(01-29-2017 01:30 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:25 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  What about counties where the actual terrorist come from like Saudi Arabia? Oh yeah, it's because Trump does business there.

Sent from my SM-T357T using CSNbbs mobile app

Fake news

Says the man who posts links from Info Wars.

Tip of the spear!

Rula Jabreal just went full REEEEEEEEEEE on CNN. Expect to see it go viral within the hour. What a train wreck.

The other panelist's response was classic -- "You're proving my point."

I don't watch the Academy Awards, but I would love to see them crying over the banned director.

Sent from my SM-N910C using CSNbbs mobile app

(01-29-2017 01:34 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Rula Jabreal just went full REEEEEEEEEEE on CNN. Expect to see it go viral within the hour. What a train wreck.

The other panelist's response was classic -- "You're proving my point."

Was that when Jack Kingston kept talking over her..

Professor Turley: "I agree with you, but we need to stop calling people names."

Rula Jabreal: "RRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!"



Professor Turley: "You're proving my point."

(01-29-2017 01:34 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Rula Jabreal just went full REEEEEEEEEEE on CNN. Expect to see it go viral within the hour. What a train wreck.

The other panelist's response was classic -- "You're proving my point."

Chuck Schumer holding back tears lol. Dems off the rails.

And leftists wonder why their party is collapsing. They are so fanatical, they no longer even know how to talk to people. Even in the off chance that they are right, the fact they they scream it in your face is so off putting, that people otherwise willing to listen are no longer interested.

This is kind of funny.

Malaysia has a national muslim registry. Non-muslims don't get any religion printed on their IDs. They are a majority muslim country, however. Here is a picture:



But I don't have the minimum idea of how this thing could be useful anywhere in the world.

Sent from my SM-N910C using CSNbbs mobile app

(01-29-2017 01:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  What about counties where the actual terrorist come from like Saudi Arabia? Oh yeah, it's because Trump does business there.

Sent from my SM-T357T using CSNbbs mobile app

Try reading the whole thread next time before you bless us with your ignorance and lack of intelligence.

(01-29-2017 01:06 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:00 PM)bullet Wrote:  http://www.nationalreview.com/article/44...t-hysteria

I posted this in the other thread about Obama's policies. This is a calm, rational discussion of the temporary ban on travel from terrorist zones.

Far right magazine, far right author.

Basically an apology for DJT.

They aren't far right.

(01-29-2017 01:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:21 PM)gdunn Wrote:  So Trump is personally detaining people? They being held in the basement of Trump Tower?

Yes, his order, issued unilaterally by him personally, is solely responsible for the detention of legal US residents, who are currently being detained on American soil without due process.

You weren't concerned with US citizens being denied their Constitutional rights when Obama wanted to do so but you are worried about non-citizens having non-existent rights violated?

Is this true or a fanfic ?

https://mobile.twitter.com/Jess4_RK/stat...2575266816

Sent from my SM-N910C using CSNbbs mobile app

(01-29-2017 01:57 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:21 PM)gdunn Wrote:  So Trump is personally detaining people? They being held in the basement of Trump Tower?

Yes, his order, issued unilaterally by him personally, is solely responsible for the detention of legal US residents, who are currently being detained on American soil without due process.

You weren't concerned with US citizens being denied their Constitutional rights when Obama wanted to do so but you are worried about non-citizens having non-existent rights violated?

what constitutional rights are you talking about?

(01-29-2017 02:08 PM)Curumim Wrote:  Is this true or a fanfic ?

https://mobile.twitter.com/Jess4_RK/stat...2575266816

Sent from my SM-N910C using CSNbbs mobile app

Sounds like people just trying to rip off other people.

Watching Rance Preibus on MTP. He doesn't even know what is going on. He just said that green card holders aren't being banned. But they are.

(01-29-2017 02:10 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:57 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:21 PM)gdunn Wrote:  So Trump is personally detaining people? They being held in the basement of Trump Tower?

Yes, his order, issued unilaterally by him personally, is solely responsible for the detention of legal US residents, who are currently being detained on American soil without due process.

