(07-08-2014 10:28 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:19 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:17 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:08 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:07 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  Seriously just why?

Offensive in multiple ways.

Skinny and sick is how I looked at it.

Actually, this is about what I had in mind LOL

That's exactly how most people took it too I bet lol.

people like that make our country a laughing stock IMO. That's probably the goal with these flaming leftists.

I vote we just keep calling them a douchebag. Try not to laugh as you scroll down.

(07-08-2014 10:08 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:07 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 09:42 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 09:38 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  At least where I live don't see nearly as many steroid users vs. the 80's into the 90's.

Me either, most of the kids look like gay AIDS patients these days. It is/was big up North though. I lived in Philly for 4 years and the juicehead population was overwhelming.

Seriously just why?

Offensive in multiple ways.

Skinny and sick is how I looked at it.

What a ****** up thing to say...you guys are messed up.

The liberals are getting testy in this thread.

(07-08-2014 10:48 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:28 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:19 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:17 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:08 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Skinny and sick is how I looked at it.

Actually, this is about what I had in mind LOL

That's exactly how most people took it too I bet lol.

people like that make our country a laughing stock IMO. That's probably the goal with these flaming leftists.

I vote we just keep calling them a douchebag. Try not to laugh as you scroll down.

The one thing all of these guys have in common; they can all wear tight pants in the crotch without any discomfort.

(07-08-2014 10:36 AM)Doctor Krieger Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:11 AM)ncbeta Wrote:  I hate this trend. It feels rampant at ECU (18% out of state students, 99% of them from places north of NC). You can't go to the pool w.o. feeling like you're at a body building convention. And then there's me, with the build of a hybrid cross country runner/college point guard. I can do pull-ups, push-ups, sit-ups, and run all day....just can't bulk up.

So basically you're whining because other guys look better than you....got it.

Better is a relative term. I don't think a guy has to be a meat head to be attractive to women. To each their own though.

(07-08-2014 11:11 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:08 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:07 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 09:42 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 09:38 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  At least where I live don't see nearly as many steroid users vs. the 80's into the 90's.

Me either, most of the kids look like gay AIDS patients these days. It is/was big up North though. I lived in Philly for 4 years and the juicehead population was overwhelming.

Seriously just why?

Offensive in multiple ways.

Skinny and sick is how I looked at it.

What a ****** up thing to say...you guys are messed up.

Whats sad is they dont even get why that statement was horrifically offensive.

The truth can be horrifically offensive. The gay AIDS patient look is one of malnourishment, underweight, and emaciated, sunken eyes and cheeks. If you don't want to look like a gay AIDS patient, get a cheesesteak and an order of chili cheese fries instead of a tofu salad with soy milk.

And now you're showing your ignorance of what someone with AIDs in 2014 necessarily looks like. I bet they appreciate that generalization. And why does it need to be someone gay with AIDS? Love that you still dont see how that comment is schmucky.

(07-08-2014 11:11 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:08 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 10:07 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 09:42 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 09:38 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  At least where I live don't see nearly as many steroid users vs. the 80's into the 90's.

Me either, most of the kids look like gay AIDS patients these days. It is/was big up North though. I lived in Philly for 4 years and the juicehead population was overwhelming.

Seriously just why?

Offensive in multiple ways.

Skinny and sick is how I looked at it.

What a ****** up thing to say...you guys are messed up.

Man, you guys are sensitive today.

(07-08-2014 12:48 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  And now you're showing your ignorance of what someone with AIDs in 2014 necessarily looks like. I bet they appreciate that generalization. And why does it need to be someone gay with AIDS? Love that you still dont see how that comment is schmucky.

It may well hurt your feelings, but everyone on here, including yourself, knew exactly what the description meant, so in essence, it was an extraordinarily effective analogy. Even got the exact graphic connotation I was looking for in the comparison.

Didnt make it any less insensitive. Tactless.

I never claimed to be "sensitive". Sensitivity is for women and white liberals.

(07-08-2014 12:48 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  And now you're showing your ignorance of what someone with AIDs in 2014 necessarily looks like. I bet they appreciate that generalization. And why does it need to be someone gay with AIDS? Love that you still dont see how that comment is schmucky.

Whose fault is it that they caught AIDS? Whose fault is it that the perception is deteriorating health? It's nobody's fault but their own. I know that's mean and ugly and insensitive, but it's true. We can't coddle the world's feelings every time we post or make a comment about something.

Is the term metrosexual dead?
How can you tell the difference between a supposed
metrosexual and a spornosexual, just body building?

(07-08-2014 01:22 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  Is the term metrosexual dead?
How can you tell the difference between a supposed
metrosexual and a spornosexual, just body building?

I guess, but those queers aren't usually into sports so it's kind of a slap in the face. That's why I'll stick to calling them a douche bag.

Just wanted to know in case I hear the term.
Which guess I will over and over.

(07-08-2014 12:41 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  The truth can be horrifically offensive. The gay AIDS patient look is one of malnourishment, underweight, and emaciated, sunken eyes and cheeks. If you don't want to look like a gay AIDS patient, get a cheesesteak and an order of chili cheese fries instead of a tofu salad with soy milk.

Straight AIDS patients don't look that healthy, either.

(07-08-2014 01:49 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 12:41 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  The truth can be horrifically offensive. The gay AIDS patient look is one of malnourishment, underweight, and emaciated, sunken eyes and cheeks. If you don't want to look like a gay AIDS patient, get a cheesesteak and an order of chili cheese fries instead of a tofu salad with soy milk.

Straight AIDS patients don't look that healthy, either.

1970s rhetoric says only gays get it. Since neverespect's schtick seems dated to then it all makes sense.

(07-08-2014 03:12 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 01:49 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 12:41 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  The truth can be horrifically offensive. The gay AIDS patient look is one of malnourishment, underweight, and emaciated, sunken eyes and cheeks. If you don't want to look like a gay AIDS patient, get a cheesesteak and an order of chili cheese fries instead of a tofu salad with soy milk.

Straight AIDS patients don't look that healthy, either.

1970s rhetoric says only gays get it. Since neverespect's schtick seems dated to then it all makes sense.

CDC says 87% of new cases are from it. Considering it is 1% of the population, you run the numbers... and that is only self reported incidences not accounting for those that got it through that means and decided to remain in the closet.

1. More than 1% of the population is gay
2. Anyone can have AIDS, it is not sexuality based therefore not a gay disease.
3. Not everyone with aids is emaciated nor gay

Stop being a schmuck to be a schmuck