(08-09-2018 11:55 AM)shere khan Wrote:  The magnificent orange bastard



Saving the Republic on tweet at a time

The slow, steady, beautiful orange drip.


DROP BY DROP

Really good question

(08-09-2018 01:50 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

Not A Smidgen

(08-09-2018 03:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 02:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe this will finally get Obama impeached.

Translation: Look, over there, shiny.

Exactly...anything to deflect from the looming train wreck of your orange overlord.

(08-09-2018 03:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 02:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe this will finally get Obama impeached.

Translation: Look, over there, shiny.

Exactly...anything to deflect from the looming train wreck of your orange overlord.

An honest question Tom. Does anything that's been revealed about how, when, and why the FBI got involved in this case, the methods they used, and how they've responded to congressional oversight bother you in the least?

Can you tell us that had this been the Bush administration's DOJ and FBI investigating the Obama campaign and later his administration, that you'd not have raised your voice?

I ask because I can't say I've seen you raise your voice on virtually anything related to the FBI......only on Trump-Russia collusion and perhaps Trump obstruction of justice.

(08-09-2018 03:45 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Really good question

Has it been reported anywhere that anyone of these people have been dragged into an on the record interview with team Bueller? Maybe Simpson?

Funny thing, that.

(08-09-2018 04:03 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 02:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe this will finally get Obama impeached.

Translation: Look, over there, shiny.

Exactly...anything to deflect from the looming train wreck of your orange overlord.

An honest question Tom. Does anything that's been revealed about how, when, and why the FBI got involved in this case, the methods they used, and how they've responded to congressional oversight bother you in the least?

Can you tell us that had this been the Bush administration's DOJ and FBI investigating the Obama campaign and later his administration, that you'd not have raised your voice?

I ask because I can't say I've seen you raise your voice on virtually anything related to the FBI......only on Trump-Russia collusion and perhaps Trump obstruction of justice.

As I've said on numerous occasions, I'm waiting for Mueller to complete his report.

Regarding a couple of other things though. I can totally understand why the FBI would be more than reluctant to provide basically any information to a congressional committee chaired by trump lapdog Devin Nunes. If Ryan was a true leader, he would have replace Nunes with someone who was not compromised or had been a trump lackey, then you may have an actual argument here.

And for this particular "revelation," what did the FBI pay Steele for and what did they reprimand him for. We don't know...so excuse me if I don't automatically jump to your conspiratorial conclusions. Especially when they come from Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller.

(08-09-2018 04:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 04:03 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 02:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe this will finally get Obama impeached.

Translation: Look, over there, shiny.

Exactly...anything to deflect from the looming train wreck of your orange overlord.

An honest question Tom. Does anything that's been revealed about how, when, and why the FBI got involved in this case, the methods they used, and how they've responded to congressional oversight bother you in the least?

Can you tell us that had this been the Bush administration's DOJ and FBI investigating the Obama campaign and later his administration, that you'd not have raised your voice?

I ask because I can't say I've seen you raise your voice on virtually anything related to the FBI......only on Trump-Russia collusion and perhaps Trump obstruction of justice.

As I've said on numerous occasions, I'm waiting for Mueller to complete his report.

Regarding a couple of other things though. I can totally understand why the FBI would be more than reluctant to provide basically any information to a congressional committee chaired by trump lapdog Devin Nunes. If Ryan was a true leader, he would have replace Nunes with someone who was not compromised or had been a trump lackey, then you may have an actual argument here.

And for this particular "revelation," what did the FBI pay Steele for and what did they reprimand him for. We don't know...so excuse me if I don't automatically jump to your conspiratorial conclusions. Especially when they come from Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller.

Blah blah blah, non-answer. And fine, I should have known better.

How about this one anyway:

Quote:With everything in the public domain today, can you tell us that had this been the Bush administration's DOJ and FBI investigating the Obama campaign and later his administration, that you'd not have raised your voice?

(08-09-2018 03:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 02:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe this will finally get Obama impeached.

Translation: Look, over there, shiny.

