Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
Author Message
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,857
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 984
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #81
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
1967 and 1991 and a story from the NRA. Sure, I'll take the victory. Thanks for your concession. 03-wink

P.S.: 500 letters is irrelevant. How many guns were confiscated????????
(This post was last modified: 06-30-2016 03:09 PM by Redwingtom.)
06-30-2016 03:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kronke Offline
Banned

Posts: 29,379
Joined: Apr 2010
I Root For: Arsenal / StL
Location: Missouri
Post: #82
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 03:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  1967 and 1991 and a story from the NRA. Sure, I'll take the victory. Thanks for your concession. 03-wink

Now, you're just trolling. There's no talking to you.
06-30-2016 03:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,393
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #83
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/us/nat....html?_r=0

Quote:Local police officers began confiscating weapons from civilians in preparation for a forced evacuation of the last holdouts still living here, as President Bush steeled the nation for the grisly scenes of recovering the dead that will unfold in coming days.

Police officers and federal law enforcement agents scoured the city carrying assault rifles seeking residents who have holed up to avoid forcible eviction, as well as those who are still considering evacuating voluntarily to escape the city's putrid waters.

Quote:Mr. Compass, the police superintendent, said that after a week of near anarchy in the city, no civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns, or other firearms of any kind. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said.

That order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16s and other assault rifles.

Mr. Compass said that he was aware of the private guards but that the police had no plans to make them give up their weapons.






But remember everybody, Redtom said the government isn't coming for your guns!
06-30-2016 03:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nomad2u2001 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,356
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation: 450
I Root For: ECU
Location: NC
Post: #84
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 02:07 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 01:41 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 12:17 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I can't stand Stephen Crowder.

I agree with you. There's something so attention-whorish about him.

Well, he is a comedian.

Isn't being funny a prerequisite to being a comedian or is it just a titular claim?
06-30-2016 03:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hambone10 Offline
Hooter
*

Posts: 40,342
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 1293
I Root For: My Kids
Location: Right Down th Middle

New Orleans BowlDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #85
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 02:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 01:12 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 01:08 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Fine...but you're mixing apples and oranges here. This is not a registration leading to a gun ban. It's violators of a law being made aware of their violation. They are found because guns, like cars, are required to be registered. You aren't advocating for no gun registration whatsoever are you???

Yes, I am against any gun registration because as the overwhelming evidence shows it leads to confiscation.

That is just patently false. You can't point to any widespread or even minor confiscation of weapons in America.

Did he say 'in America'? I don't see it... and I am less 'on his side' on this issue

We all agree that America is 'very early' in these stages because unlike other countries, we have a Constitutional protection (something your partner in crime essentially admits when speaking about 'western' countries).

But while they haven't done anything YET to enforce this, it seems clear that they're certainly TRYING to get people to 'voluntarily' (at this point, though clearly under threat of potential further action) turn in their guns.


I think you would have significantly less resistance to registration if it also came with some sort of affirmation /clarification that owning guns for home/personal defense or sport was a right protected by the Constitution... but instead what we get is letters warning us that by registering our guns, we have allowed the government to 'convict' us of offenses by our own admission 'after the fact'... with no actual crime committed.
(This post was last modified: 06-30-2016 03:49 PM by Hambone10.)
06-30-2016 03:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HeartOfDixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
Post: #86
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 03:25 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 02:07 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 01:41 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 12:17 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I can't stand Stephen Crowder.

I agree with you. There's something so attention-whorish about him.

Well, he is a comedian.

Isn't being funny a prerequisite to being a comedian or is it just a titular claim?

But he has this childish character about him that I can't stand; that's why I hate him.
06-30-2016 03:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,857
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 984
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #87
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 03:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/us/nat....html?_r=0

Quote:Local police officers began confiscating weapons from civilians in preparation for a forced evacuation of the last holdouts still living here, as President Bush steeled the nation for the grisly scenes of recovering the dead that will unfold in coming days.

Police officers and federal law enforcement agents scoured the city carrying assault rifles seeking residents who have holed up to avoid forcible eviction, as well as those who are still considering evacuating voluntarily to escape the city's putrid waters.

Quote:Mr. Compass, the police superintendent, said that after a week of near anarchy in the city, no civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns, or other firearms of any kind. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said.

That order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16s and other assault rifles.

Mr. Compass said that he was aware of the private guards but that the police had no plans to make them give up their weapons.






But remember everybody, Redtom said the government isn't coming for your guns!

No clue who Redtom is, but Redwingtom is telling all of you, with complete confidence, that the government isn't coming from your guns.

It will never cease to amaze me as to how easily many in this country have been so easily brainwashed by the NRA.

