. Something doesn’t add up. The time needs to be taken to get to the bottom of it.

just admit you hate the nominee and you want to stall the process until he buckles or time runs out. thats fair enough.

I don’t hate the nominee per se, and I personally don’t see it dragging out that long - but that doesn’t negate the fact that these women & their accusations need to be taken seriously. if he is guilty he can be removed. if they are lying they can be punished.

that is my argument for the process. so he is confirmed and there is a serious allegation every week for the next ten years. the seriousness of the allegation does not equal credibility.

these accusations waited 36 years and on the eve of confirmation they are suddenly they credible and serious?

or

are the allegations are politically motivated and ginned up to block a nominee.

which one is the more reasonable conclusion?

if he is found guilty, hang him.

(09-27-2018 01:46 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:35 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:31 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:27 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:11 AM)bullet Wrote:  He was a prep school boy and a member of a fraternity so he MUST have done it.

Again, I’m not saying he’s guilty; but that doesn’t mean the accusers are lying, either.

His buddy who he clearly hung out with has admitted to bad behavior and blackout drunken nights when he didn’t know what he did or didn’t do. Both share little quotes alluding to bad behavior in the yearbook.

Meanwhile, he paints a picture of doing nothing but service projects while all this goes on. Something doesn’t add up. The time needs to be taken to get to the bottom of it.

just admit you hate the nominee and you want to stall the process until he buckles or time runs out. thats fair enough.

I don’t hate the nominee per se, and I personally don’t see it dragging out that long - but that doesn’t negate the fact that these women & their accusations need to be taken seriously. if he is guilty he can be removed. if they are lying they can be punished.

that is my argument for the process. so he is confirmed and there is a serious allegation every week for the next ten years. the seriousness of the allegation does not equal credibility.

these accusations waited 36 years and on the eve of confirmation they are suddenly they credible and serious?

or

are the allegations are politically motivated and ginned up to block a nominee.

which one is the more reasonable conclusion?

if he is found guilty, hang him.

By not introducing the accusations during the time of the questioning of Cavanaugh Fienstien is the one who negated the appropriate addressing of these accusations. She violated protocol, did so intentionally in order to make it about a stall tactic instead of the truth, and both sides of the aisle should hold her accountable for playing games with these womens' accusations.

(09-27-2018 01:56 AM)JRsec Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:46 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:35 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:31 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:27 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  Again, I’m not saying he’s guilty; but that doesn’t mean the accusers are lying, either.

His buddy who he clearly hung out with has admitted to bad behavior and blackout drunken nights when he didn’t know what he did or didn’t do. Both share little quotes alluding to bad behavior in the yearbook.

Meanwhile, he paints a picture of doing nothing but service projects while all this goes on. Something doesn’t add up. The time needs to be taken to get to the bottom of it.

just admit you hate the nominee and you want to stall the process until he buckles or time runs out. thats fair enough.

I don’t hate the nominee per se, and I personally don’t see it dragging out that long - but that doesn’t negate the fact that these women & their accusations need to be taken seriously. if he is guilty he can be removed. if they are lying they can be punished.

that is my argument for the process. so he is confirmed and there is a serious allegation every week for the next ten years. the seriousness of the allegation does not equal credibility.

these accusations waited 36 years and on the eve of confirmation they are suddenly they credible and serious?

or

are the allegations are politically motivated and ginned up to block a nominee.

which one is the more reasonable conclusion?

if he is found guilty, hang him.

By not introducing the accusations during the time of the questioning of Cavanaugh Fienstien is the one who negated the appropriate addressing of these accusations. She violated protocol, did so intentionally in order to make it about a stall tactic instead of the truth, and both sides of the aisle should hold her accountable for playing games with these womens' accusations.

that is correct....

first there is protocol to the system of filing a police report (which kinda matters)

then there is madam fuckstein that camps on some bs for political purposes.....

these stupid assclowns talk about DJT and 'national interest' are burying themselves....

nobody is happier than thine how they're playing their version of the game (well, maybe President Donald J. Trump is)

#henceDJTultimateTroll

(09-27-2018 01:13 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:05 AM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  If it is your son, you should know you son and his behavior. It is that simple. You gave him the ethics and morals or you did not, unless the kid is a sociopath. So assuming, and reasonably so, you have done your job as a parent, how do your deal with **** allegations of abuse that have no collaboration? Do you play the "let's see" game or do you defend the honor of your child that, apparently, unfortunately, was born with a *****?

