(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:52 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:37 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Actually in criminal cases, what a suspect wrote in the past and now could be used as evidence of the crime he did. The accusations had to do with sex. Some of the terms he used had to do with sex.

Boofed or boofing is like blowing drugs in a females behind or the front. The female is usually drunk or stoned.

Devil's triangle means having sex as a 3some as the female are drunk. The other term is where the guy puts his ding dong in all 3 holes of a drunk female. Those things did matched what was being said in those terms. We do not know what type they did, but should look at all those entries of all the guys put in. I posted the link in another thread what those terms Kavanaugh used, and those entries are sick and demeaning of women.

I thought I had done it all, obviously I haven't. Could you explain to me how one blows drugs in a female's behind?

I'll hang up and listen.

Other things the site mentioned booze as well. It sounds like more of a porn where a guy put his face into the woman's hole or something. I will leave it at that. Use your imagination.

Why do I have to use my imagination when I've got you, the expert in all things from realignment to boofing? Come on man, nut up and give me some answers.

(09-26-2018 11:40 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

Quote:Attorney for Stormy Daniels, Michael Avenatti, earlier this week, claimed to have a client with a third allegation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. He made the announcement, and tweeted lurid accusations, without offering the identity of the client or any evidence.

In the statement, Julie Swetnick, a current government employee, alleges Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge attended a party where she was drugged and gang raped by a series of boys. While she does not accuse Kavanaugh of assaulting her, she claims she witnessed him participate in the gang rapes.

In his tweet that included the screenshots, Avenatti asserted that Kavanaugh’s nomination must not go forward without more investigation of the claims.

https://www.mediaite.com/online/breaking...kavanaugh/

I believe that this has now crossed from the "dunno" stage to the "what the frick" stage.....as in how can this be possible?

If the guy has undergone multiple FBI investgiations, 6 I believe is reported, over the years, and none of this came to light, then why the frick would anyone think another FBI investigation is in order?

Drugged and gang-raped by Judge and Kavanaugh, the dynamic duo and yet no one ever said a word of any of this to the FBI? Either there's a huge conspiracy amongst those who knew, or the FBI isn't worth crap when doing such investigations, or someone's just flat-out lying. Gotta be one of the three.

Yeah, I smell the rat as well.

This would be hilarious if it weren't so foul. NOBODY was doing this kind of stuff in high school 35 years ago. That's 1985, people. Guys were really letting all hang out if they had the nerve to even TALK to a girl back then. People were not "gang-banging" girls at parties back then. This is stupid.

(09-26-2018 04:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  So now if you drink in HS, you are an alcoholic for life. I bet 80% of us are alcoholics.

Y'all need to find a way to put together arguments that don't sound like they are coming from a middle-aged suburban helicopter mom with a resting bitchh face.

If you don't start drinking in high school how are you supposed to find out what tastes like **** so you can appreciate the finer things life when you get older?

(09-26-2018 04:33 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Swetnick's statement sounds like it was written by a ambulance chasing lawyer.
[i]She became aware that Judge and Kavanaugh were spiking the punch at parties. (How did she become aware of this did she witness, did he tell her if not then her statement is hearsay.)
She was gang raped at one of these parties where Kavanaugh was present. (Was Kavanaugh one of the rapists, if not his presence does not make him guilty of anything).
She attended at least 10 of these parties in 1981 - 82 where gang rapes occurred with Judge and Kavanaugh present witnessing Kavanaugh in line outside the door at least one time. (Did she actually see him enter the room and assault the girl, if not there's no evidence he did anything.)[/i
Her statement allows her to paint Kavanaugh in a bad light without actually saying she witnessed him do anything illegal so her statement can be 100% true and still provide NO Proof Kavanaugh did anything illegal.

But of course. That's all these statements are designed to do. And they are very cleverly crafted. This is why I would be fine with an FBI investigation, provided it were limited in scope and time. We don't need another Mueller witch hunt.

I think this is all a case of democrats being willing to lie, cheat, steal, do anything to keep someone who would vote to repeal RvW off the court. I think the women are lying, and I think a proper investigation would expose them fairly quickly. The way it is being done now, tried in the court of public opinion with statements from lawyers, not from parties, is guaranteed to be problematic. So make the women testify, under oath, before the FBI, and see what happens to their stories. And press them about the parts of their stories that make no sense.

