02-02-2021, 10:28 PM
(02-02-2021 05:58 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote: [ -> ](02-02-2021 05:39 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ](02-02-2021 05:11 PM)Tomball Owl Wrote: [ -> ](02-02-2021 04:54 PM)mrbig Wrote: [ -> ]And since this thread was started to discuss a few members of the House of Representatives, preferably you would describe something that a member of the House believes.
See post# 262
Sorry, I inadvertently skipped ~10 posts in annoyance after reading part of one of Tanq's posts.
I don't consider something from the WSJ editorial board to be objective or news. I would still accept it at least of a description of the Trump-Russia "conspiracy" if that is what it described. But what you posted just seems to describe why the WSJ editorial board doesn't like Adam Schiff.
And like Lad mentioned above, the Mueller Report is a lot more thorough on Trump-Russia than what I could read of this WSJ editorial board post. It also doesn't really describe what OO seems to believe that "leftists" believe about Trump-Russia.
But I do apologize for missing your post. It was an oversight on my part.
Reaching a verdict of not guilty doesn't mean an investigation wasn't warranted, and it's frustrating that this argument continues to be made despite some really damning evidence that has never been refuted.
Jr alone replying how he would love to get some dirt on Hillary released, then meeting with a Russian lobbyist and former counterintelligence officer, then lying about the purpose of the meeting, should be enough to raise alarm bells and warrant an investigation. So this talking point about how it was all an illusion is bunk.
I agree that some of the more salacious ideas parroted by talking heads, liberals, etc. were unfounded and crazy (paging Louise Mensch and the espionage tweet). But the crazy conspiracies of those from some on the left don't invalidate the very real activities that raised alarm bells in the intelligence community.
If the campaign was in collusion with the Russians, why would they need or want a meeting with that lawyer iin the TT?
And of course I am sure plenty of people in every campaign would love to get some dirt on the other candidate. Why do you that is so singular? If somebody had evidence that Trump was a ___________, thi8nkk Biden's campaign would stick their fingers in their ears and go la la la? Who paid for the Steele Dossier and leaked it to friendly media?
You sure are reading a lot into that meeting that just wasn't there.