Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Taliban is not a terrorist organization?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Enaiu Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,357
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 26
I Root For: NIU Huskies
Location: Lawrence, Kansas
Post: #41
Re: RE: Taliban is not a terrorist organization?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(02-05-2015 09:13 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  
(02-05-2015 08:49 PM)Enaiu Wrote:  
(02-05-2015 11:13 AM)klake87 Wrote:  
(02-03-2015 03:49 PM)niuguy Wrote:  
(02-02-2015 06:41 PM)niubrad00 Wrote:  03-lmfao Good lord, you can't possibly believe that. Are you seriously saying you think there will fewer jobs at the end of 2015 than at the end of 2014? That's just silly.

You're the first one on here complaining when gas prices go up and to blame Obama. Now, gas prices are down, but you're still complaining about it and still blaming Obama. Interesting!

I listen to and talk with quite a few economic analysts from some very respected institutions. Nobody I've talked to so far as predicted a loss in jobs next year just slower economic growth that 2014.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/02/0...=obnetwork

You can make the number what ever you want it to be. The jobs we are losing now(oil and gas exploration) pay extremely well. So we might create more jobs at starbucks and Chipotle. Thats a real career there.

While I agree with you that Starbucks =/= oil jobs, the point is that the US is employing more people as a whole. The number isn't a 'lie' like fox news trys to tell you in their title. It is a fact, and they are trying to put a spin on it. Fox is trying to say that the numbers are misleading... Well, if you think that, then every single point of reference you have since 1994 is misleading. The official unemployment rate, as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor, has been calculated this exact same way since then. Bottom line, More people working = less unemployment/government funding.
'That just isn't true, many have stopped looking for work, and those numbers are not included.

after the recession, labor participation rate (2009) was at 64%, but unemployment was near 10%. Now, we're at 63% at 5.6%.... The numbers dont lie. We are much better now than we were then. I am not saying everything is perfect, but we're getting closer to what we were at (numbers wise) prior to the recession. Another thing to consider - as years go on, Baby Boomers are retiring (contribute to the labor participation) , and continue to negatively impact to the the Labor Force Participation rate number.

Labor Force Participation Rate =( Employed + Unemployed) / (
Working Age Non-institutionalized Population)
(This post was last modified: 02-05-2015 09:50 PM by Enaiu.)
02-05-2015 09:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.