https://soundcloud.com/thegreat5/season-...ek-1-recap

Sounds like another shoddy podcast.

(09-04-2017 06:43 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Sounds like another shoddy podcast.

I forgot you post here during football season.... sigh

i dont get whats shoddy bout it...

tulsa losing to okstate was predicated by everyone, temple losing to nd was predicted by everyone, jmu beating ecu was no surpise by anyone....

we had no real upsets against us..some game were closer than expected but all that matters is winning..usc barely beat wmu, no one will say usc is shoddy...usc won and will still be top 7 next week

i say it was a good week.

(09-04-2017 06:54 PM)pesik Wrote:  i dont get whats shoddy bout it...

tulsa losing to okstate was predicated by everyone, temple losing to nd was predicted by everyone, jmu beating ecu was no surpise by anyone....

we had no real upsets against us..some game were closer than expected but all that matters is winning..usc barely beat wmu, no one will say usc is shoddy...usc won and will still be top 7 next week

i say it was a good week.

+SMU and Tulane for doing what they should against their FCS teams.
+UCF and Navy looked outstanding, although against bottom G5 opponents.

=Memphis had a chance to make a statement...did not. I understand it was a monsoon, but they didn't cover.

- Temple. ND is a good I think? But they still were a 4 win team last season. We've seen Temple be competitive in this spot before.

- Tulsa played a very good Oklahoma State but didn't come close to covering.

-- UConn looked terrible.
-- ECU looked terrible (predicted it... but lost by 20???)
- UC played to their competition.
- USF maybe played themselves out of the top 25

(09-04-2017 07:06 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 06:54 PM)pesik Wrote:  i dont get whats shoddy bout it...

tulsa losing to okstate was predicated by everyone, temple losing to nd was predicted by everyone, jmu beating ecu was no surpise by anyone....

we had no real upsets against us..some game were closer than expected but all that matters is winning..usc barely beat wmu, no one will say usc is shoddy...usc won and will still be top 7 next week

i say it was a good week.

+SMU and Tulane for doing what they should against their FCS teams.
+UCF and Navy looked outstanding, although against bottom G5 opponents.

=Memphis had a chance to make a statement...did not. I understand it was a monsoon, but they didn't cover.

- Temple. ND is a good I think? But they still were a 4 win team last season. We've seen Temple be competitive in this spot before.

- Tulsa played a very good Oklahoma State but didn't come close to covering.

-- UConn looked terrible.
-- ECU looked terrible (predicted it... but lost by 20???)
- UC played to their competition.
- USF maybe played themselves out of the top 25

LOL. USF isn't dropping out of the Top 25.

Mommy says turn off the computer and go brush your teeth. Wanna be well-rested for your first day of 6th grade.

(09-04-2017 07:10 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 07:06 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 06:54 PM)pesik Wrote:  i dont get whats shoddy bout it...

tulsa losing to okstate was predicated by everyone, temple losing to nd was predicted by everyone, jmu beating ecu was no surpise by anyone....

we had no real upsets against us..some game were closer than expected but all that matters is winning..usc barely beat wmu, no one will say usc is shoddy...usc won and will still be top 7 next week

i say it was a good week.

+SMU and Tulane for doing what they should against their FCS teams.
+UCF and Navy looked outstanding, although against bottom G5 opponents.

=Memphis had a chance to make a statement...did not. I understand it was a monsoon, but they didn't cover.

- Temple. ND is a good I think? But they still were a 4 win team last season. We've seen Temple be competitive in this spot before.

- Tulsa played a very good Oklahoma State but didn't come close to covering.

-- UConn looked terrible.
-- ECU looked terrible (predicted it... but lost by 20???)
- UC played to their competition.
- USF maybe played themselves out of the top 25

LOL. USF isn't dropping out of the Top 25.

"Mommy says turn off the computer and go brush your teeth. Wanna be well-rested for your first day of 6th grade."

Is what the mommies said to all of the Husky players Friday night before their big game with Holy Cross

(09-04-2017 07:17 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 07:10 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 07:06 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 06:54 PM)pesik Wrote:  i dont get whats shoddy bout it...

tulsa losing to okstate was predicated by everyone, temple losing to nd was predicted by everyone, jmu beating ecu was no surpise by anyone....

we had no real upsets against us..some game were closer than expected but all that matters is winning..usc barely beat wmu, no one will say usc is shoddy...usc won and will still be top 7 next week

i say it was a good week.