Exactly...anything to deflect from the looming train wreck of your orange overlord.

Somebody get this lib a tinfoil hat...

(08-09-2018 04:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 04:03 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 02:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe this will finally get Obama impeached.

Translation: Look, over there, shiny.

Exactly...anything to deflect from the looming train wreck of your orange overlord.

An honest question Tom. Does anything that's been revealed about how, when, and why the FBI got involved in this case, the methods they used, and how they've responded to congressional oversight bother you in the least?

Can you tell us that had this been the Bush administration's DOJ and FBI investigating the Obama campaign and later his administration, that you'd not have raised your voice?

I ask because I can't say I've seen you raise your voice on virtually anything related to the FBI......only on Trump-Russia collusion and perhaps Trump obstruction of justice.

As I've said on numerous occasions, I'm waiting for Mueller to complete his report.

Regarding a couple of other things though. I can totally understand why the FBI would be more than reluctant to provide basically any information to a congressional committee chaired by trump lapdog Devin Nunes. If Ryan was a true leader, he would have replace Nunes with someone who was not compromised or had been a trump lackey, then you may have an actual argument here.

And for this particular "revelation," what did the FBI pay Steele for and what did they reprimand him for. We don't know...so excuse me if I don't automatically jump to your conspiratorial conclusions. Especially when they come from Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller.

Well one thing is foe sure, President Trump has gotten zip info from his Attorney General. I wonder if Former President Obama had a session with his?

(08-09-2018 04:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 04:03 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 02:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe this will finally get Obama impeached.

Translation: Look, over there, shiny.

Exactly...anything to deflect from the looming train wreck of your orange overlord.

An honest question Tom. Does anything that's been revealed about how, when, and why the FBI got involved in this case, the methods they used, and how they've responded to congressional oversight bother you in the least?

Can you tell us that had this been the Bush administration's DOJ and FBI investigating the Obama campaign and later his administration, that you'd not have raised your voice?

I ask because I can't say I've seen you raise your voice on virtually anything related to the FBI......only on Trump-Russia collusion and perhaps Trump obstruction of justice.

As I've said on numerous occasions, I'm waiting for Mueller to complete his report.

Regarding a couple of other things though. I can totally understand why the FBI would be more than reluctant to provide basically any information to a congressional committee chaired by trump lapdog Devin Nunes. If Ryan was a true leader, he would have replace Nunes with someone who was not compromised or had been a trump lackey, then you may have an actual argument here.

And for this particular "revelation," what did the FBI pay Steele for and what did they reprimand him for. We don't know...so excuse me if I don't automatically jump to your conspiratorial conclusions. Especially when they come from Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller.

Wow.

I hope you didn't break anything with that contortion.

Course, you DO realize 90% of all stuff we're talking about, the shady shenanigans, "insurance plans", "Things discussed in Fired Andys office" etc., took place loooooooong before Trump even won the election, never mind been inaugurated.

None of this stuff that took place at zerO's DOJ or FBI concerns you, hunh? Did you not even glance at the IG's report?

You perhaps should, it's been out for a number of weeks by now.

(08-09-2018 11:17 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  He Was Deemed ‘Not Suitable As A Source’



That means they were paying for opposition research to be done on Trump. So both the FBI and the Democrats were funding Steele’s who then paid Russian sources.

Quote:(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today the FBI turned over 70 pages of heavily redacted records about Christopher Steele, the former British spy, hired with Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee funds, who authored the infamous Dossier targeting President Trump during last year’s presidential campaign. The documents show that Steele was cut off as a “Confidential Human Source” (CHS) after he disclosed his relationship with the FBI to a third party. The documents show at least 11 FBI payments to Steele in 2016 and document that he was admonished for unknown reasons in February 2016. The documents were turned over in response to Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for records of communications and payments between the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and his private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:17-cv-00916)).