You had to take extra time to drive because you are terrified of flying, and yet you fly to Hawaii frequently? How does that work? You are in academia, you need to attend conferences all over, how do you do that without flying? Just for starters, that part of the story makes no sense. And if you'll lie about that, what won't you lie about?

BTW to you notice the polygraph Ford took was done in Maryland, wonder if she driver from CA to MD for that?

(09-26-2018 04:35 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:52 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:37 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Actually in criminal cases, what a suspect wrote in the past and now could be used as evidence of the crime he did. The accusations had to do with sex. Some of the terms he used had to do with sex.

Boofed or boofing is like blowing drugs in a females behind or the front. The female is usually drunk or stoned.

Devil's triangle means having sex as a 3some as the female are drunk. The other term is where the guy puts his ding dong in all 3 holes of a drunk female. Those things did matched what was being said in those terms. We do not know what type they did, but should look at all those entries of all the guys put in. I posted the link in another thread what those terms Kavanaugh used, and those entries are sick and demeaning of women.

I thought I had done it all, obviously I haven't. Could you explain to me how one blows drugs in a female's behind?

I'll hang up and listen.

Other things the site mentioned booze as well. It sounds like more of a porn where a guy put his face into the woman's hole or something. I will leave it at that. Use your imagination.

Why do I have to use my imagination when I've got you, the expert in all things from realignment to boofing? Come on man, nut up and give me some answers.

I think it could be another term as butt munching. I am not an expert on the terms because I had to use Google on what those terms mean.

(09-26-2018 04:43 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:35 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:52 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:37 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Actually in criminal cases, what a suspect wrote in the past and now could be used as evidence of the crime he did. The accusations had to do with sex. Some of the terms he used had to do with sex.

Boofed or boofing is like blowing drugs in a females behind or the front. The female is usually drunk or stoned.

Devil's triangle means having sex as a 3some as the female are drunk. The other term is where the guy puts his ding dong in all 3 holes of a drunk female. Those things did matched what was being said in those terms. We do not know what type they did, but should look at all those entries of all the guys put in. I posted the link in another thread what those terms Kavanaugh used, and those entries are sick and demeaning of women.

I thought I had done it all, obviously I haven't. Could you explain to me how one blows drugs in a female's behind?

I'll hang up and listen.

Other things the site mentioned booze as well. It sounds like more of a porn where a guy put his face into the woman's hole or something. I will leave it at that. Use your imagination.

Why do I have to use my imagination when I've got you, the expert in all things from realignment to boofing? Come on man, nut up and give me some answers.

I think it could be another term as butt munching. I am not an expert on the terms because I had to use Google on what those terms mean.

Butt munching is butt munching.....tossing her salad, whatever. I want to know how someone blows drugs up a woman's butt. You made the claim, support it.

(09-26-2018 04:42 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:33 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Swetnick's statement sounds like it was written by a ambulance chasing lawyer.
[i]She became aware that Judge and Kavanaugh were spiking the punch at parties. (How did she become aware of this did she witness, did he tell her if not then her statement is hearsay.)
She was gang raped at one of these parties where Kavanaugh was present. (Was Kavanaugh one of the rapists, if not his presence does not make him guilty of anything).
She attended at least 10 of these parties in 1981 - 82 where gang rapes occurred with Judge and Kavanaugh present witnessing Kavanaugh in line outside the door at least one time. (Did she actually see him enter the room and assault the girl, if not there's no evidence he did anything.)[/i
Her statement allows her to paint Kavanaugh in a bad light without actually saying she witnessed him do anything illegal so her statement can be 100% true and still provide NO Proof Kavanaugh did anything illegal.

But of course. That's all these statements are designed to do. And they are very cleverly crafted. This is why I would be fine with an FBI investigation, provided it were limited in scope and time. We don't need another Mueller witch hunt.

