CSNbbs

Full Version: The Squad versus Reps Greene, Boebert, and Cawthorne
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
(01-28-2021 11:21 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-28-2021 11:18 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-28-2021 11:15 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]If snowflakes cry, do their own tears melt them?

Don’t read anything into this, randomly popped into my head as I waxed philosophic to myself.


Not if they are in a safe space.

Are we talking a freezer, or Antarctica? If it is cold enough, does a snowflake cry smaller snowflakes?

It would probably have to be a freezer, since Antarctica is melting, I hear.

But a safe space could be anywhere a snowflake is not subjected to any heat.
(01-28-2021 05:30 PM)Rice93 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-28-2021 04:11 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-28-2021 04:08 PM)Rice93 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-28-2021 09:26 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ]I'm just popping some more popcorn and watching what a kerfuffle has sprung out of one word.
That is a spot-on description of the behavior of an internet troll. Drop something incendiary on an internet forum just to watch the fallout. Congratulations I guess.
The phrase I use is "throwing a rock and running away". Numbers has not run away - he has engaged numerous times with multiple people on this forum. One of the least likely persons to be a troll I can think of.
"throwing a rock and running away" /= internet troll and I'll just leave it at that rather get into a lengthy discussion of definitions. Using many people's definition, though... #'s is behaving (specifically in this instance mind you) like a classic internet troll. Say something s***** and then revel in the fallout (his popcorn comment).

I made the comment, I stand by it and own it, although given the circumstances I think wh*** is probably a more accurate word the sl**. I had seen a post where somebody else used sl** and I kind of liked the flow of it.

If you find it offensive, then I'm sorry you find it offensive. But I'm not sorry I used it. Sometimes offensive is appropriate. And IMO this is one of them. And no, I'm not degrading women, I'm degrading one specific woman who is a despicable human being that needs degrading and offending.

Back to popcorn. Y'all have fun.
Says the guy who claims to never have heard of QAnon. OK, digits.
(01-29-2021 08:05 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ]If you find it offensive, then I'm sorry you find it offensive. But I'm not sorry I used it. Sometimes offensive is appropriate. And IMO this is one of them. And no, I'm not degrading women, I'm degrading one specific woman who is a despicable human being that needs degrading and offending.

THIS was also my point.

If Kamala is offended by the word being applied to her, then the word had its intended purpose. You find her offensive, so you intend to offend her.

We can have a values argument about some words being worse than others... as a father, I can think of few things more vile than to call a man a pedophile or a rapist or a mysognist or racist... seriously, to ME, slut is occasionally used as a term of some respect (ownership of one's sexuality... popular with the other sex... in demand). I've never heard those other words used in an appreciative manner by anyone at any time... and those characterizations disgust me...

Yet there are threads on this very site where democrats have used those terms against others and JUST as vehemently as here (if not more so) posters defended those uses... so while one or more individuals may have consistently applied their individual values... it is clear that 'the left' is no different from 'the right' in having people who draw their lines on words in different places...

It would never occur to me to talk about 'leftists rushing to defend calling all men rapists'.... because the very obvious response would be that you only applied that to one man based on your opinion of his character... just as here.

I don't like the leftist tactic of taking words directed at one person (Harris) or even a group of people (illegal immigrants) and intentionally and knowingly and with purpose... acting as if the word was intended for ALL women or ALL immigrants... as a means of shutting down the criticism of the person or group... but more importantly, as a means of controlling the conversation by belittling and targeting the person leveling the criticism....

So 'dissent' is now targeted by the leftist 'thought mob' against those who would deign to criticize their 'chosen ones'... and its the right who are the fascists?

FTR, I'm not calling the left fascists, I'm just demonstrating that the left engages in the same tactics that cause some to call portions of the right fascists.... but its 'okay' when the left does it because they are (laughably) 'protecting women'... except those who disagree with them.
(01-29-2021 11:38 AM)InterestedX Wrote: [ -> ]Says the guy who claims to never have heard of QAnon. OK, digits.

I've heard of QAnon, but I've been confused about their purpose and where they fall on the political spectrum... and I'm serious. Most often I've heard them associated with 'bad acts' from the right, but I've also heard them associated with 'bad acts' from the left.