The documents include a “source closing communication” that states that Steele (referred to as “CHS” or Confidential Human Source) “is being closed” because:

CHS confirmed to an outside third party that CHS has a confidential relationship with the FBI. CHS was used as a source for an online article. In the article, CHS revealed CHS’ relationship with the FBI as well as information that CHS obtained and provided to FBI. On November 1, 2016, CHS confirmed all of this to the handling agent. At that time, handling agent advised CHS that the nature of the relationship between the FBI and CHS would change completely and that it was unlikely that the FBI would continue a relationship with the CHS. Additionally, handling agent advised that CHS was not to operate to obtain any intelligence whatsoever on behalf of the FBI.

Keep reading here...

Wait—the FBI and the DNC were Working together to use an intermediary to get dirt on Trump from Russian government sources. Hmmmm. Isn’t there a name for that type of cooperation?

(08-09-2018 11:17 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  He Was Deemed ‘Not Suitable As A Source’



That means they were paying for opposition research to be done on Trump. So both the FBI and the Democrats were funding Steele’s who then paid Russian sources.

Quote:(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today the FBI turned over 70 pages of heavily redacted records about Christopher Steele, the former British spy, hired with Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee funds, who authored the infamous Dossier targeting President Trump during last year’s presidential campaign. The documents show that Steele was cut off as a “Confidential Human Source” (CHS) after he disclosed his relationship with the FBI to a third party. The documents show at least 11 FBI payments to Steele in 2016 and document that he was admonished for unknown reasons in February 2016. The documents were turned over in response to Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for records of communications and payments between the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and his private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:17-cv-00916)).

The documents include a “source closing communication” that states that Steele (referred to as “CHS” or Confidential Human Source) “is being closed” because:

CHS confirmed to an outside third party that CHS has a confidential relationship with the FBI. CHS was used as a source for an online article. In the article, CHS revealed CHS’ relationship with the FBI as well as information that CHS obtained and provided to FBI. On November 1, 2016, CHS confirmed all of this to the handling agent. At that time, handling agent advised CHS that the nature of the relationship between the FBI and CHS would change completely and that it was unlikely that the FBI would continue a relationship with the CHS. Additionally, handling agent advised that CHS was not to operate to obtain any intelligence whatsoever on behalf of the FBI.

Keep reading here...

I also see FBI payments to Steele began long before Popodoplus supposedly made his drunken comments about The Russians having damaging information on Hillary. The Justice Department narrative regarding the origins of the investigation continues to unravel.

(08-09-2018 04:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 04:03 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 02:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe this will finally get Obama impeached.

Translation: Look, over there, shiny.

Exactly...anything to deflect from the looming train wreck of your orange overlord.

An honest question Tom. Does anything that's been revealed about how, when, and why the FBI got involved in this case, the methods they used, and how they've responded to congressional oversight bother you in the least?

Can you tell us that had this been the Bush administration's DOJ and FBI investigating the Obama campaign and later his administration, that you'd not have raised your voice?

I ask because I can't say I've seen you raise your voice on virtually anything related to the FBI......only on Trump-Russia collusion and perhaps Trump obstruction of justice.

As I've said on numerous occasions, I'm waiting for Mueller to complete his report.

Regarding a couple of other things though. I can totally understand why the FBI would be more than reluctant to provide basically any information to a congressional committee chaired by trump lapdog Devin Nunes. If Ryan was a true leader, he would have replace Nunes with someone who was not compromised or had been a trump lackey, then you may have an actual argument here.

And for this particular "revelation," what did the FBI pay Steele for and what did they reprimand him for. We don't know...so excuse me if I don't automatically jump to your conspiratorial conclusions. Especially when they come from Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller.

John Solomon broke tonite that some of Bruce Ohr's handwritten notes show that they were having Steele feed the dossier directly to Mueller after Mueller was appointed.

Like I said, team taint.

(08-09-2018 10:06 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  John Solomon broke tonite that some of Bruce Ohr's handwritten notes show that they were having Steele feed the dossier directly to Mueller after Mueller was appointed.

Like I said, team taint.

Lordy. I wonder if that's why his Orange Magnificence said, Stay Tuned!?

RWT: Nothing unusual to see here, wait till Bueller finishes his investigation, move along.

