(08-31-2018 11:19 PM)The Grape King Wrote: (08-31-2018 10:46 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (08-31-2018 05:10 PM)The Grape King Wrote: (07-07-2018 09:14 PM)TU4ever Wrote: (07-06-2018 11:07 PM)Huskypride Wrote: but im pretty sure more people connect umass with basketball than tulsa tho
also you guys are not flying ahead of umass in tourny appearances
16 vs 8 isn't that crazy...imo
Perhaps in New England. But most people never think of Umass. Doubling someone up is not flying ahead? Since when? Not to mention almost all of those come from one coach for UMass and Tulsa is multiple coaches and decades. Way more conference titles, multiple ny day games, and a college world series.
Not sure where you're trying to go with this pride. The comparisons aren't close unless it's the distance to Connecticut.
Tulsa is a private school of 4,000 students in *** **** Oklahoma. UMass is a highly respected flagship university in the Boston media market where it is behind Celtics, Bruins, Patriots, red soxs, Boston college, Harvard, MIT, Providence, in importance, history, tradition, viewers, fans and educational prestige.UMass would be way more valuable to the AAC brand long term.
FIFY
Tulsa is also a top 50 market, not **** ****, which you spelled wrong by the way.
Let me know when UMass manages a bowl game, or another tournament appearence. Or you know success of any kind.
I didn't spell God or damn wrong, so you can take back those points you were so eager to throw on the board.
I don't care what Tulsa did 50 years ago. The fact of the matter is, in the modern landscape of college sports, UMass has the much higher ceiling. And this isn't coming from a UMass grad, fan, or someone who particularly likes the state of Massachusetts all that much. But the flagship school in the most economically and culturally important state in New England does a HELL of a lot more than a tiny private school in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Bad grapes I guess.
Last 10 years in football:
UMass two winning seasons (7-5, 6-5) almost half of those years they competed in FCS, including for their two winning seasons.
Tulsa has three ten win seasons in the same time period.
Basketball since Cal left:
UMass:
Six 20+ win seasons (two of 25+)
3 Tournament invites (zero wins)
4 NIT invites (one final, one semi-final)
Ten losing seasons and two .500 records (5 losing seasons in last 10, including 3 straight years currently)
Tulsa:
Thirteen 20+ win seasons (five of 25+)
7 Tournament invites (seven total wins)
4 NIT invites (one championship), CBI championship
Four losing seasons (Only one in the last twelve years)
So take your damn 50 years off the board, because if we go back that far Tulsa will really be kicking their ass.
If you didn't know, Oklahoma is the Almighty's. So it's God's damned Oklahoma.
What good is being a flagship in a tiny ass state where you are the fifth or sixth best educational choice in the state and 20th in a New England? What good is "being in" Boston when at best you are the eigth or ninth most popular team and have never consitantly won in any sport? Is 2.5 million extra people enough to make up four or five spots in the pecking order?
Higher ceiling? I would say that UMass has hit theirs already. Meanwhile that little private school in God's country has been playing with the big boys and winning since the 1890s.
Night sourness.