One of the best ways to reduce the power of people or groups is to not click on articles about them.
(01-29-2021 11:39 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-29-2021 08:05 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ]If you find it offensive, then I'm sorry you find it offensive. But I'm not sorry I used it. Sometimes offensive is appropriate. And IMO this is one of them. And no, I'm not degrading women, I'm degrading one specific woman who is a despicable human being that needs degrading and offending.

THIS was also my point.

If Kamala is offended by the word being applied to her, then the word had its intended purpose. You find her offensive, so you intend to offend her.

We can have a values argument about some words being worse than others... as a father, I can think of few things more vile than to call a man a pedophile or a rapist or a mysognist or racist... seriously, to ME, slut is occasionally used as a term of some respect (ownership of one's sexuality... popular with the other sex... in demand). I've never heard those other words used in an appreciative manner by anyone at any time... and those characterizations disgust me...

Yet there are threads on this very site where democrats have used those terms against others and JUST as vehemently as here (if not more so) posters defended those uses... so while one or more individuals may have consistently applied their individual values... it is clear that 'the left' is no different from 'the right' in having people who draw their lines on words in different places...

It would never occur to me to talk about 'leftists rushing to defend calling all men rapists'.... because the very obvious response would be that you only applied that to one man based on your opinion of his character... just as here.

I don't like the leftist tactic of taking words directed at one person (Harris) or even a group of people (illegal immigrants) and intentionally and knowingly and with purpose... acting as if the word was intended for ALL women or ALL immigrants... as a means of shutting down the criticism of the person or group... but more importantly, as a means of controlling the conversation by belittling and targeting the person leveling the criticism....

So 'dissent' is now targeted by the leftist 'thought mob' against those who would deign to criticize their 'chosen ones'... and its the right who are the fascists?

FTR, I'm not calling the left fascists, I'm just demonstrating that the left engages in the same tactics that cause some to call portions of the right fascists.... but its 'okay' when the left does it because they are (laughably) 'protecting women'... except those who disagree with them.

Look... my pushing back against #'s calling her Kamala the Slut is because it's a s*****, juvenile, disrespectful thing to do. I didn't have the idea that I was somehow protecting all women when I admonished him for it.

I came here because I thought the Rice board would be a good place to engage in political discussions without that sort of BS that you find on facebook and the main CSNbbs board. Apparently I was mistaken.

Again... I think it's wrong to call women sluts (especially when you aren't privy to their sexual history). But by all means continue to bring up fascism with regard to that opinion. Good lord.
(01-29-2021 11:41 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-29-2021 11:38 AM)InterestedX Wrote: [ -> ]Says the guy who claims to never have heard of QAnon. OK, digits.

I've heard of QAnon, but I've been confused about their purpose and where they fall on the political spectrum... and I'm serious. Most often I've heard them associated with 'bad acts' from the right, but I've also heard them associated with 'bad acts' from the left.

One of the best ways to reduce the power of people or groups is to not click on articles about them.

If a QAnon candidate is running for political office it seems to be on the Republican side.
(01-29-2021 11:41 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-29-2021 11:38 AM)InterestedX Wrote: [ -> ]Says the guy who claims to never have heard of QAnon. OK, digits.

I've heard of QAnon, but I've been confused about their purpose and where they fall on the political spectrum... and I'm serious. Most often I've heard them associated with 'bad acts' from the right, but I've also heard them associated with 'bad acts' from the left.

One of the best ways to reduce the power of people or groups is to not click on articles about them.

Wish they had thought like that in 1939...
(01-29-2021 11:56 AM)Rice93 Wrote: [ -> ]Look... my pushing back against #'s calling her Kamala the Slut is because it's a s*****, juvenile, disrespectful thing to do. I didn't have the idea that I was somehow protecting all women when I admonished him for it.

Where did I say I was speaking about you? Somewhere on her, likely in numerous places... I've clearly differentiated between posters on here and 'the left'. I use the term 'the left' to generically describe what happens. While certainly I don't expect that you would have read every one of my posts, there is one on here where I specifically exempt and even somewhat support the 'values' argument you are making here... with my only admonition that I add despicable words like rapist and pedophile and sexual predator to that list. Just because one word is slang and the other is a criminal charge doesn't make it any less despicable to me... it arguably makes it worse. We don't imprison or sanction 'aggressive action' against sluts like we do against rapists.

