Winning...

Quote:The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in favor of President Donald Trump in Trump v. Hawaii, the controversial case regarding concerning Trump's September order to restrict travel to the U.S. for citizens of several majority Muslim countries.

Keep reading here

#MAGA BABY!!!

(06-26-2018 09:21 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  Winning...

Quote:The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in favor of President Donald Trump in Trump v. Hawaii, the controversial case regarding concerning Trump's September order to restrict travel to the U.S. for citizens of several majority Muslim countries.

Keep reading here

Disturbs me that it was only 5-4. Hawaii was one of the more ridiculous ones.

Technically, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of President Trump’s argument about the power of the President. Be that person be Hillary or Corey Booker or Maxine. My only wish would be for President Trump to acknowledge that it wasn’t for him alone, but for all future Presidents.
When there are opposing views on an issue all we can rely on is the process. Destroy that, you destroy multiple views.

(06-26-2018 09:41 AM)Dasville Wrote:  Technically, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of President Trump’s argument about the power of the President. Be that person be Hillary or Corey Booker or Maxine. My only wish would be for President Trump to acknowledge that it wasn’t for him alone, but for all future Presidents.
When there are opposing views on an issue all we can rely on is the process. Destroy that, you destroy multiple views.

That why it is disturbing that Breyer and Kagan voted against that. Ginsburg you expect. Sotomayor is sometimes as bad as Ginsburg but not always.

Based on National Security, would adding Mexico to the list help or hurt?

Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.

No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.

@lsarsour 
#SCOTUS failed us today. They decided on the side of xenophobia and racism. This is a devastating decision for Muslim and Refugee communities. More families separated by a white supremacist agenda. #NoMuslimBanEver #StandWithMuslims 

(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.

The pretend oppressed.

(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)shere khan Wrote:  @lsarsour 
#SCOTUS failed us today. They decided on the side of xenophobia and racism. This is a devastating decision for Muslim and Refugee communities. More families separated by a white supremacist agenda. #NoMuslimBanEver #StandWithMuslims 

4 members of the Supreme Court failed us today by voting for a dictatorship depending on the whims of an appointed for life judge who can ignore the constitution with impunity.

5 voted for freedom, safety and the rule of law and allowing President Trump to use President Obama's list of terrorist threats to make a decision.

(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.

No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.

Then tell your Muslim buddies to quit shooting up gay bars.....

(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.

No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.

In the 5-4 opinion penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court found that Trump's immigration restriction fell "squarely" within the president's authority. The court rejected claims that the ban was motivated by religious hostility.

"The [order] is expressly premised on legitimate purposes: preventing entry of nationals who cannot be adequately vetted and inducing other nations to improve their practices," Roberts wrote. "The text says nothing about religion."

(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)shere khan Wrote:  @lsarsour 
#SCOTUS failed us today. They decided on the side of xenophobia and racism. This is a devastating decision for Muslim and Refugee communities. More families separated by a white supremacist agenda. #NoMuslimBanEver #StandWithMuslims 

lololol, not a good day for hamas sympathizers.

(06-26-2018 09:41 AM)Dasville Wrote:  Technically, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of President Trump’s argument about the power of the President. Be that person be Hillary or Corey Booker or Maxine. My only wish would be for President Trump to acknowledge that it wasn’t for him alone, but for all future Presidents.
When there are opposing views on an issue all we can rely on is the process. Destroy that, you destroy multiple views.

Errrrr, yea. That 4 justices couldn’t actually read that in the Constitution, should be chilling for anyone.

Good thing the Drumpf will likely get 2 more.

Restore some sanity to this once great country.

(06-26-2018 11:06 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)shere khan Wrote:  @lsarsour 
#SCOTUS failed us today. They decided on the side of xenophobia and racism. This is a devastating decision for Muslim and Refugee communities. More families separated by a white supremacist agenda. #NoMuslimBanEver #StandWithMuslims 

lololol, not a good day for hamas sympathizers.

Not a good day at all. I guess some judge on an island in the Pacific was wrong.

Bwahahahaha

(06-26-2018 10:07 AM)Dasville Wrote:  Based on National Security, would adding Mexico to the list help or hurt?

Why would anyone do that? We already have those immigration laws.

Just now starting to enforce them again, just like the zerO admin did.

(06-26-2018 11:05 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.

No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.

In the 5-4 opinion penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court found that Trump's immigration restriction fell "squarely" within the president's authority. The court rejected claims that the ban was motivated by religious hostility.

"The [order] is expressly premised on legitimate purposes: preventing entry of nationals who cannot be adequately vetted and inducing other nations to improve their practices," Roberts wrote. "The text says nothing about religion."

So the lower court in Masterpiece should just remove all references to the Bakers religion and they can shut him down forever. Got it.

LOL. Keep telling yourselves that Trump doesn't hate Muslims. All Muslims. Wait - I forgot the Saudis...He likes those guys so long as they keep paying him.

(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.

No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.

How’d the Tejas redistricting case go for you?

MUH GERRRRRRIE MANNDERRINNNN!!!!