(08-09-2018 04:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 04:03 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 02:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe this will finally get Obama impeached.

Translation: Look, over there, shiny.

Exactly...anything to deflect from the looming train wreck of your orange overlord.

An honest question Tom. Does anything that's been revealed about how, when, and why the FBI got involved in this case, the methods they used, and how they've responded to congressional oversight bother you in the least?

Can you tell us that had this been the Bush administration's DOJ and FBI investigating the Obama campaign and later his administration, that you'd not have raised your voice?

I ask because I can't say I've seen you raise your voice on virtually anything related to the FBI......only on Trump-Russia collusion and perhaps Trump obstruction of justice.

As I've said on numerous occasions, I'm waiting for Mueller to complete his report.

Regarding a couple of other things though. I can totally understand why the FBI would be more than reluctant to provide basically any information to a congressional committee chaired by trump lapdog Devin Nunes. If Ryan was a true leader, he would have replace Nunes with someone who was not compromised or had been a trump lackey, then you may have an actual argument here.

And for this particular "revelation," what did the FBI pay Steele for and what did they reprimand him for. We don't know...so excuse me if I don't automatically jump to your conspiratorial conclusions. Especially when they come from Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller.

I find it fascinating you understand th me FBI’s concern with a powerless committee headed by an opposition party chairman—-but are totally dismissive of concerns about an investigation carried out by longtime democrat donors, based on faulty information paid for by Hillary and the Obama FBI, that used the knowingly fake informs tax a pretense to spy on an opposition party.

(08-09-2018 04:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  As I've said on numerous occasions, I'm waiting for Mueller to complete his report.

In case the obvious escapes you, let me help you out. Robert Muller's goal is not a "completed report". His goal is to keep this embarrassment going through the mid-terms to pick up as many opposition seats as possible while simultaneously driving down Trump's approval numbers to a point where he can't effectively govern. IOW, this is political, not legal.

This is how Nazi Germany started. History repeats itself. This is a cult of personality. You guys come from an area where the Dossier is “fake’ but you can’t tell me anyplace where it is. The FBI found it credible. That’s all I need to know. The facts will come out and you will have egg on your face. Just wait til the money laundering comes out. How will you spin that? Do you really think President Best Words is this savvy businessman who has been bankrupt numerous times? He’s a money launderer! And it’s traceable. What an embarrassment.

Feel sorry for you guys. I really do. Embarrassment is your future.

(08-09-2018 04:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 04:03 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 03:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-09-2018 02:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe this will finally get Obama impeached.

Translation: Look, over there, shiny.

Exactly...anything to deflect from the looming train wreck of your orange overlord.

An honest question Tom. Does anything that's been revealed about how, when, and why the FBI got involved in this case, the methods they used, and how they've responded to congressional oversight bother you in the least?

Can you tell us that had this been the Bush administration's DOJ and FBI investigating the Obama campaign and later his administration, that you'd not have raised your voice?

I ask because I can't say I've seen you raise your voice on virtually anything related to the FBI......only on Trump-Russia collusion and perhaps Trump obstruction of justice.

As I've said on numerous occasions, I'm waiting for Mueller to complete his report.

Regarding a couple of other things though. I can totally understand why the FBI would be more than reluctant to provide basically any information to a congressional committee chaired by trump lapdog Devin Nunes. If Ryan was a true leader, he would have replace Nunes with someone who was not compromised or had been a trump lackey, then you may have an actual argument here.

And for this particular "revelation," what did the FBI pay Steele for and what did they reprimand him for. We don't know...so excuse me if I don't automatically jump to your conspiratorial conclusions. Especially when they come from Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller.

Yes we do. He was paid for the dossier. He was reprimanded and "cut loose" as a source for taking the same information that the FBI paid for to the media (Yahoo). The Yahoo story was then used to corroborate his dossier. I believe that is actually in links within this thread - possibly the other one on the topic.

All this noise and you dummies still haven't arrested anyone. You even have Q on the inside working for you. Sad.