The only point i made related to your position was that I find calling Trump a sexual predator or Kavanaugh a Rapist to be WORSE than merely juvenile... and VASTLY more disrespectful (because they are abhorrent crimes as opposed to merely questions of morals)... and while you personally may have not accepted those terms, I don't recall anyone from the left pushing back on those who did.

Tell me.,.. would you personally rather be called a slut or a racist? They're all bad, but which is worse to you? How about your spouse/daughter/girlfriend? That was my only point. I don't disagree with your position at all... I merely note that not everyone drawn their lines in the same place. I find the latter to be worse than the former... and yet that word was tossed around on the NEWS, much less blogs like this.

Quote:I came here because I thought the Rice board would be a good place to engage in political discussions without that sort of BS that you find on facebook and the main CSNbbs board. Apparently I was mistaken.

You apparently haven't spent much time on the Political/Religious board... and before drawing such conclusions, you should note that you're wrong about what you've alleged I've done here. How is that my fault?

Quote:Again... I think it's wrong to call women sluts (especially when you aren't privy to their sexual history). But by all means continue to bring up fascism with regard to that opinion. Good lord.

I directly addressed this.... and IN NO WAY did I bring it up with regard to your opinion.

I expect a higher level of discourse as well, and this isn't it... and THIS one is on you.

(01-29-2021 12:03 PM)Rice93 Wrote: [ -> ]If a QAnon candidate is running for political office it seems to be on the Republican side.
I am unaware of a QAnon candidate. I don't even know what it stands for or represents... I know some have called them 'bad people' but I don't know what they've done or who they are. I always assumed by their name that they were anonymous.
I don't really have anything else to say on the great "slut" controversy of 2019-2021 (the range of times I think we have been having this discussion across different threads). But I'll say one more thing anyway, because really, why not?!?

Ham, your post #204 entirely misses the point I have tried to make. To me (and many others, including my wife since I had a couple discussions about it with her), the word "slut" is sexist and misogynistic on its own. It doesn't matter what the woman did against whom it is used. The instances of it being used either against a man or in a positive context are exceedingly rare. The word itself has power beyond its definition and against a broad spectrum of people other than the intended target. The implication is that a woman (not just the woman against whom it is hurled) with many sexual partners (or who is easy to have sex with) is bad/gross/whatever. There simply isn't an equivalent term for a man who does the same thing (and in fact many such men might be revered as a casanova, don juan, stud, ladies man, etc.).

I do not agree that racist, pedophile, misogynist, or rapist are in the same category of word. I do agree that each of those words is worse for the individual called that word (as compare to slut). But the discussion I have been trying to have isn't "which of these words is the worst to be called".
So the conservatives here can have some idea of what Qanon is and understand why there is no one "on the left" that is a Qanon believer.

From the BBC:
Quote:At its heart, QAnon is a wide-ranging, completely unfounded theory that says that President Trump is waging a secret war against elite Satan-worshipping paedophiles in government, business and the media.

QAnon believers have speculated that this fight will lead to a day of reckoning where prominent people such as former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton will be arrested and executed.

From the Wall Street Journal:
Quote:QAnon is a far right-wing, loosely organized network and community of believers who embrace a range of unsubstantiated beliefs. These views center on the idea that a cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles—mainly consisting of what they see as elitist Democrats, politicians, journalists, entertainment moguls and other institutional figures—have long controlled much of the so-called deep state government, which they say sought to undermine Mr. Trump, mostly with aid of media and entertainment outlets.
...
QAnon conspiracy theory alleges that there is a battle between good and evil in which the Republican Mr. Trump is allied with the former. QAnon followers are awaiting two major events: the Storm and the Great Awakening. The Storm is the mass arrest of people in high-power positions who will face a long-awaited reckoning. The Great Awakening involves a single event in which everyone will attain the epiphany that QAnon theory was accurate the whole time. This realization will allow society to enter an age of utopia.
(01-29-2021 01:26 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]So the conservatives here can have some idea of what Qanon is and understand why there is no one "on the left" that is a Qanon believer.