+SMU and Tulane for doing what they should against their FCS teams.
+UCF and Navy looked outstanding, although against bottom G5 opponents.

=Memphis had a chance to make a statement...did not. I understand it was a monsoon, but they didn't cover.

- Temple. ND is a good I think? But they still were a 4 win team last season. We've seen Temple be competitive in this spot before.

- Tulsa played a very good Oklahoma State but didn't come close to covering.

-- UConn looked terrible.
-- ECU looked terrible (predicted it... but lost by 20???)
- UC played to their competition.
- USF maybe played themselves out of the top 25

LOL. USF isn't dropping out of the Top 25.

"Mommy says turn off the computer and go brush your teeth. Wanna be well-rested for your first day of 6th grade."

Is what the mommies said to all of the Husky players Friday night before their big game with Holy Cross

I think I struck a nerve. Too easy. LOL.

(09-04-2017 07:06 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 06:54 PM)pesik Wrote:  i dont get whats shoddy bout it...

tulsa losing to okstate was predicated by everyone, temple losing to nd was predicted by everyone, jmu beating ecu was no surpise by anyone....

we had no real upsets against us..some game were closer than expected but all that matters is winning..usc barely beat wmu, no one will say usc is shoddy...usc won and will still be top 7 next week

i say it was a good week.

+SMU and Tulane for doing what they should against their FCS teams.
+UCF and Navy looked outstanding, although against bottom G5 opponents.

=Memphis had a chance to make a statement...did not. I understand it was a monsoon, but they didn't cover.

- Temple. ND is a good I think? But they still were a 4 win team last season. We've seen Temple be competitive in this spot before.

- Tulsa played a very good Oklahoma State but didn't come close to covering.

-- UConn looked terrible.
-- ECU looked terrible (predicted it... but lost by 20???)
- UC played to their competition.
- USF maybe played themselves out of the top 25

What statement was it we were suppose to make against ULM. It isn't like we were really threaten by them the whole game

Tigers Should Schedule More MAC Schools

(09-04-2017 07:25 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 07:06 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 06:54 PM)pesik Wrote:  i dont get whats shoddy bout it...

tulsa losing to okstate was predicated by everyone, temple losing to nd was predicted by everyone, jmu beating ecu was no surpise by anyone....

we had no real upsets against us..some game were closer than expected but all that matters is winning..usc barely beat wmu, no one will say usc is shoddy...usc won and will still be top 7 next week

i say it was a good week.

+SMU and Tulane for doing what they should against their FCS teams.
+UCF and Navy looked outstanding, although against bottom G5 opponents.

=Memphis had a chance to make a statement...did not. I understand it was a monsoon, but they didn't cover.

- Temple. ND is a good I think? But they still were a 4 win team last season. We've seen Temple be competitive in this spot before.

- Tulsa played a very good Oklahoma State but didn't come close to covering.

-- UConn looked terrible.
-- ECU looked terrible (predicted it... but lost by 20???)
- UC played to their competition.
- USF maybe played themselves out of the top 25

What statement was it we were suppose to make against ULM. It isn't like we were really threaten by them the whole game

They were 25 point favorites

I said "shoddy." That doesn't mean it was the worst week ever. But there were some games that could be portrayed as a cause for concern. No one is scared of USF right now, UConn and ECU look dreadful, and Memphis played down to their competition when they should have put away an "inferior G4 team." ESPECIALLY when many on this board think your teams can do it in their sleep. Some rain is all ULM needed to compete.

As a whole the AAC will be fine. It's week 1.

But it's funny that any opposing opinion to the AAC being demi-gods and ya'll have your panties in a bunch. I see a lot of diverting the conversation to insults so you can feel big.... and that's not so big of you.

(09-04-2017 07:35 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  Tigers Should Schedule More MAC Schools

Toledo Should Schedule more AAC Schools

(09-04-2017 07:06 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 06:54 PM)pesik Wrote:  i dont get whats shoddy bout it...

tulsa losing to okstate was predicated by everyone, temple losing to nd was predicted by everyone, jmu beating ecu was no surpise by anyone....

we had no real upsets against us..some game were closer than expected but all that matters is winning..usc barely beat wmu, no one will say usc is shoddy...usc won and will still be top 7 next week

i say it was a good week.

