(07-08-2014 03:23 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  1. More than 1% of the population is gay
2. Anyone can have AIDS, it is not sexuality based therefore not a gay disease.
3. Not everyone with aids is emaciated nor gay

Stop being a schmuck to be a schmuck

That's not what he's saying. 78% of the people who are diagnosed with AIDS are males who have sex with males. You can leave out the 1%, but take the percentage of gay Americans and there you have it. And that data is from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) of all races and ethnicities remain the population most profoundly affected by HIV.

That doesnt and shouldnt turn AIDS into GAIDS.

(07-08-2014 03:42 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  That doesnt and shouldnt turn AIDS into GAIDS.

That wasn't his meaning at all. Do you see how things get thrown out of proportion so easy?

(07-08-2014 03:49 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:42 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  That doesnt and shouldnt turn AIDS into GAIDS.

That wasn't his meaning at all. Do you see how things get thrown out of proportion so easy?

Because anything that doesn't portray butt-sex as rainbows and unicorns is off limits.

(07-08-2014 12:41 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  The truth can be horrifically offensive. The gay AIDS patient look is one of malnourishment, underweight, and emaciated, sunken eyes and cheeks. If you don't want to look like a gay AIDS patient, get a cheesesteak and an order of chili cheese fries instead of a tofu salad with soy milk.

I have a feeling that your idea of healthy looking edging on overweight. Cheesesteak and chili fries make me think if peopleofwalmart.com.

Here's an idea: eat normal food. You don't have to choose between sludge and bark.

(07-08-2014 03:49 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:42 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  That doesnt and shouldnt turn AIDS into GAIDS.

That wasn't his meaning at all. Do you see how things get thrown out of proportion so easy?

He called it gay AIDS. What do you think GAIDS stands for?

(07-08-2014 03:53 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:49 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:42 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  That doesnt and shouldnt turn AIDS into GAIDS.

That wasn't his meaning at all. Do you see how things get thrown out of proportion so easy?

He called it gay AIDS. What do you think GAIDS stands for?

I didn't make up the statistics. It isn't my fault people see it as a gay disease. It isn't my fault that when I write the words "Gay AIDS Patient", we all get the same connotation, including you. It was the appropriate description for the image I was trying to present with words. That isn't my fault. Had I said "high school nerd", some might have pictured a fat Mexican or Bobby from King of the Hill. "Gay AIDS Patient" just happened to fit the bill on this one.

(07-08-2014 03:53 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:49 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:42 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  That doesnt and shouldnt turn AIDS into GAIDS.

That wasn't his meaning at all. Do you see how things get thrown out of proportion so easy?

He called it gay AIDS. What do you think GAIDS stands for?

And you've taken it completely over the top by feeling offended about it. You disagree with it, I get it. But as life is life and we're in reality, he can say what he wants to, just like you. If he wants to call a skinny sunken faced person a gay AIDS patient then so be it, we all knew exactly what he was talking about.

It isnt a gay disease. AIDS can affect anyone and everyone. You couldve just said a man with AIDS. It wouldve still been tacky. Then yiu judt dnoeballed thr offensiveness trying to defend yourself.

(07-08-2014 04:04 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:53 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:49 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:42 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  That doesnt and shouldnt turn AIDS into GAIDS.

That wasn't his meaning at all. Do you see how things get thrown out of proportion so easy?

He called it gay AIDS. What do you think GAIDS stands for?

And you've taken it completely over the top by feeling offended about it. You disagree with it, I get it. But as life is life and we're in reality, he can say what he wants to, just like you. If he wants to call a skinny sunken faced person a gay AIDS patient then so be it, we all knew exactly what he was talking about.

He can if he wants to and it makes him look like a raging douchebag and you as well for defending that.

(07-08-2014 03:52 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 12:41 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  The truth can be horrifically offensive. The gay AIDS patient look is one of malnourishment, underweight, and emaciated, sunken eyes and cheeks. If you don't want to look like a gay AIDS patient, get a cheesesteak and an order of chili cheese fries instead of a tofu salad with soy milk.

I have a feeling that your idea of healthy looking edging on overweight. Cheesesteak and chili fries make me think if peopleofwalmart.com.

Here's an idea: eat normal food. You don't have to choose between sludge and bark.

I'm considered overweight at 225 pounds, but if I was 175 like I'm "supposed" to be, I'd look like a string bean. What do you consider normal food?

(07-08-2014 04:06 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 04:04 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:53 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:49 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:42 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  That doesnt and shouldnt turn AIDS into GAIDS.

That wasn't his meaning at all. Do you see how things get thrown out of proportion so easy?

He called it gay AIDS. What do you think GAIDS stands for?

And you've taken it completely over the top by feeling offended about it. You disagree with it, I get it. But as life is life and we're in reality, he can say what he wants to, just like you. If he wants to call a skinny sunken faced person a gay AIDS patient then so be it, we all knew exactly what he was talking about.

He can if he wants to and it makes him look like a raging douchebag and you as well for defending that.

I'm sorry you feel that way about it.


