His point is that she is the moral, ethical choice, when given a choice between Trump or HRC. Seems like a reasonable point to me.

Lord Stanley shall hereon be known as "Lord Stanley, Supporter of the ***** Bandit"

Glenn Beck was in sane before this quote and remains insane after.

(10-12-2016 01:02 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  Lord Stanley shall hereon be known as "Lord Stanley, Supporter of the ***** Bandit"

While I appreciate my additional title, I am not sure I am following.......

(10-11-2016 07:50 PM)miko33 Wrote:  MPLS Bison is a notorious troll. Not sure why you take him/her so seriously. He/she is a major troll on the conference sports and realignment page.

I generally ignore this clown unless he/she says something so unbelievably stupid. Then I turn on snark mode and go to town.

(10-12-2016 12:10 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  bullet #37,

Since it is you asking, and not Paul, and since I respect you from the CS&CR board, I will answer you. Here is the quote, which was already quoted in the OP:

"If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice."


Paul #38,

If Beck flip-flopped due to outrage by his listeners, so be it. I don't care. He said the words and they're captured. Look in the OP.


Paul #40,

Why would I edit the thread title? It's correct, based on what was reported by CNN yesterday.


wmu #44,

Is it? If he was serious about running the country, then he wouldn't have run under a niche party that's satisfied with 5% of the vote.

(10-12-2016 12:50 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  His point is that she is the moral, ethical choice, when given a choice between Trump or HRC. Seems like a reasonable point to me.

He never EVER uttered the quote you have in the title. What are you not understanding, it's a lie. He never flip flopped. He never said it.

And no, he never EVER said or implied she is the moral, ethical choice.

(10-12-2016 12:50 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  His point is that she is the moral, ethical choice, when given a choice between Trump or HRC. Seems like a reasonable point to me.

She has a body count that numbers around a dozen. She's been the subject of several FBI investigations over the years, and numerous of her associates have gone to prison for federal crimes. We have never seen a candidate as corrupt as her.

Corruption versus Chaos and unwilling to try alternatives.

Looks like corruption is the choice then. Enjoy.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Paul,

Yes he did, CNN reported it. You can pretend he never said it - I guess. He said it.

(10-13-2016 09:37 AM)MplsBison Wrote:  Paul,

Yes he did, CNN reported it. You can pretend he never said it - I guess. He said it.

well that settles it then! If CNN reported it, then it must be true!!

(10-13-2016 09:37 AM)MplsBison Wrote:  Paul,

Yes he did, CNN reported it. You can pretend he never said it - I guess. He said it.

Provide ANY proof. Audio, video, anything. Again, you can't. Never happened. He did not say it. Troll.

Hardly the only outlet that reported the "moral, ethical" quote.

Fact is: he said it, then regretted saying it when his listeners were outraged. So he lied. Or maybe it was even his producers who forced him to say that it was a lie. To save ratings. Who knows.

Only thing we know for sure is, he did say that HRC is the "moral, ethical" choice, if DJT is the only other choice.


You can see his loathing for DJT on the Vice News interview that aired this week. He doesn't use the "moral, ethical" language in that interview, but also guessing that was filmed a couple months ago.

(10-13-2016 08:07 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(10-12-2016 12:50 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  His point is that she is the moral, ethical choice, when given a choice between Trump or HRC. Seems like a reasonable point to me.

She has a body count that numbers around a dozen. She's been the subject of several FBI investigations over the years, and numerous of her associates have gone to prison for federal crimes. We have never seen a candidate as corrupt as her.

Info wars much? No HRC hasn't killed anyone.

Paul,

I'm sure if the interview had been recorded, the evidence would've been posted. Conveniently, there is no evidence so Beck is free to lie by saying he never said those things.

He said it. I don't care if you want to pretend he didn't.



Wait, why do you care so much????? You know full well that none of "your people" take this guy seriously, anyway. So why do you care?

(10-13-2016 09:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(10-13-2016 08:07 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(10-12-2016 12:50 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  His point is that she is the moral, ethical choice, when given a choice between Trump or HRC. Seems like a reasonable point to me.

She has a body count that numbers around a dozen. She's been the subject of several FBI investigations over the years, and numerous of her associates have gone to prison for federal crimes. We have never seen a candidate as corrupt as her.

Info wars much? No HRC hasn't killed anyone.

Most people, including politicians, don't leave a trail of bodies in their wake. If you think it is all a coincidence, you're entitled to your opinion. I find it incredibly suspect especially given her other history of corruption.

So if a Hillary staffer says "They'd have to grab someone's ass to get fired twice to get fired"... should that one be called out too?

Where is the media on this one? and that's just the start of Project Vertias videos... (see the video about 3:30 in... yeowch!)

(10-13-2016 09:50 AM)MplsBison Wrote:  Paul,

I'm sure if the interview had been recorded, the evidence would've been posted. Conveniently, there is no evidence so Beck is free to lie by saying he never said those things.

He said it. I don't care if you want to pretend he didn't.



Wait, why do you care so much????? You know full well that none of "your people" take this guy seriously, anyway. So why do you care?

Damn girl, I don't know what your problem is but he never said it. Your link doesn't say he said it. You just keep saying he did. His quote is in your link and his quote is not what you put in the title.

No Glenn...She is not. There is no moral or ethical choice among the gang candidates....PERIOD.

Paul,

So this whole time, you've just being stewing over semantics of the thread title not exactly matching the link??? Yet, you couldn't articulate that?

..... No. Not going to change it.

Paul is correct...The OP is misleading and is taking Becks comment out of context. I still say Beck is wrong though. Choosing a less moral and ethical candidate when they both are simply reprehensible is still choosing one with no morals or ethics. The only choice is to stay home or vote for an alternative that has morals and ethics.

(10-14-2016 06:12 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  Paul is correct...The OP is misleading and is taking Becks comment out of context. I still say Beck is wrong though. Choosing a less moral and ethical candidate when they both are simply reprehensible is still choosing one with no morals or ethics. The only choice is to stay home or vote for an alternative that has morals and ethics.

No such candidate like that exists.