I came to a realization this weekend... we dont need gun control... we need "Millennial Control".

My parents generation didn't have a problem with guns...
My generation didn't have a problem with guns...

But these kids... apparently can't stop shooting each other up at school.

Not only do they constantly show that they are unable to deal with the real world and demand safe spaces and that anything they dont like is hate speech... but apparently they deal with anything they don't like with uncontrollable anger. Why the **** do these kids think the proper response to a girl breaking up with you is to take a gun to school shoot people?

(03-26-2018 05:47 PM)q5sys Wrote:  I came to a realization this weekend... we dont need gun control... we need "Millennial Control".

My parents generation didn't have a problem with guns...
My generation didn't have a problem with guns...

But these kids... apparently can't stop shooting each other up at school.

Not only do they constantly show that they are unable to deal with the real world and demand safe spaces and that anything they dont like is hate speech... but apparently they deal with anything they don't like with uncontrollable anger. Why the **** do these kids think the proper response to a girl breaking up with you is to take a gun to school shoot people?

More participation trophies?

(03-26-2018 05:47 PM)q5sys Wrote:  I came to a realization this weekend... we dont need gun control... we need "Millennial Control".

My parents generation didn't have a problem with guns...
My generation didn't have a problem with guns...

But these kids... apparently can't stop shooting each other up at school.

Not only do they constantly show that they are unable to deal with the real world and demand safe spaces and that anything they dont like is hate speech... but apparently they deal with anything they don't like with uncontrollable anger. Why the **** do these kids think the proper response to a girl breaking up with you is to take a gun to school shoot people?

Comes from never being told no growing up.

(03-26-2018 02:26 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Please show how that is different then the anti Obama protest?

Cars were not lit ablaze, police were not assaulted, and people were not smacked in the head with bike locks at the tea party protest....

If you can't admit to that, then you're not a moderate and you're certainly not arguing in good faith.

Quote:Don’t forget Charlottesville

Was Charlottesville an anti-obama protest?

http://thefederalist.com/2018/03/26/we-a...ays-wrong/

Its not the artists who define a generation. Its the plumbers.

The problem we have today is that people abused the 1st, 2nd and 5th rights of the constitution. Our forefathers would be rolling in their graves with what types of guns that we have today. The times have changed, and our constitution needs to change to keep up with the times.

(03-28-2018 10:35 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  The problem we have today is that people abused the 1st, 2nd and 5th rights of the constitution. Our forefathers would be rolling in their graves with what types of guns that we have today. The times have changed, and our constitution needs to change to keep up with the times.

That shows a complete lack of understanding of the reasons our forefathers put those amendments in place. Chances are if they suddenly appeared in present day they would gather as many of those arms as possible and attempt another revolution as our current government demonstrates many of the same traits they rebelled against.

I'm not interested in the political position of children.

But, maybe that's just me!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/...crowd.html

Quote:A university professor studying large-scale, Trump-era protests in Washington says the media is giving the wrong impression about who made up the crowd during last weekend’s anti-gun March for Our Lives demonstration.

“My research tells a different story about who participated in the March for Our Lives — and it is more complicated and less well-packaged for prime time,” University of Maryland sociology professor Dana R. Fisher wrote in a Wednesday story for the Washington Post.

Fisher’s study indicates that -- while news coverage focused on the teenagers marching for gun control in the wake of last month’s shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida --- 90 percent of the crowd was actually adults. She said the average age of adults in the crowd was just under 49.

“Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers,” Fisher wrote. “Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18.”

Quote:The research follows an imaging company saying the turnout for the march was much less than claimed by its organizers.

Organizers of the demonstration claimed Sunday that some 850,000 people attended the pro-gun control event.

But Virginia-based Digital Design & Imaging Service Inc., which uses aerial photos to calculate crowd sizes, reported the event’s peak crowd size was at 202,796 people.

(03-28-2018 02:52 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/...crowd.html

Quote:A university professor studying large-scale, Trump-era protests in Washington says the media is giving the wrong impression about who made up the crowd during last weekend’s anti-gun March for Our Lives demonstration.

“My research tells a different story about who participated in the March for Our Lives — and it is more complicated and less well-packaged for prime time,” University of Maryland sociology professor Dana R. Fisher wrote in a Wednesday story for the Washington Post.