For the record, I don't hear "AIDS" and immediately think of a gay person, BUT, I do consider the high chance that someone has AIDS or some other disease if they are gay. Just like some people think I am racist for having opposing views to the first black president.

(07-08-2014 04:06 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:52 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 12:41 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  The truth can be horrifically offensive. The gay AIDS patient look is one of malnourishment, underweight, and emaciated, sunken eyes and cheeks. If you don't want to look like a gay AIDS patient, get a cheesesteak and an order of chili cheese fries instead of a tofu salad with soy milk.

I have a feeling that your idea of healthy looking edging on overweight. Cheesesteak and chili fries make me think if peopleofwalmart.com.

Here's an idea: eat normal food. You don't have to choose between sludge and bark.

I'm considered overweight at 225 pounds, but if I was 175 like I'm "supposed" to be, I'd look like a string bean. What do you consider normal food?

Steak, oats, fruit, chicken, turkey, eggs, fish, whole wheat bread, veggies. I think most of those things can be considered healthy as long as they aren't deep fried.

(07-08-2014 04:12 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 04:06 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:52 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 12:41 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  The truth can be horrifically offensive. The gay AIDS patient look is one of malnourishment, underweight, and emaciated, sunken eyes and cheeks. If you don't want to look like a gay AIDS patient, get a cheesesteak and an order of chili cheese fries instead of a tofu salad with soy milk.

I have a feeling that your idea of healthy looking edging on overweight. Cheesesteak and chili fries make me think if peopleofwalmart.com.

Here's an idea: eat normal food. You don't have to choose between sludge and bark.

I'm considered overweight at 225 pounds, but if I was 175 like I'm "supposed" to be, I'd look like a string bean. What do you consider normal food?

Steak, oats, fruit, chicken, turkey, eggs, fish, whole wheat bread, veggies. I think most of those things can be considered healthy as long as they aren't deep fried.

There's a good and bad point there though. I was raised on beans, cornbread, peas, potatoes, meat, and things like that. Healthy portions of it too. As long as you're not eating candy bars and chips all day while laying on the couch watching tv, I think things are fine. Plus being in the south, you sweat out any fat by being active outdoors. If you eat small portions of healthy food, you're gonna be slim like a bicyclist, whereas if you eat big portions of the types I listed, you're gonna be a big "corn fed" boy... I'd imagine most of your southern posters can attest to that.

Timely slight nsfw video
http://vimeo.com/32230819

(07-08-2014 04:22 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  Timely slight nsfw video
http://vimeo.com/32230819

I'll have to catch it tomorrow... I'm outta here in 5 minutes

(07-08-2014 04:22 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 04:12 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 04:06 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 03:52 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 12:41 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  The truth can be horrifically offensive. The gay AIDS patient look is one of malnourishment, underweight, and emaciated, sunken eyes and cheeks. If you don't want to look like a gay AIDS patient, get a cheesesteak and an order of chili cheese fries instead of a tofu salad with soy milk.

I have a feeling that your idea of healthy looking edging on overweight. Cheesesteak and chili fries make me think if peopleofwalmart.com.

Here's an idea: eat normal food. You don't have to choose between sludge and bark.

I'm considered overweight at 225 pounds, but if I was 175 like I'm "supposed" to be, I'd look like a string bean. What do you consider normal food?

Steak, oats, fruit, chicken, turkey, eggs, fish, whole wheat bread, veggies. I think most of those things can be considered healthy as long as they aren't deep fried.

There's a good and bad point there though. I was raised on beans, cornbread, peas, potatoes, meat, and things like that. Healthy portions of it too. As long as you're not eating candy bars and chips all day while laying on the couch watching tv, I think things are fine. Plus being in the south, you sweat out any fat by being active outdoors. If you eat small portions of healthy food, you're gonna be slim like a bicyclist, whereas if you eat big portions of the types I listed, you're gonna be a big "corn fed" boy... I'd imagine most of your southern posters can attest to that.

I don't disagree... I was raised on the same foods you listed. One big difference is the kind of life that goes along with country cooking. Another difference is that a lot of those things are cooked from scratch and not deep fried.

I see it as more of shape than weight. I am about 20 pounds overweight... I weigh 180 and at 5'9" the government says I should weigh 160ish. I also smoke. On the other hand, I run about 20 miles per week and spend my weekends working around the house and I never get sick. Id say I am healthier than most people that are ideal weight.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

(07-08-2014 08:13 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  So basically the millennial liberal.

No, those idiots on Jersey Shore and those that act like them don't vote and don't care. They are just stupid. And, be glad they don't vote.

(07-08-2014 04:04 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  It isnt a gay disease. AIDS can affect anyone and everyone. You couldve just said a man with AIDS. It wouldve still been tacky. Then yiu judt dnoeballed thr offensiveness trying to defend yourself.

Unfortunately the stats don't back up your statement. Yes, it can affect anyone, but it is overwhelmingly associated with the gay population.

Take tuberculosis for instance. It can affect anyone, but it is overwhelmingly isolated to the homeless, prisoners, and illegal aliens.