(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
In the 5-4 opinion penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court found that Trump's immigration restriction fell "squarely" within the president's authority. The court rejected claims that the ban was motivated by religious hostility.
"The [order] is expressly premised on legitimate purposes: preventing entry of nationals who cannot be adequately vetted and inducing other nations to improve their practices," Roberts wrote. "The text says nothing about religion."
So the lower court in Masterpiece should just remove all references to the Bakers religion and they can shut him down forever. Got it.
LOL. Keep telling yourselves that Trump doesn't hate Muslims. All Muslims. Wait - I forgot the Saudis...He likes those guys so long as they keep paying him.
This ruling may have just kept you from being chucked off a building by some Muslim.
Be thankful for your president's wisdom.
(This post was last modified: 06-26-2018 11:18 AM by shere khan.)
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
In the 5-4 opinion penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court found that Trump's immigration restriction fell "squarely" within the president's authority. The court rejected claims that the ban was motivated by religious hostility.
"The [order] is expressly premised on legitimate purposes: preventing entry of nationals who cannot be adequately vetted and inducing other nations to improve their practices," Roberts wrote. "The text says nothing about religion."
So the lower court in Masterpiece should just remove all references to the Bakers religion and they can shut him down forever. Got it.
LOL. Keep telling yourselves that Trump doesn't hate Muslims. All Muslims. Wait - I forgot the Saudis...He likes those guys so long as they keep paying him.
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
In the 5-4 opinion penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court found that Trump's immigration restriction fell "squarely" within the president's authority. The court rejected claims that the ban was motivated by religious hostility.
"The [order] is expressly premised on legitimate purposes: preventing entry of nationals who cannot be adequately vetted and inducing other nations to improve their practices," Roberts wrote. "The text says nothing about religion."
So the lower court in Masterpiece should just remove all references to the Bakers religion and they can shut him down forever. Got it.
LOL. Keep telling yourselves that Trump doesn't hate Muslims. All Muslims. Wait - I forgot the Saudis...He likes those guys so long as they keep paying him.
This ruling may have just kept you from being chucked off a building by some Muslim.
Be thankful for your president's wisdom.
Wait.
Does he hate the Muslims or the Jews, or the blacks or the gays?!?
(06-26-2018 10:07 AM)Dasville Wrote: Based on National Security, would adding Mexico to the list help or hurt?
Why would anyone do that? We already have those immigration laws.
Just now starting to enforce them again, just like the zerO admin did.
Your correct. I have no problem with vetted Mexicans being allowed in the Country. Mexico does a decent job with its own citizens. I can only imagine how many are flooding their country. They should get tough.
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
Good to know the US Supreme Court doesn't take its marching orders from the MSM.
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
Then tell your Muslim buddies to quit shooting up gay bars.....
(06-26-2018 10:07 AM)Dasville Wrote: Based on National Security, would adding Mexico to the list help or hurt?
Why would anyone do that? We already have those immigration laws.
Just now starting to enforce them again, just like the zerO admin did.
Your correct. I have no problem with vetted Mexicans being allowed in the Country. Mexico does a decent job with its own citizens. I can only imagine how many are flooding their country. They should get tough.
Ooooookay.
This has never been about them. It is/was an action or response to the mayhem taking place at soccer stadiums, Charlie Ebo (whatever the name was, don’t care) the invasion of Sweden, the ghettoization of Paris and the like.
Why the leftists want to encourage that here is mystifying.
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
Then tell your Muslim buddies to quit shooting up gay bars.....
There are not enough rep points to give to this masterpiece post.
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
Apples and oranges. Regulating commerce has nothing to do with restricting Presidential powers granted to him by law.
The court did well. If you want to restrict what the President can do, then you need to have Congress change the laws governing his actions. It isn't the job of the court to change the law even though they might not like it.
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
Then tell your Muslim buddies to quit shooting up gay bars.....
There are not enough rep points to give to this masterpiece post.
I liked the one about being chucked off a building.
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
Don’t worry. Trump’s not going to outlaw homosexuality and they are not building concentration camps for gays.
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
Again with the false narrative, isn't it tiring pushing that heavy old thing around?
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
Then tell your Muslim buddies to quit shooting up gay bars.....
(06-26-2018 10:54 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Ok... So the US Supreme Court has now established that a CLEAR and DIRECT animus towards members of a religious group is irrelevant when deciding a case about clearly discriminatory actions targeting a religious group.
No idea how they square that with their ruling in Masterpiece, where the Court argued that because of some perceived hostility (BS really - just questions asked) towards evangelicals who discriminate against the public as the critical factor in the remanding of the ruling to the lower court, other than rank hypocrisy, but there ya go.
Apples and oranges. Regulating commerce has nothing to do with restricting Presidential powers granted to him by law.
The court did well. If you want to restrict what the President can do, then you need to have Congress change the laws governing his actions. It isn't the job of the court to change the law even though they might not like it.
...unless you're a Liberal judge who rule by FEELINGS even though it goes against the Constitution they'd swore to UPHOLD.
Poor Libturds. I think this song may soothe their FEELINGS toward those oppressed who want to kill us including gays. Tsk, poor terrorists, who will come to their defense but gullible Libturds that can't see that they're the target too.
/
Supreme Court rules for Trump in travel ban
![[Image: 1dxet4.jpg]](https://i.imgflip.com/1dxet4.jpg)
![[Image: lBYwEDm.gif?noredirect]](https://i.imgur.com/lBYwEDm.gif?noredirect)
![[Image: 1e0.gif]](http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/038/866/1e0.gif)
![[Image: rY8S97V.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/rY8S97V.jpg)