From the BBC:
Quote:At its heart, QAnon is a wide-ranging, completely unfounded theory that says that President Trump is waging a secret war against elite Satan-worshipping paedophiles in government, business and the media.

QAnon believers have speculated that this fight will lead to a day of reckoning where prominent people such as former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton will be arrested and executed.

From the Wall Street Journal:
Quote:QAnon is a far right-wing, loosely organized network and community of believers who embrace a range of unsubstantiated beliefs. These views center on the idea that a cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles—mainly consisting of what they see as elitist Democrats, politicians, journalists, entertainment moguls and other institutional figures—have long controlled much of the so-called deep state government, which they say sought to undermine Mr. Trump, mostly with aid of media and entertainment outlets.
...
QAnon conspiracy theory alleges that there is a battle between good and evil in which the Republican Mr. Trump is allied with the former. QAnon followers are awaiting two major events: the Storm and the Great Awakening. The Storm is the mass arrest of people in high-power positions who will face a long-awaited reckoning. The Great Awakening involves a single event in which everyone will attain the epiphany that QAnon theory was accurate the whole time. This realization will allow society to enter an age of utopia.

So the far right's version of the far left's "Russia, Russia, Russia" conspiracy theory?

Edit: And related to this...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-law...rham-probe
(01-29-2021 01:06 PM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-29-2021 11:56 AM)Rice93 Wrote: [ -> ]Look... my pushing back against #'s calling her Kamala the Slut is because it's a s*****, juvenile, disrespectful thing to do. I didn't have the idea that I was somehow protecting all women when I admonished him for it.

Where did I say I was speaking about you? Somewhere on her, likely in numerous places... I've clearly differentiated between posters on here and 'the left'. I use the term 'the left' to generically describe what happens. While certainly I don't expect that you would have read every one of my posts, there is one on here where I specifically exempt and even somewhat support the 'values' argument you are making here... with my only admonition that I add despicable words like rapist and pedophile and sexual predator to that list. Just because one word is slang and the other is a criminal charge doesn't make it any less despicable to me... it arguably makes it worse. We don't imprison or sanction 'aggressive action' against sluts like we do against rapists.

I mean... I don't have any recollection of a general left wing position on the term "slut" so I could only assume your comments were directed towards myself and possibly Big.

Quote:The only point i made related to your position was that I find calling Trump a sexual predator or Kavanaugh a Rapist to be WORSE than merely juvenile... and VASTLY more disrespectful (because they are abhorrent crimes as opposed to merely questions of morals)... and while you personally may have not accepted those terms, I don't recall anyone from the left pushing back on those who did.

This goes back to us left-wingers to responsible for and able to answer to every leftist policy that you guys don't like.

This discussion started with Big and I telling #'s that we aren't down with him using the term "Kamala the Slut". Your reponse to this was "Well... left-wingers didn't push back hard enough when Kavanaugh was called a rapist". I'm having trouble figuring that out.

Quote:Tell me.,.. would you personally rather be called a slut or a racist? They're all bad, but which is worse to you? How about your spouse/daughter/girlfriend? That was my only point. I don't disagree with your position at all... I merely note that not everyone drawn their lines in the same place. I find the latter to be worse than the former... and yet that word was tossed around on the NEWS, much less blogs like this.

I'd rather be called a slut than a rapist. I'd also rather #'s not call Kamala "Kamala the Slut". Both things can be true.

Quote:
Quote:I came here because I thought the Rice board would be a good place to engage in political discussions without that sort of BS that you find on facebook and the main CSNbbs board. Apparently I was mistaken.

You apparently haven't spent much time on the Political/Religious board... and before drawing such conclusions, you should note that you're wrong about what you've alleged I've done here. How is that my fault?

Quote:Again... I think it's wrong to call women sluts (especially when you aren't privy to their sexual history). But by all means continue to bring up fascism with regard to that opinion. Good lord.

I directly addressed this.... and IN NO WAY did I bring it up with regard to your opinion.

I expect a higher level of discourse as well, and this isn't it... and THIS one is on you.

Sorry... I'm not going to accept responsibility for a poor level of discourse when it comes to this discussion. It's not on me.

