(09-26-2018 03:52 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  I'd be curious to see what the public sentiment on Kavanaugh is at this point. My suspicion is people generally are souring on him (maybe not on this board but in a lot of places). I wrote the other day we can do better than him on the Supreme Court and I'm fully aware if he withdraws it's possible someone replaces him who is even more conservative.

Even if you don't believe any of the accusers, you have to admit (a) Kavanaugh has/had a drinking problem,Based on the same questionable accusers (b) he made a lot of very ill-advised decisions in his youth (and some other questionable decisions much later in his life - there are way too many to list them in this response but I'd be happy to do so if people want them,What decisions in his youth other than the same questionable accusers and © he's just not impressive when in front of the committee or in front of the media.Your opinion is in contrast to everything said prior to the last month

But ram him through if you have to. I'm willing to deal with the consequences because I think it will help the Democrats cause in November. I truly believe that if Kavanaugh gets confirmed, the Democrats will win back both the Senate and House. Good luck in getting a replacement on the Supreme Court at that point, President Trump.

You just have zero credibility with this nonsense that you think people have to admit. You believe any nonsense you hear.

The first paragraph is a legitimate question. I don't know. The rest is pure nonsensical talking points.

So now if you drink in HS, you are an alcoholic for life. I bet 80% of us are alcoholics.

Y'all need to find a way to put together arguments that don't sound like they are coming from a middle-aged suburban helicopter mom with a resting bitchh face.

(09-26-2018 03:52 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  I'd be curious to see what the public sentiment on Kavanaugh is at this point. My suspicion is people generally are souring on him (maybe not on this board but in a lot of places). I wrote the other day we can do better than him on the Supreme Court and I'm fully aware if he withdraws it's possible someone replaces him who is even more conservative.

Even if you don't believe any of the accusers, you have to admit (a) Kavanaugh has/had a drinking problem, (b) he made a lot of very ill-advised decisions in his youth (and some other questionable decisions much later in his life - there are way too many to list them in this response but I'd be happy to do so if people want them, and © he's just not impressive when in front of the committee or in front of the media.

But ram him through if you have to. I'm willing to deal with the consequences because I think it will help the Democrats cause in November. I truly believe that if Kavanaugh gets confirmed, the Democrats will win back both the Senate and House. Good luck in getting a replacement on the Supreme Court at that point, President Trump.

Link, to back up the BS your peddling. Though we all know where your producing it from.

(09-26-2018 04:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  So now if you drink in HS, you are an alcoholic for life. I bet 80% of us are alcoholics.

Y'all need to find a way to put together arguments that don't sound like they are coming from a middle-aged suburban helicopter mom with a resting bitchh face.

If the AUP wasn't so strict I would love to start a thread on how many us in today's political climate could run for any sort of public office.

I for one sure as hell could not. I got enough skeletons from my 20s to fill a cemetery

Boof basically meant anal intercourse. It is very possible that was written in the yearbooks as a rib, as back in the early 1980s doing anything with the rectum was not as acceptable as it is today. Back in the 1980s it was quite common for guys (friends) to call each other derogatory names for homosexual males and say they like it that way.

(09-26-2018 04:09 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  So now if you drink in HS, you are an alcoholic for life. I bet 80% of us are alcoholics.

Y'all need to find a way to put together arguments that don't sound like they are coming from a middle-aged suburban helicopter mom with a resting bitchh face.

If the AUP wasn't so strict I would love to start a thread on how many us in today's political climate could run for any sort of public office.

I for one sure as hell could not. I got enough skeletons from my 20s to fill a cemetery

There was a period in my life where I lived it in an alcoholic haze. In between the Keys, NOLA, NY, and Oregon, there are nights I can't piece together. Maybe I need to run for office and it'll come to light.

(09-26-2018 04:09 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  So now if you drink in HS, you are an alcoholic for life. I bet 80% of us are alcoholics.

Y'all need to find a way to put together arguments that don't sound like they are coming from a middle-aged suburban helicopter mom with a resting bitchh face.

If the AUP wasn't so strict I would love to start a thread on how many us in today's political climate could run for any sort of public office.

I for one sure as hell could not. I got enough skeletons from my 20s to fill a cemetery

Anybody who ever asked a girl out could be accused of "sexual harrassment." Or for that matter, any girl who got aggressive and asked a guy.

We all have done stupid things. We all have people who don't like us.

I never did drugs and probably have fewer skeletons than over 99% of the people out there. I moved around so much, most people don't even remember me. And I wouldn't put myself through it.

GEOTUS is killing it right now with the press and their loaded questions.

(09-26-2018 04:11 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:09 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  So now if you drink in HS, you are an alcoholic for life. I bet 80% of us are alcoholics.

Y'all need to find a way to put together arguments that don't sound like they are coming from a middle-aged suburban helicopter mom with a resting bitchh face.