Extrapolating a horrific natural disaster in New orleans and 500 letters to law breakers in New York to the federal government confiscating your guns????? Puhleeze! 03-talktothehand
06-30-2016 04:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kronke Offline
Banned

Posts: 29,379
Joined: Apr 2010
I Root For: Arsenal / StL
Location: Missouri
Post: #88
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 04:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 03:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/us/nat....html?_r=0

Quote:Local police officers began confiscating weapons from civilians in preparation for a forced evacuation of the last holdouts still living here, as President Bush steeled the nation for the grisly scenes of recovering the dead that will unfold in coming days.

Police officers and federal law enforcement agents scoured the city carrying assault rifles seeking residents who have holed up to avoid forcible eviction, as well as those who are still considering evacuating voluntarily to escape the city's putrid waters.

Quote:Mr. Compass, the police superintendent, said that after a week of near anarchy in the city, no civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns, or other firearms of any kind. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said.

That order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16s and other assault rifles.

Mr. Compass said that he was aware of the private guards but that the police had no plans to make them give up their weapons.






But remember everybody, Redtom said the government isn't coming for your guns!

No clue who Redtom is, but Redwingtom is telling all of you, with complete confidence, that the government isn't coming from your guns.

It will never cease to amaze me as to how easily many in this country have been so easily brainwashed by the NRA.

Extrapolating a horrific natural disaster in New orleans and 500 letters to law breakers in New York to the federal government confiscating your guns????? Puhleeze! 03-talktothehand

Do Democrats make it a habit to propose legislation to ban the possession of things they aren't "coming for"?

Assault (meaningless buzz word) Weapons Ban of 2013 - (Sec. 3) Amends the federal criminal code to ban the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of a semiautomatic assault (meaningless buzz word) weapon, including:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-cong...e-bill/150
(This post was last modified: 06-30-2016 04:07 PM by Kronke.)
06-30-2016 04:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HeartOfDixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
Post: #89
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
The argument that it is just for muskets would seem to fly in the face of the fact that the same group also want us to interpret the Constitution as a living document. If it is living then it is built to adapt to more than muskets.
06-30-2016 04:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull_In_Exile Offline
Eternal Pessimist
*

Posts: 21,809
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 461
I Root For: The Underdog
Location:
Post: #90
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 03:10 PM)Kronke Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 03:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  1967 and 1991 and a story from the NRA. Sure, I'll take the victory. Thanks for your concession. 03-wink

Now, you're just trolling. There's no talking to you.

Sad thing is at one point he was a nice guy to have around.
06-30-2016 04:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Offline
nuts zongo's in the house
*

Posts: 69,248
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7133
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
Post: #91
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 04:08 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 03:10 PM)Kronke Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 03:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  1967 and 1991 and a story from the NRA. Sure, I'll take the victory. Thanks for your concession. 03-wink

Now, you're just trolling. There's no talking to you.

Sad thing is at one point he was a nice guy to have around.

03-wink at least you remember things how the ignore list gets revised 03-wink

04-cheers
06-30-2016 04:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fitbud Offline
Banned

Posts: 30,983
Joined: Dec 2011
I Root For: PAC 12
Location:
Post: #92
Re: RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-29-2016 01:58 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Was the first amendment just for town cryers, printing presses, and Protestants?

Bingo
06-30-2016 04:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kronke Offline
Banned

Posts: 29,379
Joined: Apr 2010
I Root For: Arsenal / StL
Location: Missouri
Post: #93
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 04:06 PM)Kronke Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 04:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 03:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/us/nat....html?_r=0

Quote:Local police officers began confiscating weapons from civilians in preparation for a forced evacuation of the last holdouts still living here, as President Bush steeled the nation for the grisly scenes of recovering the dead that will unfold in coming days.

Police officers and federal law enforcement agents scoured the city carrying assault rifles seeking residents who have holed up to avoid forcible eviction, as well as those who are still considering evacuating voluntarily to escape the city's putrid waters.

Quote:Mr. Compass, the police superintendent, said that after a week of near anarchy in the city, no civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns, or other firearms of any kind. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said.

That order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16s and other assault rifles.

Mr. Compass said that he was aware of the private guards but that the police had no plans to make them give up their weapons.






But remember everybody, Redtom said the government isn't coming for your guns!

No clue who Redtom is, but Redwingtom is telling all of you, with complete confidence, that the government isn't coming from your guns.

It will never cease to amaze me as to how easily many in this country have been so easily brainwashed by the NRA.

Extrapolating a horrific natural disaster in New orleans and 500 letters to law breakers in New York to the federal government confiscating your guns????? Puhleeze! 03-talktothehand

Do Democrats make it a habit to propose legislation to ban the possession of things they aren't "coming for"?

