(03-10-2015 09:27 AM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  The shorts, not so much. they look like their pants are falling off and their undies are showing.

I was thinking the same thing. But maybe that was the point?

On a somewhat related note, did anyone watch the ND State v. SD State Summit championship game last night? SD St. has UA uniforms and they were pretty cool. They looked clean with a striped side panel.

(03-10-2015 09:46 PM)BeerCat Wrote:  Thank you Ctipton.

I would even say they look good. I don't know why people are flying off the handle over them.

The shirt will be tucked in during games, revealing the dumbest part.

(03-11-2015 08:58 AM)Coopdaddy67 Wrote:  

(03-10-2015 09:46 PM)BeerCat Wrote:  Thank you Ctipton.

I would even say they look good. I don't know why people are flying off the handle over them.

The shirt will be tucked in during games, revealing the dumbest part.

I think I'm just comparing them to the past style which I thought was atrocious. They look pretty plain to me which I'm a fan of.

(03-11-2015 07:56 AM)edetzel Wrote:  On a somewhat related note, did anyone watch the ND State v. SD State Summit championship game last night? SD St. has UA uniforms and they were pretty cool. They looked clean with a striped side panel.

Oh man I thought you were talking about ND St.'s there for a second (god that game was confusing) and those greens were awful. But, I agree SD St.'s were pretty slick.

(03-11-2015 09:04 AM)BeerCat Wrote:  

(03-11-2015 08:58 AM)Coopdaddy67 Wrote:  

(03-10-2015 09:46 PM)BeerCat Wrote:  Thank you Ctipton.

I would even say they look good. I don't know why people are flying off the handle over them.

The shirt will be tucked in during games, revealing the dumbest part.

I think I'm just comparing them to the past style which I thought was atrocious. They look pretty plain to me which I'm a fan of.

I thought last year's iteration was actually really good, better than our regular season jerseys

(03-11-2015 08:58 AM)Coopdaddy67 Wrote:  

(03-10-2015 09:46 PM)BeerCat Wrote:  Thank you Ctipton.

I would even say they look good. I don't know why people are flying off the handle over them.

The shirt will be tucked in during games, revealing the dumbest part.

Anyone else here old enough to remember when the NCAA allowed jerseys to be worn out of the shorts? Marquette had jerseys designed to be worn that way when Al McGuire took them to the national championship. And if memory serves me, I believe the Bearcats beat that championship team during the regular season @ "Riverfront Coliseum".

I'm OK with the tourney uniforms but look forward to a fresh look from UA next season.

(03-11-2015 10:18 AM)indycat Wrote:  

(03-11-2015 08:58 AM)Coopdaddy67 Wrote:  

(03-10-2015 09:46 PM)BeerCat Wrote:  Thank you Ctipton.

I would even say they look good. I don't know why people are flying off the handle over them.

The shirt will be tucked in during games, revealing the dumbest part.

Anyone else here old enough to remember when the NCAA allowed jerseys to be worn out of the shorts? Marquette had jerseys designed to be worn that way when Al McGuire took them to the national championship. And if memory serves me, I believe the Bearcats beat that championship team during the regular season @ "Riverfront Coliseum".

I'm OK with the tourney uniforms but look forward to a fresh look from UA next season.

Your memory is good. Gayle Catlett team.

The asymmetric banding around one leg kinda reminds me of the Nike uniforms from 93-94'.

I've seen Nebraska and now NC State wearing the same jerseys, they look totally fine.

Adidas sure has a talent of designing ugly uniforms.

(03-11-2015 06:33 PM)BeerCat Wrote:  I've seen Nebraska and now NC State wearing the same jerseys, they look totally fine.

Me too, and I think the exact opposite. They look stupid.

I hate the sleeves part the most...it just totally sucks

(03-11-2015 10:08 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  I hate the sleeves part the most...it just totally sucks

I have played in wife beaters and I have played (real games) with the t-shirt look. The only real difference is it is easier to wipe sweat out of your eyes with the t-shirt. I am sure they will be loose enough that it will in no way inhibit the shooters ability.

The only difference is in the eye of the beholder (and the mind of the player).

(03-11-2015 10:53 PM)ctipton Wrote:  

(03-11-2015 10:08 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  I hate the sleeves part the most...it just totally sucks

I have played in wife beaters and I have played (real games) with the t-shirt look. The only real difference is it is easier to wipe sweat out of your eyes with the t-shirt. I am sure they will be loose enough that it will in no way inhibit the shooters ability.

The only difference is in the eye of the beholder (and the mind of the player).

I hate playing in sleeves. Probably a mental thing but I always feel it messes my shot up...no matter how loose the sleeves. Agreed its a personal opinion for sure.

Same here, and that's before even considering adding massive amounts of sweat.

If sleeves are so bad, how come most everyone warms up shooting with bulky long sleeve shirts and jackets on?

To break a sweat and loosen up.

It could be worse. They could have a trend where they all wear girls volleyball shorts. Then we'd have a real reason to complain.

(03-12-2015 08:49 AM)Murph29 Wrote:  It could be worse. They could have a trend where they all wear girls volleyball shorts. Then we'd have a real reason to complain.

Wasn't that called the 80's