Quote:
(01-29-2021 12:03 PM)Rice93 Wrote: [ -> ]If a QAnon candidate is running for political office it seems to be on the Republican side.
I am unaware of a QAnon candidate. I don't even know what it stands for or represents... I know some have called them 'bad people' but I don't know what they've done or who they are. I always assumed by their name that they were anonymous.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/us-journa...ium=social
(01-29-2021 02:20 PM)Tomball Owl Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-29-2021 01:26 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]So the conservatives here can have some idea of what Qanon is and understand why there is no one "on the left" that is a Qanon believer.

From the BBC:
Quote:At its heart, QAnon is a wide-ranging, completely unfounded theory that says that President Trump is waging a secret war against elite Satan-worshipping paedophiles in government, business and the media.

QAnon believers have speculated that this fight will lead to a day of reckoning where prominent people such as former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton will be arrested and executed.

From the Wall Street Journal:
Quote:QAnon is a far right-wing, loosely organized network and community of believers who embrace a range of unsubstantiated beliefs. These views center on the idea that a cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles—mainly consisting of what they see as elitist Democrats, politicians, journalists, entertainment moguls and other institutional figures—have long controlled much of the so-called deep state government, which they say sought to undermine Mr. Trump, mostly with aid of media and entertainment outlets.
...
QAnon conspiracy theory alleges that there is a battle between good and evil in which the Republican Mr. Trump is allied with the former. QAnon followers are awaiting two major events: the Storm and the Great Awakening. The Storm is the mass arrest of people in high-power positions who will face a long-awaited reckoning. The Great Awakening involves a single event in which everyone will attain the epiphany that QAnon theory was accurate the whole time. This realization will allow society to enter an age of utopia.

So the far right's version of the far left's "Russia, Russia, Russia" conspiracy theory?

Edit: And related to this...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-law...rham-probe

What is the "Russia, Russia, Russia" conspiracy theory? Please provide links describing it, preferably from sources folks around here accept as "not too biased" like BBC and WSJ. Also, so things are on the level, try to find some links describing where adherents to this conspiracy theory believe that prominent politicians should be executed for their actions. Thanks and happy hunting!

Also, no thoughts on QAnon? OK with you that a republican congresswoman is an adherent? She also believes a space laser from a Jewish-owned company might have started the forest fires in California and that the shootings at both Parkland and Sandy Hook might have been false flag events. She now sits on the House education committee. That cool? Or would you rather dig up some more what aboutisms and both sidisms?
(01-29-2021 01:20 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]I don't really have anything else to say on the great "slut" controversy of 2019-2021 (the range of times I think we have been having this discussion across different threads). But I'll say one more thing anyway, because really, why not?!?

Ham, your post #204 entirely misses the point I have tried to make. To me (and many others, including my wife since I had a couple discussions about it with her), the word "slut" is sexist and misogynistic on its own. It doesn't matter what the woman did against whom it is used. The instances of it being used either against a man or in a positive context are exceedingly rare. The word itself has power beyond its definition and against a broad spectrum of people other than the intended target. The implication is that a woman (not just the woman against whom it is hurled) with many sexual partners (or who is easy to have sex with) is bad/gross/whatever. There simply isn't an equivalent term for a man who does the same thing (and in fact many such men might be revered as a casanova, don juan, stud, ladies man, etc.).

I do not agree that racist, pedophile, misogynist, or rapist are in the same category of word. I do agree that each of those words is worse for the individual called that word (as compare to slut). But the discussion I have been trying to have isn't "which of these words is the worst to be called".

I think we're all in the 'why not' phase. I don't think I could disagree with you more though... nor could the women in MY life.

As I said, I don't think anyone supports stoning for sluts... I would support it for pedophiles or rapists... so I disagree with your contention. Being a slut isn't even a crime, but being a sexual predator is... and being labeled a racist (whether true or not) can cost you more than your dignity. Honest people can disagree.

