Prime example of Queer Black on White Hetero Hate Crime. Where is BHO and his Crew? Clearly targeted Caucasian heterosexuals.

Nothing could have stopped this tragedy. I'm a huge open carry guy but that wouldn't have stopped this lunatic. I firmly believe that an armed citizenry is more protected than one unarmed. But what people are failing to recognize is that there is pure evil in this world and sometimes shtih happens that no one can do anything about. All we can do is mourn the loss of young life and their hopes dreams and futures. A crazy evil man robbed them of that and nothing we do or say now can bring them back or prevent it from happening. When someone like that has a mind to it, nothing can stop them. It's the 'lone gunman' scenario'

So what kind of gun did he use?

(08-26-2015 11:19 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 11:07 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 10:56 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Disgruntled employees are a reason why businesses should bar persons from packing heat at their business.

1 - In pretty much ever CC state business have the right to tell their employees not to have a gun
2 - Few here would argue with you that private property owners (businesses) should have the final say in what is allowed on their property. The only ones who don't are the people who want to force bars not to allow smoking.
3 - This *DID NOT HAPPEN AT HIS PLACE OF WORK*
4 - There are many things different about the US / Australia, gun control is only one of them.

NRA/GOA supports banning businesses from keeping armed nutcases off their propoerty.

Because everyone knows that an individual intent on breaking the laws against committing homicide will naturally respect a company policy prohibiting firearms on their property.

(08-26-2015 01:54 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Prime example of Queer Black on White Hetero Hate Crime. Where is BHO and his Crew? Clearly targeted Caucasian heterosexuals.

better start ripping down those rainbow flags

#offensive
#queerlivesmatter

or something

(08-26-2015 02:16 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 11:19 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 11:07 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 10:56 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Disgruntled employees are a reason why businesses should bar persons from packing heat at their business.

1 - In pretty much ever CC state business have the right to tell their employees not to have a gun
2 - Few here would argue with you that private property owners (businesses) should have the final say in what is allowed on their property. The only ones who don't are the people who want to force bars not to allow smoking.
3 - This *DID NOT HAPPEN AT HIS PLACE OF WORK*
4 - There are many things different about the US / Australia, gun control is only one of them.

NRA/GOA supports banning businesses from keeping armed nutcases off their propoerty.

Because everyone knows that an individual intent on breaking the laws against committing homicide will naturally respect a company policy prohibiting firearms on their property.

Lots of gun violence happens because the gun happens to be there. When we get 'open bully oops open carry' in Texas in January, I expect gun violence to go through the roof.

Angry cowardly nutcase ambushed 3 innocent people just doing their jobs/attending a prayer meeting/seeing a movie.

That is what angry cowardly nutcases do.

No need for reading manifestos, pondering, banning things, arguing with each other, reciting agendas, making memes, formulating talking points, etc.

It's just what they do.

(08-26-2015 08:41 AM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  Gun lobbyists will say if they had been packing heat they would have survived.

A small chance is better than no chance.

(08-26-2015 01:49 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 01:38 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 01:28 PM)Hokie4Skins Wrote:  Revenge for Charleston:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/shooting-allege...d=33336339

That manifesto is probably all over the place. Blame for everyone.

Everyone but himself, I'll bet.

Course if you read much of this thread, HE'S the victim. Gay, black and a constant disgruntled and perpetually Ooooooffended victim mentality. Had to be escorted out of this TV station after being fired by the cops.

Quote:He says he has been attacked by black men and white females.

Interesting, who'd he leave OFF his list?

Now dead. Good. Rot in hell, effing coward.

Whatever victimization he suffered didn't justify his violent crimes.

The bigger issue is that if everyone in the NRA/GOA/GOP fantasy world is packing heat 24-7, the number of these incidents will continue to rise (as it has). People snap. Guns rarely prevent anything.

(08-26-2015 11:19 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  NRA/GOA supports banning businesses from keeping armed nutcases off their propoerty.

GOA supports CC by default UNLESS the PRIVATE property owner clearly states and posts otherwise. Source: I'm a GOA Life Member.

(08-26-2015 02:24 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Lots of gun violence happens because the gun happens to be there.

Is that the case here?

So now he was gay?

(08-26-2015 02:31 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:24 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Lots of gun violence happens because the gun happens to be there.

Is that the case here?

Actually I'd like to see a source on that because I don't think it's a true statement

(08-26-2015 02:35 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:31 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:24 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Lots of gun violence happens because the gun happens to be there.

