(04-03-2016 04:02 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 03:57 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 03:51 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 03:22 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 03:04 PM)dcCid Wrote:  Going without oxygen for a long period may explain why someone is brain dead. Save the drama for cable. If you want my thought just say so.

In other words you have absolutely nothing but leftist gun control rhetoric to add and when it's pointed out that numerous laws and regulations were broken in this situation you have nothing. As usual. Huge shock considering your posting history.

Since you responded I am guessing you are breathing again.

I have a couple of married friends since High School who has a son who is a VA state trooper who knew this family. This happened in my neck of the woods.

I do not know how you define "leftist" , but most guns used in criminal activity & right wing terrorist attacks are purchased legally. They are often transferred via gun show loopholes.

I would suggest that anyone purchasing a gun has some insurance/bonding & if transferred needs to be transferred to someone who has insurance/bonding.

I have no problem with people owning guns. But I do not believe that the taxpayer & families of the victims should be left holding the financial baggage.

My suggestion I admit is a blue sky level. What are your thoughts on this?

Going to need you to back this claim up with some proof.

Try the internet that traces guns used in chicago to the deep south and on the east cost a similar trail. I just knoe what I have read in newspapers & the web.

Those are straw purchases and already against federal law. So again tell me how a new law is going to stop an already illegal activity. Are these criminals going to say "Ya know homes....it was already against the law for us to buy these weapons but now that they have passed another law I guess we can't get them anymore and we should just turn what we have in. It wasn't a big deal breaking the law before but this last law was the straw that broke the camel's back."

And nothing you have proposed will keep criminals who want guns from getting guns. You can outlaw the sale of guns countrywide tomorrow and by Tuesday the same cartels that are flooding our streets with drugs will diversify into arms sales.

These dudes


Don't care if that 150lb pack on their back is filled with crystal meth or AK47s because at that level 150lbs is 150lbs.

(04-03-2016 03:51 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 03:22 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 03:04 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 12:36 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 12:25 PM)dcCid Wrote:  True - but the gun he was carrying was legally purchased. What I do not know is if he purchased it, or obtained it through a straw buyer, or whatever. Either way I see it as a gun control loophole. Which I do admit can never be totally closed.

Unless he bought the gun prior to 1999 he couldn't legally buy the gun. If he bought it legally prior to 1999 he still couldn't legally possess it anywhere because he was a convicted felon and by law he was prohibited from possessing a firearm. The is no "loophole" where he could have obtained the gun....any possible way he obtained it was illegal, any possible way he possessed it was illegal.

But I wait breathlessly until you come back to tell us what kind of new law would have prevented it.

Going without oxygen for a long period may explain why someone is brain dead. Save the drama for cable. If you want my thought just say so.

In other words you have absolutely nothing but leftist gun control rhetoric to add and when it's pointed out that numerous laws and regulations were broken in this situation you have nothing. As usual. Huge shock considering your posting history.

Since you responded I am guessing you are breathing again.

I have a couple of married friends since High School who has a son who is a VA state trooper who knew this family. This happened in my neck of the woods.

I do not know how you define "leftist" , but most guns used in criminal activity & right wing terrorist attacks are purchased legally. They are often transferred via gun show loopholes.

I would suggest that anyone purchasing a gun has some insurance/bonding & if transferred needs to be transferred to someone who has insurance/bonding.

I have no problem with people owning guns. But I do not believe that the taxpayer & families of the victims should be left holding the financial baggage.

My suggestion I admit is a blue sky level. What are your thoughts on this?

...and not an ounce of outrage from you on this cops death. As I said, truly disgusting.

(04-03-2016 10:51 AM)dcCid Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 10:41 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 10:35 AM)dcCid Wrote:  

(04-01-2016 08:49 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

James Brown III or Aurora, ILL. The man who coldly walked up and murdered the trooper. So where is Obama and BLM with their outrage over this murder. Where are Jesse and Al with their anger about this murder? Of course BLM wants dead cops. They have stated that fact along with Sharpton. I guess they are happy.



Trooper Chad Dermyer, a 37-year-old decorated Marine vet and married father of two. Murdered in cold blood by James Brown. Where is the anger from our President? Where are the riots protesting this senseless murder? Don't police lives matter?

