(12-14-2015 04:15 AM)emu79 Wrote: (12-13-2015 02:40 PM)emu steve Wrote: (12-13-2015 01:42 PM)emu79 Wrote: (12-13-2015 10:18 AM)Luckeyone Wrote: I believe Murphy has got to try and build a Recruiting class with high school seniors who could have three years to play with Thompson. I do not mind sprinkling a JC player here or there but he devotes too much emphasis on JC players that only have two years of Eligibility
You mean top Michigan high school players aren't flocking to play for someone with so many media contacts and with two back to back 20 win seasons? Shocking I say. WMU and CMU seems to have no problems. Murphy deserves credit from bringing us from the bottom of the MAC to just average or maybe a C+. As you recall this was a team that blew games with Ball State last year. Outside of Thompson the newcomers this year haven't impressed me overall and we have a mediocre game at point guard no matter who plays. Bond hasn't matured into the scorer I thought he'd be. Murphy rolled the dice this year with LWH and lost so we really don't have any frontcourt depth this year. Price has been better defensively but where's the shooting that once marked him a top 150 prospect prior to DePaul? Oakland is gobbling up the transfers that should be all rights be looking at EMU. Will Murphy take EMU to the NCAAs or NIT? If he can't within the next two years we should look at a change.
We might have the best mid-major recruit in the United States of America and you complain... Plus two good sit outs.
There are a lot of frosh mid-major centers who can't walk and chew gum at the same time.
Hm, we know why we got Thompson, lets call that a special case, we have a sit out that was to be on the court right now not sitting out for academic reasons, but I do agree with you next year Murphy and staff have to bring the goods in a conference championship and NCAA bid. I keep forgetting when it comes to recruiting Michigan high school kids WMU, Oakland and CMU have to the NCAAs in recent history and Murphy well Murphy has not.
'79, you really out to try to be fair. EMU doesn't recruit well within MI for men's hoops that is true. For football it is in my opinion WORSE. I don't post much on FB recruiting, but I do see this lists of top 35, 50 or 60 in MI. EMU gets virtually shutout in MI. In recent years whenever we got a 'rated' football recruit in MI, he was one who was rated higher earlier and then dropped off in the recruiting battles but we rank them higher than they really were.
EMU revenue sports, FB, men's basketball and women's basketball all have trouble recruiting MI.
I've always maintained that one can take a dozen h.s. athletes from MI and a dozen from outside MI and ask their 'opinion' of EMU and the outside MI group will have a much more positive attitude.
EMU has an image problem within the state it does not have as one gets outside MI and the Midwest.
The 'theme' in EMU recruiting is if you can get a recruit on campus you can sign him/her. Their opinion of having visited the school is better than their opinion, from whatever sources in forming an opinion, is of the school beforehand. They visit the athletic facilities and the rest of the campus and come away surprised. I consider EMU to have a very nice campus.
If one used one of the polling techniques for assessing public opinions and attitudes (e.g., about cities), and asked about Ann Arbor, E. Lansing, Mt. Pleasant, Kalamazoo, Ypsilanti, Rochester Hills, probably Ypsilanti would come in dead last (and that is unfortunate as one can live anywhere in the area some very nice areas including near Ann Arbor. Another case where public perception isn't always accurate.). I believe social researchers now use adjective lists and let the respondent pick the one(s) which they best feel best describe the attribute. Ann Arbor: well educated, white collar, cultured, affluent, etc. Ypsilanti: blue collar. Mt. Pleasant: mid-Michigan, growing, small town, etc. Auburn Hills: Oakland County, affluent, etc.
Winning championships in FB or men's basketball would help change that.