You weren't concerned with US citizens being denied their Constitutional rights when Obama wanted to do so but you are worried about non-citizens having non-existent rights violated?

what constitutional rights are you talking about?

Their rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Tom was one of many leftists who supported people who were placed on the no-fly list being denied their right to purchase and/or possess firearms. There is no due process involved with being placed on the no-fly list, just bureaucratic action.

(01-29-2017 02:12 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 02:10 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:57 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:21 PM)gdunn Wrote:  So Trump is personally detaining people? They being held in the basement of Trump Tower?

Yes, his order, issued unilaterally by him personally, is solely responsible for the detention of legal US residents, who are currently being detained on American soil without due process.

You weren't concerned with US citizens being denied their Constitutional rights when Obama wanted to do so but you are worried about non-citizens having non-existent rights violated?

what constitutional rights are you talking about?

Their rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Tom was one of many leftists who supported people who were placed on the no-fly list being denied their right to purchase and/or possess firearms. There is no due process involved with being placed on the no-fly list, just bureaucratic action.

Provided for a WELL REGULATED....militia.

(01-29-2017 02:15 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 02:12 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 02:10 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:57 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Yes, his order, issued unilaterally by him personally, is solely responsible for the detention of legal US residents, who are currently being detained on American soil without due process.

You weren't concerned with US citizens being denied their Constitutional rights when Obama wanted to do so but you are worried about non-citizens having non-existent rights violated?

what constitutional rights are you talking about?

Their rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Tom was one of many leftists who supported people who were placed on the no-fly list being denied their right to purchase and/or possess firearms. There is no due process involved with being placed on the no-fly list, just bureaucratic action.

Provided for a WELL REGULATED....militia.

You don't know what regulated means.

(01-29-2017 02:12 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 02:10 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:57 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:21 PM)gdunn Wrote:  So Trump is personally detaining people? They being held in the basement of Trump Tower?

Yes, his order, issued unilaterally by him personally, is solely responsible for the detention of legal US residents, who are currently being detained on American soil without due process.

You weren't concerned with US citizens being denied their Constitutional rights when Obama wanted to do so but you are worried about non-citizens having non-existent rights violated?

what constitutional rights are you talking about?

Their rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Tom was one of many leftists who supported people who were placed on the no-fly list being denied their right to purchase and/or possess firearms. There is no due process involved with being placed on the no-fly list, just bureaucratic action.

I don't recall Obama ever passing a meaningful gun restriction. you are not allowed to subject your own opinion as the end all be all. obviously there is a limit to the 2A as people can't own their own personal bazooka. we just have differing views on where in between a boozoka and a BB gun that line is. just because you have an opinion on background checks, clip capacity, etc. that differs from libs doesn't mean your view is factual and the libs view aren't.

(01-29-2017 02:15 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 02:12 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 02:10 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:57 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Yes, his order, issued unilaterally by him personally, is solely responsible for the detention of legal US residents, who are currently being detained on American soil without due process.

You weren't concerned with US citizens being denied their Constitutional rights when Obama wanted to do so but you are worried about non-citizens having non-existent rights violated?

what constitutional rights are you talking about?

Their rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Tom was one of many leftists who supported people who were placed on the no-fly list being denied their right to purchase and/or possess firearms. There is no due process involved with being placed on the no-fly list, just bureaucratic action.

Provided for a WELL REGULATED....militia.

Quote:"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."

— George Mason

And at the time the Constitution was written the phrase well regulated meant "proper working order"

http://www.constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

Quote:The following are taken from the Oxford English Dictionary, and bracket in time the writing of the 2nd amendment:

1709: "If a liberal Education has formed in us well-regulated Appetites and worthy Inclinations."

1714: "The practice of all well-regulated courts of justice in the world."

1812: "The equation of time ... is the adjustment of the difference of time as shown by a well-regulated clock and a true sun dial."

1848: "A remissness for which I am sure every well-regulated person will blame the Mayor."

1862: "It appeared to her well-regulated mind, like a clandestine proceeding."

1894: "The newspaper, a never wanting adjunct to every well-regulated American embryo city."

The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.