I also think that while 'slut' can be a term of derision, it is/was often hurled against women by other women... whereas misogynistic men might actually see it as a quality to be sought. Amusingly I woke up in the middle of the night last night to 'Blast from the Past'... in the scenes where Eve and her gay house mate Troy were discussing 'Sophie' and the 'dancers'... who were both sluts AND female dogs... and Adam couldn't understand why Eve would say that about an unknown woman (based solely on her looks... 'she has 'witch' written all over her)... or why Troy would say that about Eve. As I said, growing up mostly with a gay uncle and a 2yrs older sister, I heard them use those words thousands of times more frequently than I ever heard my father do so. I don't think I've ever heard him do so, and as I said, I rarely if ever do myself. I remember girls calling my son one, with some affection I might add.

I'm not saying at all that Men don't do it... of course they do... sticking with movies, Jay and Silent Bob of course... I'm just challenging the idea that its solely or perhaps even mostly about men. As I said, my daughter said it about the girl who did the very thing we're discussing here. Yes, it's a terrible and degrading word... used by some to describe terrible and degrading acts by terrible people. The woman in question degraded my daughter and enabled a misogynist... but its not just a personal difference of opinion between us, but apparently supposed to be a cultural norm that people who use a bad word to describe her are actually the ones degrading 'women'?? If it weren't, we wouldn't need to go on for days about it. How is my daughter IN ANY WAY 'worse' towards the woman in specific or women in general than the woman who degrader her FIRST AND WORSE and enabled a misogynist putting OTHER women at risk of the same treatment? That's just impossible for me to wrap my head around.

I don't think I'm missing your point... but I think you're missing mine. I'm wondering where these challenges FROM YOUR SIDE, NOT NECESSARILY FROM ANY OF YOU to the use of horrible terms were when Trump was being labeled a racist or pedophile or even sexual predator by the very person being labeled a slut?

The left (again, not you but as a group) is using this same charge that labeling her a slut is misogyny... but had no problem with her labeling him a sexual predator... Seo he can be labeled without knowing details of his personal life... AND men in general can be labeled for labeling others. Remember when Trump was labeled for calling her a monster? So MONSTER is now 'worse' than 'sexual predator' to some as well?

It's a double standard that has NOTHING TO DO with your descriptions or personal positions, other than pointing out that such rules don't seem to apply to those on the left, but your values are co-opted by them for use against the right.



(01-29-2021 01:26 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]So the conservatives here can have some idea of what Qanon is and understand why there is no one "on the left" that is a Qanon believer.

From the BBC:
Quote:At its heart, QAnon is a wide-ranging, completely unfounded theory that says that President Trump is waging a secret war against elite Satan-worshipping paedophiles in government, business and the media.

QAnon believers have speculated that this fight will lead to a day of reckoning where prominent people such as former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton will be arrested and executed.

From the Wall Street Journal:
Quote:QAnon is a far right-wing, loosely organized network and community of believers who embrace a range of unsubstantiated beliefs. These views center on the idea that a cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles—mainly consisting of what they see as elitist Democrats, politicians, journalists, entertainment moguls and other institutional figures—have long controlled much of the so-called deep state government, which they say sought to undermine Mr. Trump, mostly with aid of media and entertainment outlets.
...
QAnon conspiracy theory alleges that there is a battle between good and evil in which the Republican Mr. Trump is allied with the former. QAnon followers are awaiting two major events: the Storm and the Great Awakening. The Storm is the mass arrest of people in high-power positions who will face a long-awaited reckoning. The Great Awakening involves a single event in which everyone will attain the epiphany that QAnon theory was accurate the whole time. This realization will allow society to enter an age of utopia.


Thank you for the information...

I'll be honest.... fully acknowledging that you merely presented this.... this to me reads like the description a RABID right winger would give to a group like ANTIFA or BLM and I suspect those groups would deny their accuracy... and since they're so loosely organized (or to use my best recollection of words used in another context, more of a train of thought than an actual group) allowing someone to find a single nut case and apply his beliefs to an entire movement... PLENTY of people think Hillary should be arrested but don't believe for a second that there is a secret satan worshiping pedophelia group within the DNC... so someone could claim that someone espousing that hillary be investigated and arrested is part of this 'belief'....