If the AUP wasn't so strict I would love to start a thread on how many us in today's political climate could run for any sort of public office.

I for one sure as hell could not. I got enough skeletons from my 20s to fill a cemetery

There was a period in my life where I lived it in an alcoholic haze. In between the Keys, NOLA, NY, and Oregon, there are nights I can't piece together. Maybe I need to run for office and it'll come to light.

Not if you ran as a Democrat.

They keep trying to pin him down on calling them liars, and he says he'll keep an open mind, and he could be convinced. Just depends on tomorrow.

He just asked the room if he should give hallie jackson a third question, and they all go "NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!"

bahahahahhaah

(09-26-2018 04:18 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:11 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:09 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  So now if you drink in HS, you are an alcoholic for life. I bet 80% of us are alcoholics.

Y'all need to find a way to put together arguments that don't sound like they are coming from a middle-aged suburban helicopter mom with a resting bitchh face.

If the AUP wasn't so strict I would love to start a thread on how many us in today's political climate could run for any sort of public office.

I for one sure as hell could not. I got enough skeletons from my 20s to fill a cemetery

There was a period in my life where I lived it in an alcoholic haze. In between the Keys, NOLA, NY, and Oregon, there are nights I can't piece together. Maybe I need to run for office and it'll come to light.

Not if you ran as a Democrat.

I'd have to up my soy intake. Right now it's virtually -150%.

Swetnick's statement sounds like it was written by a ambulance chasing lawyer.

She became aware that Judge and Kavanaugh were spiking the punch at parties. (How did she become aware of this did she witness, did he tell her if not then her statement is hearsay.)

She was gang raped at one of these parties where Kavanaugh was present. (Was Kavanaugh one of the rapists, if not his presence does not make him guilty of anything).

She attended at least 10 of these parties in 1981 - 82 where gang rapes occurred with Judge and Kavanaugh present witnessing Kavanaugh in line outside the door at least one time. (Did she actually see him enter the room and assault the girl, if not there's no evidence he did anything.)

Her statement allows her to paint Kavanaugh in a bad light without actually saying she witnessed him do anything illegal so her statement can be 100% true and still provide NO Proof Kavanaugh did anything illegal.

(09-26-2018 03:52 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:37 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Actually in criminal cases, what a suspect wrote in the past and now could be used as evidence of the crime he did. The accusations had to do with sex. Some of the terms he used had to do with sex.

Boofed or boofing is like blowing drugs in a females behind or the front. The female is usually drunk or stoned.

Devil's triangle means having sex as a 3some as the female are drunk. The other term is where the guy puts his ding dong in all 3 holes of a drunk female. Those things did matched what was being said in those terms. We do not know what type they did, but should look at all those entries of all the guys put in. I posted the link in another thread what those terms Kavanaugh used, and those entries are sick and demeaning of women.

I thought I had done it all, obviously I haven't. Could you explain to me how one blows drugs in a female's behind?

I'll hang up and listen.

Other things the site mentioned booze as well. It sounds like more of a porn where a guy put his face into the woman's hole or something. I will leave it at that. Use your imagination.

CPL's "bombshell" has now only moved the odds of Kavanaugh being confirmed by 5 points (and still dropping) for the day.

CPL is low energy. Little man. Sad.

(09-26-2018 04:03 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 03:52 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  I'd be curious to see what the public sentiment on Kavanaugh is at this point. My suspicion is people generally are souring on him (maybe not on this board but in a lot of places). I wrote the other day we can do better than him on the Supreme Court and I'm fully aware if he withdraws it's possible someone replaces him who is even more conservative.

Even if you don't believe any of the accusers, you have to admit (a) Kavanaugh has/had a drinking problem, (b) he made a lot of very ill-advised decisions in his youth (and some other questionable decisions much later in his life - there are way too many to list them in this response but I'd be happy to do so if people want them, and © he's just not impressive when in front of the committee or in front of the media.

But ram him through if you have to. I'm willing to deal with the consequences because I think it will help the Democrats cause in November. I truly believe that if Kavanaugh gets confirmed, the Democrats will win back both the Senate and House. Good luck in getting a replacement on the Supreme Court at that point, President Trump.

Link, to back up the BS your peddling. Though we all know where your producing it from.

I think the yearbook references back up some of it.

In terms of the drinking, these two quotes are from Kavanaugh's college roommate, James Roche.

Roche remembered Kavanaugh "frequently drinking excessively and becoming incoherently drunk."

He described Kavanaugh as a "normally reserved" person but a "notably heavy drinker, even by the standards of the time," adding that "he became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk."

He basically admitted on Fox News the other night that he was a heavy drinker in high school.

He was in the DKE fraternity at Yale, which was pretty much the party frat house with most of the school's athletes.

Here's a nice New Yorker profile of that fraternity at Yale when he was a member there.