I thought you would be celebrating that the killers second amendment rights were not violated.

...and I thought you'd be cheering that the cop was white.

And why would you think that?

For the same reason you confuse the second amendment (keep and bear arms) with the right to put two in someones chest for no reason.

(04-03-2016 12:25 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 12:07 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 10:51 AM)dcCid Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 10:41 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 10:35 AM)dcCid Wrote:  I thought you would be celebrating that the killers second amendment rights were not violated.

...and I thought you'd be cheering that the cop was white.

And why would you think that? Yes I do understand the BLM issues & agree with many of them, More so in that I understand death & loss of a loved one.

I still ask why this guy was carrying a legally purchased gun.

He wasn't. As a convicted felon he was prohibited from carrying a firearm.

Greyhound also has strict no gun policies, including in baggage.

True - but the gun he was carrying was legally purchased. What I do not know is if he purchased it, or obtained it through a straw buyer, or whatever. Either way I see it as a gun control loophole. Which I do admit can never be totally closed.

That's as useless as saying if someone OD's on a prescription they stole or bought on the street that they obtained legally purchased drugs.

Virginia is proud to have such a noble officer protecting and serving all of us. May he rest in peace.

May the criminal feel the full brunt of the justice system.

(04-04-2016 12:24 AM)Murray007 Wrote:  Virginia is proud to have such a noble officer protecting and serving all of us. May he rest in peace.

May the criminal feel the full brunt of the justice system.

Uhhh, you mean the dead F$^& criminal?

I guess they could try a corpse, but not sure the point...

And soooprise of sooprises, he was heading his dead asss back to the killing fields of chitcago where I'm sure he was looking to make some coin on the supply of ammo he'd bought.

Intresting, no? Where do the guns and ammo come from? Other criminals.

Wow. Color me shocked. Course, if we just pass another law...

(04-03-2016 12:25 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 12:07 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 10:51 AM)dcCid Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 10:41 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 10:35 AM)dcCid Wrote:  I thought you would be celebrating that the killers second amendment rights were not violated.

...and I thought you'd be cheering that the cop was white.

And why would you think that? Yes I do understand the BLM issues & agree with many of them, More so in that I understand death & loss of a loved one.

I still ask why this guy was carrying a legally purchased gun.

He wasn't. As a convicted felon he was prohibited from carrying a firearm.

Greyhound also has strict no gun policies, including in baggage.

True - but the gun he was carrying was legally purchased. What I do not know is if he purchased it, or obtained it through a straw buyer, or whatever. Either way I see it as a gun control loophole. Which I do admit can never be totally closed.

you have no clue how stupid that argument is.....

(04-04-2016 01:08 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(04-04-2016 12:24 AM)Murray007 Wrote:  Virginia is proud to have such a noble officer protecting and serving all of us. May he rest in peace.

May the criminal feel the full brunt of the justice system.

Uhhh, you mean the dead F$^& criminal?

I guess they could try a corpse, but not sure the point...

And soooprise of sooprises, he was heading his dead asss back to the killing fields of chitcago where I'm sure he was looking to make some coin on the supply of ammo he'd bought.

Intresting, no? Where do the guns and ammo come from? Other criminals.

Wow. Color me shocked. Course, if we just pass another law...

you can't fix the porch set old english 44s....unless we create and force 'em to work....class division and the wealth gap widening only makes this worse (hell, one could toss in the NBA and rap as arguments leading to jealousy in entitled expectation)

it's also like australia and their 'turn 'em in' law....

fk'n morons....

Descansa en paz.

(04-04-2016 01:08 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Uhhh, you mean the dead F$^& criminal?

I guess they could try a corpse, but not sure the point...

And soooprise of sooprises, he was heading his dead asss back to the killing fields of chitcago where I'm sure he was looking to make some coin on the supply of ammo he'd bought.

Intresting, no? Where do the guns and ammo come from? Other criminals.

Wow. Color me shocked. Course, if we just pass another law...

Sounds like the justice system worked just fine to me.

"Send them all to their Maker and He will settle them down."

Toby Keith "Beer for my Horses"