In the attempt to stay on topic, your daughter has made an accusation against someone. Do you call it **** without waiting to see how the story plays out? I wouldn’t, just like I would wait to hear both sides before blindly defending any actions on my son’s part. Isn’t that what repubs lament these days? The “my kid would NEVER do that” defense?

Stop trotting out this same tired left wing talking points over and over. They ARE being heard and people HAVE listened to them from the start. You can't sit back and act otherwise because of a few comments on some message board.

Unless new facts suddenly emerge tomorrow the accusations lack substance and credibility and they in no way should derail the nomination.

(09-27-2018 01:27 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:11 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:08 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:00 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 12:36 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  “drunk beetch” or anything like that wasn't in the post you directed your post to. The post that I quoted.
https://csnbbs.com/thread-859070-post-15...id15534270

So for the 4th time I will ask if this was your son and knowing the facts we know. Would you be so willing to trust Mrs. Fords facts as she remembers them? Or the things said by the repeatedly gang rape girl?

A simple yes or no is all that's needed...why is that so hard for you?

Because it’s not as simple as a yes or no. If it were my son in Kavanaugh’s situation, I’d want to hear these women’s stories, and I’d want to hear from those who hung out with my son during that same time, as a parent is it privy to everything. In Kavanaugh’s case, the company he kept doesn’t exactly paint the picture he is trying to present.

appeal to tradition,faulty induction, guilt by association.

He was a prep school boy and a member of a fraternity so he MUST have done it.

Again, I’m not saying he’s guilty; but that doesn’t mean the accusers are lying, either.

His buddy who he clearly hung out with has admitted to bad behavior and blackout drunken nights when he didn’t know what he did or didn’t do. Both share little quotes alluding to bad behavior in the yearbook.

Meanwhile, he paints a picture of doing nothing but service projects while all this goes on. Something doesn’t add up. The time needs to be taken to get to the bottom of it.

There is hardly a person on the SCOTUS or in the Senate or in the government who did not do some drinking and act a fool a few times as a teenager, or have a shady friend or two at that age.

These things are not remotely relevant and in no way disqualify a person or make these allegations any more credible.

It says a lot that you claim HIS story doesn't add up, but find no such problems with the accuser's story, which clearly have some serious issues and inconsistencies.

(09-27-2018 01:13 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 01:01 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 12:47 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Character assassination is an attempt to tarnish a person's reputation. It may involve exaggeration, misleading half-truths, or manipulation of facts to present an untrue picture of the targeted person. It is a form of defamation and can be a form of ad hominem argument.

let them vote. there is a reason that there is a vote.

if he is confirmed and the accusations are true, then remove him

if the accusations are false let the accusers be punished.

how stupid are people? seriously?

Why vote until these women have been heard & their stories discussed? What’s the rush? Isn’t that what we were told in 2015?

and there you have it.

this is why I miss playing you guys in foosball.....

this thread got really good in the laugh factory.....

fwiw, they're pretty dayum stupid....

I call Fabrics on this last accuser. The accusations are so outlandish that they are laughable. Nothing like this has ever happened in High School or much less anywhere else outside of Chatsworth California.

so this woman went to these frat parties, in which she knew the punch got spiked, saw girls getting gang banged, but kept going back to said parties?

(09-27-2018 06:13 AM)NCeagle Wrote:  so this woman went to these frat parties, in which she knew the punch got spiked, saw girls getting gang banged, but kept going back to said parties?

Sounds like she was either in on it or just simply hates women...

Irony....

(09-27-2018 12:02 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 11:52 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 11:41 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 10:56 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 12:26 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  You haven't been paying attention if you don't know why victims don't always report, especially back then.

Yes I remember women reporting it against Bill Clinton. Dragged through the mud by our vaunted mainstream press. And of course Hillary too. If I was a woman I'd think twice about reporting.

As I said multiple times in this thread, I’d hope we’d would learn from past politicians/SC candidates’ behavior & listen to them before making judgement calls. If it were your daughter making these reports, I’d bet you’d think twice before dismissing them.