I think this is all a case of democrats being willing to lie, cheat, steal, do anything to keep someone who would vote to repeal RvW off the court. I think the women are lying, and I think a proper investigation would expose them fairly quickly. The way it is being done now, tried in the court of public opinion with statements from lawyers, not from parties, is guaranteed to be problematic. So make the women testify, under oath, before the FBI, and see what happens to their stories. And press them about the parts of their stories that make no sense.

You had to take extra time to drive because you are terrified of flying, and yet you fly to Hawaii frequently? How does that work? You are in academia, you need to attend conferences all over, how do you do that without flying? Just for starters, that part of the story makes no sense. And if you'll lie about that, what won't you lie about?

BTW to you notice the polygraph Ford took was done in Maryland, wonder if she driver from CA to MD for that?

You would think the Democrats could find a crooked polygraph operator in California.

Seriously. Why would she do it in Maryland?

(09-26-2018 04:47 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:42 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:33 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Swetnick's statement sounds like it was written by a ambulance chasing lawyer.
[i]She became aware that Judge and Kavanaugh were spiking the punch at parties. (How did she become aware of this did she witness, did he tell her if not then her statement is hearsay.)
She was gang raped at one of these parties where Kavanaugh was present. (Was Kavanaugh one of the rapists, if not his presence does not make him guilty of anything).
She attended at least 10 of these parties in 1981 - 82 where gang rapes occurred with Judge and Kavanaugh present witnessing Kavanaugh in line outside the door at least one time. (Did she actually see him enter the room and assault the girl, if not there's no evidence he did anything.)[/i
Her statement allows her to paint Kavanaugh in a bad light without actually saying she witnessed him do anything illegal so her statement can be 100% true and still provide NO Proof Kavanaugh did anything illegal.

But of course. That's all these statements are designed to do. And they are very cleverly crafted. This is why I would be fine with an FBI investigation, provided it were limited in scope and time. We don't need another Mueller witch hunt.

I think this is all a case of democrats being willing to lie, cheat, steal, do anything to keep someone who would vote to repeal RvW off the court. I think the women are lying, and I think a proper investigation would expose them fairly quickly. The way it is being done now, tried in the court of public opinion with statements from lawyers, not from parties, is guaranteed to be problematic. So make the women testify, under oath, before the FBI, and see what happens to their stories. And press them about the parts of their stories that make no sense.

You had to take extra time to drive because you are terrified of flying, and yet you fly to Hawaii frequently? How does that work? You are in academia, you need to attend conferences all over, how do you do that without flying? Just for starters, that part of the story makes no sense. And if you'll lie about that, what won't you lie about?

BTW to you notice the polygraph Ford took was done in Maryland, wonder if she driver from CA to MD for that?

You would think the Democrats could find a crooked polygraph operator in California.

Seriously. Why would she do it in Maryland?

Deep state.

(09-26-2018 04:43 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:35 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:52 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:37 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Actually in criminal cases, what a suspect wrote in the past and now could be used as evidence of the crime he did. The accusations had to do with sex. Some of the terms he used had to do with sex.

Boofed or boofing is like blowing drugs in a females behind or the front. The female is usually drunk or stoned.

Devil's triangle means having sex as a 3some as the female are drunk. The other term is where the guy puts his ding dong in all 3 holes of a drunk female. Those things did matched what was being said in those terms. We do not know what type they did, but should look at all those entries of all the guys put in. I posted the link in another thread what those terms Kavanaugh used, and those entries are sick and demeaning of women.

I thought I had done it all, obviously I haven't. Could you explain to me how one blows drugs in a female's behind?

I'll hang up and listen.

Other things the site mentioned booze as well. It sounds like more of a porn where a guy put his face into the woman's hole or something. I will leave it at that. Use your imagination.

Why do I have to use my imagination when I've got you, the expert in all things from realignment to boofing? Come on man, nut up and give me some answers.

I think it could be another term as butt munching. I am not an expert on the terms because I had to use Google on what those terms mean.

I graduated high school in 1982. I can tell you that boofing was not a term back then. Buttchugging was not a thing back then. And I didnt know anyone taking anything up their butt.

(09-26-2018 12:05 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  He gone. You almost had it.