Fisher’s study indicates that -- while news coverage focused on the teenagers marching for gun control in the wake of last month’s shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida --- 90 percent of the crowd was actually adults. She said the average age of adults in the crowd was just under 49.

“Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers,” Fisher wrote. “Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18.”

Quote:The research follows an imaging company saying the turnout for the march was much less than claimed by its organizers.

Organizers of the demonstration claimed Sunday that some 850,000 people attended the pro-gun control event.

But Virginia-based Digital Design & Imaging Service Inc., which uses aerial photos to calculate crowd sizes, reported the event’s peak crowd size was at 202,796 people.

Please site one story that says the crowd was "primarily made up of teenagers".

Thanks.

(03-26-2018 03:58 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(03-26-2018 03:48 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(03-26-2018 01:43 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(03-26-2018 01:39 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(03-26-2018 01:38 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Yes it does. You swallowed man. You swallowed.

gotta love when you a leftist gets put in his place.

If you were smart enough to analyze any of this, you would realize I am a centrist.

Now THAT’S just comedy gold!

Never seen a centrist who always sides with the left before have you?

How many issues are actually discussed here? Because I believe differently then you on a a couple of trigger issues you are ready to label me. Sad.

(03-28-2018 03:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-28-2018 02:52 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/...crowd.html

Quote:A university professor studying large-scale, Trump-era protests in Washington says the media is giving the wrong impression about who made up the crowd during last weekend’s anti-gun March for Our Lives demonstration.

“My research tells a different story about who participated in the March for Our Lives — and it is more complicated and less well-packaged for prime time,” University of Maryland sociology professor Dana R. Fisher wrote in a Wednesday story for the Washington Post.

Fisher’s study indicates that -- while news coverage focused on the teenagers marching for gun control in the wake of last month’s shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida --- 90 percent of the crowd was actually adults. She said the average age of adults in the crowd was just under 49.

“Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers,” Fisher wrote. “Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18.”

Quote:The research follows an imaging company saying the turnout for the march was much less than claimed by its organizers.

Organizers of the demonstration claimed Sunday that some 850,000 people attended the pro-gun control event.

But Virginia-based Digital Design & Imaging Service Inc., which uses aerial photos to calculate crowd sizes, reported the event’s peak crowd size was at 202,796 people.

Please site one story that says the crowd was "primarily made up of teenagers".

Thanks.

Kap? There's supposed to be "many" accounts. I'm only asking for one.

(03-29-2018 08:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-28-2018 03:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-28-2018 02:52 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/...crowd.html

Quote:A university professor studying large-scale, Trump-era protests in Washington says the media is giving the wrong impression about who made up the crowd during last weekend’s anti-gun March for Our Lives demonstration.

“My research tells a different story about who participated in the March for Our Lives — and it is more complicated and less well-packaged for prime time,” University of Maryland sociology professor Dana R. Fisher wrote in a Wednesday story for the Washington Post.

Fisher’s study indicates that -- while news coverage focused on the teenagers marching for gun control in the wake of last month’s shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida --- 90 percent of the crowd was actually adults. She said the average age of adults in the crowd was just under 49.

“Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers,” Fisher wrote. “Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18.”

Quote:The research follows an imaging company saying the turnout for the march was much less than claimed by its organizers.

Organizers of the demonstration claimed Sunday that some 850,000 people attended the pro-gun control event.

But Virginia-based Digital Design & Imaging Service Inc., which uses aerial photos to calculate crowd sizes, reported the event’s peak crowd size was at 202,796 people.

Please site one story that says the crowd was "primarily made up of teenagers".

Thanks.

Kap? There's supposed to be "many" accounts. I'm only asking for one.

Ask professor Fisher?

So grass roots.

#Kony2012

(03-29-2018 11:58 AM)Kronke Wrote:  So grass roots.

#Kony2012

And half the kids there thought they were going to a rally to make Tide Pods the national dessert

They're winning.

(03-29-2018 02:17 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  They're winning.

2nd A has been removed?

(03-29-2018 02:17 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-29-2018 02:17 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  They're winning.

2nd A has been removed?

Where did they say that was the goal? In fact, students like Hogg are saying the exact opposite.

A G A I N, there is no second amendment right to own any type of weapon you want.