If it was your son being accused I bet you wouldn't be so quick to believe someone that admits they were drunk. Didn't know who's house. Didn't know how many people were there. Didn't know the month. Didn't know the year.

Why is it only daughters are so special we have to believe them? Especially when they name 3 people that supposedly saw this and none of the three remember it?

If it were my son I would expect him not to be a party to people who did these things, whether or not he was an active participant. If he were drunk and/or involved with these people when they did these things, he’s part of the problem.

yeah and if this was my daughter, I would expect her to stop going to the parties after the first time... instead of going 9 more times.

(09-26-2018 02:06 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 01:36 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The GOP. The party of serial rapists and pu55y grabbers. How pathetic. It’s not the defense of it it’s the utterrecklessness of jamming him through. This after you left Garland out to dry for 14 months. What in the hell is a matter with you guys? Party over country indeed.

Bill Clinton. Ted Kennedy. Harvey Weinstein. John Conyers. You are just failing miserably as a troll. The Russians are paying you too much

He's just mesmerized by the MSM. They all have a vested and coordinated interest in seeing the USSC stay as is. They have proven they will go to the bottom of the barrel to keep the status quo.

(09-27-2018 06:30 AM)gdunn Wrote:  Irony....

and avanetti blocked her too. haahahaha

This is as stupid as the made up bs surrounding Ping Pong Pizza. Good thing no one believed those lies either.

(09-27-2018 06:13 AM)NCeagle Wrote:  so this woman went to these frat parties, in which she knew the punch got spiked, saw girls getting gang banged, but kept going back to said parties?

that's where it loses traction.....toss in zero police reports and you get a crockpot full of crock....

this is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy stupiderrrrrrrrrrr than the Clarence Thomas accusation......

you have to be dumbarse to believe ANY of these allegations....

(09-27-2018 06:13 AM)NCeagle Wrote:  so this woman went to these frat parties, in which she knew the punch got spiked, saw girls getting gang banged, but kept going back to said parties?

Isn't "the punch" supposed to be "spiked". We called it jungle juice and made it in the tub. Besides who would go to a party that has straight "punch"?

(09-26-2018 11:41 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 10:56 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 12:26 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 11:44 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  So is she suggesting that Kavanaughs high school is the most rapey school in the country, where girls are gang-raped at every party but she decided to keep going to them anyway?

Who are these dozens of rapists? Where are the dozens of victims? Why the f**k did no one ever file a police report if this was routinely happening?

You haven't been paying attention if you don't know why victims don't always report, especially back then.

Yes I remember women reporting it against Bill Clinton. Dragged through the mud by our vaunted mainstream press. And of course Hillary too. If I was a woman I'd think twice about reporting.

As I said multiple times in this thread, I’d hope we’d would learn from past politicians/SC candidates’ behavior & listen to them before making judgement calls. If it were your daughter making these reports, I’d bet you’d think twice before dismissing them.

My daughter wouldn't allow herself to be in any situation resembling what's been described nor would she make up false allegations as part of a smear campaign against a SCOTUS nominee, or against anyone for that matter. She's also too smart to allow herself to be exploited for political gain.

(09-26-2018 11:52 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  When the entire Southside of Memphis is a huge unwashed French armpit, your data set becomes much more compressed between the bathers and the unwashed.

Lol, thanks, I was looking for a way to say something like that and couldn't so I let it go.

(09-27-2018 07:52 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 06:13 AM)NCeagle Wrote:  so this woman went to these frat parties, in which she knew the punch got spiked, saw girls getting gang banged, but kept going back to said parties?

Isn't "the punch" supposed to be "spiked". We called it jungle juice and made it in the tub. Besides who would go to a party that has straight "punch"?

c'mon man, get it right....it was "whoop juice" with bacardi 151 with a bit of 'shine as the majik potion....

(09-26-2018 11:57 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 11:52 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  When the entire Southside of Memphis is a huge unwashed French armpit, your data set becomes much more compressed between the bathers and the unwashed.

Or, they actually have friends at different schools and don’t live in a private school bubble. Cute retort, though.

I attended both and the private school kids didn't mix well with the boorish and oafish kids whose parents couldn't afford private school.