I note that I wrote the above before clicking on your link.... and the next line in the BBC story is
[i]That's the basic story, but there are so many offshoots, detours and internal debates that the total list of QAnon claims is enormous - and often contradictory. /i] which is basically what I'm saying. It also presents the 'contradictions' that have caused me to all but ignore it. I fully admit there are such people... some of them are on the Memphis political board and they see me and my support for VOLUNTARY masks as a matter of courtesy like shirts and shoes making me a 'scared liberal hiding in my basement'.

That said, if like the Klan there is actually such a group and such people are actually being elected to public office, that to me only shows either how many uninformed voters there are (simply pulling an R or D) or how many people shouldn't be allowed to vote if we can find a way to do that 'fairly'. Not all of the far right guys on the Memphis board are that nuts... just a few of them.
(01-29-2021 03:00 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]What is the "Russia, Russia, Russia" conspiracy theory?

Oh, come now, you KNOW he was referring the supposed Trump/Russia collusion myth that led to the Mueller witch hunt.
Ham - what that "other woman" did to your daughter was not "be a slut". There are more accurate phrases like "gold digger" or "slept her way to the top". Here are some actual definitions, none of which describe what happened to your daughter with this other woman:
Merriam-Webster - disparaging + offensive : a promiscuous person : someone who has many sexual partners —usually used of a woman
Cambridge Dictionary - a woman who has sexual relationships with a lot of men without any emotional involvement
dictionary.com - Disparaging and Offensive. a person, especially a woman, who is sexually promiscuous.
vocabulary.com - A slut is a vulgar insult hurled at woman and it implies that she sleeps around or has sex with too many people. It is not cool to call any woman a slut.

Rather than thinking it is OK because your daughter is OK with it, maybe expand the portfolio of voices you consider? This article in Teen Vogue is pretty elucidating.

Also, if you have any links to definitions that suggest it is not an offensive term, I'll read them. Might as well expand my own knowledge and views.
(01-29-2021 03:12 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-29-2021 03:00 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]What is the "Russia, Russia, Russia" conspiracy theory?

Oh, come now, you KNOW he was referring the supposed Trump/Russia collusion myth that led to the Mueller witch hunt.

I know generally what he is referring to, but I don't know specifically which part of it is considered a "conspiracy theory". Some parts of it are obviously true (there was a Trump Tower meeting, for example). So what parts are the "conspiracy"? Anything from BBC or WSJ describing the "conspiracy" aspect? And since some parts are clearly true of Trump-Russia, what parts of QAnon are clearly true such that they are good comparables for each other?
Has anyone here ever called a woman a slut to her face? To their friends? Let's not pretend like this term was so taboo that male athletes in high school and college don't sometimes use the term when describing women with who they had sex. I know I heard it a few times. The worst was in high school when one of my baseball teammates (affectionately) called the young woman sitting next to him a "big-tittied slut". Was that an OK thing for a guy to say to a 16-year-old girl? I sincerely regret not having a serious conversation with him about it, but I didn't have the guts back then.
(01-29-2021 03:27 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-29-2021 03:12 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-29-2021 03:00 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]What is the "Russia, Russia, Russia" conspiracy theory?

Oh, come now, you KNOW he was referring the supposed Trump/Russia collusion myth that led to the Mueller witch hunt.

I know generally what he is referring to, but I don't know specifically which part of it is considered a "conspiracy theory". Some parts of it are obviously true (there was a Trump Tower meeting, for example). So what parts are the "conspiracy"? Anything from BBC or WSJ describing the "conspiracy" aspect? And since some parts are clearly true of Trump-Russia, what parts of QAnon are clearly true such that they are good comparables for each other?

Intentionally obtuse. Not a good look on you.

Never heard of Qanon until you guys brought it up. Sounds outlandish from the clips you quoted. About as outlandish as the theory that Trump and Putin conspired to steal the 2016 election by stealing and publishing Hillary's emails, or that Flynn was colluding with Russia by shaking hands at a state dinner or that Trump was giving Russia secrets to settle a construction debt. Some people call that theory Russia Russia Russia in derision of the constant wailing about Russia 2016-2021. Others call it the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy in derision of the Vast Right-wing Conspiracy Hillary blamed for Bill's. The lefties just called it the Trump-Russia Collusion Investigation. A rose by any other name is still a conspiracy theory.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Reference URL's