(10-15-2016 03:46 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-15-2016 11:55 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Exposing how the election system is rigged and corrupt is NOT influencing our elections.

Sorry

This smacks of a political move to paint a rival as the bad guy instead of those destroying our own government who are the real enemy.

there have literally been attacks on our election system not just the DNC.

and by your logic "yesterday december 7th 1941..." is a "political move"

we were attacked. the event of an attack is indisputable. the source of the attack is indisputable.

Yea, Pearl Harbour!



That's absolutely asinine.

(10-15-2016 03:48 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-15-2016 03:46 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-15-2016 11:55 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Exposing how the election system is rigged and corrupt is NOT influencing our elections.

Sorry

This smacks of a political move to paint a rival as the bad guy instead of those destroying our own government who are the real enemy.

there have literally been attacks on our election system not just the DNC.

and by your logic "yesterday december 7th 1941..." is a "political move"

we were attacked. the event of an attack is indisputable. the source of the attack is indisputable.

Yea, Pearl Harbour!



That's absolutely asinine.

in this day in age cyber war is a very real thing.

you can easily kill americans via hacking. or at the very least sink us into anarchy by messing with our power grid, traffic grid, or you know...under minding the integrity of our elections.

(10-15-2016 04:05 PM)john01992 Wrote:  you can easily kill americans via hacking.

And you still claim Hillary's crimes don't matter.

(10-14-2016 07:28 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News:

Quote:...The Obama administration is contemplating an unprecedented cyber covert action against Russia in retaliation for alleged Russian interference in the American presidential election, U.S.....to deliver options to the White House for a wide-ranging "clandestine" cyber operation...designed to harass and "embarrass" the Kremlin leadership.

Link to NBC News

I don't know where to begin on this one. So let me just throw out some bait.

Do we have absolute proof the Russians were behind the attack? Do we start a war over allegations? Are we ready to start a war because the Russians embarrassed Hillary and the DNC? Do the so-called intelligence officials understand the definition of covert and clandestine?

Bo-Bo...please....everyone except the water carrier brigade laughs when you go all sunken chest wimp talking tough.

(10-14-2016 07:28 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News:

Quote:...The Obama administration is contemplating an unprecedented cyber covert action against Russia in retaliation for alleged Russian interference in the American presidential election, U.S.....to deliver options to the White House for a wide-ranging "clandestine" cyber operation...designed to harass and "embarrass" the Kremlin leadership.

Link to NBC News

I don't know where to begin on this one. So let me just throw out some bait.

Do we have absolute proof the Russians were behind the attack? Do we start a war over allegations? Are we ready to start a war because the Russians embarrassed Hillary and the DNC? Do the so-called intelligence officials understand the definition of covert and clandestine?

Are you actually buying this none sense?

(10-15-2016 04:43 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(10-15-2016 04:05 PM)john01992 Wrote:  you can easily kill americans by not properly handling classified information making it easily accessible by our enemies via hacking.

And you still claim Hillary's crimes don't matter.

FI
Cue the "but, but, but…there is no evidence that the server was actually hacked!"
1) whether or not it was hacked is irrelevant as it does not relieve the person who mishandled the classified information of the crime of mishandling.
2) servers can be hacked without la trace