Oh no. Is this thread going to go the route of the "was the U.S. justified in dropping the A-bomb?" thread. Fit thinks that because he doesn't shut up that he's right. Don't fall for it.

(02-08-2016 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:55 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 01:04 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  As to who started it...who followed who? Easy answer.

Speculation. If Zimmerman started following Martin and Martin never stopped walking what happens?

IIRC, there were no accounts anywhere that Martin first started following Zimmerman. Even Zimmerman didn't say that. Maybe after it got started, but the initial action by Zimmerman to follow the scary kid in a hoodie started the whole event.

That's all I'm saying.

Still didn't answer my question. What happens if Martin just keeps walking and then goes into the house he was staying at?

Z probably fires a warning shot at him.

Holy ******* what the hell? Just pulled that one out of nothing at all didn't ya. You're more laughable by the day. By the post. Stop pushing that damn button and I'll...

(02-08-2016 02:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  What part of the Zimmerman case has been made that wasn't factual?

Any part that says that Zimmerman committed any crime.

To get back on topic, the answer to the OP is a deafening yes. Hillary's email scandal will continue to stay in the news, and not just that of the so-called "right-wing".
MSNBC
Buzzfeed
NYTimes
DAilyKos
DAily Beast

Quote:She has said the federal email investigation was “nonsense” and the FBI said last fall that it could neither confirm nor deny the existence of any investigation.

Clinton audaciously told moderator Chuck Todd during the Democratic debate that there was no investigation but rather a “security review” that would eventually involve a number of people, “because we’ve got this absurd situation of retroactive classifications.”

But just one day before the New Hampshire primary, a letter from the FBI has surfaced calling the probe into Hillary Clinton’s secret email server an “ongoing law enforcement effort.”

http://www.youngcons.com/fbi-makes-it-of...stigation/

It won't go anywhere. You might as well piss in the wind. At least you will get some warmth.

For the millionth time, only if she's "to big to prosecute".

BS. and i know you guys don't know it. She is one of those who can classify information. There is too much gray area. If she is prosecuted it's political. Republican witch hunt. Team over country.

See how easy it is to politicize?

(02-09-2016 09:40 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  BS. and i know you guys don't know it. She is one of those who can classify information. There is too much gray area. If she is prosecuted it's political. Republican witch hunt. Team over country.

See how easy it is to politicize?

Nope. She is supposed to know if communications contains Classified content and treat is accordingly, whether it's marked as such or not. Obviously, she didn't follow that part of the agreement she signed on to.

If she's not indicted - Democratic team over country. Petraus was brought up on charges for not handling classified materials correctly - he's required to follow the law and not her??

Democratic Team over country!

(02-09-2016 09:40 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  BS. and i know you guys don't know it. She is one of those who can classify information. There is too much gray area. If she is prosecuted it's political. Republican witch hunt. Team over country.

See how easy it is to politicize?

Yes.

Stop doing it.

No,

It is the right who is politicizing the criminal justice system. We had two other Republican Secretary of States do something very familiar. You can argue semantics. It's a total grey area. There won't be an indictment and that there is even an investigation is highly politicized.

Red Team over Country.

(02-09-2016 10:28 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  No,

It is the right who is politicizing the criminal justice system. We had two other Republican Secretary of States do something very familiar. You can argue semantics. It's a total grey area. There won't be an indictment and that there is even an investigation is highly politicized.

Red Team over Country.

sim·i·lar
ˈsim(ə)lər/
adjective
1.
resembling without being identical.

Just like the Benghazi hearing fiasco. Using the power of the Congressional Subpoena for purely political partisan reasons. McCarthy the Representative from California that was up for Speaker before Ryan even stated as such. Anyone with half a brain can see this whole charade is to bring down her numbers.

Just use their own words.
Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee, what are her numbers today?" McCarthy told Fox News' Sean Hannity. "Her numbers are dropping, why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened.

No. She has committed crimes and pointing to 2 others that did something not familiar at all is showing the politicization. Response from the Red Team has been unanimous. If the 2 other SOS had committed crimes, prosecute them too.

(02-08-2016 09:50 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:55 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 01:04 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Speculation. If Zimmerman started following Martin and Martin never stopped walking what happens?

IIRC, there were no accounts anywhere that Martin first started following Zimmerman. Even Zimmerman didn't say that. Maybe after it got started, but the initial action by Zimmerman to follow the scary kid in a hoodie started the whole event.

That's all I'm saying.

Still didn't answer my question. What happens if Martin just keeps walking and then goes into the house he was staying at?

Z probably fires a warning shot at him.

Holy ******* what the hell? Just pulled that one out of nothing at all didn't ya. You're more laughable by the day. By the post. Stop pushing that damn button and I'll...

Of course dude...he asked me what I thought might happen. Who the hell knows? But you're right...Z was such a calm rational human being. We know this by his squeaky clean image since this incident.

(02-09-2016 11:26 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 09:50 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:55 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  IIRC, there were no accounts anywhere that Martin first started following Zimmerman. Even Zimmerman didn't say that. Maybe after it got started, but the initial action by Zimmerman to follow the scary kid in a hoodie started the whole event.

That's all I'm saying.

Still didn't answer my question. What happens if Martin just keeps walking and then goes into the house he was staying at?

Z probably fires a warning shot at him.

Holy ******* what the hell? Just pulled that one out of nothing at all didn't ya. You're more laughable by the day. By the post. Stop pushing that damn button and I'll...

Of course dude...he asked me what I thought might happen. Who the hell knows? But you're right...Z was such a calm rational human being. We know this by his squeaky clean image since this incident.

what about before the incident?

(02-08-2016 10:38 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  What part of the Zimmerman case has been made that wasn't factual?

Any part that says that Zimmerman committed any crime.

I've never said he committed a crime.

(02-09-2016 11:43 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 10:38 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  What part of the Zimmerman case has been made that wasn't factual?

Any part that says that Zimmerman committed any crime.

I've never said he committed a crime.

He didn't say you did, though you certainly imply it by maintaining he wasn't completely "innocent" even though you are inwilling to say what he isn't completely "innocent" of.

(02-09-2016 11:43 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 10:38 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  What part of the Zimmerman case has been made that wasn't factual?

Any part that says that Zimmerman committed any crime.

I've never said he committed a crime.

Maybe you did, maybe you didn't. But enough people certainly did that you can't deny it was part of the Zimmerman case.

(02-09-2016 12:14 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-09-2016 11:43 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 10:38 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  What part of the Zimmerman case has been made that wasn't factual?

Any part that says that Zimmerman committed any crime.

I've never said he committed a crime.

Maybe you did, maybe you didn't. But enough people certainly did that you can't deny it was part of the Zimmerman case.

I agree with that. By the same token, Zimmerman has done so much bad stuff since then that many have reconsidered what actually took place on that night.

(02-09-2016 02:21 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(02-09-2016 12:14 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-09-2016 11:43 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 10:38 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 02:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  What part of the Zimmerman case has been made that wasn't factual?

Any part that says that Zimmerman committed any crime.

I've never said he committed a crime.

Maybe you did, maybe you didn't. But enough people certainly did that you can't deny it was part of the Zimmerman case.

I agree with that. By the same token, Zimmerman has done so much bad stuff since then that many have reconsidered what actually took place on that night.

What he has done since has no bearing on what happened that night.