Assault (meaningless buzz word) Weapons Ban of 2013 - (Sec. 3) Amends the federal criminal code to ban the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of a semiautomatic assault (meaningless buzz word) weapon, including:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-cong...e-bill/150

Hmm, it seems Tom has 04-bolt from this thread.
(This post was last modified: 06-30-2016 05:05 PM by Kronke.)
06-30-2016 05:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Offline
The Black Knight of The Deplorables

Posts: 9,618
Joined: Oct 2013
I Root For: Army, SFU
Location: Michie Stadium 1945
Post: #94
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
You are better off arguing with a brick wall than trying to get RedTom and John to understand a Constitutional right.
06-30-2016 08:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kronke Offline
Banned

Posts: 29,379
Joined: Apr 2010
I Root For: Arsenal / StL
Location: Missouri
Post: #95
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 08:31 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  You are better off arguing with a brick wall than trying to get RedTom and John to understand a Constitutional right.

I know, but it gets old always having the last post in gun threads because I back them into a corner, they stop responding and let the thread fall off the first page, and then a few days go by, and they're back spewing the same BS in a new thread.
(This post was last modified: 06-30-2016 08:43 PM by Kronke.)
06-30-2016 08:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UTSAMarineVet09 Offline
Corporal of the Board.
*

Posts: 16,361
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
Post: #96
Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 08:42 PM)Kronke Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 08:31 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  You are better off arguing with a brick wall than trying to get RedTom and John to understand a Constitutional right.

I know, but it gets old always having the last post in gun threads because I back them into a corner, they stop responding and let the thread fall off the first page, and then a few days go by, and they're back spewing the same BS in a new thread.


Yep! Then if you keep beating them in discussions, they'll either put you on ignore or try to troll you.


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk
06-30-2016 09:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cb4029 Offline
The spoon that stirs the pot.
*

Posts: 18,793
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 353
I Root For: Deez Nuts
Location: B'ham

Donators
Post: #97
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 04:08 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  The argument that it is just for muskets would seem to fly in the face of the fact that the same group also want us to interpret the Constitution as a living document. If it is living then it is built to adapt to more than muskets.

It needs updating. 05-stirthepot
06-30-2016 09:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dfarr Offline
Murse Practitioner
*

Posts: 9,402
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 166
I Root For: UAB
Location:

BlazerTalk AwardBlazerTalk Award
Post: #98
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 09:17 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 04:08 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  The argument that it is just for muskets would seem to fly in the face of the fact that the same group also want us to interpret the Constitution as a living document. If it is living then it is built to adapt to more than muskets.

It needs updating. 05-stirthepot

There are ways to update it. It's written in there.
06-30-2016 09:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
geosnooker2000 Offline
I got Cleopatra in the basement
*

Posts: 25,269
Joined: Aug 2006
Reputation: 1358
I Root For: Brandon
Location: Somerville, TN
Post: #99
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 09:32 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 09:17 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 04:08 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  The argument that it is just for muskets would seem to fly in the face of the fact that the same group also want us to interpret the Constitution as a living document. If it is living then it is built to adapt to more than muskets.

It needs updating. 05-stirthepot

There are ways to update it. It's written in there.

Article V...
07-01-2016 02:58 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,857
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 984
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #100
RE: Was the second amendment just for Muskets?
(06-30-2016 05:02 PM)Kronke Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 04:06 PM)Kronke Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 04:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(06-30-2016 03:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/us/nat....html?_r=0

Quote:Local police officers began confiscating weapons from civilians in preparation for a forced evacuation of the last holdouts still living here, as President Bush steeled the nation for the grisly scenes of recovering the dead that will unfold in coming days.

Police officers and federal law enforcement agents scoured the city carrying assault rifles seeking residents who have holed up to avoid forcible eviction, as well as those who are still considering evacuating voluntarily to escape the city's putrid waters.

Quote:Mr. Compass, the police superintendent, said that after a week of near anarchy in the city, no civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns, or other firearms of any kind. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said.

That order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16s and other assault rifles.

Mr. Compass said that he was aware of the private guards but that the police had no plans to make them give up their weapons.






But remember everybody, Redtom said the government isn't coming for your guns!

No clue who Redtom is, but Redwingtom is telling all of you, with complete confidence, that the government isn't coming from your guns.

It will never cease to amaze me as to how easily many in this country have been so easily brainwashed by the NRA.

Extrapolating a horrific natural disaster in New orleans and 500 letters to law breakers in New York to the federal government confiscating your guns????? Puhleeze! 03-talktothehand

Do Democrats make it a habit to propose legislation to ban the possession of things they aren't "coming for"?

Assault (meaningless buzz word) Weapons Ban of 2013 - (Sec. 3) Amends the federal criminal code to ban the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of a semiautomatic assault (meaningless buzz word) weapon, including:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-cong...e-bill/150

Hmm, it seems Tom has 04-bolt from this thread.

I posted an hour ago. I don't give this place a second thought when I leave work for the day and go home. Lastly, get a ******* life. 03-zzz
07-01-2016 09:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.