+SMU and Tulane for doing what they should against their FCS teams.
+UCF and Navy looked outstanding, although against bottom G5 opponents.

=Memphis had a chance to make a statement...did not. I understand it was a monsoon, but they didn't cover.

- Temple. ND is a good I think? But they still were a 4 win team last season. We've seen Temple be competitive in this spot before.

- Tulsa played a very good Oklahoma State but didn't come close to covering.

-- UConn looked terrible.
-- ECU looked terrible (predicted it... but lost by 20???)
- UC played to their competition.
- USF maybe played themselves out of the top 25

-- you realize memphis was up 37-14 mid-4q quarter and the last ulm td was with a minute left...the games wasnt anywhere close to the score...ps i dont care about the cover, the line wasnt made with weather consideration...

that memphis game made me a believer of memphis, they did make a statement...memphis is a passing team, a monson should have destroyed their offense (passing in that rain is unrealistic)..but instead they ran over 300yds ..that game showed memphis offense will be deadly. they can gain yards in any form or fashion..whatever you try to take away they can score another way

-- temple graduated everyone, lost their coach, and ND is a top 7 recruiting team...why is this game a surprise in any form??...we are aac homers in this forum and everyone picked ND pre-game...most of us knew temple would be rebuilding ..even temple fans

---tulsa, who cares about covering...okstate is a top 10 team, judging how youll do in the g5 vs how you do vs top 10 teams is a bad evaluation

---uconn looked horrible for 3 quarters with new qb david pindell....they switched to their original qb (who was their 2 year starter) in the 4th, and they scored a td on every drive after that...pindell likely isnt playing anymore so using the first 3 quarters to evaluate anything is meaningless

--ecu: jmu just won the fcs national championship, they are the favorite to win the fcs national championship this year again..ecu was a 3-9 team who lost its best players..fcs title contenders have beaten top 25 fbs teams in recent years...no one publicly said it because ecu fans like to attack anyone who say otherwise....but this is what most people thought would happen

--usf will still be in the top 25....usf isnt losing 8 spots for winning....temple 2 years ago beat every bad team in the league by inches but was still top 25 most of the year...usf lost a chance to move up but is still secure as a top 25

overall good week

(09-04-2017 07:40 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 07:25 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 07:06 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 06:54 PM)pesik Wrote:  i dont get whats shoddy bout it...

tulsa losing to okstate was predicated by everyone, temple losing to nd was predicted by everyone, jmu beating ecu was no surpise by anyone....

we had no real upsets against us..some game were closer than expected but all that matters is winning..usc barely beat wmu, no one will say usc is shoddy...usc won and will still be top 7 next week

i say it was a good week.

+SMU and Tulane for doing what they should against their FCS teams.
+UCF and Navy looked outstanding, although against bottom G5 opponents.

=Memphis had a chance to make a statement...did not. I understand it was a monsoon, but they didn't cover.

- Temple. ND is a good I think? But they still were a 4 win team last season. We've seen Temple be competitive in this spot before.

- Tulsa played a very good Oklahoma State but didn't come close to covering.

-- UConn looked terrible.
-- ECU looked terrible (predicted it... but lost by 20???)
- UC played to their competition.
- USF maybe played themselves out of the top 25

What statement was it we were suppose to make against ULM. It isn't like we were really threaten by them the whole game

They were 25 point favorites

I said "shoddy." That doesn't mean it was the worst week ever. But there were some games that could be portrayed as a cause for concern. No one is scared of USF right now, UConn and ECU look dreadful, and Memphis played down to their competition when they should have put away an "inferior G4 team." ESPECIALLY when many on this board think your teams can do it in their sleep. Some rain is all ULM needed to compete.

As a whole the AAC will be fine. It's week 1.

But it's funny that any opposing opinion to the AAC being demi-gods and ya'll have your panties in a bunch. I see a lot of diverting the conversation to insults so you can feel big.... and that's not so big of you.

Well we were kind up by 30 till our injuries pulled up on the defensive front

Did you actually watch all the games or did you wing it like your googled Top 10 stadiums rankings?

(09-04-2017 07:42 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 07:35 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  Tigers Should Schedule More MAC Schools

Toledo Should Schedule more AAC Schools

Question: Would Toledo join the AAC upon invitation?

Answer: Any response other than "yes " means you are a liar, a fool, or both.

