Needing and wanting are two different things. Almost every conference change over the last two decades has been an effort to grab more money. It doesn't matter how much they currently have.

(03-16-2015 09:09 PM)JMU_Newbill Wrote:  Jmu was a bad loss for richmond

Errr, beating the ticks was a pretty good win for OUR Dukes. Is that what you meant to say?!?

(03-17-2015 12:46 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(03-16-2015 09:09 PM)JMU_Newbill Wrote:  Jmu was a bad loss for richmond

Errr, beating the ticks was a pretty good win for OUR Dukes. Is that what you meant to say?!?

I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. Absolutely a great win for the Dukes, but certainly a bad loss for the ticks.

(03-17-2015 06:44 AM)JMU_Newbill Wrote:  

(03-17-2015 12:46 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(03-16-2015 09:09 PM)JMU_Newbill Wrote:  Jmu was a bad loss for richmond

Errr, beating the ticks was a pretty good win for OUR Dukes. Is that what you meant to say?!?

I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. Absolutely a great win for the Dukes, but certainly a bad loss for the ticks.

DUH, is the glass half full or is it half empty???

This has become sad....I remember beating good teams, hanging w BYU, respectable against UNLV, losing to FL by a few in the tourney....losing was never so fun as it was back then.

(03-16-2015 10:33 PM)JMUNation Wrote:  Needing and wanting are two different things. Almost every conference change over the last two decades has been an effort to grab more money. It doesn't matter how much they currently have.

Not JMU! JMU won't whore itself out for money!