(09-26-2018 03:07 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 02:36 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 02:26 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 02:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  If I've said it once I've said it 10 times now...an investigation by ANY CREDIBLE BODY at this point. The FBI is likely the best qualified, but I'd be fine with any party independent from either political party or the senate committee.

so you think that the FBI is going to find something much different from the 6 previous investigations that they have done in regards to his background?

So, the FBI who did the background checks, FLAWLESS, but the one handling trump-Russia are all DEEP STATE HACKS? What a wonderful world you've created...lol

But bottom line, how the hell will I know if the FBI is going to find anything if you refuse to let them even investigate the allegations?

The background checks go all the way back to the age of 18 and nothing was found. How far you want them to go back?

His wife's step-great grandfather was a racist and owned slaves.

My background check as a Navy Midshipman included talking to my teachers in my high school.

(09-26-2018 05:16 PM)WoodlandsOwl Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:07 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 02:36 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 02:26 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  so you think that the FBI is going to find something much different from the 6 previous investigations that they have done in regards to his background?

So, the FBI who did the background checks, FLAWLESS, but the one handling trump-Russia are all DEEP STATE HACKS? What a wonderful world you've created...lol

But bottom line, how the hell will I know if the FBI is going to find anything if you refuse to let them even investigate the allegations?

The background checks go all the way back to the age of 18 and nothing was found. How far you want them to go back?

His wife's step-great grandfather was a racist and owned slaves.

My background check as a Navy Midshipman included talking to my teachers in my high school.

Background checks for state boards include talking to one's neighbors.

(09-26-2018 04:47 PM)bullet Wrote:  You would think the Democrats could find a crooked polygraph operator in California.

Seriously. Why would she do it in Maryland?

She was obviously there meeting with Feinklestein and others. She was scared to death her name would be revealed yet she was in DC meeting with the senators, taking a polygraph, plotting her last minute appearance. And risked taking a cross-country trip in a confined space. Odd, no?

If I was a cynic, which I'm not............

(09-26-2018 12:14 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Y'know, who says this "investigating' should stop at high school? I mean, what about grade school antics? What was he doing in kindergarten? What were his nursery school classmates doing? Did he ever play "doctor" as a 4 year old? What about his mom or dad or even worse, a babysitter actually changing a poopy diaper in an inappropriate manner, not swaddling correctly, et cetera according to some leftist child rearing "expert?" What about his mom's OB/GYN -- there is a LOT to unpack here that is SOO relevant to his now middle-aged adult career. What a bunch of flippin' losers the left are. And what a bunch of pansies the repubs have been to allow this to even get half this far. Should have voted last week and been done with it. No soup for you! Next!

Heaven forbid if you were a member of the Rice Rally Club or assisted in transporting a 4 foot long paper mache "object" into Rice Stadium at the 81-Rice/AM football game.

(09-26-2018 11:44 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  So is she suggesting that Kavanaughs high school is the most rapey school in the country, where girls are gang-raped at every party but she decided to keep going to them anyway?

Who are these dozens of rapists? Where are the dozens of victims? Why the f**k did no one ever file a police report if this was routinely happening?

Good point and one that any person should immediately question. Why would anyone put out a statement like that? She indicates that she went to many of these parties where girls were gang raped and was a victim herself. Why on earth would a girl go to multiple gang-rape parties? It's either one of two things: she was either a willing participant (maybe) or it didn't happen (more probable). All three of these stores are Swiss cheese regarding the recollections or lack thereof, witnesses or lack thereof, recantations, and statements made like this one. Tomorrow should be amusing.

"I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their “turn” with a girl inside the room. These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.”

(09-26-2018 04:52 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:43 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:35 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:52 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  I thought I had done it all, obviously I haven't. Could you explain to me how one blows drugs in a female's behind?

I'll hang up and listen.

Other things the site mentioned booze as well. It sounds like more of a porn where a guy put his face into the woman's hole or something. I will leave it at that. Use your imagination.

Why do I have to use my imagination when I've got you, the expert in all things from realignment to boofing? Come on man, nut up and give me some answers.

I think it could be another term as butt munching. I am not an expert on the terms because I had to use Google on what those terms mean.

I graduated high school in 1982. I can tell you that boofing was not a term back then. Buttchugging was not a thing back then. And I didnt know anyone taking anything up their butt.