Is that the case here?

Actually I'd like to see a source on that because I don't think it's a true statement

The highly technical term "lots" leaves him a lot of wiggle room...

(08-26-2015 02:30 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 11:19 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  NRA/GOA supports banning businesses from keeping armed nutcases off their propoerty.

GOA supports CC by default UNLESS the PRIVATE property owner clearly states and posts otherwise. Source: I'm a GOA Life Member.

Uh..They've been supportive of banning employers from telling employees.. "No firearms on my property..that includes my parking lot". At least they've been so in Oklahoma.

I don't want Angry Terminated employee going to his (its always his) car after I can him and getting a gun out of his car and going all 2nd Amendment on my other employees.

Taking a gun from your home is a bad idea.
Unless you work in a convenience store (and then its probably a bad idea).

(08-26-2015 02:38 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:30 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 11:19 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  NRA/GOA supports banning businesses from keeping armed nutcases off their propoerty.

GOA supports CC by default UNLESS the PRIVATE property owner clearly states and posts otherwise. Source: I'm a GOA Life Member.

Uh..They've been supportive of banning employers from telling employees.. "No firearms on my property..that includes my parking lot".

I don't want Angry Terminated employee going to his (its always his) car after I can him and getting a gun out of his car and going all 2nd Amendment on my other employees.

the second amendment has nothing to do with murder.

(08-26-2015 02:38 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:30 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 11:19 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  NRA/GOA supports banning businesses from keeping armed nutcases off their propoerty.

GOA supports CC by default UNLESS the PRIVATE property owner clearly states and posts otherwise. Source: I'm a GOA Life Member.

Uh..They've been supportive of banning employers from telling employees.. "No firearms on my property..that includes my parking lot". At least they've been so in Oklahoma.

I don't want Angry Terminated employee going to his (its always his) car after I can him and getting a gun out of his car and going all 2nd Amendment on my other employees.

Taking a gun from your home is a bad idea.
Unless you work in a convenience store (and then its probably a bad idea).

If that guy has it in his head to do you in the he can simply go home get a gun and come back. The only thing the company policy is going to accomplish is make sure he can proceed uninhibited.

(08-26-2015 02:41 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:38 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:30 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 11:19 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  NRA/GOA supports banning businesses from keeping armed nutcases off their propoerty.

GOA supports CC by default UNLESS the PRIVATE property owner clearly states and posts otherwise. Source: I'm a GOA Life Member.

Uh..They've been supportive of banning employers from telling employees.. "No firearms on my property..that includes my parking lot".

I don't want Angry Terminated employee going to his (its always his) car after I can him and getting a gun out of his car and going all 2nd Amendment on my other employees.

the second amendment has nothing to do with murder.

That's your opinion. Lots of us, after watching an ever increasing avalanche of gun violence, feel otherwise.

---

If you support our current 'no questions asked, no records kept, no rules' gun system, then why support nuclear non-proliferation? Why not just accept that everyone has a right to nukes and that no rules or sanctions can stop people from getting them and using them?
---

We have a system of firearm proliferation. With effectively zero controls.

(08-26-2015 11:59 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 11:55 AM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 10:16 AM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 10:15 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 08:56 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  Jesus Christ... you couldn't wait to make a stupid comment like that, could you?

The truth should never wait...

What truth?

if the 9 church members in Charleston had guns they would still be alive today

Unless all 9 were terrible shots, they would be.

The truth should never wait.

So you're Nostradamus now?

(08-26-2015 02:46 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:41 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:38 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:30 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 11:19 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  NRA/GOA supports banning businesses from keeping armed nutcases off their propoerty.

GOA supports CC by default UNLESS the PRIVATE property owner clearly states and posts otherwise. Source: I'm a GOA Life Member.

Uh..They've been supportive of banning employers from telling employees.. "No firearms on my property..that includes my parking lot".

I don't want Angry Terminated employee going to his (its always his) car after I can him and getting a gun out of his car and going all 2nd Amendment on my other employees.

the second amendment has nothing to do with murder.

That's your opinion. Lots of us, after watching an ever increasing avalanche of gun violence, feel otherwise.

---

If you support our current 'no questions asked, no records kept, no rules' gun system, then why support nuclear non-proliferation? Why not just accept that everyone has a right to nukes and that no rules or sanctions can stop people from getting them and using them?
---

We have a system of firearm proliferation. With effectively zero controls.

No, its a fact. Not an opinion. Learn the difference.