(01-03-2014 11:57 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  

(01-03-2014 08:12 AM)goodknightfl Wrote:  The AAC gets the bid so we can make Miko look like a fool for asking.

But he's liable to not even see the thread. So what's the point.

Where'd he go? And to be honest, if you are complaining about the people taking shots at him now then it may be a sign that he outlived his usefulness (there was none) on this site.

(11-25-2013 07:03 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(11-25-2013 06:11 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-25-2013 03:50 PM)miko33 Wrote:  I don't understand why they still have an auto bid. The conference changed so fundamentally on the FB side that it should no longer be a part of the BCS. No offense to the American conf fans intended, but it's a far cry from what the conference used to look like when the BCS contract was renewed. In the interest of fairness, it the American's auto bid should go become an at large bid.

Why does Pitt go 6-6 every year? UCF, Cincinnati, or Ville would smack Pitt all over the field, same for Cuse and WVU. The football got better when your program left.

Whether your statement is accurate or just a bunch of hot air is irrelevant. The bottom line is the AAC champion will be several notches lower than the other champs and runners up in the other P5 conferences. Combine that with the notion that the AAC bears very little resemblance to the original Big East all sports conference and it's not even debatable. This is an injustice that will be rectified come 2014 and beyond. My issues are that it should have been addressed in 2013 given the expansion that happened within the P5 plus the significant changes to the Big East now AAC. That's all I'm saying.

No offense intended to anyone. I'm not like that.

how does that crow taste now dbag?