I am just referring to what it is.

Quote:The act of inserting drugs into the anus for a longer trip. Most often occurs at Disco Biscuits shows by spun-out kids on ketamine.
Dude I was so spun out at the Disco Biscuits show after we were boofing that ketamine!

Quote:Inserting drugs or having someone insert drugs into your body through your anus. Better experience is allowing someone to blow the substance inside you with a straw.
I had Stover blow cocaine in my ass last night to achieve the best high. Hit her up...she's boofing everyone!

Quote:the act of consuming alcohol via the anus, for rapid buzz
e.g. Lance boofed a bottle of Old Thompson

Quote:Slang native to the Washington DC area, describing when a woman's ****** may not be P.H. Balanced, therefore resulting in her ***** having a rather pungent odor.
(EX) Person 1: Wassup Son, I saw you leave the club with that broad last night, did you **** her?

Person 2: he'll nah son, she was boofing like ****.
Her ***** smelled like Zoo Dirt.

Quote:the act of taking it in the butt; having anal sex.
Mal got boofed by Nick last night.

Quote:To lift the bow of a whitewater kayak while going over rocks, waves, or waterfalls, in order to launch over hydraulics ("holes") or rocks. The name is derived from the sensation that it gives the kayaker, which is similar to rectal administration of drugs.
Boofing on the Little River was such a rush today. Why would you ever plug the hole, when you can boof over it?

I do not think it is the kayak one. Since the school is Washington D.C. It has to do with females.

(09-26-2018 04:35 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:52 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:37 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Actually in criminal cases, what a suspect wrote in the past and now could be used as evidence of the crime he did. The accusations had to do with sex. Some of the terms he used had to do with sex.

Boofed or boofing is like blowing drugs in a females behind or the front. The female is usually drunk or stoned.

Devil's triangle means having sex as a 3some as the female are drunk. The other term is where the guy puts his ding dong in all 3 holes of a drunk female. Those things did matched what was being said in those terms. We do not know what type they did, but should look at all those entries of all the guys put in. I posted the link in another thread what those terms Kavanaugh used, and those entries are sick and demeaning of women.

I thought I had done it all, obviously I haven't. Could you explain to me how one blows drugs in a female's behind?

I'll hang up and listen.

Other things the site mentioned booze as well. It sounds like more of a porn where a guy put his face into the woman's hole or something. I will leave it at that. Use your imagination.

Why do I have to use my imagination when I've got you, the expert in all things from realignment to boofing? Come on man, nut up and give me some answers.

And we are to believe HIGH SCHOOL kids did this in 1982? Then they somehow became the man Kavanaugh is today. BS is not strong enough.

(09-26-2018 04:41 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  So now if you drink in HS, you are an alcoholic for life. I bet 80% of us are alcoholics.

Y'all need to find a way to put together arguments that don't sound like they are coming from a middle-aged suburban helicopter mom with a resting bitchh face.

If you don't start drinking in high school how are you supposed to find out what tastes like **** so you can appreciate the finer things life when you get older?

The failing lame stream fake news doesn’t want to report on all of Brett’s bad deeds. The deep state is protecting him, that I can tell you.

(09-26-2018 06:07 PM)HCJag Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 11:44 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  So is she suggesting that Kavanaughs high school is the most rapey school in the country, where girls are gang-raped at every party but she decided to keep going to them anyway?

Who are these dozens of rapists? Where are the dozens of victims? Why the f**k did no one ever file a police report if this was routinely happening?

Good point and one that any person should immediately question. Why would anyone put out a statement like that? She indicates that she went to many of these parties where girls were gang raped and was a victim herself. Why on earth would a girl go to multiple gang-rape parties? It's either one of two things: she was either a willing participant (maybe) or it didn't happen (more probable). All three of these stores are Swiss cheese regarding the recollections or lack thereof, witnesses or lack thereof, recantations, and statements made like this one. Tomorrow should be amusing.

"I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their “turn” with a girl inside the room. These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.”

That's not a gang rape. If one goes to multiple parties where girls are in bedrooms with guys lined up outside waiting their turn, then those girls are pulling a train. They're not being raped.