(09-04-2017 07:42 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 07:06 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 06:54 PM)pesik Wrote:  i dont get whats shoddy bout it...

tulsa losing to okstate was predicated by everyone, temple losing to nd was predicted by everyone, jmu beating ecu was no surpise by anyone....

we had no real upsets against us..some game were closer than expected but all that matters is winning..usc barely beat wmu, no one will say usc is shoddy...usc won and will still be top 7 next week

i say it was a good week.

+SMU and Tulane for doing what they should against their FCS teams.
+UCF and Navy looked outstanding, although against bottom G5 opponents.

=Memphis had a chance to make a statement...did not. I understand it was a monsoon, but they didn't cover.

- Temple. ND is a good I think? But they still were a 4 win team last season. We've seen Temple be competitive in this spot before.

- Tulsa played a very good Oklahoma State but didn't come close to covering.

-- UConn looked terrible.
-- ECU looked terrible (predicted it... but lost by 20???)
- UC played to their competition.
- USF maybe played themselves out of the top 25

-- you realize memphis was up 37-14 mid-4q quarter and the last ulm td was with a minute left...the games wasnt anywhere close to the score...ps i dont care about the cover, the line wasnt made with weather consideration...

that memphis game made me a believer of memphis, they did make a statement...memphis is a passing team, a monson should have destroyed their offense (passing in that rain is unrealistic)..but instead they ran over 300yds ..that game showed memphis offense will be deadly. they can gain yards in any form or fashion..whatever you try to take away they can score another way

-- temple graduated everyone, lost their coach, and ND is a top 7 recruiting team...why is this game a surprise in any form??...we are aac homers in this forum and everyone picked ND pre-game...most of us knew temple would be rebuilding ..even temple fans

---tulsa, who cares about covering...okstate is a top 10 team, judging how youll do in the g5 vs how you do vs top 10 teams i a bad evaulation

---uconn looked horrible for 3 quarters with new qb david pindell....they switched to their original qb (who was their 2 year starter), and they scored a td on every drive after that...pindell likely isnt playing anymore so using the first 3 quarters to evaluate anything is meaningless

--ecu: jmu just won the fcs national championship, they are the favorite to win the fcs national championship this year again..ecu was a 3-9 team who lost its beast players..fcs title contenders have beaten top 25 fbs teams in recent years...no one publicly said it because ecu fans like to attack anyone who say otherwise....but this is what most people thought would happen

--usf will still be in the top 25....usf isnt losing 8 spots for winning....temple 2 years ago beat every bad team in the league by inches but was still top 25 most of the year...usf lost a chance to move up but is still secure s a top 25

overall good week

I'm aware of all these things, just disagree that it was a "Good week." 2 teams did good things if you ask me... The rest of the conference went par or below par for expectations.

Tulsa will be fine, Ok State is good. But you CAN take away some things from a game like that. Ok State was prepared and wasn't going to let CMU of 2016 happen again. I can certainly take away something good from the WMU versus USC game, or the CSU versus Colorado game. Why am I not allowed to say I was expecting more of a 2 to 3 TD game for Tulsa @Ok State??

And betters do look at the weather before placing their bets. Probably why the line moved from 27.5 to 25 near game time.

Once again, great teams bury lower competition, and by the words on this board prior, you should NOT be okay with NOT winning that game by 50 points. That wasn't my prediction... I don't boast P6.

and Once again... it's week 1. There are jitters and things to fix. Memphis will have chances to prove themselves as the season goes on and they play more non monsoon games. I like Memphis. I picked them as my top 3 in the G5 prior to the season. FOR ME... they did not impress.

(09-04-2017 07:49 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 07:42 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(09-04-2017 07:35 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  Tigers Should Schedule More MAC Schools

Toledo Should Schedule more AAC Schools

Question: Would Toledo join the AAC upon invitation?

Answer: Any response other than "yes " means you are a liar, a fool, or both.

Not concerned at the moment. I enjoy driving to most of my games. Travel expenses makes it harder for me to be a fan on the road in Texas and Florida. Marshall left the MAC and look at that program. Temple left and they still don't beat good MAC teams. It's a stable league right now. The short answer is How Much Can you Pay Us compared to what we make now? We're a flagship for football in our current conference. It wouldn't be an easy conversation.

I like this Toledo fan's passive aggressive snipes