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultur...ty-at-yale

Kavanaugh has been on the record saying a number of times things to the effect of 'what happened at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep'. He later deleted that specific part of his speech when he testified before the Senate but there are plenty videos of the 2015 speech.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHGGNPMPz3M

He's had financial issues in the past few years, which either were because he bought too many Washington Nationals season tickets he couldn't afford, or possibly because of sports gambling losses.

The guy has had issues. So have a lot of politicians/athletes/celebrities. He's not alone, but he's certainly not an angel.

(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Swetnick's statement sounds like it was written by a ambulance chasing lawyer.

She became aware that Judge and Kavanaugh were spiking the punch at parties. (How did she become aware of this did she witness, did he tell her if not then her statement is hearsay.)

She was gang raped at one of these parties where Kavanaugh was present. (Was Kavanaugh one of the rapists, if not his presence does not make him guilty of anything).

She attended at least 10 of these parties in 1981 - 82 where gang rapes occurred with Judge and Kavanaugh present witnessing Kavanaugh in line outside the door at least one time. (Did she actually see him enter the room and assault the girl, if not there's no evidence he did anything.)

Her statement allows her to paint Kavanaugh in a bad light without actually saying she witnessed him do anything illegal so her statement can be 100% true and still provide NO Proof Kavanaugh did anything illegal.

Exactly. Its so obvious.

On this day Lindsay Graham has my respect!!! He certainly has the biggest pair of any GOP Male in the senate today.

Quote:From my view, just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, it just did.

The lawyer to porn stars has just taken this debacle to an even lower level.

I hope people will be highly suspicious of this allegation presented by Michael Avenatti.

Graham Highly Critical of CPL Client

GEOTUS: "One week I'm a fascist, and trying the take over the world. The next I'm incompetent, 25th amendment!"

OMG REKT

(09-26-2018 04:23 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Swetnick's statement sounds like it was written by a ambulance chasing lawyer.
[i]She became aware that Judge and Kavanaugh were spiking the punch at parties. (How did she become aware of this did she witness, did he tell her if not then her statement is hearsay.)
She was gang raped at one of these parties where Kavanaugh was present. (Was Kavanaugh one of the rapists, if not his presence does not make him guilty of anything).
She attended at least 10 of these parties in 1981 - 82 where gang rapes occurred with Judge and Kavanaugh present witnessing Kavanaugh in line outside the door at least one time. (Did she actually see him enter the room and assault the girl, if not there's no evidence he did anything.)[/i
Her statement allows her to paint Kavanaugh in a bad light without actually saying she witnessed him do anything illegal so her statement can be 100% true and still provide NO Proof Kavanaugh did anything illegal.

But of course. That's all these statements are designed to do. And they are very cleverly crafted. This is why I would be fine with an FBI investigation, provided it were limited in scope and time. We don't need another Mueller witch hunt.

I think this is all a case of democrats being willing to lie, cheat, steal, do anything to keep someone who would vote to repeal RvW off the court. I think the women are lying, and I think a proper investigation would expose them fairly quickly. The way it is being done now, tried in the court of public opinion with statements from lawyers, not from parties, is guaranteed to be problematic. So make the women testify, under oath, before the FBI, and see what happens to their stories. And press them about the parts of their stories that make no sense.

You had to take extra time to drive because you are terrified of flying, and yet you fly to Hawaii frequently? How does that work? You are in academia, you need to attend conferences all over, how do you do that without flying? Just for starters, that part of the story makes no sense. And if you'll lie about that, what won't you lie about?

(09-26-2018 04:09 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 04:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  So now if you drink in HS, you are an alcoholic for life. I bet 80% of us are alcoholics.

Y'all need to find a way to put together arguments that don't sound like they are coming from a middle-aged suburban helicopter mom with a resting bitchh face.

If the AUP wasn't so strict I would love to start a thread on how many us in today's political climate could run for any sort of public office.

I for one sure as hell could not. I got enough skeletons from my 20s to fill a cemetery

I grew up believing in the Biblical declaration that Jesus made to the woman's accusers, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

Unfortunately the way the two party system works is with a process that is called vetting which isn't what the public thinks it is at all. In political vetting a candidate is passable when the party knows they have enough on the guy or gal to torpedo them if they get out of line.

In other words the ones they don't want in their parties are those they have nothing on. It's like the Mafia. You have to be a made man before they trust you. Or as a friend of mine once put it, it is like a fraternity rush party where each candidate was given a live chicken to carry throughout the party. At the end of the night those who had molested their chickens were in. Those who had not were out. Truly dishonest people don't trust honest ones. Hence my buddy called Congress "The Chicken Molester's Society".

If God said to Lot today find me 10 faithful and honest Senators and House Members and I will spare your nation, we would be toast!

Lord Acton's dictum applies here. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Now does that mean that Congress is comprised of felons? No. But it means that in a world where those who think in black and white terms are feared, all of Congress is a massive gray area.